Career and Technical Education programs; and provides a variety of professional development for SETM and technology secondary and post-secondary educators focused on advanced technologies. She earned a B.A. in Chemistry at Agnes Scott College and both a B.S. in Engineering Science and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering (Environmental) from the University of South Florida, where her research focused on mem- brane separation science and technologies for water purification. She has over 20 years of experience in developing curricula for engineering and engineering technology for elementary, middle, high school, and post secondary institutions, including colleges of engineering. Dr. Barger has presented at many national
, Construction, and Environmental Engineering at San Diego State University. She received her PhD and MS degrees from University of Colorado at Boulder. Dr. Mladenov is the Director of the Water Innovation and Reuse Lab at SDSU and leads projects on decentralized water reuse systems and water quality in pristine and polluted environments. She is also a founding member of the Area of Excellence, ”Blue Gold: Mitigat- ing the Effects of Water Scarcity,” an interdisciplinary and collaborative group conducting research and educational activities on topics relevant to water scarce regions of the world. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 FACULTY, STUDENT, AND PRACTITIONER INITIAL
Paper ID #22125Research Initiation: Effectively Integrating Sustainability within an Engi-neering Program: Project AccomplishmentsDr. Paul Gannon, Montana Engineering Education Research Center Associate Professor, Chemical Engineering Associate Director, Montana Engineering Education Research CenterDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for over 25 years, and she continues to work on
Paper ID #21969MEERCat: A Case Study of How Faculty-led Research Initiatives Gave Riseto a Cross-departmental Research Center with Potential to Inform Local Pol-icyMr. Rohit Kandakatla, Purdue University, West Lafayette Rohit Kandakatla is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity. He has his bachelors and masters in Electrical Engineering from India. He currently serves as the Chair-elect of the ASEE Student Division as has been an active member of the international engineering education community while serving as the President of Student Platform for Engineering Education De
. Friess’ research background includes fluid mechanics, composite materials, performance optimization, and global engineering education. Current research interests focus on engineering education, in particular curriculum integration and innovative pedagogical methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Aerospace Engineering Initiative at the University of MaineAbstractThe growing interest in aerospace engineering and related technology in the state motivated theaerospace engineering initiative within the Department of Mechanical Engineering at theUniversity of Maine. Through the hiring of multiple full-time faculty and development ofundergraduate and graduate courses in aerospace
as a Natural Science teacher in High School where he, as a scholarly teacher, constantly assessed his performance to design better learning environments that pro- mote students’ conceptual understanding. In 2015, Ruben earned the M.S in Chemical Engineering at Universidad de los Andes in Colombia where he also received the title of Chemical Engineer in 2012. His research interests include cognition and metacognition in the engineering curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Initial Problem Scoping in K-2 Classrooms (Fundamental)The use of engineering design as “the glue” to integrate science, mathematics, and
Paper ID #21838Integrative Engineering Leadership Initiative for Teaching Excellence (iELITE)Hyun Hannah Choi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Hannah Choi is a senior lead instructional designer at the Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learn- ing. She collaborates with faculty to conduct research, program evaluations, and learning outcomes as- sessments pertinent to innovative curriculum designs and educational technologies. She is responsible for fostering continuous improvement in teaching, student experiences, and educational programs through the use of development and learning theories. Her areas of focus
Paper ID #21645Overriding Tradition? An Initial Exploration of the Intersection of Institu-tional and Disciplinary Cultures from the Student PerspectiveMr. Ashish Agrawal, Virginia Tech Ashish Agrawal is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He did his B-Tech from Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee and his MS from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, both in Electric Engineering. His research inter- ests include experiences of international faculty and students in US classrooms, sociology of education, and critical and
Clemson University. Broadly, her research interests include self-directed learning and motivation, learning within communities of prac- tice, the cultural influence on informal and formal learning, and intergenerational learning. Abby currently works as a graduate assistant for the General Engineering Learning Community, which supports freshmen engineering students in building effective learning strategies that are transferable to the workforce, includ- ing collaboration, self-regulation, and reflection. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Strategic, Translational Retention Initiatives to Promote Engineering SuccessAbstractThis Work in
students recognize and connect to their potential.Natalie Stringer, Clemson University Natalie Stringer is a senior at Clemson University, graduating in May 2018 with a Bachelor of Science in Biological Sciences with a minor in Microbiology. She has worked at the Academic Success Center as an organic chemistry tutor for four semesters. After completing CRLA Level 3 certification, Natalie served the tutoring program in a mentoring capacity as well, acting as a liaison between her colleagues in the sciences and the Assistant Coordinator for Tutoring. Natalie will continue her academic career and research efforts at the Medical University of South Carolina’s College of Medicine after her time at Clemson.Dr. Rachel K
