Machining, HVAC, Power and Green Energy Technology,Mining, Oil & Gas etc. Figure 1(b) shows a random PLC troubleshooting equipment at the trainingfacility. (a) (b) Figure 1: (a) First batch of students receiving FANUC training certification in Engineering Technology department at SHSU and (b) PLC troubleshooting station at Amatrol Training.CNC Training and Certification:According to the 2018 Deloitte [1] and The Manufacturing Institute skills gap and future of workstudy’, programming skills applied to industrial robots and automated manufacturing system suchas computer numerical control (CNC) machine are one of the five critical skills expected to beneeded to succeed in the future
introduce topics. In addition to in-class activities, this classrequires several assignments and group projects outside of class; each student is required tosubscribe to TopHat for attendance, lecture questions, discussion, and to help instructorsassess and measure student learning and understanding. A variety of participants were involved (n=80), comprised of 15 female students and65 male students. Of the total sample, 56% are classified as computer science majors and44% non-computer science majors. Approximately half of the class was sophomores(51.2%), while 22.5% were seniors, 17.5% were juniors, and 8.8% were freshmen. Thecourse had two sections (A and B) with 40 participants registered in each section wherestudents are not the same in
ferrite, etc. Even though the textbook presents the picture of dryclinker (Figure 1a), it would be more helpful to show crystalline structures of alite, belite, aluminate andferrite in micro scale. In addition, the textbook published by Cengage only provides a picture of anhydrousPortland cement in figure 1b. The SEM image of Portland cement could be beneficial for students. (a) (b)Figure 1: 1. Pictures of (a) dry clinker and (b) Portland cement [1]Figure 2a shows SEM images of alite, belite, aluminate and ferrite in clinker [6]. With advances in imageprocessing and optical technology, we can provide students visualization of the micro-structures of thesecrystal
be just goin there and repeat what I already know to the students, so mechanical. And the thing is thatafter I hear so many people - everybody’s issues - I feel that teaching itself is a lively thing. It’salive. Teaching is not just mechanics. It’s really dynamic. So, I think that’s the most - that is, Ithink, something influenced me most. And because of this change, this viewpoint change, I thinkmy way of approaching students is also different.We suggest our lessons learned paper be presented as a lightning talk in order to supportdiscussion with other participants who are also developing communities of practice.References[1] E. Wenger, B. Trayner, and M. de Laat, “Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a
undergraduate engineering courses, principally in the following ways: a. Close-Ended versus Open-Ended Problems: The capstone experience should by design be structured so that students deal with an open-ended design problem. b. Unique Answers versus Multiple Solutions: Solutions to problems in core courses of the engineering curriculum are unique, i.e., permitting a single correct answer, with the solution typically found in the instructor manual. In contrast, by its natural variance, the design process of the Capstone admits multiple possible solutions. c. Individual Work versus Teamwork: Core courses typically require individual effort by students on all assignments, laboratory projects
at each iteration based on feedback received and growth in their own andthe collective group’s understandings. Each group assignment extends the work from theprevious, culminating in a SOAR Portfolio. The portfolio includes: 1. Project vision and summary – This assignment requires students to: a. Briefly describe what the product-in-development is and what it can do. b. Examine what they need to do, how they are going to do it, what they will need to accomplish it, and then define what success looks like. They will be required to list several goals for their group to collectively envision the path to completion. c. Describe who will be impacted by the product. Think beyond the client and
B), we asked them to also rate where they think they will have tobe when they graduate. Both surveys asked them to rate (on a scale from 1-5) their current orexpected future confidence and proficiency, defined here as students’ being able to identify theirown educational needs and also being able to develop ways to maintain their competence in thediscipline [3]. For lifelong learning, specifically, we asked students to identify personal areas ofstrengths and weaknesses; different ways to develop the strengths and eliminate the weaknesses;ways to develop broader knowledge; and ways to apply critical inquiry and analysis toengineering problems and to the communications that support the engineering work. On“working to develop broader
