executive committee of this division (Program Chair 2011, Division Chair 2012, and Nominating Committee Chair 2013). Dr. Allen is the recipient of ten teaching awards at UVA, including the All-University Teaching Award in 2017. Since 2016, he has been the PI on an NSF REU site focused on multi-scale systems bioengineering and biomedical data sciences, a collab- oration involving faculty in SEAS, SOM, SDS, and CLAS at UVA, as well as six partner institutions in the mid-Atlantic and Southeast. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Effect of In-person versus Pre-recorded Final Presentations on Student Learning Outcomes and EngagementAbstractPre-recorded
transparentinstitutional action to enhance diversity and promote inclusive and equitable learningenvironments” [2, p.3]. Despite this growing attention and acknowledgment of the need toimprove graduate education in engineering, cultures and practices in these spaces are seldomcharacterized as welcoming. In response to the above calls, this study explores the engineering graduate student’sexperience, focusing on their perceived stressors or challenges, while considering the student’sdegree and citizenship status. This study is situated in a three-year effort to develop andimplement a mandatory graduate seminar course focused on promoting equity in STEM at anR1, research-intensive university in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. The following sections will
rendered 64 listings for data collection. It was found thatqualifications in job listings referenced mostly soft skills, whereas responsibilities referencedtechnical skills the most. The listings were analyzed to find representation of Student LearningOutcomes (SLOs) as well. It was observed that job responsibilities represented more SLOs thanthe qualification sections. The findings from this study could be used by institutions to bringtheir construction management programs up to current industry expectations. Recent andupcoming graduates can use these findings to understand the skills they need to possess to workin their desired positions in construction.IntroductionConstruction graduates usually occupy a plethora of professional positions within
options forexposure and involvement [4].Two types of learning arrangements, structured and unstructured, as well as two forms ofcuriosity, specific and diversive, have been previously identified and expressed as a matrix [5].Students’ pathways provide insight into the overlapping experiences of learning in formaleducational settings as well informal settings such as the home. Towards the exploration of thecomplex definition and validation of this model, seven targeted interviews were conducted withstudents enrolled in a non-disciplinary engineering program at a mid-Atlantic, primarilyundergraduate, comprehensive, public university. Exploring in detail the unique livedexperiences of each of these students gives insight into the development of
Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 378-398, 2018.[8] D. Roberts and R. Carpick, A DEI task force within a Mechanical Engineering Department, 2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meering, 2021.[9] K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, M. L. Morris, A. M. A. Casper, R. A. Hensel, J. C. Schwartz and R. A. Atadero, "Examining the effects of equity, inclusion, and diversity activities in first-year engineering classes," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[10] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. Knight, C. Swan and C. N., "Intersections between engineering ethics and diversity issues in engineering education," Journal of Civil Engineering Education, vol. 144, no. 2, 2018.[11] M. Eastman, M. M. and R. Yerrick, "Exploring the White
Brook University, and SUNY Office of Provost. He received A.T. Yang award for the best paper in Theoretical Kinematics at the 2017 ASME Mechanisms and Robotics Conference and the MSC Software Simulation award for the best paper at the 2009 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences (IDETC) . He is the recipient of the Presidential Award for Excellence in Teaching by Stony Brook University and the winner of the 2018 FACT2 award for Excellence in Instruction given to one professor from the entire SUNY system. He also received the 2021 Distinguished Teaching Award from the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Mid-Atlantic Division. He has been twice elected as a member of the ASME
extended into other domains, as it has been for general systemsthinking, another key element of system architecture.References:[1] E. Dano, “Augmented ARCADIA Capella based approach for the system architecture of engineered systems,” Presented to INCOSE Canada, Feb. 13, 2023, website: (https://incose- org.zoom.us/rec/play/qK0_yMxsAgwT5GZEEVwggAltKpDmQJk5NBM0AhCMzrE6- KOLNozMAIvUxqLVWkn5BKTY3iair6zxiZFx.mZjttg633nJRGoTs?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=liVYN xq9T3aSYjYJFK5FOg.1677558111981.d3e6fc0a4ca18c2e12583257a0238e66&_x_zm_rhtaid=581).[2] E. Dano. “System architecture, the missing piece of engineering education,” Proceedings of the Mid-Atlantic Section (MAS) ASEE Fall Conference, Philadelphia, PA., Sept. 2021.[3] R. Arnold
flow theory, traffic safety and public transportation. His research approach includes a combination of an- alytical models, micro-simulations and empirical analysis of transportation data. He has authored over 50 peer-reviewed journal articles, over 50 refereed conference proceedings, and numerous research reports to sponsors. He has worked on research contracts valued at more than $5 million, sponsored by the Penn- sylvania, Washington State, Montana and South Dakota Departments of Transportation, US Department of Transportation (via the Mineta National Transit Research Consortium and the Mid-Atlantic Universi- ties Transportation Center), Federal Highway Administration, National Cooperative Highway Research
