, (b) enjoyment with coursemeasured on a five- point Likert scale and (c) students’ approaches to learning which weremeasured using the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) [20]. In thefinal evaluation students answered the question “On a scale from 1 to 10, how would you ratethe USE Basic course?” as well as to provide their feedback about the course.Table 2. Overview of questions Learning It was clear what was expected in the H/E assignment. environment The lectures provided clear input for the H/E assignment. questions The document Assignment Part A/B (H/E) was a help to know what I had to do in the H/E assignment. The activities in the H/E tutorials helped me to make the
much detail as they were able.Reflection Entries: Reflective entries were intended to complement the field notedocumentation by prompting students to reflect on their experiences creating more synthesis andmore personal accounts. Students were given structured prompts to guide their reflections.Throughout the quarter, these prompts became more open ended, based on group discussions.Prompts related to A) student experiences B) resources C) design and fabrication, D) topics fromthe previous meeting, E) project choice, and F) different modes of learning. In this analysis wedraw from reflection entries where students speak about design or instruction sets and tutorials.In six of the ten weeks, prompts explicitly related to design were posed. These
(worst), 3.01 (average:a ‘B’), and 4.3 (excellent: an ‘A+’).The process has resulted in two different review forms to date. The seed form was designed basedon teaching style, the students and their preparation, and the courses. The second iteration removedtwo questions and added thirteen leveraging our process for capturing sentiment. Since these factorsvary widely, our particular form may not be appropriate for other courses. Although the questionsare not solely limited to the field of engineering, they do reflect feedback from students in ourdiscipline. We do not believe there is a one-size-fits-all review form — it is a mistake to use onetuned to a specific course/discipline without going through the process of iteratively mining
- 2015.htm. [Accessed: 12-Jan-2019].[28] A. Dwivedi, “10 Things Learned In The Military That Can Be Applied To Life.,” Business Insider, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com/10-things-learned-in- the-military-that-can-be-applied-to-life-2014-8. [Accessed: 12-Jan-2019].[29] M. Blaauw-Hara, “‘The Military Taught Me How to Study, How to Work Hard’: Helping Student-Veterans Transition by Building on Their Strengths.,” J. Res. Pract. Community Coll., vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 809–823, 2016.[30] B. Hanington and B. Martin, Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers, 2012.[31] P. Baxter and S. Jack
commercialisation: student learning in a sustainable engineering innovation project, European Journal of Engineering Education, 32:2, 143-165, DOI: 10.1080/03043790601118689[8] Goldberg, D. E. (1996). Change in engineering education: One myth, two scenarios, and three foci. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 107–115.[9] Rogers, D., Jr., Stratton, M. J., & King, R. E. (1999). Manufacturing education plan: 1999 critical competency gaps. Society of Manufacturing Engineers and SME Education Foundation.[10] S. F. Freeman, C. Pfluger, R. Whalen, K. Schulte Grahame, J. L. Hertz, C. Variawa, J. O. Love, M. L. Sivak and B. Maheswaran, (2016) Cranking Up Cornerstone: Lessons Learned from Implementing a Pilot
Paper ID #24757Developing a Request for Qualifications Activity to Integrate ConstructionTopics at the Sophomore LevelDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development
Paper ID #26427Work in Progress: A Path to Graduation: Helping First-Year Low Income,Rural STEM Students SucceedDr. Carol S. Gattis, University of Arkansas Dr. Carol Gattis is the Associate Dean Emeritus of the Honors College and an adjunct Associate Pro- fessor of Industrial Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Her academic research focuses on STEM education, developing programs for the recruitment, retention and graduation of a diverse population of students. Carol also serves as a consultant specializing in new program development and grants. She earned her bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
. Wood, and M. E. Layne, “The Impact of Work/Life Balance Policies on Faculty Careers,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.1550.1-26.1550.10.[15] E. A. Cech and M. Blair-Loy, “Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers,” Work Occup., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 86–110, Feb. 2014.[16] B. Bagilhole and J. Goode, “The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation,” Eur. J. Womens Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 161–180, 2001.[17] M. C. Skewes et al., “Absent autonomy: Relational competence and gendered paths to faculty self-determination in the promotion and tenure process
