Conference Session

K-12 Outreach Initiatives

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven Fisher; Jed Lyons

/dge/programs/gk12/2. Bottomley, L., Parry, E., Brigade, S., Coley, L.T., Deam, L., Goodson, E., Kidwell, J., Linck, J., and Robinson, B. (2001). Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a GK-12 Grant Outreach Program. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1692.3 Bottomley, L., Parry, E., Washburn, S., Hossain, A., Meyer, R. (2000). Engineering Students in K-12 Schools. Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1692.4. deGrazia, J., Sullivan, J., Carlson, L., and Carlson, D. (2001). A K-12/University Partnership: Creating Tomorrow’s Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 4, 557

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Keshav Varde

Rates,” NACME Research Letter, Vo. 2 (2), 1991. 6. Snyder, N., and Bowman, B., “Improving the Pre-Engineering Education of Low-Income Minority Youth: Lessons from a Demonstration Project,” ASME Tech. Soc. Publ., Vol. 2, 1-6, 1989. 7. Baker, G., “Pre-College Preparation of Minority Students for Careers in Engineering,” Trans. of the American Nuclear Soc., Vol. 46, 35-36, 1984. 8. Das, M., “Novel Summer Camp for the Underrepresented Minority High School Students,” Proc. ASEE Annual Conf., Washington, D.C., 1997. 9. Engineering Institutions Ranked by Minority Retention Rates and Relative Retention Index, NACME Research Letter, Vol. 4, 1997. 10.Bibliographical InformationKeshav S. Varde is a Professor of

Conference Session

Professional Ethics in the Classroom

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Carsten Ahrens

Conference & Exposition Copyright @ 2004, American Society for Engineering“12. Introduction to Engineering Ethics, Roland Schinzinger, Mike W. Martin McGraw-Hill, 2000, ISBN 0-07-233959-413. Engineering Ethics, Charles B. Fleddermann, The Prentice Hall, 1999, ISBN 0-13-784224-414. Environmental Ethics Today, Peter S. Wenz, Oxford University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-19-513384-615. A Practical Companion to Ethics, Anthony Weston, Oxford University Press, 2002, ISBN 0-19-514199-7Biographical InformationProf. Dr. Carsten D. Ahrens, born 04.01.1944Department of Civil Engineering and GeoinformationProfessor for Mathematics, Building and Environmental Physics, Technical MechanicsFachhochschule Oldenburg/Ostfriesland

Conference Session

Innovative Ideas for Energy Labs

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Gregory Davis

Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2003-1133, 2003.3. Ken French, “Recycled Fuel Performance in the SR-30 Gas Turbine,” Proceedings of the 2003 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2003-1133, 2003.4. T. Witkowski, S. White, C. Ortiz Dueñas, P. Strykowski, T. Simon, “Characterizing The PerformanceOf The Sr-30 Turbojet Engine,” Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2003-1133, 2003.5 . B. R. Munson, D. F. Young, and T. H. Okiishi, “The Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics”.Biographical InformationDR. GREG DAVIS is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, formerly known asGMI Engineering & Management Institute. Acting

Conference Session

Current Issues in Aerospace Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Wayne Cottrell

) ANew Mexico St U (Las Cruces) B BMDNorthern Arizona U (Flagstaff) BPhoenix Coll (AZ) APueblo Comm Coll (CO) ARocky Mountain Coll (Billings, MT) BSalt Lake Comm Coll (UT) A ASouth Dakota Sch of Mines & Tech (Rapid City) BSouthwestern Indian Polytech Inst (NM) ATrinidad St Jr Coll (CO) AU of Arizona (Tucson

Conference Session

Entrepreneurial/Innovative Communication

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Roxanne Spray; Lori Donath; Nancy Thompson; Theresa McGarry; Elisabeth Alford

Session Number : 3561 Linguistic Evidence of Cognitive Distr ibution: Quantifying Lear ning Among Under gr aduate Resear cher s in Engineer ing L. Donath, R. Spr ay, E. Alfor d T. McGar r y and N. Thompson Univer sity of South Car olinaAbstractThe Research Communication Studio at the University of South Carolina nurtures undergraduatelearning in engineering through guided interaction among student peers, near-peer graduatementors, and faculty members. The RCS bases its pedagogical approach on Dorothy Winsor’sconcept of thought and knowledge as a network distributed among members

Conference Session

Innovative Classroom Techniques

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Yasar Demirel

& Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education12. M.S. Zwyno, Engineering Faculty Teaching Styles and Attitudes toward Student-Centered and Teaching- Enabled Teaching Strategies, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 1122, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).13. M.S. Zywno, A contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2351, Nashville, Tennessee (2003).14. D. Elger, J. Beller, S. Beyerlein, B. Williams, Performance Criteria for Quality in Problem Solving, Proceedings of 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Session 2230