--35279[3] Gravé, I. (2019, June), Improving Technical Writing Skills Through Lab Reports Paperpresented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—32951[4] Alba-Flores, R. (2018, April), Enhancing Engineering Lab Report Writing Using PeerReview Assessment Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Spring Conference,Washington, District of Columbia. https://peer.asee.org/29461[5] Corneal, L. (2015, June), A Guided Approach to Technical Report Writing forUndergraduate Engineering Students Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23392 13[7] D. N. Perkins and G. Salomon, “Transfer of Learning
opportunities for students to engage with STEM programming.Ann did not specifically mention efforts to broaden participation with engineering, but didmention that this was an area of interest for her. Ann discussed that her work with studentsinvolves both individual meetings as well as group presentations. Additionally, the counselingdepartment sends out information in advance to students. The second case study counselor, Tina (pseudonym), is also an experienced counselorat a public high school in the Mid-Atlantic region who has worked with the program for severalyears. She participated in an initial professional development workshop during the summer of2020 and continued work with the same teacher for the last two years. Tina reports that
graduates/new professionals in CS. Both groups of women were from the sameHistorically Black University in the Mid-Atlantic United States. The questions asked duringthese focus groups covered topics such as: established identity in CS with themselves and others,personal experiences and challenges as a black woman in CS that are gender and/or race related,psycho-social characteristics experienced (e.g. imposter syndrome and confidence), and personalfeedback/recommendations for promoting equity, inclusion, and representation of black womenin CS. Key results revealed that the majority of these women exhibited an identity with CS. Yet,the majority of them also noted a lack of confidence and exhibiting imposter syndrome as part oftheir CS experiences
Reflecting Apprenticeship and Industry Need. 2022ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference, Penn State, Harrisburg, PA.[4] Krutsch, E. (2022, December). Computer Science Education Week: Explore In-Demand ITJobs. Computer Science Education Week: Explore In-Demand IT Jobs | U.S. Department ofLabor Blog (dol.gov)[5] Jarvis, D. (2023 August). Tech Talent Is Still Hard To Find, Despite Layoffs In The Sector.Deloitte Insights. Tech talent gap | Deloitte Insights[6] Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Leaning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.Cambridge University Press.[7] Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeships in Critical Ethnographic Practice. University of ChicagoPress.Appendix ICompany A - Production Support Analyst Degree MapTerm: Fall 1 Course
, “The effect of context on student performance on a homework-styleproblem,” Proceedings of ASEE Mid-Atlantic, Online, 2021.[11] J. Sweller, “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning,” Cognitive Science,vol. 12, pp. 257-285, 1988.[12] J. Sweller, P. Chandler, P. Tierney and M. Cooper, “Cognitive Load as a Factor in theStructuring of Technical Material,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 119, no. 2,pp. 176-192, 1990.Appendix: All Survey InstrumentsFBD Survey AThe rectangle is supported as shown in the figure. It has a weight W that acts through the center of gravityat G.Q1: Draw a free body diagram of the rectangle. Do NOT solve the problem, only draw the diagram.Q2: How confident are you about the completeness
when they participated indiscussions and peer reviews applied research activities.MethodsResearch Design. This exploratory quantitative research study examined STEM graduatestudents’ perceptions of metacognition when they participated and completed the appliedresearch course learning modules. Specifically, this study examined how the inquiry-basedcollaborative approach impacted STEM students' perceived individual (self-regulation) andgroup (co-regulation) metacognition when they completed the applied research modules as partof their course requirements.Participants. Participants in this study were graduate students (n=155) enrolled in the AppliedInformation Technology (AIT) courses at one of the public universities in the Mid-Atlantic areain
master and doctoral dissertations. Dr. Mosleh has received the Outstanding Teaching Award by the ASEE Mid- Atlantic Section in 2018 and the Outstanding Section Campus Representative from the ASEE in 2017. He a recipient of Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring (PAESMEM) in 2022.Dr. Preethi Chandran, Howard UniversityArlene P MaclinJohn HarklessCourtney J. Robinson, Howard UniversityProf. Hassan Salmani Dr. Hassan Salmani is an Assistant Professor in the electrical engineering and computer science de- partment at Howard University, Washington DC. His main research projects are currently on hardware security and trust. Dr. Salmani has published two books enDr. Sonya T Smith
communication will afford students with thecompetencies necessary to navigate the challenges faced by 21st Century engineers.The authors’ experiences teaching interpersonal communication in technical engineering coursesoffers a roadmap for how professional communication instruction can be effectivelyimplemented even in large-section engineering courses to further discussions around diversity,equity, and inclusion. Furthermore, the authors’ research and experiences working in anddeveloping integrated communication programs in engineering and other STEM fields providesthree unique cross-disciplinary case studies at three different institutions that offer clear andtransferrable recommendations for how communication instruction can be
