Paper ID #21881An Initial Exploration of Engineering Students’ Emotive Responses to Spa-tial and Engineering Statics ProblemsDr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student
engineering. Her other research interests include mixed-methods research design, integrating sustainability and professional ethics into the engineering curriculum, and communication of science and engineering concepts to non-technical audiences.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best
Paper ID #21891Exploring Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Engineering: Case Stud-ies of Professionally Focused and Career Exploration CoursesDr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research
math, science, computer science, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological
Paper ID #21884What Does Hidden Curriculum in Engineering Look Like and How Can ItBe Explored?Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and
of whichneeds special mention. I would like to thank Dr. Edward J. Berger, Associate professor ofEngineering Education at Purdue University, for lending his equipment for data collection. I alsowant to thank Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Assistant professor of Engineering Education at Utah StateUniversity for providing advice on collecting and interpreting EDA data. Finally, I want to thankmy adviser, Dr. Michael Loui, Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor in Engineering Education, forproviding financial support for this project through his discretionary funds.References[1] W. Sun and X. Sun, “Teaching computer programming skills to engineering and technology students with a modular programming strategy,” presented at the 2011 ASEE
one of the mostimportant research question of this area. In the future, as we focus on further developing ourprocess, we should also focus on identifying the readiness of our students and if so, the forms ofthe activities that suits their need to be engaged.References[1]. Villanueva, Idalis, and Louis Nadelson. "Are We Preparing Our Students to BecomeEngineers of the Future or the Past?." International Journal of Engineering Education 33, no. 2(2017): 639-652.[2]. Daly, Shanna R., Erika A. Mosyjowski, and Colleen M. Seifert. "Teaching creativity inengineering courses." Journal of Engineering Education 103, no. 3 (2014): 417-449.[3]. Felder, Richard M., and Rebecca Brent. "Understanding student differences." Journal ofengineering education 94