dark arts (of Cyberspace) universities are offering graduate degrees in cybersecurity,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 26–26, Jun. 2014.[2] M. Lloyd, “Negative Unemployment: That Giant Sucking Sound In Security,” Forbes, 21- Mar-2017.[3] B. NeSmith, “The Cybersecurity Talent Gap Is An Industry Crisis,” Forbes, 09-Aug-2018.[4] A. Bicak, X. (Michelle) Liu, and D. Murphy, “Cybersecurity Curriculum Development: Introducing Specialties in a Graduate Program,” Inf. Syst. Educ. J., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 2015.[5] S. A. Kumar and S. Alampalayam, “Designing a graduate program in information security and analytics,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology education - SIGITE ’14
but could be clearer or more elegant; The program is not professionally indented or documented.• Mastered: The program functions correctly as specified; It is well-written and elegant, uses a professional indentation style, and is well-documented. Assignment Level Outcome a. Simple Digital I/O Apply #1 b. Analog I/O (A/D and PWM) Apply #1 c. Hardware + Timer Interrupts Apply #1 d. Cloud communications Apply #1 e. Local / Serial Communication Apply #1 f. Finite State Machines Apply #1
, respectively, as well as a “Comments/Suggestions” box for open endedrecommendations. These questions (together with the TA evaluation section) provide a holisticreview of all major aspects of a course, allowing the instructor to obtain broad and detailedstudent feedback to support future changes in the course delivery.The rating scale used in the questions of the course evaluation surveys is selected to match thescale of the rating system of each university. Thus, course evaluation surveys administered inUniversity A use a 6-point scale (A to F), whereas, course evaluation surveys administered inUniversity B use a 5-point scale (A to E). “University A” refers to the Department of Civil,Environmental and Architectural Engineering at the University of
and A. Mantzavinou, “Design thinking in development engineering education: A case study on creating prosthetic and assistive technologies for the developing world,” Development Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 166–174, 2018.[15] D. I. Levine, A. M. Agogino, and M. A. Lesniewski, “Design thinking in development engineering,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32:3, pp. 1396- 1406, 2016.[16] M. Palacin-Silva, J. Khakurel, A. Happonen, T. Hynninen, and J. Porras, “Infusing Design Thinking into a Software Engineering Capstone Course,” in IEEE 30th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T), pp. 212-221, 2017.[17] L. B. Nilson, Teaching at Its Best, 4th ed. San
, Michigan: ThreeJoy Associates Inc, 2016, ch.4, pp. 93-116. 5. T. J. Kriewall, K. Mekemson, "Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergraduates", The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 5-19, 2010. 6. S. Purzer, N. Fila, K. Nataraja, "Evaluation of Current Assessment Methods in Engineering Entrepreneurship Education", Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no.1, pp. 1-27, 2016. 7. J. D. Novak, and B. Gowin, Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1984, pp. 36-37, 93-108. 8. M.K. Watson, E. Barrella, “Using concept maps to explore the impacts of a learning-cycle-based sustainability module implemented in two institutional
, "SimPlus: An Experimental Simulation Tool", in Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (ASEE'04), June 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah. Session 2420.8. Rajaei, H. Eid E., Kannungo, D., Ringerberg, J., 2011, "JSimPlus: A Tool for Teaching Simulation Techniques", in the 14th Communications and Networking Simulation Symposium, CNS'11, sponsored by ACM/SCS, April 4-11, Boston.9. Law, A. 2007, “Simulation Modeling & Analysis”, 4th Ed, McGraw Hill10. Harrell C, Ghosh B, and Bowden R, 2012 “Simulation Using ProModel”, 3rd Ed, McGraw Hill11. Chamberlain T, 2013, “Learning OMNeT++, Packt Publisher12. Virdis A, 2019 “Recent Advances in Network Simulation, the OMNeT Environment and its
three materials andmanufacturing courses form prerequisites for the Final Year Project that runs for the last twosemesters and consists of designing, constructing, and testing of a complex mechanicalproduct. During the last year, students can also opt for electives offered in this area, such asAdvanced Materials Technology, Corrosion Engineering, etc. Course outcomes for the MScourse from a recent semester are shown in Fig-1. Materials Science: Course Outcomes Letters in parentheses denote ABET-based program outcomes/performance indicators (a,b,e,j), and Bloom’s taxonomy (cognitive) levels (L1,L2,L3,L4). Upon the successful completion of this course, students should be able to: 1. Understand the basics of engineering materials and
