Implementation of P-20 initiatives requires not only leaders but team players. The key tobeing able to lead is to be surrounded by those who can function on a team. Lencioni (2002)notes that team dysfunctions can be identified as a pyramid at the top labeled with the inattentionto results and descending due to lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability, the avoidanceof conflict and lack of trust as the makeup of the dysfunctional pyramid. The ideal team playershould be humble, hungry and smart (Lencioni, 2016). A P-20 leader must be able to identifythese traits in others and cultivate these individuals so that improvements to P-20 can beimplemented. P-20 educators need to instill leadership capacity in P-20 students throughpractice, research and
Session ETD 526 Engineering Education Fostering University Industry Relations Claudio R. Brito President of IEEE Education Society President of Science and Education Research Council - COPEC São Paulo, BRAZIL E-mail: drbrito@copec.eu Melany M. Ciampi President of World Council on Systems Engineering and Information Technology Secretary of IEEE Education Society São
authors extended their study2 byreaching out to many large research institutions with engineering programs. These authors and others formulated objectives for IABs which include advocacy,recruitment and placement, support for research, curriculum review, fundraising and similargoals. Research studies have attempted to evaluate how effectively institutions and IABs aremeeting these objectives. Much of the previous work has focused on Engineering programs. This study extends the research of IABs into engineering technology (ET) education. Asurvey instrument examines the responses of multiple Engineering Technology programs andanalyzes them by discipline as well as overall results.Introduction Industry Advisory Board (IAB) or
(of a region where there are manyindustries) as a way to improve entrepreneurship in the region, aiming at fostering employmentand private initiatives to change the community’s profile.COPEC ORGANIZATIONCOPEC – Science and Education Research Council is a multi-disciplinary organization that is aleader to advance science and its application to the development of technology serving society. Itstarted its activities sixteen years ago and since then this organization has made a majorcontribution to the development of science and education working to increase the best practicesin several research fields.Integration activities promoted by COPEC provide a qualified coordination and buildingpartnerships because COPEC is a organization that brings
initiative to promote thetransformation of student learning experience in the manufacturing engineering technologyprogram in the School of Engineering Technology at Purdue University. The roboticmanufacturing system supports various applications of digital manufacturing by integrating bothtraditional subtractive manufacturing approaches and emerging additive manufacturing ones(e.g., 3D printing) in a novel way. Such a multi‐ functional robotic manufacturing system makesit a perfect platform for students not only to creatively learn and apply all kinds of existingmanufacturing technologies, but also to actively explore new and better solutions formanufacturing problems in their team‐ based interdisciplinary undergraduate research. Withsuch an
’, where the students are expected to develop anunderstanding of parallel and divergent canons and traditions of architecture, landscape andurban design.Since 2008, we have addressed this criterion with our Fall semester second-year graduatearchitectural design studio class. Our students are required to research, program, and design anIslamic Community Center, which includes amongst other things, a Mosque. This projectprovides a unique educational opportunity. Students must understand and appreciate howarchitecture reflects not only its place, program, and client, but also the politically andemotionally sensitive issues it can evoke. This class also engages the accreditation needs forethics and diversity.Our Graduate StudentsThe Architecture
Session ETD 5225 Engineering Technology Students: Do they approach capstone courses differently than other students? Anne M. Lucietto1, Andrew Scott2 and Frederick Berry1 Purdue University1/Western Carolina University2Using data collected from students in engineering technology, engineering, and other areas suchas computer science a comparison of student reactions to the capstone course are coded andsorted. Using content analysis methods, the researchers compare and contrast the variousstudent groups and their reactions to assigned capstone projects. They are also able to assessstudent
undertaking the ALERT (Active Learning inEngineering Technology) initiative to address the issue by implementing evidence-based activelearning techniques in selected courses to foster students’ interest and persistence. Statics,Dynamics and Thermodynamics are the target courses. Statics is a gateway course foundationalto the rest of the program, Dynamics is taken right after Statics, and Thermodynamics is one ofthe most challenging senior level courses. These courses are serving as the avenues formeasuring the effectiveness of using active learning techniques. The specific techniques we areimplementing are: in-class experiments, just-in-time teaching, team quizzes, and students asteachers. On a broader impact, the ALERT initiative will be the launch
