to be ‘epic’ by gaining knowledge in a real-lifeenvironment, which resulted in valuable and practical advice for our overall research.Reference[1] N. Bennett, Overview of the NSF REU Program and Proposal Review: the GRC Funding Competitiveness Conference, February 18-21, 2015. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2015[2] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Undergraduate research experiences for STEM students: Successes, challenges, and opportunities. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2017.[3] A.L. McDevitte, M.V. Patel, B. Rose, & A.M. Ellison, “Insights into student gains from undergraduate research using pre-and post-assessments,” BioScience, vol. 66-12, pp. 1070- 1078
nonvisible minorities than were originally surveyed.Questions regarding the engineering curriculum and learning environment were adapted from[14]. Satisfaction and self-confidence scales were adapted from the PACE survey [15].(4) self-reported perceptions of (a) “otherness”—feeling “othered” by the interpersonal climate (perceiving a sense ofdifference from the other students in a variety of situations), which is associated with perceptionsof a chilly climate that may alienate students, and hence a lack of integration into the engineeringcommunity, as well as (b)identifying as belonging to the engineering community;(5) long-term commitment to the field of engineering, either in terms of graduate education orexpectations of
Force on Civic Learning and Democratic Engagement. (2012) A CrucibleMoment: College Learning and Democracy’s Future. ISBN 978-0-9827850-5-8Saltmarsh, John and Hartley, Matthew (2011) To Serve a Larger Purpose: Engagement forDemocracy and the Transformation of Higher Education. ISBN: 978-1-439-90508-1Schoem, David and Hurtado, Sylvia, eds. (2001) Intergroup Dialogue: Deliberative Democracyin School, College, Community, and Workplace. ISBN: 0-472-09782-2Smith, B., Mayer, J., & Fritschler, A. (2008). Higher education and the “culture wars”. Closedminds, 8-23.Thomas, N. (2015). The politics of learning for democracy. Diversity and Democracy, 18(4), 4-7.Thomas, N., Bergom, I., Casellas Connors, I., Gautam, P., Gismondi, A., & Roshko, A
, “Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and indigenous education sovereignty,” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 101-124. 2014.[5] B. Brayboy, “Toward tribal critical race theory in education,” The Urban Review, vol. 37, no. 5, pp 425-446. [Online]. Available: https://link-springer- com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/article/10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y.[6] Tohono O’odham Nation, “History,” tohono-oodham-nsn.gov, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.tonation-nsn.gov/tohono-oodham-history/.[7] Tohono O’odham Nation, “Districts,” tohono-oodham-nsn.gov, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.tonation-nsn.gov/districts/.[8] San Xavier District, “A brief history,” waknet.org. 2019. [Online]. Available
"StronglyAgree." The survey results, displayed in figure 4, showed that more than 70% of the students“Agreed” and “Strongly Agreed" on the positive impact of the cooperative learning sessions onimproving attitude towards participation, enhancing the learning experience, and encouraginginteraction between students. The overall evaluation of the technique was extremely positive andindicated great satisfaction with the quizzing approach. Table 1: Cooperative Learning evaluation metrics Ref. No Evaluation Metric a Cooperative learning facilitates greater student participation in class activities b Cooperative learning enhances class participation c Cooperative learning makes learning easier d
or write well. These questions are adapted from Ref. [15].Appendix B summarizes the survey for Study 2.Overview of Studies 1 and 2Study participants were recruited from students enrolled in a junior-year materials kineticscourse at a large research institution. The required MSE course integrates CMSE topics using aseries of four MATLAB programming assignments throughout the term [16]. Students firstcomplete two introductory modules that prepare them to complete two comprehensive modulesrelated to course content. A comparison of the instructor and course enrollments are given inTable 1. The two terms represent the third and fourth times that the instructor had taught theclass, each time incorporating MATLAB programming assignments
calendar, ASAP, blackboard and bluebook can all be found from the common Universitywebpage and this is demonstrated for the attendees. If attendees have brought a laptop, they areasked to navigate these sites during the workshop. Often the instructor must stop to help oneattendee, yet it is better to navigate these sites before the semester begins.Detailed Syllabus is EssentialMany problems stem from the lack of a clear understanding of important points that should becovered in the syllabus. All engineering courses have a two part structure for the syllabus. Part“A” describes the standard information for all courses followed by Part “B” which described howthe course will be conducted this semester by this instructor. Part A is 2-pages long, which
