, anecessary step in any design process. A Program Manager (PM) is assigned to each project.This is either a graduate teaching assistant or one of the courses instructors. The PM gives thestudents four or five higher level requirements. The students must write the remainingrequirements that follow from these higher level requirements. To do this they must furtherresearch the subject area, submit their requirements to the PM, and get them approved. Thisprocess takes several weeks. The engineering school librarian provides instructions on doing aliterature search. The students write a second research paper on what they have found. There isa laboratory exercise and several lectures in which the students learn how to write requirementswith the correct
Engineering Design, Technology & Professional Programs. Her research interests center on the transition of students from high school to 4-year engineering programs, especially those from under-represented populations.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock is the Associate Department Head and Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Aerospace Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She re- ceived her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in mathematics and physics, incor- porating non-traditional teaching methods into the
University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Full Paper: Creating an Effective Retention ProgramAbstract:The Choose Ohio First Scholarship program is designed to significantly strengthen Ohio’scompetitiveness within Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine(STEMM) disciplines and STEMM education.The Choose Ohio First Program is the University of Cincinnati College of Engineering andApplied Science’s retention program for first year students. There are 33 freshman engineeringstudents currently enrolled in the cohort of STEMM students. Through the program the studentsreceive competitive scholarship funding and professional development workshops which helpprepare them to enter into the STEMM workforce.Prior to their freshman year
Paper ID #28018EDSGN 100: A first-year cornerstone engineering design courseDr. Sarah C Ritter, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah C. Ritter, PhD, is an associate teaching professor in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs at the Pennsylvania State University and course chair for EDSGN 100, the cornerstone engineering design course. She received her BS degree from Louisiana Tech University and PhD degree from Texas A&M University, both in Biomedical Engineering. Her research focused on developing an optics-based system for long-term monitoring of relevant blood
management techniques and best teaching practices.Dr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of South Florida. He is the Director of First Year Experiential Education and Learning. Through this position, he develops and implements the curriculum for USF’s Foundations of Engineering Lab course. He is also the Principle Investigator for Bulls Engineering Youth Experience (Bulls-EYE Mentoring) a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math based outreach program that uses undergraduate students to mentor middle school youth.Dr. Schinnel Kylan Small, University of South Florida Schinnel Small is an Instructor I and IT
;stimulating interest; initiating the development of important engineering skills such as teamwork,leadership, and communications; making an informed decision regarding their major, andimprove retention [9]-[13]; introduction to engineering design [14]-[17] and appreciating the roleof engineers in society [18]-[20]; as a sample. This need was also recognized by our engineeringdepartment, more than fifteen years ago, when we had only 50 students enrolled in ourengineering program and has continued with a current enrollment of around 150 students in theprogram. This work describes our experience teaching such a course, describing our teachingand learning objectives, and our recommendations.Course StructureThe first-year seminar (FYS) course has been
teamwork, communication, prototyping, design, project management, and creatingaccountability between the groups to deliver a high quality product.The sections below detail the project implementation at both universities (including someexamples), as well as discuss the initial feedback from the students, addressing learningoutcomes around motivation, student accountability, teamwork, and project management.Finally, this paper concludes with lessons learned and next steps for project implementation,including more formalized assessment strategies.Escape Room Design Project – Rowan UniversityThe 5-week project had students from four first-year engineering classes in the Fall 2018semester design and build full escape rooms using their shared learning
skills and college resources, and offered some teaching on basicengineering communication. It became clear that this iteration of the first-year experience wasgeared more toward students coming out of high school. Feedback provided by transfer studentswas not positive, as they felt like they already knew the introductory material being taught.In Spring 2017, the second semester transfer students were mixed in with the freshman cohort forthe second class in the program series, EGR 103. EGR 103 is a class intended to teach studentsabout team building and engineering design. The transfer students in the course often becameteam leaders and felt as though they were left making the decisions and doing more of the workthan the freshmen. In addition
fundamentals of engineering at OSU and is interested in the use of VR in engineering education.Ms. Irina Kuznetcova, The Ohio State University I am currently in the 5th year of the doctoral program of Educational Psychology at the Ohio State Uni- versity. My research interests focus on the use of technology in education, including the design, imple- mentation and assessment of technology-integrated curriculum. I have worked with Multi-User Virtual Environments (such as Second Life) and Virtual Reality for my projects, and currently I am pursuing the line of work integrating VR and mobile, desktop and tablet technology to improve students’ visuospatial thinking skills.Ethan Kirk Andersen Ethan Andersen received his
Paper ID #27997A Flexible, Portable Making Solution to Enable Hands-On Learning with Ad-ditive Manufacturing in Cornerstone Engineering DesignDr. Nicholas A Meisel, The Pennsylvania State University Dr. Nicholas (Nick) Meisel is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Design in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs (SEDTAPP) at Penn State and an affiliate faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He graduated from Virginia Commonwealth University in 2010 with his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and received his Ph.D. from Virginia Tech in Mechanical Engineering in 2015. He joined