educational improvement initiatives, however, thecollege discovered in 2013 that they had a problem in their ability to meet employer demandswithin the local manufacturing sector. Whereas one employer needed one or two people withelectrical skills, another employer needed one or two people with knowledge of fluid powersystems. Still others needed blueprint reading, machine tool skills, knowledge of industrialmotors, understanding of process control techniques, robotics and automation abilities, or a widevariety of other skill sets. Given that Bay College supports a student population of only about1,700 during the typical fall semester and has a similarly limited set of financial resourcesavailable, creating a separate academic program to address each
lower engagement with the discipline andless interaction with faculty and student organizations.There is little investigation of students who leave engineering and pursue degrees in ET. Theleaky pipeline to STEM professions is well known by researchers. However, the reasons studentsleave are less universal. Research on faculty perceptions of student persistence in STEM studiesshow study habits, commitment to educational goals, and family support as primary influencingfactors [1], but other researchers report that the main reasons students depart from engineeringand STEM fields are non-academic [2, 3, 4]. Furthermore, George-Jackson [4] reports that not allstudents who leave engineering leave STEM, and calls upon researchers to learn more
MXET curriculum was and will continue to betailored to real-world needs and entry-level job opportunities. Finally, the costs associated with thenew program in terms of equipment and faculty positions were reasonable and manageable. The MXET program was initially limited to accepting 25 students in each of the first twosemester of operation; a goal that was easily achieved. Based on the enrollment growth needs of theCollege of Engineering’s 25x25 initiative, this quota was raised for the second year to 50 studentsper semester which also appears to be achievable based on acceptable applications that have beenreceived prior to the start of the Fall 2017 semester. It is expected that the first MXET students will graduate from the
. Some students also usethe project for entry in the University-wide annual research symposium and/or Six Sigma GreenBelt or Black Belt certification.The project is used for assessment of several program learning outcomes. In fact, thispaper/presentation will cover continuous improvement opportunities that were identified throughthe assessment of the project work. Some of the problems that were identified and addressedinclude inadequate and untimely project selection by companies, students wasting time gettingstarted, weak team leadership, and ambiguous root causes.1. Introduction and Overview“The ET department's emphasis on solving real world problems has prepared me to avoid thepitfalls that many of my peers encounter and start achieving
development of the TST program in the summer of 2013. Withinweeks the number of participating faculty shrank to roughly 15, whose affiliations varied widelyranging from engineering technology to theatre. These remaining faculty were exposed to aseries of individual and team exploration exercises intended strengthen the bond among theparticipants. The initial design of two distinct learning experiences emerged in the spring of2014. Their purpose was to examine real-world open-ended problems from different lenses. A“Seminar” experience would address the problem from a cultural and societal lens while a“Design Studio” experience would examine the problem from a science and technologyperspective. The notion of “competency” was adopted through research
in homes, we can find an additional potential for the improvement of residential smartenvironments.Future work in home automation for storing and retrieving systemsBased on the objectives initially set as the project’s primary goal, several benefits follow asoutcomes, and as opportunities for future projects and research, for the QOL improvement forthe elderly and disabled: The reduction of misused space in the residential built environment (ongoing and future projects have been registered for the analysis of unconditioned spaces: garage, attic, crawling space, and basement). The technology-based aid provided to the elderly and disabled users to organize and select stored items through an automated retrieval
power engineering3. Onecollaborative effort to fill this gap in skilled workforce is the Consortium of Universities forSustainable Power4 (CUSP™) which is currently offered by the research group led by ProfessorNed Mohan of the University of Minnesota. This consortium includes universities that havecome together to utilize, collectively evolve and promote the curriculum developed at theUniversity of Minnesota – Twin Cities with the help of funding from various organizationsincluding NSF, ONR (Office of Naval Research), NASA and EPRI. Western CarolinaUniversity joined this consortium in 2012 to enable the development of a state of the artcurriculum in electric power/energy systems.In the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology program at
