economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability Kirsten H. Dodson Assistant Professor, Lipscomb an ability to communicate effectively University, kirsten.dodson@lipscomb.edu the broad education necessary to understand the impact Kerry E. Patterson Execute Director, The Peugeot Center of engineering solutions in a global, economic, for Engineering Service in Developing Communities at environmental, and societal context Lipscomb University, kerry.patterson@lipscomb.edu a knowledge of contemporary issues Joseph B. Tipton Associate Professor, Lipscomb
asked in the CT was different from the one in the first attempt. While CTs in general followed the same format, some competencies were evaluated as in-class quizzes. From Table I, Electrical Concept Application and Multimeter Skill were evaluated as in-class quizzes. Quizzes were not a. Checking if ‘x’ is less than ‘y’ b. Assign a value of 30 to variable p provided with
” longof two. Each team is given a computer and is asked to submit string. They are also offered lab tools: a scissors, a 1/8” hole-the weekly deliverable after the lab. One graduate teaching punch, and a rivet gun as shown in Fig. 3 (B).First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 – 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL W1A-2 The properties of the straws are pointed out in the students are instructed to measure twice and cut once. Theylecture. Specifically, straws can tolerate high tension but very are also repeatedly reminded to count the number of memberslittle compression. In the lab, the
interdisciplinary [2] Goeser, P.T. , Coates, C.W., and Johnson, W.M "The role of ancharacter of the Final Project, starting in Spring 2017 the introduction to engineering course on retention." ASEE Southeast Section Conference. 2011.mechanical engineering and civil & environmentalengineering (CEE) projects were combined into a [3] Zhu H., Mertz, B “Redesign of the introduction to engineeringcooperative project to design and build an underpass truss course and its impact on students’ knowledge and application of thebridge (led by the ME team) to support a water treatment engineering design process”facility
research, as well as for non-technical skills and efforts, such as leadership and service. [1] Office of Institutional Research at Tennessee TechnologicalWe will discuss the following opportunities we have University.developed to recognize the students in the College of [2] Jolly, E. J., Campbell, P. B., & Perlman, L. Engagement, CapacityEngineering: and Continuity: A Trilogy for Student Success. GE Foundation, 2004. Scholarship Awards Banquet: The Clay N. Hixson Retrieved from http://www.campbell-kibler.com/trilogy.pdf Student Success Center has
Paper ID #20880Creating a First Year Engineering Course Utilizing the SCALE-Up MethodDr. David Joseph Ewing, The University of Texas at Arlington Earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Pensacola Christian College and a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University. He spent several years teaching in a first year engineering program at Clemson University. He is now a senior lecturer at the University of Texas at Arlington, where he continues to teach first year engineering courses. Combined, he has been teaching first year engineering courses for over five years. His previous research
registers in several sequences of theexecutable into RAM is discussed. This allows a clear fetch-decode-execute cycle. This model emphasizes severaldiscussion of the process of executing a specific instruction. key concepts to the learner, (a) the connection source code At this point we can introduce our first mental model. In has with instructions, (b) the sequential nature of allit we provide a simplified model of a computer, including programs, and (c) the importance of the program counter toonly RAM and the CPU with only a few registers. This the execution of a program. Examples of these exercises aresimplified model can be seen in figure 1. This model is not included in the addendum to this
involved in several grants at CSULA increasing student articulation.Dr. Zanj Kano Avery ElDr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering Department at CalStateLA. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has focused on improving student success and has participated in sev- eral teaching workshops, including one on ”Excellence in Civil Engineering Education” and another in ”Enhancing Student Success through a Model Introduction to Engineering Course.” He is currently the PI of TUES project to revamp the sophomore-year experience at the college of engineering (esuc- ceed.calstatela.edu) and the PI/Director of the First-Year Experience (FYrE
measured by the REFERENCESstudents GPA after Introduction to Engineering. Studentswere divided into two groups according to their nationality, [1] J. L. Hieb, K. B. Lyle, P. A. S. Ralston, and J. Chariker, “Predictingand divided again according to which version of the course performance in a first engineering calculus course: implications forthey took. The interaction effect between nationality andFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference July 31 – August 2, 2016, Columbus, OH W1A-3
with all of the interpretations/conclusions of this paper. 3 N/A REFERENCES 4 31 [1]Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing 5 29 the effects of stereotype threat on African American college 6 37 students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental
tasks [3]. Throughout the process students have obtained and these could have been used by faculty tomust document and manage the project appropriately. have conversations with the team about work distribution.Students began keeping track of their time via timesheets. For example, in Figure 1 it is clear that Students A, B and DThese timesheets tracked: (1) the activities each group are contributing a similar percentage of time toward themember worked on, and (2) the self-reported time spent on project. An instructor may want to determine what iseach activity. Activity choices included: Documentation, happening with Student C. Figure 2 shows helpful trends ofProject Management, Coding
, 10.18260/p.26590 Washington. 10.18260/p.24306 [14] Shepard, T., & Choi, J., & Holmes, T. D., & Carlin, B. W. (2015,[2] Bringardner, J., G. Georgi, V. Bill, "Incorporating Open-Ended June), The Effect of Project Constraints and Choice on First-Year Design Projects in a First-Year Engineering Course," In the 2016 Microcontroller Projects. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference Proceedings
87.5 56 ment association and are nominated for various awards. For 2013 94.4 57 example, several HOME Program participants have been b 92.9 --- nominated for the Namaskar Award, the highest award for 2014 COE undergraduates, several participants have won the Blackb – data was not available through the Office of Institutional Engineer of the Year Award, have the designation as a GrandResearch Challenge Engineer, and secured prizes from participating in
Paper ID #20923Get Rid of Your Student’s Fear and Intimidation of learning a ProgrammingLanguageDr. Christina Frederick, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Dr. Frederick is currently a Professor and Graduate Program Coordinator in the Human Factors and Systems Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida. Dr. Frederick received her Ph.D. in 1991 from the University of Rochester with a major in Psychological Development. She previously taught at the University of Rochester, Southern Utah University and the University of Central Florida. In 2000, Dr. Frederick joined the Human
Physics and interpret data. c An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. d An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. e An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. PSO f An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. a 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 g An ability to communicate effectively. b
future learning activities and pursuits.Process for Becoming a World Class Engineering Student. III. Design Your Process Project LITERATURE REVIEW The Design Your Process For Becoming A World Class Engineering Student project (DYP) is a nationally adoptedI. Framework: Self-Regulated Learning reflective activity originally developed by Raymond B. Landis [11] and Steffen Peuker [12, 13]. The primary purposeFirst Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference August 6 – August 8, 2017, Daytona Beach, FL
Paper ID #20904Development of Engineering Professional Identity and Formation of a Com-munity of Practice in a New Engineering ProgramDr. Lee Kemp Rynearson, Campbell University Lee Rynearson an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Campbell University. He received a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology in 2008 and earned his PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University in 2016. He also has previous experience as an instructor of engineering at the Kanazawa Institute of Technology, in Kanazawa, Japan. His current research interests focus on instruction for
Paper ID #20951Using a Math Tutorial Program to Decrease the Number of Failed Grades theFirst Semester helping the College achieve a 91% First Year Retention RateDr. Mary E. Goodwin, University of South Florida Dr. Goodwin, who has engineering degrees in industrial and environmental engineering, is the Director of Student Services in the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. She worked in industry for nine years and more than 23 years in higher education, focusing on engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Paper ID #20939Motivation Profiles of Non-Major Computer Programmers in a Flipped Class-room EnvironmentLauren Miranda LingarAbbey WilliamsDr. Rachel McCord, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Rachel McCord is a a Lecturer and Research Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Divi- sion at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. She received her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include the impact of metacognitive and self-regulated learning development on engineering student success, particularly in the first year. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #20945Third year assessment of a student-based mentorship program for first-yearenvironmental engineering studentsJoanne F. Uleau, Environmental Engineering Program, University of Colorado- Boulder Joanne Uleau graduated from West Chester University in PA with a BS degree in Elementary Education. Currently she is the Undergraduate Academic Advisor in Environmental Engineering. She was awarded the Outstanding Staff Advisor Award in 2016, she holds the place as chair for the Advisors Council and graduation ceremony. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017