propose policy is critical. For the leadership section,some highlights of what is covered include discussing the paper “What is EngineeringLeadership? A Proposed Definition” [19], specifically how to define engineering leadership andhow to compare it with engineering management. Also, ten qualities of an effective leader arediscussed and students complete a self-evaluation of their own leadership qualities based on“The Art of Leadership” [20]. Individually, students rate each of the ten leadership qualities(vision, ability, enthusiasm, stability, concern for others, self-confidence, persistence, vitality,charisma, and integrity) on a scale of one to ten (low to high) based on their success in thatparticular area. Then, they provide a self
Program,” presented at the 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2006, p. 11.1410.1- 11.1410.13. Accessed: Sep. 27, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/using-service-learning-to- integrate-k-12-outreach-into-a-first-year-engineering-program[22] M. Lima, “The LSU Community Playground Project: Reflections on 16 Years of an Engineering Service- Learning Program,” Int. J. Serv. Learn. Eng. Humanit. Eng. Soc. Entrep., pp. 492–508, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.24908/ijsle.v0i0.5565.[23] G. J. Delagrammatikas and E. M. Waters, “Development of a Multi-Tier K12 STEM Outreach Program in New York City,” presented at the 2018 Mid Atlantic Section Fall Meeting, Oct. 2018. Accessed: Nov. 22, 2022. [Online]. Available: https
, engineering professors, and business officers.Some liaisons had expertise in civil engineering, electrical engineering, and engineering ethics.Four liaisons were in their first year of serving as a liaison, while one was in his second. Eachliaison supported one or two teachers at one or two high schools. Table 1. Summary of university liaisons’ institutions and involvement in e4usa University Liaison Institutional Year(s) with Number of High School (UL) Number Information e4usa Supported UL1 Private, Mid-Atlantic 1 2 schools (2 teachers) UL2 Public, Southeastern 1 1 school (2 teachers) UL3
, which we utilize to gather data for this study. The setting for thisstudy is an ABET accredited Mechanical Engineering program [16] at a public land and seagrant university in the Mid-Atlantic US with a mid-sized course enrollment (ca. 140 students peryear).Course and Design Project Descriptions“Machine Design” is typically a one or two semester course sequence, usually occurring in thejunior year, that builds upon the fundamentals taught in Statics, Dynamics, and Solid Mechanicswhile also serving as preparation for Senior/Capstone Engineering Design experiences[17,18,19]. Thus, these courses provide a key stepping stone from a more structured learningenvironment to a more open-ended workplace-like environment that serves as a culmination
multidisciplinarity of a team drives communication andargumentation decisions. This study investigated how team multidisciplinary (denoted“disciplinary diversity” of the design team) affects the communication strategies employed bysenior-level engineering design students at a large, public university.MethodsContext and Data Collection. This study was conducted on transcripts of student presentationsgiven for the Fall 2019 Senior Design Showcase at a large R1 university in the Mid-Atlantic UnitedStates. The Senior Design Showcase projects were scoped to solve real-world engineeringproblems experienced by industry sponsors. One of the core components of the Senior Designcurriculum is that teams are multidisciplinary (i.e., the teams include students from
HurricaneKatrina and (3) the student selected research project on an engineered system that negativelyimpacted their local community. For each case, we discuss the learning goals of the givenactivity, how the activity was enacted for the class, and finally draw connections between theactivity and the theories of power it emphasized. After presenting the details of each case weshare our reflections on each of them as instructors. Our reflections explore what went well witheach activity, what challenges it had, and what we might change for future implementations.Study ContextThe three cases reported here all happened in a year-long senior capstone course for a multipledisciplinary engineering degree at a Mid Atlantic University with a large engineering
age 497 Graduate University Civil 18-29 Male No No White Student in Mid- Engineering years Atlantic of age 65 Graduate University Civil 18-29 Male No Yes White Student in Engineering years Southwest of age 20 Graduate University Manufacturing 18-29 Prefer No No Other- Student not listed Engineering years not to Kekistani of age say 449 Undergraduate University
’ approach toprocess safety judgements [34], [36]. There were five senior-level chemical engineering studentsrecruited from a process safety course at a mid-Atlantic institution for this pilot. Due toscheduling complications, only three students completed all phases of the data collection process.The participants were selected at random after they filled out an interest and consent form. Theirdata has been de-identified as part of the analysis process and pseudonyms were assigned to thestudents (Alex, Bradley, and Charlie). These students were all male, senior-level chemicalengineering students. The selected participants then completed the three-phase pilot researchstudy that took place over the course of the spring 2022 semester. IRB approval was