Conference Session

Student Teams & Active Learning

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Steven Zemke; Jennifer Beller; Donald Elger

Session 2131 Tailoring Cooperative Learning Events for Engineering Classes Steven C. Zemke, Donald F. Elger, Jennifer Beller University of Idaho/University of Idaho/Washington St. UniversityAbstractFaculty value high student engagement that leads to high learning outcomes. While high studentengagement is frequently difficult to achieve, numerous studies have shown that cooperativelearning events produce greater student engagement in a wide variety of disciplines. However,many students have had negative experiences with "group work" and are hesitant to

Conference Session

Practice/Partnership/Program Issues

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Tsung-juang Wang

college oftechnology deemed as being more important than the practical technique and ability. (3) According to the industry, the work technique and related affaires are ranked at the topand the architecture and construction management and practical ability stay at the bottom forthose four subjects of the course of architectural practices at present wherein practicalknowledge is deemed as being more important than the curricular context of architecture incollege of technology. (4) Areas calling for emphasis of the extent of important five years later as predicated bythe industry are: a. QC and QC practices are ranked at the top in the practical technique and ability appliedin architectural and construction practices; b

Conference Session

Outreach and Recruitment

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Dae-Wook Kim

minority elementarygrade students,” Engineering Education, October1987, pp. 64-65.[5] Mary B. Vollaro, “Field Trips: An innovative approach in teaching Page 9.199.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education‘Manufacturing Processes’ to traditional undergraduates,” Proc. 2002 ASEE Annual Cof.,Session 2559, CD-ROM, 12 pages, June 2002, Montréal, Quebec Canada.[6] Hesham Shaalan, “Field trips: a teaching tool in an introductory course on ProcessIndustry,” Proc. 2003 ASEE Annual Conf. Session 3660, CD-ROM, 5 pages

Conference Session

Design and Manufacturing Experiences II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Charles Coleman; Jennifer Craig

communication scoresCompetition Competition SPS 6 SPS 7 SPS 8 a SPS 8 b Team nameRank Score1 925 3 3 4.5 4.5 Pukin’ Dogs2 613 3 4 3.5 4 Flying Fokkers3 316.5 5 3 4.5 5 Chapter 114 290 3 2 4.5 4 Eggcellent5 244 4 3 3.5 4 MotherGoose6 215 4 4 5 4 Superfly7 198 4 4 4 4

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade: Outside Class

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Kirk Schulz; Noel Schulz

: Lessons LEA/RNed”, Proceedings of the 1998 Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Session 1213.10. R.M. Marra and Thomas A. Litzinger, “Learning to Juggle: A Model for New Engineering Faculty Development, Proceedings of the 2000 Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Session 3575.11. R.Brent et. al, “Engineering Faculty Development: A Multicoalition Perspective”, Proceedings of the 2000 Annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Session 2630.12. W. Campbell, “Mentoring of Junior Faculty”, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Vol. 56, No. 1, Spring 1992, pp. 75-78.13. P. Boyle and B. Boice, “Systematic Mentoring for New Faculty Teachers and Graduate

Conference Session

Interdisciplinary Approaches

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Jessica Matson; David Elizandro

hours.EnvironmentThe Department of Industrial Engineering at Tennessee Technological University offers twocourses in Engineering Economy. Course Outcomes for the three-credit-hour course, IME 3100,are presented below. Course Outcomes for the two-credit-hour course, IME 3110, are outcomesa through d. a. Summarize concepts of time value of money. Cash flow diagrams; compound, nominal, and effective interest rates; and equivalence. b. Perform interest formula calculations for cash flow diagrams. Present worth, annual equivalence, future worth, and internal rate of return for single, uniform, and gradient Page 9.1371.2 series payments

Conference Session

The Climate for Women in Engineering

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Dona Johnson; Harriet Hartman; Beena Sukumaran

high enrollment and subsequent employment of women in thefield. In addition, there are facilitating conditions, which support women’s participation inengineering venues. In Kerala, India these conditions appear to have come together to createconditions that seem to facilitate higher enrollment of women in engineering. The various Page 9.674.6factors that appear to facilitate engineering enrollment includes a less patriarchal socialestablishment, greater encouragement of women to continue in science and mathematics, and asocial system that values intellectual development.Bibliography 1. Sukumaran, B., and Hartman, H. (2002), “Lessons from

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Case Studies

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Alice Trussell

improper citation of resources to plagiarism. This paper willfocus on the convergence of these important contextual elements followed by specific ways thatengineering and library faculty can partner to include ethics within the context of bothprogrammatic and course offerings. Engineering librarians and faculty are encouraged to sharefurther ideas of specific subject content applicable to the infusion of ethics in course instruction.IntroductionChanges in engineering education are visible on several fronts. ABET 2000+ introduced a hostof challenging expectations that encompass values as well as scales of academic achievements.Colleges of Engineering are working more closely with partner corporations. New engineeringstudents bring with them

