CoNECD ASEE Conference April 29-May 1, 2018Members of the CSP-Hatchery team include: • Timothy Andersen, PhD, Professor, BSU CS • Amit Jain, PhD, Associate Professor, BSU CS • Dianxiang Xu, PhD, Professor, BSU CS • Noah Salzman, PhD, Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering & Engineering Education (IdoTeach) • Don Winiecki, EdD, PhD, Professor of Ethics & Morality in Professional Practice, College of Engineering, BSU, and Professor, Organizational Performance & Workplace Learning, [Social Scientist] • Carl Siebert, PhD, Assistant Professor, Curriculum & Instruction (Education), [Outside Evaluator]As required by NSF, the project team included experts in engineering education and
strong pre-college background inmath and science, so many students from low-income backgrounds enter collegeunderprepared to begin engineering curriculums. When coupled with a lack of familiarity with theculture of higher education and rising tuition costs, the result is a much higher attrition rate forthese students. Ohland et al. (2012) found that economically disadvantaged studentsmatriculate and graduate from engineering programs at lower rates than students fromhigher-income backgrounds.In this paper, we will discuss a model for improving the inclusion and retention ofhighly-motivated but underprepared students in engineering. Evidence from the EngineeringGoldShirt Program at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-B) and the Washington
Cal Poly,Computer Engineering is a program jointly offered between Electrical Engineering and ComputerScience, with a curriculum made up of roughly an even split of courses already offered by the two homedepartments. It bears further study to determine whether the high Kessler readings for CPEs result fromthe program’s unique identity (no home department or dedicated faculty, and only orientation andcapstone courses are unique to the program), the stress from combining courses from two majors thatalready suffer from high percentages of positive Kessler screens (EE and CSSE), or if this comes fromanother cause altogether.While individual majors fluctuate on the percentage of respondents screening positive for eachcondition, it appears that
] Hurtado, Sylvia, et al. "Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project." New Directions for Institutional Research 2010.148 (2010): 5-15.[7] Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553-579.[8] Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2010, October). What matters in STEM: Institutional contexts that influence STEM bachelor’s degree completion rates. In annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education
ofgroups collected under this label [5-7, 9, 20-25]. Also, there are many other dimensions ofdifference through which students or engineers are subjected to marginalization because they areperceived as Other within the norms of engineering [26-28].Owning exclusionThe language of "underrepresented minority" masks the responsibilities of the engineeringeducational system to correct exclusion manifested through culturally accepted practices andstructural policies prescribed by the dominant culture. We offer a limited set of many availableexamples from our research and that of others to demonstrate how common practices andpolicies are exclusionary. Historically, the concept of a challenging curriculum to “weed-out”students not suited for the
the project include: 1. increase the awareness of what is "needed" to be anassistant professor; 2. quantify the specific areas PhD students and post-docs need the mostassistance with; 3. increase the participant knowledge on effective STEM undergraduatelearning; 4. advance the awareness and skills pertaining to curriculum development, deliveryand assessment; 5. enhance the establishment of a research career; and 6. increase participantnetworking opportunities.The primary activity was a two-week professional development training during the summer.ACADEME (Advancing Career in Academics with Diversity and Mentorship in Engineering)Fellows were recruited from the three institutions collaborating on the project as well as fromuniversities in the