undergraduateresearch experiences. The program has provided twenty-six scholarships and academic resourcesto a diverse group of engineering and engineering technology students.Results from several project initiatives have been promising. Recruitment efforts have resulted ina demographically diverse group of participants whose retention rates within the program haveheld at 82%. A vibrant learning community has organically developed where participants areprovided both academic and non-academic support across several majors and grade classes.Since May 2014, SPIRIT undergraduate research projects have resulted in forty-fivepresentations at seven different undergraduate and professional conferences. Twenty-seven PBLand five integrated open-ended design challenges
Paper ID #21881An Initial Exploration of Engineering Students’ Emotive Responses to Spa-tial and Engineering Statics ProblemsDr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student
Paper ID #22890The Distributed System of Governance in Engineering Education: A Reporton Initial FindingsDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair
Paper ID #24049The UTEP Edge: A Student Success Initiative for Developing High-impactPracticesDr. Peter Golding, University of Texas, El Paso Professor and Undergraduate Program Director in the Department of Engineering and Leadership at UTEP; Director of the Center for Research in Engineering & Technology Education (CRE@TE); Provost Faculty Fellow in Residence in the Center for Faculty Leadership and Development at UTEP.Mr. Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El Paso Mike Pitcher is the Director of Academic Technologies at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a
studies were included as part of fiveof the six the fundamental units, including: U 1) New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power, 2010, The Royal Society [2]; U 2) “The Lower Mekong Initiative,” announced by United States Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in 2009 [40]; U 3) “The Antarctic Treaty,” case study created by the Royal Geographical Society [41]; U 4) the French campaign to “Make the Planet Great Again,” by attracting climate change scientists to relocate and conduct research in France [42]; and; U 5) “The South Africa AIDS Controversy: A Case Study in Patent Law and Policy,” published by the Harvard Law School [43].As
will make inventions and actually conceive, design,implement and operate systems and products that deliver value. Discoverers are those who willhave careers as researchers and in R&D --- those who will create new knowledge and increaseour understanding of phenomena.Another NEET principle is that we should build our education around the way our students bestlearn, engaging them in their learning and self-learning. We should increase the use of theapproaches proven to work, including more active engagement of students in the classroom,more project exposure, and creative uses of digital learning and professional experiences.Progress and Activities during 2016-17NEET (see neet.mit.edu) was initiated in September 2016.The first stage focused on
. Holmes MacDonald Award ”for the Outstanding Young Electrical Engineering Educator.”Dr. Edwin Hou, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Edwin Hou is a professor in the Helen and John C. Hartmann Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research interests include embedded systems, autonomous vehicles, nonlinear optimization, and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Impact of Initiatives for Helping First Year Students Start on Track in Mathematics SequenceAbstractThis is an evidence-based practice paper. New Jersey Institute of Technology, located inNewark, NJ, administers
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Lessons Learned: Using Modified Emerging Scholars Program Concepts in the Development of STEP Grant – Funded Initiatives Lynn Peterson, James Alvarez, Ramon Lopez, Kevin Schug, and Carter Tiernan University of Texas at ArlingtonIntroductionAURAS, the Arlington Undergraduate Research-based Achievement for STEM, is a projectundertaken at The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) under a STEP grant from the NSF.Since the goal of the NSF STEP program is to increase the number of graduates in science,technology, engineering and math (STEM) majors, it was recognized that success in entry-levelcourses was a necessary first step in improving graduation rates of students majoring
endowed chair in Computer Science at Georgia Tech. Her research interests include computer networking, civic data and design, and teaching community engagement. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Undergraduate STEM Students and Community Engagement Activities: Initial Findings from an Assessment of Their Concern for Public Well-Being1IntroductionIn response to findings from the Cech study on the “Culture of Disengagement” atAmerican engineering institutions [1], much unease emerged regarding how futureengineers might not be developing a mindset that places the public’s well-being as aforemost priority. The study indicated that engineering programs negatively impactthe
Paper ID #22551Effective Methods of Engineering Information Literacy: Initial Steps of aSystematic Literature Review and Observations About the LiteratureMargaret Phillips, Purdue University, West Lafayette Margaret Phillips is an Assistant Professor of Library Science and Engineering Information Specialist in the Purdue University Libraries. Her research interests include technical standards and engineering and technology information literacy.Amy S. Van Epps, Harvard University Amy S. Van Epps is Director of Sciences and Engineering Services in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Li- braries at Harvard University. She was
Paper ID #21080Aerospace Capstone Design: Interactive Initial Sizing Estimates for Increas-ing Designer Intuition and Mitigating Risk in the Early Stages of AircraftConceptual DesignDr. D. Blake Stringer, Kent State University Blake Stringer, Ph.D. is an assistant professor of at Kent State University. He is the founding faculty member of the university’s aerospace engineering program. Prior to joining the faculty at Kent State, Dr. Stringer served in the Army for 20 years as an army aviator, West Point faculty member, and research engineer. He holds a bachelors degree in aerospace engineering from the US Military Academy, a
