I use she and her pronouns.” Many universities still include birth/given names in the student information system. Using this name could accidentally “out” a student who uses a different name. 2. As a getting-to-know-you activity, pass around 3x5 cards and ask students to provide a photo, write down their names and pronouns, and tell you 1 or 2 things that are important to them (e.g., a hobby). Collecting the cards during the next class meeting. 3. Use a syllabus statement (see example above). 4. When in doubt, ask! Generally, it is best to use pronouns that are consistent with the way an individual present themselves. If you are not sure, it is OK to ask politely and with discretion.Safe
Information Technology two of themost ubiquitous STEM fields in the 21 st century. No matter the discipline area, it is clear fromlooking at workplace trends that students’ studies and professional development would benefitfrom exposure to, and comfort with, computing skills such as programming, and increasedfacility in computational thinking. Introducing a broader range of students to coding andcomputational thinking practices has been used as a strategy for broadening participation incomputing (BPC) [1, 2]. There have been numerous calls to bring computational thinking intothe general K-12 curriculum to both improve computational literacy in the next generation andenhance general education (e.g., [3, 4]). A recommended approach to teachers
must be classified as Pre-Engineering in Lincoln, technically admitted to the Explore Center as their college at UNL o Omaha: Any student in Omaha who applied for the College of Engineering and is either (1) admitted to the Pre-Engineering major (not the major they applied for) in the College of Engineering; or (2) was denied admission to the College of Engineering by the University of Nebraska Omaha admissions office and was not seen in the COE college review process (usually classified as “Undeclared” major with “Academic and Career Development Center” as their college) • ≥19 Math ACT sub score • ≥3.4 unweighted high school GPA Students will receive
Website 2 100% 0 0% 0 0% CC Visits/Information Sessions 11 69% 4 25% 1 6% CC Engineering Faculty Advisors 16 53% 12 40% 2 7% CC First-Year/General Advisors 3 30% 4 40% 3 30% CC Course Catalog 3 27% 6 55% 2 18% Transfer Articulation Agreement 6 50% 5 42% 1 8%Commonly used university web resources were viewed as overwhelmingly effective sources ofinformation on course transfer including the university transfer equivalency guide (+ 70%),university website (+ 72%), and university checksheets (+ 71%). In contrast, participants wereoften
-support practitioners can further marginalize studentsfrom underrepresented populations in the engineering and computing professions by not fullyconsidering dimensions of inclusion, including gender identity and expression, race andethnicity, disability, LGBTQ+, first-generation status, and socio-economic status. Motivation Within conversations addressing equity and inclusion in engineering higher education, amajor focus has been and continues to be on a collection of institutional efforts termed co-curricular support [1]–[4]. By co-curricular support, we are referring to institutional efforts tobetter support students through the offering of out-of-class efforts (e.g., mentoring programs,summer
exploring necessary variations to promote future success in recruitment and retention. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 2018 population estimates for Texas were 42 percent white, 39 percent Hispanic/Latino, 13 percent black or African American, 5 percent Asian and 1 percent other [1]. We believe tailored marketing strategies will help achieve the ultimate goal of an enrollment reflecting the demographics of Texas. History of the Partnerships In 2013, a version of what would become the Engineering Academies was piloted under the name Blinn TEAM‐E and housed under the Transition Academic Programs department at Texas A&M University. This initial partnership was established with Blinn College, a 2‐year institution located approximately 5 miles
). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 and 2015 Best Paper Awards for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research.Prof. Michelle M. Camacho, University of San Diego Michelle M
Mathematics Self-Concept of High Ability Adolescent Girls," Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 53-73, 1993.[16] J. M. Trenor, S. L. Yu, C. L. Waight and K. S. Zerda, "Influences for Selecting Engineering: Insights on Access to Social Capital from Two Case Studies," in Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga, 2008.[17] M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman and L. J. Shuman, "Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students: Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139-149, 1997.[18] D. R. Simmons and J. P. Martin, "Developing Effective Engineering Fictive Kin to Support Undergraduate First-Generation College Students," Journal
in Industrial Engineering at Purdue University. She completed her B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering at San Jos´e State University. Dina is a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an Honorable Mention for the Ford Foundation Fellowship Program. Her research interest focuses on changing the deficit base perspective of first-generation college students by providing asset-based approaches to understanding this population. Dina is interested in understanding how first-generation college students author their identities as engineers and negotiate their multiple identities in the current culture of engineering.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is
. 8Our Center is upfront with faculty that they should expect some back‐and‐forth on this. We ask for advance notice of at least 4 weeks before a grant is due and 8 weeks or more if they want a City Schools letter or if developing new programming. Letters of collaboration from our center—we will not sign the very generic standard letter unless we’ve seen the proposed budget including the outreach and the broader impacts proposal so that we know what we are committing to. Our center writes a concise and NSF‐attractive description of program for the proposal. Generally faculty don’t have much space in their proposal for this but want to get across the impact it will have. Our center