Paper ID #25232Board 122: Disciplinary Migration of Engineering Master’s Students: WhyDo Some Students Change Their Majors and Others Do Not?Mr. Demetri Blackwood, Kettering University Demetri is Senior at Kettering University in Flint, MI. He is writing for his bachelors in Industrial Engi- neering and minoring in Business and Statistics.Dr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.Dr. Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University Elizabeth Gross is a postdoctoral research fellow in Engineering Education at Kettering University in Flint, MI. She
also transmitted acomputer running LabView software which simulates a virtual instrument panel for displayingtypes of data. The printed circuit board is 3.1cm by 4.1cm. Its microprocessor is FT232RL. Theshield’s interface is a mini-B USB and a 2.54mm pitch pin header. The communication protocolsfor this shield are UART, eight bit-bang inputs/outputs, and SPI. Its adapter socket is XBeecompatible with a 2.0mm pitch female pin header. The shield is FTDI compatible and has a USB2.0 compatible Serial Interface. It has 3.3V and 5V inputs/outputs and 3.3V and 5V dual poweroutputs. The typical and maximum input voltage is 5Vdc, and it has a current consumption of500mA. Its minimum output voltage is 3.3Vdc, while its maximum output voltage is
Paper ID #26352Factors Influencing the Interest Levels of Male versus Female Students goinginto STEM Fields (Evaluation)Dr. Murad Musa Mahmoud, Wartburg College Murad is an Assistant Professor at the Engineering Science Department at Wartburg College. He has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Utah State University. Research interests include recruitment into STEM, diversity in STEM as well pedagogy and instruction.Ms. Jessica Marie Faber, Wartburg College Jessica is a student at Wartburg College studying Engineering Science with a minor in Creative Writing and Mathematics. She is active with soccer at Wartburg and works
Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course.” IEEE Trans on Education, 2013, pp 1-6. [3] Kerr B. “The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of the research.” Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), International Conference. 2015 Sep 20 (pp. 815-818). IEEE. [4] Bishop JL, Verleger MA. “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research.” Proceedings from ASEE national conference. Atlanta, GA 2013 Jun 23 (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1-18). [5] Shatto B, L'ecuyer K, Quinn J. “Retention of content utilizing a flipped classroom approach.” Nursing education perspectives. 2017 Jul 1;38(4):206-8. [6] Taglieri C, Schnee D, Camiel LD, Zaiken K, Mistry A, Nigro S, Tataronis G, Patel D, Jacobson S, Goldman J
pre- 8:00– 10:00 am 2 hrs. printed parts and servo motors 10:00-10:15 am Break 15 min. Electrical wiring: Electrical wiring between servo motors, 10:15–12:00 pm 1 hr. 45 min. batteries, and switch 12:00 – 1:00 pm Lunch break Programming: Programming code for: a) testing each leg 1:00 – 2:45 pm 1 hr. 45 min. and b) walking gait 2:45 – 3:00 pm Break
T. Hodapp, "Investigating approaches to diversity in a national survey of physics doctoral degree programs: The graduate admissions landscape," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 020142, 12/29/ 2017.[11] (1/29/2019). 2018-19 Graduate School Handbook of The Ohio State University Graduate School. Available: https://gradsch.osu.edu/handbook[12] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Ballantine Books, 2006.[13] (1/29/2018). The Ohio State University Graduate School University Fellowship. Available: https://gradsch.osu.edu/pursuing-your-degree/graduate- fellows/university-fellowship[14] CollegeXpress, D. Masciello, B. Sullivan, and H
: Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2011. 19(3), pp. 399-410.[7] R. Hollands, B. Denby, G. Brooks, and A. Burton, “Equipment Operation/Safety Trainingusing Virtual Reality and Safe VR,” In Proc. MineSafe International 2000, September. Perth, WA: Western Australian Chamber of Mines and Energy, 2000, pp. 165-178.[8] D. Zhao and J. Lucas, “Virtual reality simulation for construction safety promotion,” In:International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2015. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 57-67.[9] A.Z. Sampaio, M.M. Ferreira, D.P. Rosario, and O.P. Martins, “3D and VR models in civilengineering education: Construction, rehabilitation and maintenance,” In: Automation inConstruction, 2010, 19(7), pp. 819-828.[10] K. Lin, J. Son, and E