component was limited to computationaldesign due to the lack of facilities available for prototyping.This paper documents the process of the design and implementation of a new student project thathas the flexibility to challenge students. In this project, students are exposed to various expertisein engineering including programming, electronics, and modeling, while using minimal resourcesand operating without access to a traditional machine shop. The paper starts with the rationale ofthe new student project, theoretical considerations behind the project, followed by theimplementation of each semester and student feedback. The authors will conclude by sharing thereflection of the multi-semester project with other engineering educators who also hope
more convenient for students to fit into their first-semester schedules,which often include blocks of lab time.A committee of COE faculty was assembled to develop the course, which was given thedesignation ENGR 1101. After reexamining what could be accomplished in fifteen 50-minutesessions, and what would be most useful to transfer students, the committee decided on thefollowing learning objectives for ENGR 1101: Work on a design project in multi-disciplinary teams Develop an engineering entrepreneurship mindset Explain the basis for and importance of engineering ethics Describe the different engineering disciplines Recognize and utilize academic and personal student resources available at UTATeam ProjectThe
Paper ID #28041Partnering with Occupational Therapists for First-Year Design ProjectsDr. Todd France, Ohio Northern University Todd France is the director of Ohio Northern University’s Engineering Education program, which strives to prepare engineering educators for the 7-12 grade levels. Dr. France is also heavily involved in de- veloping and facilitating the Introduction to Engineering course sequence at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder where his research focused on pre-engineering education and project-based learning.Dr. J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an
Engineers and Entrepreneurial Thinking Frank T. Koe, Ph.D. Penn State University College of Engineering“The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed withoutchanging our thinking.” ~Albert Einstein~This GIFTS presentation acknowledges that engineering studies coupled with exposure toentrepreneurship training develops a mindset that contributes to innovation and creative solutionsto complex problems.Through exposure to entrepreneurial thinking, engineering students are encouraged to identifyneeds and solve problems that create positive change. Although engineering design is a
holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to beginning his doctoral studies, Hassan worked for five years at General Electric where he graduated from their Edison Engineering Development Program (EEDP) and then worked as a gas turbine fleet management engineer. In addition to his technical role, Hassan supported the recruiting, interview, and selection process of the EEDP Program, where he mentored interns, co-ops and Edison associates from the Middle East and Africa regions by developing and teaching a technical training cur- riculum, providing guidance for graduate school applications, and providing
team received Best Paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Daniel M. Ferguson is CATME Managing Director and the recipient of several NSF awards for research in engineering education and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the
students acclimate to life at the University. Topics such as timemanagement, course registration, academic policies and campus resources are discussed in thecourse. Sections were all advisor-taught and were designated by special populations(Engineering Learning Community, Peer Mentor, transfer), and by major for a total of 31sections. UNIV E101 instructors met bi-weekly as a group to discuss course assignments, lessonplans, and policies, and to share ideas on topics like student engagement, and classroominteraction and management. For Academic Year 2018/19, (AY 1819) COE administered UNIVE101 using a similar model as the previous year - that being an in-person, seminar-style deliveryformat.components of the courseAlthough the delivery format of
the student entrepreneurship club and as the State Partner for the FIRST LEGO League Program—a nationally recognized program that incorporates robotics with innovation and community engagement. He holds a PhD and BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky.Prof. Michael W. Prairie, Norwich University Dr. Prairie is an Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Norwich University in Vermont where he teaches electrical engineering courses and guides undergraduate student research in electrical system design. Prior to joining Norwich he spent 10 years in industry developing sensor systems after serving as an officer managing Science & Technology development programs for 15 years in
design experiences.explore their potential through various course contents, The author’s previous works [1-6] describe the detailstopics, and activities integrated with the EML about the Freshman Engineering Discovery courses that havepedagogical approach. In order to indirectly assess and been running for more than ten years at Marquette Universitymeasure how freshman engineering students have built – Opus College of Engineering. The main objective of thetheir engineering entrepreneurial mindset through these two-semester course integrated with EML is to provide newtwo semester courses, course surveys were given to engineering students with a vision as engineers with anstudents twice a
, and associate dean for student affairs and curriculum at the college from 2004 to 2018. Dr. Perry’s research interests include semiconductor device modeling, embedded systems design, and engineering education. He is an electrical and computer engineering program evaluator for ABET, Inc, a senior member of the IEEE, and a member of ASEE.Dr. Charmane Caldwell, Dr. Charmane V. Caldwell is the Director of Student Access at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering (COE). As Director, Charmane leads a comprehensive effort to increase the number of underrepresented undergraduate minorities and women in engineering. She has developed and managed several reten- tion programs at the college: Engineering Concepts Institute (ECI