. McGough, "A Learning Community: Teaching Technical Writing in the Chemical Engineering Unit Operations Laboratory," 2014.[4] K. Croker, H. Andersson, D. Lush, R. Prince, and S. Gomez, "Enhancing the student experience of laboratory practicals through digital video guides," Bioscience education, vol. 16, pp. 1-13, 2010.[5] D. E. Berry and K. L. Fawkes, "Constructing the components of a lab report using peer review," Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 87, pp. 57-61, 2009.[6] D. Miller and J. Williams, "Incorporating Peer Review Into The Che Laboratory," presented at the ASEE, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004.[7] N. M. Trellinger, B. K. Jesiek, C. Troy, J. Boyd, and R. R. Essig, "Engineering Faculty on
○ weakly relevant 94. PROTOTYPING AND DETAILED DESIGNPhase 3 of the product development process is producing a detailed design and CAD modelbased on the system architecture developed in the previous phase. CAD modeling is an iterativeprocess, which usually starts from hand sketches of the major and auxiliary function carriers, aswell as the connections between them. Figure 3 (A) shows the hand sketch of the spindleassembly that provides movement on z direction as well as the adaptor for the bit change. (B) is apreliminary CAD model with the major parts simply laid out. The detailed CAD model is shownat (C), a
coursework in this way without continuing on to a master’s degree atTAMUK or any other institution, for a total of 18 (approximately 45%) of senior design studentsattempting graduate work at any level. Table 2. Graduate School Recruitment Summary for Senior Design CohortsTeam Number Students Continuing to Student Continuing Percentage of StudentsLabel of Graduate School at to Graduate School Continuing to Students TAMUK at Any School Graduate School 2015-2016A 5 2 2 40%B 4 0 1
Teaching Innovation Professorship. The authors would like tothank the students for their feedback. This study complied with the University of Toronto’spolicies on research ethics.7.0 References[1] K. Barns , R. C. Marateo, and S. P. Ferris, “Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation,”Innovate: Journal of Online Education, vol. 3, no. 4, April 2007.[2] M. Prensky, “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,” On the Horizon, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 67–85,Oct. 2001.[3] B. Mitra, J. Lewin-Jones, H. Barrett & S. Williamson, ‘The use of video to enable deeplearning”, Research in Post-compulsory Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 405- 414, July 2010[4] A. Clifton, and C. Mann, “Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning”, Nurse EducationToday, vol. 31, no. 4
and after class; 3) learnstudent names; and 4) pose non-intuitive questions that spark curiosity (Figure 1).This emerging model, termed ECNQ (e.g., acronym for Engage, Communicate, Names,Questions), is an active and dynamic approach to engaging students in the engineering classroomand works towards disrupting traditional normalized, ineffective teaching practices that limitand/or stifle student participation by helping to engender conditions for deep learning, activeparticipation, and engagement. Three main sources provided the foundation for development andrefinement of the model proposed by the authors: a) teaching practices employed by the authorduring lecture sessions; b) post course analysis of teaching experiences; c) literature
. Ramachandran received the B. Eng degree (with great distinction) from Concordia University in 1984, the M. Eng degree from McGill University in 1986 and the Ph.D. degree from McGill University in 1990. From October 1990 to December 1992, he worked at the Speech Research Department at AT&T Bell Laboratories. From January 1993 to August 1997, he was a Research Assistant Professor at Rutgers University. He was also a Senior Speech Scientist at T-Netix from July 1996 to August 1997. Since September 1997, he is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University where he has been a Professor since September 2006. He has served as a consultant to T-Netix, Avenir Inc., Motorola and Focalcool. From
an Introduction to Engineering course," in 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[14] J. B. Brockman, T. E. Fuja and S. M. Batill, "A Multidisciplinary Course Sequence for First-Year Engineering," in 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, CA, 2002.[15] Bensimon, E. M. & Dowd, A. C. (2012). Developing the Capacity of Faculty to Become Institutional Agents for Latinos in STEM. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.[16] Reichert, M. and Absher, M. (1997), Taking Another Look at Educating African American Engineers: The Importance of Undergraduate Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 86: 241-253.[17