student leadership development: A study exploring gender and ethnic identity," Journal of College Student Development, 2000.[6] K. Crenshaw, "Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics," U. Chi. Legal F., p. 139, 1989.[7] b. hooks, Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. South End Press, 1989.[8] H. Y. Choo and M. M. Ferree, "Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities," Sociological theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 129-149, 2010.[9] L. McCall, "The complexity of intersectionality," in
asking questions, defining problems, brainstorming, developing andtesting models or prototypes, analyzing and revising models, using mathematics andcomputational thinking, and communicating solutions to problems. Some benefits of teachingthe engineering design process (EDP) include helping students understand and improve theirworld, developing their problem solving skills and dispositions, and increasing motivation andengagement in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects [5].However, teachers mentioned the following challenges in terms of implementing EDP in theirclassrooms: (a) not having extra time to engage students in the design process, (b) limitedresources and materials, (c) ways to facilitate student’s varied
sameevaluation protocol as in the previous study where the RC circuits test was scored independentlyby the authors, and any differences were discussed and reconciled. Each question was given ascore of 0-2 based on the answer and the reasoning provided.We analyzed the results using the same metrics as for the previous study, using question number2 from parts (a) to (e) in the RC circuits test as a prompt for mathematical-oriented problem-solving skills. We used four different instruments as indicators of conceptual understanding: a)the second midterm excepting a problem that was on RC circuits, b) the RC circuits problem inthat second midterm, c) the post-test of the 12 ECCE questions and d) the qualitative part of theRC circuits test.ResultsFigure 1
research. Teachers have brought up the value of being ableto speak to these issues in supporting the concept of resiliency in their own students. As wecontinue to improve and refine the program, we are interested in gathering stronger data toexplore how these concepts are transferred to classrooms and if they indeed promote increasedlearning and interest in bioengineering.REFERENCES[1] "NGSS: Developing the Standards." https://www.nextgenscience.org/developing- standards/developing-standards (accessed April 6, 2020).[2] M. S. Garet, A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon, "What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers," American educational research journal, vol
Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp
. Kirshstein, L. Banks Amos, W. Jones, L. Espinosa, and D. Watnick, “Broadening Participation in STEM: A call to action,” Washington. DC, 2012.[7] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[8] G. L. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard, “An Engineering Major Does Not (Necessarily) an Engineer Make : Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate Engineering Majors,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 227–234, 2009.[9] Ö. Eris et al., “Outcomes of a Longitudinal Administration of the Persistence in Engineering Survey,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp
, seven students agreed to participate.The demographic information for the seven participants can be found in Table 1. Students wereassigned a letter identity A-G. All of the participants fit into the town or rural categories given bythe National Center for Education Statistics School Locale Definition [15] and are considered“in-state” students who were currently living on campus. All seven participants were 18-24 yearsold, single and had no religious affiliation. There were 6 participants who identified as male andone female. With the exception of student B, who was Asian-American, all participantsidentified as Caucasian. None of the seven participants were first generation college students. Allof them had two parents with bachelor’s degree or
engineeringjudgement to ensure that the right scientific theories have been applied properly.ConclusionThe three-model framework and its application to engineering problem solving is a useful toolfor helping students develop as engineers. The three models can help students better understandthe engineering problem solving format and make sense of the efforts of their educationalexperience in college. Ideally, each engineering graduate has developed an appreciation andrespect for reality, and mental models that intuitively understand how the world works, and theengineering/math models to quantitatively predict outcomes consistent with both their mentalmodel and reality.References[1] R. B. Landis, Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career, 5th ed