the instructor on quality costs followed by the evaluation: a. During the first round, students were given the definitions of quality costs and asked to identify them as to whether each of them is a quality cost. If a potential cost is identified as a quality cost, students would then have to classify it as prevention, appraisal, internal failure, or external failure cost. b. The second round of identification was done using the proposed model with the same questions in random order. Students were asked to use the proposed model for validation if they already knew the answer and change it to what the model suggested, if different.4. Chi-Square (χ2) test of association was used
Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA., 2013.[3] M. Boynton, “People not print: Exploring engineering future possible self-development in rural areas of the Cumberland Plateau,” Ph.D. dissertation, Engineering Education, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA., 2014.[4] L. W. Perna, “Studying college choice: A proposed conceptual model,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 21, J. C. Smart, Ed. New York, NY: Springer, 2006, pp. 99–157.[5] R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 4 th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 2009.[6] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA
life activities of such individual,(B) a record of such impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment.” ForAmericans with disabilities, the right to equal opportunity is protected by law. Under ADA,hiring discrimination is prohibited and reasonable accommodations must be made for employeeswith disabilities. Particularly relevant to colleges and universities, The Rehabilitation Act of1973 prohibits institutions that receive federal funding from discriminating against individualswith disabilities, as well as from excluding such individuals from participating in or benefittingfrom federally-funded programs and activities. American institutions of higher educationreceiving federal funds are, like workplaces, required to make
theperspective or details that have been revealed, can be thought of as acceptable, or academicallydishonest. These cases have the greatest variety in rationale behind them, but generally centerupon what “acceptable” collaboration is. For instance, we ran into many cases where groups ofstudents had very similar code. Upon speaking to parties involved, the following story mightevolve: - Student A and B worked together closely, but have clearly different submissions via comments and style, and report each other as collaborators. - Student C, in a panic, asks Student B for help after Student B submitted their project. Their submission is very similar to Student B, and thus Student A, but they do not report working with Student A
Paper ID #31009Design Course in a Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Jamie Szwalek, University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Jamie Szwalek is currently a Clinical Assistant Professor at University of Illinois at Chicago in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering.Dr. Yeow Siow, The University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Yeow Siow has over fifteen years of combined experience as an engineering educator and practi- tioner. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. from Michigan Technological University where he began his teaching career. He then joined Navistar’s thermal-fluids system group as a senior engineer, and later brought
Comments sometimes Comments do not advance the move class conversation advance the conversation, conversation or are actively forward but sometimes do little to harmful to it move it forward Frequency of Actively participates at Sometimes participates but Seldom participates and is Participation appropriate times at other times is “tuned out” generally not engaged Class participation deserving of an A grade will be strong in most categories; participation that is strong in some categories but needs development in others will receive a B; a
students working on the project. Inhind-sight, we should have had seven to 10 students both years. As stated in the introduction, wehad seven desired outcomes for each of the students. The rubric below shows the ranking foreach student in the study for the two years thus far. Each student was given a ranking on a 1-10scale assessing their observed performance in each area. Student C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 M Year 1 a 10 10 9.5 10 8 10 10 10 b 9 9 9 9 9 9 9.5 10 c 9
Institute of Medicine, Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011.[2] B. M. Ferdman. (2013, 1 December 2015). Diversity at work: the practice of inclusion in diverse organizations.[3] Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1-24.[4] Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2018). LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583-610.[5] Patridge, E. V., Barthelemy, R. S., & Rankin, S. R. (2014). Factors impacting the academic