Paper ID #26703Identity, Self-Esteem, and Academic Motivation: An Analysis of Effects onUnderrepresented STEM MajorsJos´e Carlos Villalobos, University of Central Florida Jose Villalobos is currently a student at the University of Central Florida studying for a Bachelor’s Degree in Mathematics and a minor in Statistics. After graduation, he intends to pursue a Ph.D. in Mathematics or Statistics.Mr. Uday K. Nair, University of Central Florida Mr. Uday Nair is the Associate Director of the Assessment office at the University of Central Florida. His professional portfolio includes institutional effectiveness
Paper ID #25447Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET)program at MIT - Building Community, Developing Projects, and Connect-ing with IndustryDr. Edward F. Crawley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Ed Crawley is the Ford Professor of Engineering at MIT, a member of the National Academy of Engineering, and a recipient of the Bernard M. Gordon Prize for engineering education of the NAE. He is the Founding President of the Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech) and. the Co-Director of NEET at MIT.Dr. Anette Hosoi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Anette
. 57, no. 2, pp. 141–158, 2007.[33] K. B. Catton, A. Galang, and A. T. Bulk, “Disruption in large classes during active learning sessions,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016–June, 2016.[34] D. Haak, J. HilleRisLambers, E. Pitre, and S. Freeman, “Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology,” Science (80-. )., vol. 332, no. June, pp. 1213–1217, 2011.[35] M. Lorenzo, C. H. Crouch, and E. Mazur, “Reducing the gender gap in the physics classroom,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 118–122, 2006.[36] R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz, “The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 3–17
significance of being a business major and environmentalmajor as predictors of responsibility for sustainability. A third level model added interactionsbetween being a business major and the five variables in Model 2, between being anenvironmental studies major and the five variables in Model 2, and between beliefs about socialjustice and beliefs about sustainability. None of these interactions were significant in the thirdlevel model and are therefore not reported. Table 6: Hierarchical Regression Models (Responsibility for Sustainability) Predictor Variable Model 1 Model 2 Unstandardized Coefficient B (Standard Error
). Influential factors in academic and career self‐efficacy: Attachment, supports, and career barriers. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(1), 36-46.[10] Barry, C. L., & Finney, S. J. (2009). Can we feel confident in how we measure college confidence? A psychometric investigation of the college self-efficacy inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 197-222.[11] Solberg, V. S., & Villareal, P. (1998). Examination of self-efficacy, social support, and stress as predictors of psychological and physical distress among Hispanic college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 182-201.[12] DeWitz, S. J., & Walsh, W. B (2002). Self-efficacy and college
. Education, 92(1), 7–25 (2003).7. T. DeBacker & R. Nelson. “Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 71-94. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0984 (1999).8. P. Pintrich, D. Smith, T. Garcia & W. McKeachie. “Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).” Educational and psychological measurement, 53(3), 801-813 (1993).9. A. Wigfield & J. Cambria. “Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes.” Developmental Review, 30(1), 1-35 (2010).10. J. Flake, K. Barron, C. Hulleman, B. McCoach & M. Welsh. “Measuring
and Contact in Signed Languages, C Lucas, Ed. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press, 2002, pp. 3-26. [12] A. Biglan. "The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 3, pp. 195–203, 1973. [13] M. Borrego. "Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96, No. 2, pp. 91-102, 2007. [14] J.B. Lodahl and G. Gordon. "The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments," American Sociological Review, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 57–72, 1972. [15] S. Sorby and B. Baartmans, "The Development
Paper ID #25579It’s Not Just What TA’s Know: Exploring the Role of Teacher Efficacy amongEngineering TA’sJoanna Wright, University of Washington Joanna Wright is an M.Ed. student in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her education research interests span early childhood through higher education, with a focus on the impact of pedagogical practices and contexts on learning and development.Lauren N. Summers, University of Washington Lauren N. Summers is a doctoral student in the College of Education at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests focus on the
, “Why Do So Many People Leave Graduate School Without a Ph.D.?,”Chron. High. Educ. Wash., vol. 47, no. 38, p. A10, Jun. 2001.[5] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph.D. Completion Project.”[6] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for amental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, pp. 282–284, Mar. 2018.[7] D. J. Satterfield, M. Tsugawa-Nieves, and A. N. Kirn, “WIP: Factors Affecting GraduateSTEM Student Attrition Rates,” p. 4.[8] B. Miller, M. A. Tsugawa, J. N. Chestnut, H. Perkins, C. Cass, and A. Kirn, “TheInfluence of Perceived Identity Fit on Engineering Doctoral Student Motivation andPerformance,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &
, 2000.[4] E. Seat, J. R. Parsons, and W. A. Poppen, “Enabling Engineering Performance Skills: A Program to Teach Communication, Leadership, and Teamwork*,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2001.[5] C. D. Grant and B. R. Dickson, “Personal Skills in Chemical Engineering Graduates: The Development of Skills Within Degree Programmes to Meet the Needs of Employers,” Educ. Chem. Eng., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 23–29, Jan. 2006.[6] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative Learning,” in Active Learning, vol. 970, 0 vols., American Chemical Society, 2007, pp. 34–53.[7] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2003.[8] P. M. Boynton and T. Greenhalgh, “Selecting
, A.J., 2017. Bringing experiential learning into the online classroom: A mechanics of materials course case study. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017–June.Duan, B. et al., 2005. An online laboratory framework for control engineering courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(6), pp.1068–1075.Kinney, L., Liu, M. & Thornton, M.A., 2012. Faculty and Student Perceptions of Online Learning in Engineering Education. 2012 ASEE Annual Conferenc.Kuh, G.D., 2001. Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning Inside The National Survey of Student Engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(3), pp.10–17.Moore, A. et al., 1996. College teacher immediacy and student
Construction Kits for Kids,” in The Design of Children’s Technology. A. Druin ed. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc. pp. 149-16, 1999.[8] A. Watters. “Lego Mindstorms: A History of Educational Robotics,” 2015. http://hackeducation.com/2015/04/10/mindstorms Retrieved February 3, 2019.[9] FIRST, Building a Community: 2017 Annual Impact Report, 2018. https://www.firstinspires.org/sites/default/files/uploads/annual-report/fy2017-annual-impact- report.pdf Retrieved February 3, 2019.[10] J. Wakeman-Linn, and A. Perry, “A Proposal to Incorporate Lego® Mindstorms into an Introduction to Engineering Courses,” 2002. Paper presented at 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.[11] B. Adams, Traction and Ballasting Experiments
, 2012.[10] Transportation Research Board (TRB), Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2018.[11] C. Putnam, M. Dahman, E. Rose, J Cheng, and G. Bradford, “Best Practices for Teaching Accessibility in University Classrooms; Cultivating Awareness, Understanding, and Appreciation for Diverse Users.” ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Vol. 8, No. 4, Article 13, Mar. 2016. 14[12] C. Traver, J.D. Klein, B. Mikic, A. Akera, S. Shooter, A. Epstein, and D. Gillette, “Fostering Innovation through the Integration of Engineering and Liberal Education,” in American Society of Engineering Education: Proceedings from the 2011 Annual Conference, Paper ID #2011-1233, June 2011.[13] B. Chang, K. Tremblay
completed.Whiteboard Learning Modules:The whiteboarding learning modules focused on ideation, modeling strategies, problem-solvingstrategies. These techniques provided sketching practice prior to learning the CAD learningoutcomes. For instance, during basic drafting and design and engineering drawing principles,students were asked to freehand sketch an isometric, front, top, and side view of a simple shape,as presented in Figure 2 below. In addition, during this portion of the course, they used freehandsketching on whiteboards to learn sketching views through different axonometric projections, aswell as proportions and dimensioning for manufacturing.Figure 2: a) Sample question and b) student response to support engineering drafting and design.For the
be shorter and the number of assignments was needed toto be reduced. Students said that they were already short on time and could not afford to complete allreading assignments. However, if this was the case student should have liked the concise/summary ofmajor points provided by the instructor (Figure 8). 8 Number of A 6 Students T NT Combined Length of reading assignments 4 2 0 Too Short Short No Opinion Long Too Long 15 B
, and E. Nilsen “Teaching Cybersecurity Analysis Skills in the Cloud”, in Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2015, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 332–337.17. M. Micco and H. Rossman, “Building a cyberwar lab: lessons learned: teaching cybersecurity principles to undergraduates”, in Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE 2002, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 23–27.18. F. B. Schneider, "Cybersecurity Education in Universities," IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3–4, 1 Aug. 2013.