features that would promote more meaningful engagement in the app, show the importance of high quality design and implementation of technology tools for learning and research. References [1] S. Sorby, N. Veurink, and S. Streiner, “Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is ‘yes,’” Learning and Individual Differences , vol. 67, pp. 209–222, 2018. [2] M. Berkowitz and E. Stern, “Which cognitive abilities make the difference? Predicting academic achievements in advanced STEM studies,” Journal of Intelligence , vol. 6, no. 4, p. 48, 2018. [3] S. Sorby, B. Casey, N. Veurink, and A. Dulaney, “The role of
increasingnonlinearity. The initial conditions are ϕ0 = 0 and ϕɺ0 = 0 in all plots, and a second plot isdepicted in each subplot with a modified initial amplitude φ0 ( ϕ0 = 10o for Figure 9 (a) and (b)and ϕ0 = 1o for Figure 9 (c), (d) and (e). In general, it can happen that small differences in theinitial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomena. A small error in the formerwill produce an enormous error in the latter, so that the prediction of a real system’s behaviorbecomes impossible.Due to the fact that the phase portraits ϕɺ over ϕ represent the projection of the extendedphase space (with coordinates ϕ , ϕɺ , and t ), intersecting trajectories appear in subfigures (c) to(e).(a) µ ωn2 = 0 , ∆ϕ0 = 10o(b) µ ωn2 = 0.5 , ∆ϕ0 = 10o(c) µ ωn2 = 1
the business curriculum a financial management example,” J Bus Ethics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 105–110, Feb. 1994.[39] D. Stone, B. Patton, S. Heen, and R. Fisher, Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most, 10 Anv Upd edition. New York: Penguin Books, 2010.[40] P. Aubusson, S. Fogwill, R. Barr, and L. Perkovic, “What happens when students do simulation-role-play in science?,” Research in Science Education, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 565–579, Dec. 1997.[41] S. L. Sullivan, “A Software Project Management Course Role-play-team-project Approach Emphasizing Written and Oral Communication Skills,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 1993, pp. 283
research design, community-engaged research and mentoring to a) investigate how people perceive, understand, and make decisions about the planet in order to b) address access, inclusion, equity, and justice in STEM and academia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Developing a conceptual framework to understand student participation in entrepreneurship education programsAbstract: The importance of fostering innovativeness and creativity in graduates has beenwidely noted in national calls and accreditation reforms to enhance graduates’ competitiveness inthe global economy. As a result, universities and other higher education institutions haveinitiated curricular
–entirely online. Included in this category are synchronous models, which attempt to replicate face-to-face classroom experience online, and competency-based models that enable students to move through a course at their own pace. The institution provides advising, tutoring, and all other student support services online, as well.” It should be noted that the idea of self-paced instruction has been discussed in engineering education since at least 1971 when B. V. Koen published a paper on it in IEEE Transactions on Education. In 2001 he and K. J. Schmidt described a web based course (Koen, B. V. and Schmidt, K. J (2001). The professor and the media laboratory: a case study in web-based course
renaissance of the design studio.Ashwin, P. (2005). Variation in students’ experiences of the ‘Oxford tutorial’. Higher Education, 50(4), 631-644.Association of American Universities. (2017). Progress Toward Achieving Systemic Change: A Five-Year Status Report on the AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative. Washington, DC.Bourn, D., & Neal, I. (2008). The Global Engineer: Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers.Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice
changed over time?• What should we do to include different kinds of thinking in the doing of engineering?• What are the barriers that make engineering inaccessible to some people as a pathway? How can we remove these? 5(b) Peer-Reviewed PapersThe Conference organizers had asked that papers be submitted under five general themes. Twohundred eight (208) papers were received, with the majority coming from the U.S., with India,Colombia, and Ecuador being second, third and fourth. The themes and the number of papersreceived under each are:1. How do we teach/learn about Peace Engineering? - 432. Relationships among academia, industry, governments