observation protocol thatallows researchers to categorize these aspects of formative assessment.Conceptual Model of Formative AssessmentThe conceptual model in Figure 1 demonstrates a hypothesized process of formative assessment.First, an instance of formative assessment is initiated by the instructor (first block). Then, one ormore students respond to the formative assessment (second block), for example, by answeringthe instructor’s question or by asking their own question. And finally, the instructor evaluates thestudent response and makes their own response (third block). This response may be brief (e.g.confirming that a student’s answer is correct) or more involved (e.g. discussing why a student’sanswer is correct), and it may change the course
? the focus of this studyThe first phase entailed a subset of the research team identifying an initial set of critical incidentsfor each individual. These observers reviewed critical incident literature to understand whattypes of events, activities or actions could be considered “critical.” Then each observer readthrough three sets of reflections (none of which was their own). Two observers were assignedeach subject’s reflection, coding independently. The observers identified evidence of criticalincidents within the individual person’s transition, noting details about the incident (e.g., causeand effects) and any questions they may have about the incident or its effects. Figure 1: Iterative analysis process engaging the subjects
researchers, standardsfor quality vary significantly among those who engage in qualitative research.[4] In theengineering education community, the most widely accepted framework for quality in qualitativeresearch was initially proposed by Walther, Sochacka, and Kellam in the Journal of EngineeringEducation in 2013,[5] and has since been expanded in subsequent publications.[6],[7]With great respect for this framework, we offer this critique as a means to further expand theframework by making it more rigorously account for linguistic and cultural plurality. Indeed, theauthors of this framework have suggested that addressing the persistent problem ofunderrepresentation is one core reason for conducting qualitative research.[8] Given thatresearchers of
Paper ID #22172The Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) Principal Investigators(PI) Guide: Development of a Best Practices WebsiteMs. Mariangely Iglesias Pena, Iowa State University Mariangely Iglesias Pena is an MS student in Human Computer Interaction at Iowa State University’s Virtual Reality Applications Center. Her background is in industrial design, which drives her interest in interactive and web design.Prof. Stephen B. Gilbert, Iowa State University Stephen B. Gilbert received a BSE from Princeton in 1992 and PhD from MIT in 1997. He has worked in commercial software development and run his own company. He
other methodologies in engineering education research and theopportunities for using this methodology in engineering education research. As a result of theNational Science Foundation’s Innovation Corps (I-Corps) and I-Corps for Learning initiatives,the Lean LaunchPad®/Customer Discovery methodology has grown in popularity withinacademic institutions, particularly in business and entrepreneurship education. In addition, theLean LaunchPad®/Customer Discovery approach has helped startups, individuals, academics,and students test the potential of an idea, make important decisions about the structure, value,and implementation of their projects, and develop a minimum viable product, service, oroffering. While the Lean LaunchPad®/Customer Discovery
we describethe methods we used to visualize and represent his real-time screen-capture data. In the discussion,we examine what our approach makes visible about graduate student writing processes anddescribe how our work could potentially further the literature and understanding of engineeringgraduate student writing, engineering writing in general, and other large amounts of time-resolveddata.2. Literature ReviewEngineering writing competencies at the undergraduate level are often emphasized in terms ofWriting Across the Curriculum (WAC) and Writing in the Disciplines (WID) initiatives 1,2.However, at the graduate level, academic engineering writing is rarely taught through formalmechanisms, instead relying heavily on research advisorship to
Add/Edit/Remove Sensor Tree Add/Edit/Paste/Remove Tree Visual Analysis Heliodon, Animate Sun, Shadow, Daily Cumulative Radiation Schema 3 Insulation Change Solar Heat Gain Spin View, Top View, Zoom Coefficient, Change U-ValueAn initial review of student data logs showed 95 and 121 distinct student actions captured in theprocess data at the high school and middle school, respectively. Any resulting n x n matrix resultingwould have over 9000 or over 14000 cells many of which would be sparsely populated. In orderto make the matrices amenable to analysis, researchers reviewed
capacity.Summary of findings1) Evidence-based interview protocol about relationships between epistemic cognition and identity in the context of researchResults from our pilot study and Phase I survey data analysis2 revealed four themes based onfactors that students perceived as affecting their researcher identities: discovery, dissemination,integration into society, and self-regulation. These themes were used to develop a semi-structuredinterview protocol that included base questions and follow-up questions; follow-up questionsallowed us to explore topics that participants were not initially able to verbalize on their own. Forexample, one base question asked about where knowledge in the field comes from; a follow-upquestion was added to prompt
”, aslessons learned for those choosing an REU. This first year of the REU may not provide enoughdata for the intended purpose (e.g., the detailed statistical analyses as suggested by Grimberg etal. [2]), but we initiated this study as the start of a longer-term study later by providingdescriptive statistics on the students, the program, and the mutual net effects. With the guidancefrom the previous work in REU assessment [3-6], this study conducted both quantitative andqualitative analyses for the purposes of formative and summative evaluation.A. Purpose of the StudyOne purpose of this study was to explore US and non-US students' research experiences duringsummer at a research university in the United States. Specifically, we tried to identify