qualitative approachprovides a deeper look into dimensions of this experience for women on the transfer pathway andtheir perception of factors contributing to success.Quantitative methodsSurvey data were collected from 414 students aged 18 or older at three community colleges inTexas between April and September 2019. Select demographics of the sample are shown in Table1, more detailed demographic information can be found in Appendix B. The survey capturedinformation on students’ self-efficacy, inclusion, motivation, and confidence in ECS usingpreviously-validated measures from the Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Self-Efficacy(LAESE) [12] and the Academic Table 1: Demographic characteristics of survey
National Cybersecurity AwarenessMonth in October. The module was delivered as follows: 1. Students were placed in teams of four, and first part of the ‘four corners exercise was introduced. Teams were asked to discuss whether it’s ethical to hack, and then add their names under one of the four statements given the phrase “It is Ethical to Hack”. (students did not have to come to a unanimous agreement in their teams): a. Strongly agree b. Agree c. Strongly disagree d. Disagree 2. Case studies were handed out; each group had a different type of case study, all related to ethical hacking and how the
College. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Virtual Writing Group Participation: Surprises & Unintended Outcomes Dr. Lisa B. Bosman, Dr. Erin McCave, Dr. Molly Goldstein, and Dr. Kelli ChelbergIntroduction & BackgroundThis work-in-progress paper emerged from the shared experience of participation in a VirtualWriting Group (VWG) composed of early career engineering education researchers (EER) in avariety of positions at different institutions. In general, this particular group of EERs had limitedresources and access to a peer community at their respective institutions, therefore, the VWGwas formed with the intention to spur EER scholarly activity
(b) an ability to design and conductappropriate experimentation, analyze experiments, as well as to analyze andand interpret data, and use engineering interpret datajudgment to draw conclusions7. an ability to acquire and apply new (i) a recognition of the need for, and anknowledge as needed, using appropriate ability to engage in life-long learninglearning strategies.Now included in criterion 5(b): aminimum of 45 semester credit hours (orequivalent) of engineering topics (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills,appropriate to the program, consisting and
Workshop Electrical Workshop Manufacturing Workshop 1. Did you learn something 1. Did you learn something 1. Did you learn something new new during this activity? new during this activity? during this activity? (a) I learned a lot (a) I learned a lot (a) I learned a lot (b) I learned some (b) I learned some (b) I learned some (c) I did not learn anything (c) I did not learn anything (c) I did not learn anything (d) I was confused (d) I was confused (d) I was confused 2. Did you enjoy the 2. Did you enjoy the 2. Did you enjoy the activity? activity
problems rapidly dropped off. Many of the problemsproduced in the second semester were slight variations on problems already found in the textbookor done in class, so that there appeared to be minimal effort put into developing them. While theymay have had some benefit for students to work through, the benefit to the students creating themwas questionable. This project type was no longer permitted after the second semester of theproject. One example of a three-problem exam problem project that received a high course gradeand has been received well by students in later iterations of the class is presented in Figure 1. (a) (b) (c) (d)Figure 1
. Engineering is Elementary (2010). Available on-line at http://www.mos.org/eie/.10. Ellis, G.W., Rudnitsky, A., and Moriarty, M. (2010). Theoretic stories: Creating deeper learning in introductory engineering courses. International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol 26, No. 5.11. Ellis, G.W, Rudnitsky, A., Moriarty, M.A., and Mikic, B. (2011). Applying Knowledge Building in an Engineering Class: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Engineering Education, 27(5), 1–13.12. Ellis, G.W., and Thornton, K. (2011). Preparing Engineers for Innovation and Collaboration in the Knowledge Economy. International Journal of Engineering Education 2(1).13. Ellis, G.W., Rudnitsky, A., McGinnis-Cavanaugh, B., Huff, I., Ellis, S.K. (2015, June). Designing