Advisors on Science and Technology, Washington, DC, Report to the President, Feb. 2012.[2] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, "Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, pp. 259-278, July 2008.[3] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman. “Why they leave: Understanding student attrition from engineering majors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 29, pp. 914- 925, Mar. 2013.[4] S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams. Why aren’t more women in science: Top researchers debate the evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007.[5] M. Eliot and J. Turns, "Constructing
therefore can make a differencethrough my work.”AcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EEC-1540301. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] J. R. Herkert, “Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education,” The Bridge, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 8–13, 2002. [2] K. Riley, M. Davis, A. C. Jackson, and J. Maciukenas, “‘Ethics in the Details’: Communicating Engineering Ethics via Micro-Insertion,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 95–108, Mar. 2009. [3] S. M. J. Howland, G. M. Warnick, C. B
student engagement with the material, such asintegrating with the Computer-Aided Modeling software that students learned in their first year.The team is also exploring potential curricular content using 3-D holographic, augmented realitytechnology that connects with students’ mobile devices (MERGE Cube®) [4]. The systemallows students to hold a virtual object in their hands and experiment with manipulating theholographic images via smartphone. 3References[1] R. B. Landis, Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career, 4th ed., Anaheim, CA: Discovery Press, 2013.[2] S. A. Sorby, Developing Spatial Thinking, Boston, MA: Delmar Cengage
Walk, S. R., “Defining Engineering and Technological Literacy,” Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference (2012). American Society for Engineering Education.4. Foltz, Z., Kaur, A., Tushaus, W. H., Mikelson, C. S., Skalak, B. V., and Mina, M., “The United States Energy Policy: As Determined by Non-experts,” Proceedings of the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (2012). American Society for Engineering Education.5. Chenea, Paul F., Engineering management challenges, Engineering Management International, Volume 1, Issue 1, 1981, Pages 7-11, ISSN 0167-5419, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016754198190003X.6. Heywood, J., “Why Technological Literacy
b Extended relocation students lived in another country c Travel Junkie’s presented anecdotes of multiple of the international experience typesData Analysis and Coding Protocol When generating the codebook, interviews were holistically reviewed with an a prioricoding scheme based on the research objectives and furthered employed an inductive, iterativecoding protocol to further refine coding definitions and allow additional themes to emerge notpreviously addressed within the codebook. This was done by two graduate researchers. The finalcodebook contained two main categories – Intercultural Wonderment and Learning Outcomes –with twenty-four sub-categories. Both graduate researchers
Engineering Education, 2007. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790701520594[3] Chin-Min Hsiung. “The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning”. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00044.x[4] R. Felder, & R. Brent. “Effective strategies for cooperative learning”. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration, 2001. Available: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742- 051X(96)00045-5[5] K. H. Price, D. A. Harrison, & J. H. Gavin. “Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006. Available: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1375[6] Kaufman, D. B
. 44, no. 2, pp. 293–312, 2014.[4] Borrego M, “Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions.” Journal of Engineering Education 96(1): 5–18, 2007 11[5] Fitzpatirck, J.L., J.R. Sanders, and B.R. Worthen, Chapter 1, in Program Evaluation : Alternate Approaches and Practical Guidelines. 2012, Pearson: Boston.[6] Felder, R.M. and R. Brent, Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 92(1): p. 7-25.[7] R. A. Singleton and B. C. Straits, “Chapter 9: Survey Research,” in Approaches to Social
Conference on Select 2016 BCCE Presentations: Tracking Student Use of Web-Based Resources for Chemical Education,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2010–2012, 2017.[3] D. Z. Grunspan, B. L. Wiggins, and S. M. Goodreau, “Understanding classrooms through social network analysis: A primer for social network analysis in education research,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 167–178, 2014.[4] M. Nelson, S. Pearson, N. Pearson, J. Major, A. Godwin, and A. Kirn, “Using Social Network Analysis to Study the Social Structures of Inclusion Using Social Network Analysis to Study Inclusion in the Engineering Classroom,” 2018.[5] M. Saqr, U. Fors, and J. Nouri, “Using social network analysis to understand online