. These trends are made clear in a study conducted bythe market research firm, Metra Martech, “Positive Impact of Industrial Robots onEmployment”1. The IFR projects that 1.9 to 3.5 million jobs related to robotics will be created inthe next eight years2. The rapid growth of robotics and automation, especially during the last fewyears, its current positive impact and future projections for impact on the United States economyare very promising. Even by conservative estimates1, the number of robots used in industry in theUnited States has almost doubled in recent years. From 2014 to 2016, robot installations areestimated to increase about 6% a year, resulting in an overall 3-year increase1 of 18%. Likewise,industrial robot manufacturers are
Engineering Education, 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition2012, American Society for Engineering Educaiton: San Antonio, Texas USA.13. Vaidyanathan R.; Umashankar, R., Summer Engineering Academy (SEA), a STEM initiative to recruit high- school students into engineering and science disciplines. World Engineering Education Flash Week. 2011. Lisbon Portugal.Biographical InformationSUSAN ESKINSusan Eskin joined the faculty at the Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg in August 2013 in the School ofScience, Engineering, and Technology. Dr. Eskin moved to Harrisburg to teach physics from the University Parkcampus where she was a member of the research faculty. Before that she was a member of the Medical SchoolFaculty first at
Session CEED 432 EUROTECH - PREPARING ENGINEERING STUDENTS FORINTERNATIONAL CO-OPS IN GERMANY AND BEYOND Brian Schwarz – Co-Director –Eurotech Director of Experiential Engineering Education Initiatives http://eurotech.engr.uconn.edu bwgermany.uconn.edu Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session CEED 432Eurotech Program history•Starting in 1993 by Engineering and German
; teams• Global markets & overseas competition• Outsourcing products/manufacturing• Research collaborations Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session CEED 442What is a “Global Engineer”?A global engineer is defined as one who has the personal qualities, international knowledge, and technical skills required to work effectively in a range of international settings and diverse environments
developed, and the team chooses the optimal. Industryis involved from day one. Initially, faculty meet with representatives of the companies toexamine and develop the project into a well-defined undertaking so that students will not go intomany different directions and lose focus. The meetings also specify company/team involvement,project deliverables, and the needed funding. Projects are selected based upon the company andthe track record of past work (if any), support the company is capable of providing, andcomponents or areas of technology which comprise the proposed project. The projects are alsochosen based upon the needed time frame; if the tasks are a priority for the company, they arenot suitable for the student teams.During the first
shaped the answers to the question of theways chief executive officers lead (9).” From these interviews they identify five leadershipapproaches that respond to the CEO’s challenges. These are 1) strategic approach, 2) humanasset approach, 3) expertise approach, 4) box approach and 5) change approach. They go on toargue that it is important to focus on the approach with consistency and not every seniormanagement team can adapt to all five approaches. During a 2001 forum they stated in theframework for understanding leadership that some CEOs try as they might simply do not lead.In their research they stumbled on an answer to a question that they did not anticipate which isthat even though they try some CEOs do not lead at all. The stakes are so
acting on a building, b) the strength of building members and connections, and c)design practices for serviceability (prevention of deflections, unsightly cracks, etc.). Thecompletion of these tasks involves the production of calculations, structural models, and thedrafting of building drawings. Most of the design work utilizes and expands upon the student’sprevious coursework. However, portions of the building project often require a designmethodology that the students are initially unfamiliar with (elevator pit design, handrail design,etc.). In turn, students must research how to utilize their basic principles to complete that part ofthe design. The students typically find this both challenging and rewarding. Again thesustainably process is
collapsed. The1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge was one of the most prominent failures in the history ofengineering. The bridge collapsed, millions of dollars were lost, and transportation in thecommunity was crippled for a decade.There is a second failure related to the bridge collapse: the initial forensic investigation in 1943(Othmar, Kármán, & Woodruff, 1941). That report concluded, “The Tacoma Narrows Bridgewas well designed and built to resist safely all static forces, including wind.” Clearly this initialforensic analysis was contradicted by even the most cursory review of the evidence. In sharpcontrast to that 1943 report, a more recent analysis, by ASCE, provides deeper insight (ACSE,n.d.): “The structure failed dramatically in a rather
space along a straight line as a function of timewe would pick an initial point P(x, y, z) and specify a direction and our equations would enableus to compute where the particle was at every time, t. The equations for the position of theparticle at every time can be described in parametric form extended to three dimensions: x – x0 = Ax (t – t0) y – y0 = Ay (t – t0) z – z0 = Az (t – t0) . Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education