Conference Session

Teaching Innovations in Architectural Engineering

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

David Cowan

finalgrades) students were asked to fill out a questionnaire summarizing their impressions of workingwith Architectural Desktop 3.3 (see Appendix A). The questionnaire was distributed and filledout in absence of the instructor.5.3 Architectural Desktop (ADT) Use in Industry To understand the type and extent of the use of ADT in the local Indianapolisarchitectural community, several (20) architectural firms were surveyed via short telephoneinterviews (see Appendix B). The purpose of this stage of the study was to compare the type andextent of use of the software in industry to that within the classroom setting, as well as to gain aninsight into the software’s attributes and limitations within each firm. Telephone interviewswere conducted over a

Conference Session

Student Teams & Active Learning

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard Bannerot

Engineering Education, January 1997, pp. 17-25.2. James L. Brickell, David B. Porter, Michael R. Reynolds and Richard D. Cosgrove, “Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods,” Journal of Engineering Education, July, 1994, pp. 259-262.3. David Hunkeler and Julie E. Sharp, Assigning Functional Groups: The Influence of Group Size, Academic Record, Practical Experience, and Learning Style, Journal of Engineering Education, October, 1997, pp. 321-332.4. Mary McCaulley, “The MBTI and Individual Pathways in Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, July/August, 1990, pp. 537-542.5. R. M. Felder, G. N. Felder, and E. J. Dietz, “The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering

Conference Session

Knowing Students: Diversity & Retention

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

J.D., Christine Andrews; Leslie Wilkins

Technology Council, EnsuringA Strong U.S. Scientific, Technical, and Engineering Workforce in the 21st Century. April, 2000. p. 3. 12. Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering andTechnology Development, Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering andTechnology, 2000. 13. National Science Foundation, Grant Proposal Guide. 14. Goodman Research Group, Final Report of the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE)Project, Cambridge, MA, April 2002. 15. Campbell, Patricia B., E. Jolly, L. Hoey, and L.K. Perlman, Upping the Numbers: Using Research-BasedDecision Making to Increase Diversity in the Quantitative Disciplines, A Report Commissioned by

Conference Session

Recruiting/Retention Lower Division

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Chih-Ping Yeh

University, 1990.8. G. Zhang, T. Anderson, M. Ohland, R. Carter and B. Thorndyke, “Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation and Retention: A Longitudinal and Cross-institutional Study,” Proceedings of 2002 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 2793, June 16-19, 2002, Montreal, Canada Page 9.1294.7“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright© 2004, American Society for Engineering”CHIH-PING YEHDr. Yeh received his B.S. degree in Electronic Engineering from Taiwan, M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineeringfrom Northwestern University in Evanston, IL, M.S

Conference Session

TC2K and Assessment

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Peter Shull; John Wise

of Instruction, 3rd Edition, 1990, Harpers Collins:NY.6. Rossett, Allison, Training Needs Assessment, 1987, Educational Technology Publications: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.7. Rogers, Everett M., Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition, 1995, The Free Press: NY. Page 9.573.8 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationJOHN C. WISEJohn Wise is the Director of Engineering Instructional Services at Penn State's College of Engineering. He earnedhis B. A. in Liberal Arts from

Conference Session

Learning & Teaching Issues

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Vladimir Briller; John Carpinelli

the student; the instructor’s name; and the time when the course was taken. Page 9.1046.2 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering4. Limitations and Delimitations of the StudyThe primary limitation of this study is its quasi-experimental design, because students could notbe randomly assigned to DL and FTF courses.There are three major delimitations of the study: (a) Records prior to 1995F were not included. (b) Undergraduate records of graduate students (and vice-versa) were not

Conference Session

Nontechnical Skills for Engineering Technology Students

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Michael Kozak

Segregation of Occupations. Handbook of Gender & Work. (Ed: G. N. Powell). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 125-1417 American Association of University Women. (1992). How Schools Shortchange Girls, Executive Summary. 8 Phillips, J. A. & Wilson, N. (2000). Role Models in Engineering and Technology. Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education.9 Davis, B. (2002). A Shortage of Technology Job Candidates and an Abundance of Women in the Workplace: Why the Dilemma? Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education.10 Hanna, E. (2000). The Academy at Rutgers for Girls in Engineering and Technology (TARGET). Conference Proceedings

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Ehsan Sheybani, Virginia State University

; Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationTable 1. Data for the effectiveness and attitude Group A (10 Students) – Control Group Satisfaction Effectiveness Efficiency Value AttitudeSatisfaction 0.656Effectiveness 0.316 0.746Efficiency 0.318 0.408 0.689Value 0.264 0.254 0.257 0.703Attitude 0.360 0.107 0.241 0.490 0.789 Group B (10 Students) – Study GroupSatisfaction 0.645Effectiveness 0.331

Conference Session

Scholarship in Engineering Technology

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Abi Aghayere

Education (http://qemnetwork.qem.org/SPmonograph.html) 10. Ransdell, Lynda B, (2001) “Using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model to increase the Productivity in Health Education Faculty”, International Electronic Journal of Health Education, 4:276-282, http://www.iejhe.org 11. http://.wsu.edu/~aaa/scholarlydefinitions.htm 12. Middaugh, Michael F, (2001) “Understanding Faculty Productivity – Standards and Benchmarks for Colleges and Universities,” Jossey-Bass Publications, San FranciscoABI AGHAYEREAbi Aghayere is associate professor of civil engineering technology at Rochester Institute of Technology and theFaculty Associate for Scholarship in CAST. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Lagos,a S.M. in

Conference Session

Retention: Keeping the Women Students

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Rose Marra; Cherith Moore; Mieke Schuurman; Barbara Bogue

Session 1392 Assessing Women in Engineering (AWE): Assessment Results on Women Engineering Students Beliefs Rose M. Marra, Cherith Moore,; Mieke Schuurman; Barbara Bogue University of Missouri – Columbia / The Pennsylvania State UniversityIntroductionWomen in Engineering (WIE) programs around the United States are a crucial part of ourcountry's response to the need for more women in engineering professions1. For Women inEngineering (WIE) programs to be maximally effective, they must have access to validatedassessment instruments for measuring the effectiveness of their recruitment and retentionactivities for women in

Conference Session

Engineers & Engineering Education in Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, and Turkey

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Lerzan Özkale; Fatma Küskü; Gülsün Saglamer

in most of the developed countries [5, 6, 7]. There are several reasons to that:engineering profession is still an attractive one in terms of social status; engineers are employedin a large spectrum and not only in their own field; top management positions are generallyoccupied by engineers. This is why boys as well as girls continue to prefer engineeringdepartments to other fields of study. This explains why the enrolment rate in engineering inTurkey is not decreasing, as it is the case in most of the developed western countries. Yet theenrolment of women in engineering education is almost half of the overall women enrolment inhigher education in Turkey which is 42.6%.Kennedy and Parks [8] stated that the reasons of low female participation

Conference Session

Faculty Reward System Reform

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Stanford Thomas; Donald Keating

Session 2155 Issues Driving Reform of Faculty Reward Systems to Advance Professional Graduate Engineering Education: Differentiating Characteristics Between Scientific Research and Engineering D. A. Keating,1 T. G. Stanford,1 J. M. Snellenberger,2 D. H. Quick,2 I. T. Davis,3 J. P. Tidwell,4 D. R. Depew,5 G. R. Bertoline,5 M. J. Dyrenfurth5 A. L. McHenry,6 D. D. Dunlap,7 S. J. Tricamo8 University of South Carolina 1/ Rolls-Royce Corporation 2 / Raytheon Missile Systems 3 The Boeing Company 4/ Purdue University 5 / Arizona State University East 6

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Frederick Stern

1526 Development of Hands-On CFD Educational Inter face for Under gr aduate Engineer ing Cour ses and Labor ator ies Fr ed Ster n, Tao Xing, Don Yar br ough, Alr ic Rothmayer , Ganesh Rajagopalan, Shour ya Pr akash Otta, David Caughey, Rajesh Bhaskar an, Sonya Smith, Bar bar a Hutchings, Shane Moeykens Iowa/Iowa State/Cor nell/Howar d/FluentAbstr actDevelopment described of an educational interface for hands-on student experience withcomputational fluid dynamics (CFD) for

Conference Session

DEED Poster Session

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Prathivadi Ravikumar

Session 1725 TEACHING AND LEARNING ASPECTS FOR AN ONLINE GRADUATE COURSE ON DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY P. B. Ravikumar Professor, Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Department University of Wisconsin, Platteville, WIABSTRACTAn online Master of Engineering program is offered at the University of Wisconsin - Platteville.The curriculum consists of core courses, technical emphasis courses, and elective courses.Curriculum improvements are made through revisions to existing courses and the introduction ofnew

Conference Session

International Engineering Education I

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Yuko Hoshino; Masakatsu Matsuishi; Wayne Sanders

9 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education Session 1660Table 1: Summary of Maximum Loads applied to Bridges Average Strength (*) Maximum Strength (**) Designed by Individuals (B) 88 160 Designed by Teams (A) 154 200 A/B 1.75 1.25 * Average Strength is the average of the ratio of maximum loads applied on bridges to weight of bridges