Paper ID #20918Workshop: Implementing Cloud Collaboration using Fusion 360 into a First-Year Engineering Design CourseDr. Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University Dr. Cory Brozina is an assistant professor and the Director of First Year Engineering at Youngstown State University. He completed his B.S. and M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his PhD is in Engineering Education, also from Virginia Tech. His research interests include: Learning Analytics, First-Year Engineering and Assessment.Ms. Akshay Sharma, Virginia Tech + Autodesk Akshay Sharma, an Associate Professor, is passionate about
earned his Master’s in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. He is a native of Dayton, OH and a graduate of Dayton Public Schools. Dr. Long’s research interests include: (a) technology use, (b) diversity and inclusion, and (c) retention and success, with a particular focus on students in STEM fields. He has conducted and published research with the Movement Lab and Center for Higher Education Enterprise at OSU. Dr. Long has taught undergraduates in the First-Year Engineering Program and Department of Mechan- ical Engineering at OSU and served as a facilitator for both the University Center for the Advance- ment of Teaching and Young Scholars Program at
Paper ID #20907Redesigning an Introductory Engineering Course to Address Student Percep-tions About Engineering as a Profession and Field of StudyDr. David M. Feinauer P.E., Norwich University Dr. Feinauer is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and the Freshman En- gineering Coordinator at Norwich University. His scholarly work spans a number of areas related to engineering education, including P-12 engineering outreach, the first-year engineering experience, and incorporating innovation and entrepreneurship practice in the engineering classroom. Additionally, he has research experience in the
Kaitlin E. Mallouk, William T. Riddell, Karl B. Dyer Rowan University, mallouk@rowan.edu, riddell@rowan.edu, dyerk@rowan.eduAbstract - In a freshman engineering course, one measurements, units and dimensions, statistics, engineeringobjective is to introduce multidisciplinary teams of economics, etc.), as well as to develop the professionalengineering students to unifying engineering and science skills outlined in the ABET A-K outcomes. In the secondprinciples such as mass, momentum and energy semester, students from six engineering majors work inbalances; materials; thermodynamics, and electricity interdisciplinary teams on faculty-designed projects thatand magnetism using a
at least 75% of the input to a 5 V supply and measure theMCO topics and outcomes. voltage at the output. Resistor color code The LOs from the CEC222 MCO [8] are listed below. is given in the reference booklet. 1-B 8, 10 Measure a mystery waveform using anAll of the LOs relate, with various degrees of intersection, (2) oscilloscope, trigger the oscilloscope onto ABET Criterion 3 [9], student learning outcomes A-K the leading edge of the
THREE C’S MINDSET BEHAVIORALengineering design classes. The paper describes the OUTCOME OUTCOME (ACTION)context and background of two vertically integrated (ATTITUDE)classes. Example work from students show the CURIOSITY 1. Inherently a. Observes surroundings tointerpretation of the entrepreneurial mindset. A survey interested in a wide recognize opportunitymeasures the effectiveness of the entrepreneurial mindset variety of things b. Explores multiple
do receive the necessary career guidance as wellas social and academic support. In light of our conclusion, we recommend institutionsevaluate the effectiveness of their FYE courses. Weencourage implementation of any ideas shared that wouldenhance student learning and success through such acourse. REFERENCES[1] Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., and Carlstrom, A., “Do Psychosocial and Study Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-analysis”, Psychological Bulletin, 130, 2004, pp. 261-288.[2] Krumrei-Manucuso, E. J., Newton, F. B., Kim, E. and Wilcox, D., “Psychosocial Factors Predicting First-Year College Student Success”, Journal of College Student
formula wasdeveloped to calculate the overall score portion of thestudents design. The details of the formula are presented inAppendix B. FIGURE 2 TWO DIFFERENT DESIGN OF RACE CARProject Module 2: Reverse Engineering Project Two possible areas of improvements are either toReverse engineering is the practice of taking products apart enlarge the piston and cylindrical housing while keeping the(product dissection) to discover how they work and gain nozzle the same size, or replacing the compression springinsight into why a product was made the way
engineeringENGR 101 is a 4-credit course meeting for 90 minutes of students are assigned to MATH 111 Calculus I (the desiredlecture two times a week, and 90 minutes of recitation and "normal path"); or to MATH 110 University Mathematics B90 minutes of lab meeting once a week. The total population II (pre-calculus, one course away from the "normal path");of students will be divided into a group of 90 students per or to MATH 108 University Mathematics B II (pre-calculus,common lecture and 30 students for both recitation and lab. two courses away from the "normal path").The structure of ENGR 101 is loosely based on the WSU MATH 108 engineering students who took ENGR 101 weremodel. The course was changed to cater
the 2016 academic EMT 1255, a course within the EMT AAS program,year. has targeted 6 of 11 Students Outcomes of Criterion III. The The assignments consisted of reading materials and EMT department at NYCCT chooses 6 Student Outcomes a,carefully constructed theory and lab questions which b, d, e, g, and k as the targeted outcomes for EMT1255(seemapped the course outcomes to an assessment rubric Table 2). Table 1. READ Assessment Rubric Performance Full Proficiency 4