recommendations presented arethose of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Mahmoud, "Attracting Secondary Students to STEM Using a Summer Engineering Camp," PhD, Engineering Education, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 2018.[2] D. W. Callahan and L. B. Callahan, "Looking for engineering students? Go home," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 500-501, 2004.[3] M. F. Kazmierczak and J. James, Losing the Competitive Advantage?: The Challenge for Science and Technology in the United States (no. Book, Whole). American Electronics Association, 2005.[4] T. Jarvis and L. J. Rennie, "Perceptions about Technology Held by Primary Teachers in England
. Amazon [cited 2016 September 25]; Available from: https://www.amazon.com/b?node=8037720011.4. Zuckerberg, M. The technology behind Aquila. Facebook 2016 [cited 2016 September 24]; Available from: https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/the-technology- behind-aquila/10153916136506634/.5. Soergel, A., New Application for Drones: Disaster Relief, in U.S. News. 2016.6. Greene, S., Mesa County, Colo. A National Leader In Domestic Drone Use, in The Huffington Post. 2013: Colorado.7. Workforce Data. Oklahoma Department of Commerce 2016 [cited 2016 September 24]; Available from: http://okcommerce.gov/data/workforce-data/.8. Reese, J., W. Hundl, and T. Coon, Oklahoma Agriculture Statistics 2015
learning. Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 1, T3A20-T3A25 (2003).3. Carberry, A., Siniawski, M., Atwood, S. & Diefes-Dux, H. Best Practices for Using Standards-based Grading in Engineering Courses Best Practices for Using Standards-based Grading in Engineering. ASEE Conf. Proc. (2016).4. Ankeny, C. & D. O’Neill. Work in Progress: Aligning and Assessing Learning Objectives for a Biomedical Engineering Course Sequence Using Standards-based Grading within a Learning Management System. ASEE Conf. Proc. (2019).5. Beck, C. & Lawrence, B. Inquiry-based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills. 3, (2012).6. Carberry, A., Krause, S., Ankeny, C. & Waters, C
Paper ID #29222Implementation of a ”Near-Peer” Mentoring Program between a High SchoolTechnology Class and a University Senior Design Engineering ClassProf. James S. Mokri P.E., San Jose State University Mr. Mokri is an adjunct professor in the SJSU Mechanical Engineering Department, 2007 to present, and has taught Senior Design Project, Hybrid and Electric Vehicle Fundamentals, Solar Energy Engineer- ing, Thermal Engineering Lab, and advises post graduate students. He has consulted in these areas and encourages the students to appreciate the hands-on aspects of the engineering education. Mr. Mokri is applying knowledge gained
to minimize the thermal contact resistance betweenthe heat sink and simulator. A flat surface-thermocouples was placed on the top side of the block.Subsequently, a heat sink was mounted on the top of the block and fastened with a customdesigned clamp to ensure good contact at the interface and secure the heat sink against the wind.The assembly was installed inside the windtunnel and additional thermocouples were placed onthe side surfaces of the aluminum block, which were then insulated with foam insulation tape toensure that heat is mainly conducted to the heat sink. The complete assembly before installingthe thermocouples is shown in Fig. 1(b). Thermocouples were connected to NI-9213 cDAQ(National InstrumentsTM) based on LabVIEW for data
College whose excellence and commitment to the workwas critical to this research.References[1] G. D. Ewert, "Habermas and Education: A Comprehensive Overview of the Influence of Habermas in Educational Literature," Review of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 345-378, 1991.[2] L. Holth and U. Mellstrom, "Revisiting engineering, masculinity and technology studies: Old structures with new openings," International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 313-329, 2011.[3] J. R. Mahalik, B. D. Locke, L. H. Ludlow, M. A. Diemer, R. P. J. Scott, M. Gottfried and G. Freitas, "Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory," Psychology of Men & Masculinity, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3-25, 2003.[4] D
Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014. https://peer.asee.org/23015[2] R. A. Linsenmeier, and A. Saterbak, “Fifty years of biomedical engineering undergraduate education,” Ann Biomed Eng, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02494-0 , 2020.[3] J. A. White, D. P. Gaver, R. J. Butera, Jr., B. Choi, M. J. Dunlop, K. J. Grande-Allen, A. Grosberg, R. W. Hitchcock, A. Y. Huang-Saad, M. Kotche, A. M. Kyle, A. L. Lerner, J. H. Linehan, R. A. Linsenmeier, M. I. Miller, J. A. Papin, L. Setton, A. Sgro, M. L. Smith, M. Zaman, and A. P. Lee, “Core Competencies for Undergraduates in Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering: Findings, Consequences, and Recommendations,” Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 48, no. 3