underserved populations. The momentum of Humanitarian Engineering inAustralia looks set to continue, creating new opportunities for students and professionalsworking for prosperity of communities globally.References[1] B. Amadei and W. A. Wallace, “Engineering for humanitarian development,” IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 6–15, 2009.[2] K. M. Passino, “Educating the humanitarian engineer,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 577, 2009.[3] B. Allenby, C. F. Murphy, D. Allen, and C. Davidson, “Sustainable engineering education in the United States,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 7, 2009.[4] Sphere Association, The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, Fourth
teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 373–385, 2005.[15] J. H. Newman, The Idea of a University Defined and Illustrated: In Nine Discourses Delivered to the Catholics of Dublin. Project Gutenberg, 1852.[16] J. P. How, “Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems - Version 2,” IEEE Control Systems. 2017.[17] C. O’Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: Broadway Books, 2017.[18] J. Holt-Lunstad, T. B. Smith, and J. B. Layton, “Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review.,” PLoS Med., vol. 7, no. 7, p. e1000316, 2010.[19] B. DiJulio, L. Hamel, C
. R EFERENCES [1] J. Peckham, L. L. Harlow, D. A. Stuart, B. Silver, H. Mederer, and P. D. Stephenson, “Broadening participation in computing: issues and challenges,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 9–13, 2007. [2] O. Astrachan, T. Barnes, D. D. Garcia, J. Paul, B. Simon, and L. Snyder, “Cs principles: piloting a new course at national scale,” in Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2011, pp. 397–398. [3] K. Fabian, E. Taylor-Smith, D. Meharg, and A. Varey, “Facilitating computing students’ transition to higher education,” in Proceedings of the 1st UK & Ireland Computing Education Research Conference. ACM, 2019, p. 2. [4] S. Engle, “Community Engaged Scholars website,” https
entities also allows the experiment of highlydynamic behavior of the network agents that exist and interact within the complex architecture.Some promising research questions related to complex network systems may include: (a) how dointeractions between network agents (nodes/vertices) help to develop new ideas or informationwhile disseminating through the network? (b) is there any threshold at which the informationdissemination becomes a global cascade? (c) what is the rate and extent at which the informationdisseminates? The answer to these questions can be found in many empirical studies of real worldsystems, such as, disease transmission [7, 8]; transmission of computer viruses [9, 10]; collapse infinancial systems [11], failures of power grid
completed. In this simulation, the participants are first presented with a set of instructions on theirtasks. To assemble the toy car, the four participants are given the tasks, respectively: (a) The selection and assembly of wheels and axels; (b) The selection and assembly of tires and rims; (c) The selection and assembly of the base; (d) The selection and assembly of sides and roof; Once the participants are ready to start, the car order along with the set of customerrequirements are presented to the participants. For example, the requirements could be: (a) vehicle must have four tires, a windshield, a steering wheel and a roof; (b) all tires must be of the small-soft type; (c) vehicle base
Mobile Solar generators are utilized in many fields effectively. Figure 1(a) shows MS-325,7.2 kW rated power, 35 kWh battery capacity unit for mobile applications. Another electricutility company, EREC a touchstone energy cooperative custom made a semi-truck size bunktrailer for disaster relief efforts as seen in Figure 1(b) [6]. Worldwater and Power Companyfacilitated the use of one of their mobile solar PV powered water pumping and filtration systemsduring Hurricane Katrina [3]. Similarly as part of Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts, bothFlorida Solar Energy center and national Renewable Energy Center provided their mobile PVpower systems for victims [3]. Figure 2 shows schematic model of a smart renewable energymicro-grid developed by
chronological order in Table 1. Table 1. Topics for Homework Problems/Quizzes Used in Current Study Quiz Problem Topic Designation A 3D Moment Calculation B Equivalent Force-Couple C Method of Sections D Shear Force/Bending Moment E Friction F Composite CentroidOnce the semester had ended and the final grades had been submitted, the instructor analyzed thesubmitted homework solutions and then compared them with the quiz scores
, it should be clarified Athat in this model, there are two paths that can be taken in Astin’s Model, either: 1) Inputs − → B CEnvironment → − Outputs; or directly via 2) Inputs →− Outputs. Since we do not know if there is a A B Cgreater impact of −→ to → − , or to go directly though → − , we later assess if there are differences interms of rankings when we run the inputs and environment variables alone to predict graduationrates, or as a combined set.DatabaseTo assess what variables are most