SchoolLunch program [11].At GU, the freshman engineering cohort is typically divided across three sections. Within eachsection, students are assigned to multidisciplinary teams comprising typically between 5-6 members.Once the teams are formed, they will spend the next 6 weeks developing their proposal. Along theway, multiple interim progress reports are submitted and evaluated. At the end of 6 weeks, thestakeholders are invited to class to score the competing designs as each team makes a presentation.At the end of the competition design phase, the winning design from each section advances to theconstruction phase. At this point, materials are acquired and the team leader blends in students fromnon-winning teams. In this way, they learn valuable
Colorado State University, specializing in structural engineering. She conducts research on the inspection, management and renewal of existing structures, and on diversity, equity and diversity in engineering education.Dr. Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University Tom Siller is an Associate Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Colorado State University. He has been a faculty member at CSU since 1988. 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Full Paper: An Evaluation of a First-Year Civil Engineering Student Group Dynamics InterventionIntroductionWomen and people of color are underrepresented in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math(STEM
Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity of undergraduate and graduate students, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching.Dr. Mahnas Jean Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University Dr. Jean Mohammadi-Aragh is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engi- neering at Mississippi State University. Dr. Mohammadi-Aragh investigates the use of digital systems to measure and support engineering education, specifically
strugglemore in the class than their counterparts, including underprepared students, and underrepresentedminorities. This paper will show all students benefit from these resources as evidenced byincreased first semester engineering retention and class success rates.IntroductionIn Fall 2015, the University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) created a new course designed to aidstudents in problem solving and the use of computer programming in a highly active andcollaborative environment, calling it Engineering Problem Solving. This course uses activelearning methodologies while implementing peer instruction to enhance the student’s ability tosolve practically applied problems, while appealing to the largest base of students possible,especially underprepared
Paper ID #28076Increasing first-year student motivation and core technical knowledge throughcase studiesMs. Darlene Spracklin-Reid P.Eng., Memorial University Darlene Spracklin-Reid is a lecturer in the Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at Memorial University. She received her B.Eng (Civil) from Memorial University of Newfoundland in 1995. After working as a geotechnical designer and a project manager in the construction industry, she earned a B.Ed (2004) and began a career in post-secondary education. She is currently the chair of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Newfoundland and Labrador, and has served
at a lower math levelinto CEAS-Exploratory (EXEP) cohorts designed to help promote academic success. Thesecohorts are not formed based on major. Cohort classes for these groups include MATH 1110,(Algebra II); ENGR 2100 (an engineering-flavored first-year experience seminar course), andENGR 1002 (a problem-solving course designed to complement MATH 1110), along with oneor two general education courses. ENGR 2100 is designed to expose students to effective studyhabits, time management skills, and to help them recognize and implement the habits needed topursue engineering, computer science, or engineering technology as a major of study. Thecourse makes heavy use of material from Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a RewardingCareer [4
Paper ID #28057GIFTS: Introduction to Technical Graphics and Hand Sketching Using aTablet and StylusMr. William Cohen, The Ohio State University William Cohen is a Lecturer for the Fundamentals of Engineering program at The Ohio State University: a 2 semester course sequence for first-year engineering students focusing on programming in MATLAB, computer aided drawing in SolidWorks, and a semester long Advanced Energy Vehicle design project. William has also received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering and M.S. in Nuclear Engineering from Ohio State. 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania
life, effectiveness oflearning, scheduling and class hours, and evaluation. 2Assuming academic responsibility may be among the most difficult transitions highschool students face in the first year of college. In fact, American high school studentsspend about 30 hours in class per week and 5 hours per week studying; while collegestudents spend approximately 15 hours each week in class and are expected to studyabout 30 hours.3 Although this 2:1 ratio of hours studying to hours in class may be typicalfor most college students, the demands of engineering programs are even higher,requiring better time management. But not all students enter college with the same studyskills and discipline. In fact, many first year students do not put in adequate
curriculum design, including the incorporation of entrepreneurial thinking into the engineering curriculum and especially as pertains to First-Year Engineering.Dr. Lauren H. Logan, Ohio Northern University Lauren H. Logan is an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at Ohio Northern Uni- versity. Her research focuses on quantifying the impacts of thermal pollution from thermoelectric-power- plant water use on aquatic ecosystems. She earned her Ph.D. from the Energy-Water-Environment Sus- tainability program at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Lauren is active in Tau Beta Pi, and the Sustainability Committee of the Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) through the American
Chemical Engineering. She coordinated STEM outreach for the Leonard C. Nelson College of Engineering and Sciences.Dr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Depart- ment of Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She has been active in improving undergraduate education including developing laboratories to enhance experimental design skills and mentoring and guiding student teams through the capstone design and a translational course following capstone design. In her Director role, she works closely with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including