from underrepresented groups and averaged academicachievement. The program objectives are to: a) Enhance the teachers' professional knowledge by providing unique research experiences in modern and advanced manufacturing, b) Use a design thinking approach to help teachers integrating new research knowledge into their class /laboratory activities while motivating young students to pursue engineering careers, c) Support the school infrastructure for long term partnership, and d) Enhance the schools' quality and performance for continuous collaboration with the host university.This paper presents the program structures of the last two summers 2018-2019, feedback fromparticipants, and
description. For example, “it is both mandatory and extremely helpful” and “b/c itwas very beneficial and gave us guidance.” The next most prevalent specific reason was for helpwith their topic (24; 16%). For example, “librarians are great at helping narrow down a topic tosomething we can reasonably write about” and “it helped focus our efforts in finding a topic.”The only reasons provided for not scheduling an appointment were graduating and beingcomfortable with databases.Discussion The students’ feedback was important in assessing teaching effectiveness and consideringfuture changes on consultations. In the fall 2018 questionnaire, the subject librarian wanted toknow if a library session was needed prior to this class. During some
for Civil Engineering in 2025 (2006), American Society of Civil Engineers[2] Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineerfor the Future, Second Edition. (2008) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston,VA.[3] ASCE Body of Knowledge. Committee, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21stCentury: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future. Reston, VA, 2008.[4] B. Chance and R. Peck, "From Curriculum Guidelines to Learning Outcomes: Assessment atthe Program Level," The American Statistician, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 409-416, 2015/10/02 2015.[5] K. Brumbelow, D. A. Fowler, J. R. Morgan, and W. L. Anthony, "Transformation of a LargeCivil Engineering Department Curriculum using the ASCE BOK2
Paper ID #29918Exploring Perceptions of Disciplines using Arts-Informed MethodsMatthew B James P.E., Virginia Tech Matthew James is an Assistant Professor of Practice in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia. He holds bachelors and masters degrees from Virginia Tech in Civil Engineering.Dr. Homero Murzi, Virginia Tech Homero Murzi is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero
University Fullerton, the Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Education at Stanford University, the School of Medicine at Stanford University, and the School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Dr. Carol B. Muller, Stanford University Carol B. Muller is the Executive Director of WISE Ventures, an internal initiative at Stanford located in the Office of Faculty Development, designed to communicate, build networks, and help amplify existing and seed new and needed ventures across the Stanford campus to advance equity in science and engineer- ing. She also serves as executive director for Stanford’s Faculty Women’s Forum. A longtime university administrator, educator, and social
through college.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college- level engineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school ex- perience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellProf. Chris Buergin
seek to describe two cases, Group A andGroup B, from upper elementary school classrooms in the same socioeconomically, ethnically,and linguistically diverse suburban school district in the Northeastern United States.Group A comes from a 3rd-grade classroom that was implementing our “Animal Habitats” unit.The design challenge in this unit centers on a large commercial development in the students’town and the habitat destruction and fragmentation that it caused. Students aim to aid animalsthat have been displaced by the development by moving them to a more natural habitat. Tosupport their thinking in the design challenge, students study related science phenomena aboutanimal habitats and survival. Group B comes from a 4th-grade classroom enacting
activities include control system theory and applications to industry, system engineering, robust design, modeling, simulation, quality control, and optimization.Dr. Byul Hur, Texas A&M University Dr. B. Hur received his B.S. degree in Electronics Engineering from Yonsei University, in Seoul, Korea, in 2000, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, in 2007 and 2011, respectively. In 2017, he joined the faculty of Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. USA, where he is currently an Assistant Professor. He worked as a postdoctoral associate from 2011 to 2016 at the University Florida previously. His research interests include