. Waight, K. Zerda, and T.-L. Sha, “The Relations of Ethnicity to Female Engineering Students’ Educational Experiences and College and Career Plans in an Ethnically Diverse Learning Environment,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 449–465, 2008.[11] C. E. Brawner, J. Main, C. Mobley, S. M. Lord, and M. M. Camacho, “The institutional environment for student veterans in engineering,” in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015, pp. 1–5.[12] S. M. Lord, K. A. Kramer, R. T. Olson, M. Kasarda, D. Hayhurst, S. Rajala, R. Green, and D. Soldan, “Special session #x2014; Attracting
the targeted Ph.D. programs earlier andmore often.Formative Project EvaluationA professional program evaluator is conducting ongoing formative assessment of the project. The primaryassessment mechanisms are (1) a pre- and post-program survey of all Master’s level students at NCCUbefore the start of the project activities and at the end of Year 5, (2) yearly student feedback sessions togather data on what is working well in the program and what could be improved, (3) exit interviews withfunded Bridge students who complete the Master’s degree from NCCU and go on to doctoral degreeprograms at NCSU or other research universities, or to employment in industry, and (4) interviews andsurveys of faculty to determine their attitudes toward working
students, first generation students, and/or low-income students. The results are encouraging in that they suggest that students from historically marginalized backgrounds do not feel less belonging than their peers, but concerning in that belonging generally decreased across the semester.During their first year, engineering majors are required to take several fundamentalcourses. Here we study students in two of these early required courses: calculus-basedintroductory physics, and the fundamentals of programming. In the current research,we look at a measure of social belonging. We see how student sense of socialbelonging changes over time, and pay particular attention to the students who are inthe minority in our sample and
American) decision to discontinue her pursuit of a STEM doctorate.1.1 Intersectionality Framework The current study is grounded in the theoretical framework of Intersectionality (Collins,2000; Crenshaw, 1991). Central to this approach is the nuanced way in which people’s livedexperiences are shaped by a multiplicity of interdependent social categories and identity markers(Cole, 2009). For example, the structures of race, class, and gender ‘‘create disadvantages forwomen of color’’ but also ‘‘provide unacknowledged benefits for those who are at the top ofthese hierarchies’’ (Zinn & Dill, 1996, p. 327). More recently, Purdie-Vaughns and Eibach(2008) coined intersectional invisibility and defined it as “the general failure to fully
. Overall, theimportance of peer support and family could potentially link to students’ comfort and strengths as teammembers. Florida Both Texas st 1 generation college student Cultural diversity* Military experience Bilingual* Desire to learn Motivated* Comfortable working in Desire to succeed Naivety groups/teams* Diverse experiences Problem-solving skills Commuter* Diverse perspectives Responsible
knowledge rather than solely consumers of knowledge.BackgroundA 2016 Harvard Business School report found a faltering United States economy and a need forreform [1]. One principal reason for this faltering economy is the United States’ inability todevelop qualified science and engineering (S&E) human capital, in particular women andminorities. However, diversity in the S&E workforce has not improved over the last decade [2];and, given Hispanics aged 21 years and older represent 15% of the U.S. population, a mere 6%of the S&E workforce are Hispanic [2].The Bureau of Labor Statistics has projected that total employment in S&E jobs will increase at afaster rate (1.1% compound annual growth rate) from 2016 to 2026 than employment in
given a brief introduction toWISE@OU and its initiatives. There were typically one to two lunches each Fall andWinter for STEM faculty members. Each session provided time for informalnetworking as well as addressed a relevant topic – such as planning for the summer,connecting with upper-level administrators (including the Provost and ChiefInformation Officer), and working on grant proposals.Workshops were generally hosted for STEM non-tenured faculty, however selectsessions were for mid-level career faculty from all departments or for departmentchairs. These workshops focused on planning for promotion (associate to fullprofessor) and goal setting.In addition to career-related workshops, WISE@OU addressed bias-related concernsthrough
disabilities like PTSD and TBI.Often, they are seen as being mentally deficient or unintelligent because of generalizations madefrom exaggerated public cases.Unique Skills of Student Veterans with DisabilitiesPast research has focused on the deficits of student veterans with disabilities and how they needto be better supported by the administrators and faculty members of academic institutions [1],[7], [10], [13]. However, student veterans’ disability status does not negate the unique skills andpositive attributes acquired during military service. Student veterans, including student veteranswith disabilities, may find themselves better suited than others to conquer the challenges of anundergraduate engineering program [5], [6], [11]. Due to extensive
meets monthly, with discussion topics including culturally responsive mentoring, experiences of minority doctoral students o Information sessions for department heads and graduate directors, deans, and provosts to orient them to the AGEP-NC project 7 o Fellows collect information on pathways of doctoral students through their programs • Winter year 1: o Winter alliance-wide meeting for provosts, deans, Student Leadership Council, leadership team, evaluators and Fellows. Fellow workshop on culturally
in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and building capacity in low and middle income countries through inclusive technical education.Ms. Mayra S Artiles , Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Mayra S. Artiles is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University with a focus on nanotechnology. Prior to her current position, she worked at Ford Motor Company as an Electrified Vehicles Thermal Engineer. Her research interests are broadening participation in engineering higher education, graduate
