the instructor on quality costs followed by the evaluation: a. During the first round, students were given the definitions of quality costs and asked to identify them as to whether each of them is a quality cost. If a potential cost is identified as a quality cost, students would then have to classify it as prevention, appraisal, internal failure, or external failure cost. b. The second round of identification was done using the proposed model with the same questions in random order. Students were asked to use the proposed model for validation if they already knew the answer and change it to what the model suggested, if different.4. Chi-Square (χ2) test of association was used
quantity. The week 6 column has the last large/red sticky note on the game board;this is the blanket purchase order representing a total quantity ordered to supply Weeks 6 – 10.Students then issued “purchase order releases against the blanket” beginning with Week 6,represented by the smaller pink sticky notes. In addition, the game moderator added yellow [B]sticky notes to represent a “bill of lading” for the supplier shipment, and yellow [I] sticky notesrepresenting the “invoice” from supplier to customer. Student teams posted payment the sameway it was done in the first half of the game. The additional forms were explained during theWeek 5 break, along with communicating that the blockchain sticky notes, while placed on thegame board, are
A Build torso -- B Build legs -- C Connect legs B D Attach legs C, A E Build arms -- F Attach arms D, E G Attach head & mask F H Attach launcher & disk GTasks A, B, and E had no precedence requirements. Task C, G, and H only needed the precedingtask’s work to complete their own. Task D needed both Tasks A and C’s completed work andTask F needed both Task D and E’s completed work. This fact
, vol. 84, pp. 240-245, 2009.[13] E. B. Ray, and G. B. Ray, “Teaching conflict management skills in corporate training: A perspective-taking approach,” Communication Education, vol. 35, pp. 288-290, 1986.[14] J. T. Garner and M. S. Poole, “Perspectives on workgroup conflict and communication,” in The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice, J. G. Oetzel and S. Ting-Toomey, Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013, pp. 321- 347.[15] J. P. Folger, M. S. Poole, and R. K. Stutman, R. K, Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2009.[16] J. K. Jameson, “Conflict,” in Origins and Traditions of Organizational Communication: A
Integrative Framework for Engineering Education, Sustainability,and Risk ManagementTo design engineering program learning activities and experiences consistent withachieving the engineering graduate attributes and the emerging development of asustainability culture, we integrate three frameworks: 1) the CEAB Graduate Attribute framework (Appendix A), 2) the United Nations (UN) Sustainable development framework (UN Sustainable Development Summit, 2015) (Appendix B), and 3) the Risk Based Process Safety (RBPS) management framework (AIChE CCPS, 2007; Crowl & Louvar, 2019) (Appendix C).All suggest that education, continual improvement and lifelong learning practices underliethe long-term success of sustainable development
Revenue per Banchee from customer 4. Define the problem 5. Deliverables: A. Charter- Project Charter (1).doc or begin A-3 B. SIPOC – in lab spreadsheet C. Specifications of product- Product Specification Sheet.doc D. Review Process Map – In spreadsheet E. Review Customer Specs – Product Specification Sheet.doc F. Produce first Banchees – make 10 G. Get first measurement a. Weight b. Size – thickness c. Conformance to specs H. Quality people do 1st MSA – do an attribute MSALab 2 – Measure 1. Run 10 minute production – 3 times 2. Take measurements a. Weight b. Thickness c. Other specs d. Factory measurements e. Delivery time f
Paper ID #29252Applying Systems Engineering Tools to Model a Food Justice System in anEngineering Management CourseDr. Sandra L. Furterer, University of Dayton Dr. Sandy Furterer is an Associate Professor and Associate Department Chair at the University of Day- ton, in the Department of Engineering Management, Systems and Technology. She has applied Lean Six Sigma, Systems Engineering, and Engineering Management tools in healthcare, banking, retail, higher education and other service industries, and achieved the level of Vice President in several banking insti- tutions. She previously managed the Enterprise Performance
Paper ID #29992Predicting Student Degree Completion using Random ForestTatiana A. Cardona, Missouri University of Science and Technology Tatiana A. Cardona is a Ph.D. candidate in Systems engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology (MS&T)from where she also received her M.S. in Engineering Management in 2016. Tatiana completed her B.S. in Industrial Engineering at Technological University of Pereira, Colombia in 2009. Her research interests include statistical modeling, Operations research and Data Science. She has served as a head teaching assistant for four semesters in operations management and
7.961 Step 2: Final Regression with only task and process conflict Variable B SE B β Intercept 5.254* 0.297 _ Task Conflict -0.376* 0.173 -0.244 Process Conflict -0.458* 0.174 -0.327 2 R 0.235 2 F for change in R 11.988Note: B is unstandardized beta, SE B is the standard error for the unstandardized beta, and β isthe standardized beta. *p < .05. This data comes from a total of 81 observations.Discussion The most immediate
global conference 2004–North America, conference proceedings, 2004.[14] A. L. Sherwood, “Problem-based learning in management education: A framework for designing context,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 536–557, 2004.[15] S. L. Beckman and M. Barry, “Innovation as a learning process: Embedding design thinking,” Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 25–56, 2007.[16] B. Nussbaum, “The power of design,” Bus. Week, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 2004, 2004.
Paper ID #31339Engineering Economy Taught Across Engineering Disciplines: Work inProgressDr. Brian Aufderheide , Hampton University Dr. Brian Aufderheide is Chairperson in Chemical Engineering at Hampton University. He completed his PhD in Chemical Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His areas of expertise are in advanced control, design, and modeling of biomedical, chemical, and biological processes. He has consulted for both medical device and biotechnology companies. He was sole engineer and QC supervisor of a 40MM lb/yr custom extrusion company. He has over 15 years of experience in education developing over
Paper ID #30279Interleaving Lenses to Scale Our Units of Analysis for EngineeringEducation ImprovementMr. Nicholas Jon MonacelliDr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now a professor of integrated engineering at Minnesota State Univer- sity, Mankato, where she is helping to build the Bell Engineering program, and the managing partner of Kaizen Academic
Paper ID #30609Career Paths in Structural Engineering: What We Can Learn from the SE3(Structural Engineering Engagement and Equity) ReportProf. Christina McCoy SE, RA, Oklahoma State University Professor McCoy is a licensed Structural Engineer and Architect. She holds a Bachelor Degree in Archi- tectural Engineering and a Bachelor in Architecture from Oklahoma State University. She holds a Masters of Science in Architecture from the University of Cincinnati and Masters of Civil Engineering (Structural Emphasis) from the University of Kansas. She worked in the structural engineering profession for 10 years before joining
Paper ID #31403Piloting an Undergraduate Engineering Mentoring Program to EnhanceGender DiversityMs. Elizabeth Hart, University of Dayton Beth Hart is a Lecturer for the University of Dayton School of Engineering Dean’s Office. She received her B.S. and M.S. degrees from the University of Dayton, both in Chemical Engineering. She currently teaches engineering design and oversees the Women Engineering Program, part of the Diversity in Engi- neering Center.Miss Andrea Mott, University of Dayton Andrea Mott is a graduate student studying Renewable and Clean Energy at the University of Dayton. She received a Bachelor’s in
Paper ID #31276Development of an Open Textbook for Engineering EconomicsMr. Bradley James Schmid, University of Saskatchewan Brad Schmid is an assistant professor in Civil, Geological, and Environmental Engineering at the Univer- sity of Saskatchewan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Development of an Open Textbook for Engineering EconomicsAbstractKnowledge of Engineering Economics is a required outcome for accreditation in mostengineering colleges in Canada, the United States, and many other countries. This outcome isoften fulfilled by offering a course focused on Engineering