/hbcu_research_summit.html[12] J. S. Katz and B. R. Martin, “What is research collaboration?” Research Policy, vol. 26, no.1, pp. 1-18, 1997.[13] H. Bukvova, “Studying research collaboration: A literature review,” Sprouts: WorkingPapers on Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 3, 2010.[14] B. Bozeman, D. Fay, and C.P. Slade, “Research collaboration in universities and academicentrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-67,2013.[15] B. Bozeman, J. S. Dietz, and M. Gaughan, “Scientific and Technical Human Capital: Analternative model for research evaluation,” International Journal of Technology Management,vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 716-740, 2001.[16] B. Bozeman and E. Corley, “Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications
, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. His research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity. Lee received his Ph.D in engineering education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in industrial & systems engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State university Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State
international student perspective. We seek agreater understanding of the following: 1) experiences that contribute to international students’ perceivedsense of belonging, and 2) contributors to international students’ perceived quality of interactions with peersand faculty. A qualitative research approach using the critical incident technique with a constructivistperspective was used for this study. The overall results, and in particular understandings about the conceptof ‘sense of belonging’ that emerged from the students’ lived experiences, will provide insights fordeveloping an improved and inclusive institutional support structure for international students within U.S.engineering doctoral education.Sense of belonging Sense of belonging is
served on multiple NAE committees, and on the NSF ENG division’s Advisory Committee. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Quantifying the Pool of Underrepresented Minority Students for Engineering StudiesAbstract: A widely held belief exists among engineering educators and policy-makers that if pre-college student interest in engineering were broadly increased, the population of studentspursuing a collegiate engineering education would be more diverse [1]. However, after years ofworking in engineering admissions, a more probable hypothesis emerged that the pool ofengineering-eligible students that come from communities of color is smaller than might beexpected. To reach parity in
multiple dimensions of identity using an intersectional lens toanswer three research questions: 1) Why did BSVEs join the military? 2) Why did BSVEschoose engineering? and 3) How do BSVEs enact their veteran, engineering, and racial identitieswhile in school? We find that family influences, a desire to be part of something bigger thanthemselves, and economics were factors in BSVEs’ decision to join the military. Technical jobsin the military that often included exposure to engineers and engineering problems led them tothe belief that as engineers, they would be able to solve many of the problems they faced whilemaintaining military hardware. All seven BSVEs claimed that their military and engineeringidentities were central, or nearly so, to their
Paper ID #24750A Systematic Review of the Intersections of Engineering Identity and Finan-cial Need LiteratureMaria Luz Espino M.A, Iowa State University Maria Luz Espino, M.A. is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Higher Education Administration program at Iowa State University. She holds a Masters degree in Educational Policy and Leadership from Marquette University and a Bachelors degree in Community and Nonprofit Leadership and Gender and Women Studies from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. She investigates issues of college access and retention of first-generation low-income students
to enroll in the program. Each session lasts two hours, generally from 9 – 11am. The first hour of each session is spent using the “Assessment and LEarning in Knowledge Spaces” (ALEKS) web-based instructional software. Students work through the program individually with monitoring from volunteers. For the 2nd hour of the session, the students participate in hands-on and/or group projects that 1) help reinforce the lessons learned in their classroom and ALEKS and 2) help increase student excitement and efficacy towards learning STEM concepts. Students enter the program at the beginning of their 3rd grade year. These students are grouped as a cohort. The first cohort in West Lafayette launched in 2017. The first cohort for
process [1]. Figure 1 provides arepresentation of conjecture mapping which defines the high level conjecture, embodiments,mediating processes and outcomes used to frame the design. When designing learningenvironments, the process begins with establishing a high level conjecture which outlines thekind of learning the design attempts to support. Embodiments generate the mediating processesthat produce the desired outcome. These embodiments could include tools, materials, tasks andparticipant structures, and discursive practices. A design may or may not include all theseelements. Mediating processes are required to produce outcomes; they utilize particular tools fora particular task in a learning environment enacted in certain ways to produce
MISSIONThe LSAMP program is a National Science Foundation funded program that assistsuniversities and colleges in their efforts to significantly increase the numbers ofstudents matriculating into and successfully completing high quality degreeprograms in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)disciplines.The LSAMP Program seeks to transform undergraduate STEM education primarilythrough 1. Innovative, evidence-based recruitment and retention strategies 2. Relevant educational experiences in support of racial and ethnic groups historically underrepresented in STEM disciplines LSAMP PROGRAM PRIORITIES1. Increase individual student retention and progression to baccalaureate degrees for underrepresented racial and ethnic
. 9College counseling:Garrison Forest School (GFS) has 2 counselors for 60‐70 students (senior class), who also advise juniors Every week the counselors offer college workshops for juniors and seniors, outreach with parents. These students have generally been supported by parents and their school since early elementary. The expectation is that they’ll go to college. The school has a 100% placement rate in 4‐year colleges.Western High School has 1 College Bound counselor in the school and 1 senior counselor for 300 students. Because this is a high poverty, majority minority school district, these students are likely to be first generation to college and not have as much home support as their GFS counterparts.Teacher