Engineering Education, 2017 UAS Curriculum for Students using an Active Learning ApproachAbstractUnmanned aircraft systems (UAS) offer an exciting opportunity to teach students about basicprinciples of aerospace engineering and instill valuable systems engineering design experience.The widespread popularity of UAS, an explosion of affordable and capable systems, and recentadvances in policy by the FAA have created a permissive climate where these may be effectivelyused by students as either a new means to conduct scientific research or as the primary focus of asystems engineering design project. Whether a means or an end, UAS-based projects and coursesprovide stimulating and relevant learning opportunities many students are seeking today.The
design and space systems engineering. Dr. Fowler’s has received over a dozen local, regional, and national teaching awards. He is a Fellow of both the ASEE and the AIAA. He is a member of the University of Texas Academyof Distinguished Teachers. He served as President of ASEE in 2000-2001. He was the recipient of the 1985 AIAA/ASEE John Leland Atwood Award and the 1994 ASEE Fred Merryfield Design Education Award. He currently directs the NASA Texas Space Grant Consortium. He has served as an ABET visitor for 24 programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Approaching ABET Preparations as a Design ExerciseAbstract Much of the preparation of the self-study
Rendezvous Proximity Operations and Capture simulation. Page 12.826.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 IMPACT OF NEW FACILITIES ON ENGINEERING STUDENT OUTCOMESAbstractEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) has established a reputation for providingundergraduate students with a curriculum which has a strong emphasis on application basedlearning. In an effort to improve this learning environment, the campus has recently added a20,000 square foot Aerospace Experimentation and Fabrication (AXFAB) building dedicated toproviding undergraduate students with a premier laboratory
AC 2012-4754: HYBRID COURSE DESIGN: LEADING A NEW DIREC-TION IN LEARNING PROGRAMMING LANGUAGESDr. Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Lulu Sun is an Associate Professor in the Department of Freshman Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University, where she has taught since 2006. She received her B.S. degree in mechanical en- gineering from Harbin Engineering University (China), in 1999, and her Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from University of California, Riverside, in 2006. Before joining Embry-riddle, she worked in the consulting firm of Arup at its Los Angeles office as a Fire Engineer. Her research interests include pedagogy in engineering education and fire behavior
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationConclusionThe on-going “hands on” educational experience continues at Cal Poly with the developmentof laboratory course Aero 572, and knowledge is passed onto a new generation of students.The revitalization of our curriculum continues to face difficult challenges and risk associatedwith implementing an aircraft project into the existing aerospace engineering curriculum. Thepractical experience and the unique applications gained from working with homebuilt aircraftbrings a much needed “hands on” systems approach to engineering practice for the students.The many associated theoretical areas in aerospace engineering that the homebuilt aircraft canbe linked to, such as aerospace structures
aerospace and information technologydomains. As evidenced by the ideas presented in this paper, a great deal of progress can be madeby bringing individuals together in closely related fields to innovate methods of defense thatprotect our critical and other infrastructure. If we do not, we put ourselves at risk as our worldbecomes more interconnected. Industries that once had little concern for attack in cyberspace mustnow become much more aware of the threats and devise defense strategies that best protect theirassets.In engineering and technology, cyber-security occupies only a small portion of the educationalsurface area that is considered in today’s curriculum. It is necessary that new technologies bedeveloped with security in mind. Not only
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Redefining Student Preparation for Engineering Leadership Using Model-Based Systems Engineering in an Undergraduate Curriculum University of Michigan George Halow, Professor, Aerospace Engineering and Principal Investigator Maia Herrington, Undergraduate, Computer Engineering and Instructional Aide, Aerospace Engineering Tony Waas, Department Chair and Professor, Aerospace Engineering Siemens Gil Morris, Strategic Project Manager (retired
Page 15.677.7introduced to the design process and its framework better preparing them for success.Specifically, the use of the progressive approach and the glider design methodology outlined inthis paper gives students a stepping stone to begin analytical modeling of more advancedcapstone projects thus enabling teams to better support and document their capstone designdecisions. It is my hope that engineering educators will use this as a tangible, fun, andinexpensive way to enhance the education of their students in the fundamentals of aircraftdesign.Bibliographic Information1 Anderson, John D. Jr., Aircraft Performance and Design,New York: McGraw-Hill, 19992 Anderson, John D. Jr., Introduction to Flight, Sixth Edition, New York: McGraw
AC 2009-638: A MODULAR APPROACH IN THE DEVELOPMENT OFCURRICULA FOR AEROSPACE SCHOOLS PROVIDES FLEXIBILITY ANDUNIFORMITYJohn Anderson, Oregon Institute of TechnologySergey Dubikovsky, Purdue UniversityRonald Way, El Camino CollegeBradley Harriger, Purdue UniversityBuford Pringle, Butler Community CollegeScott Schaffer, Purdue University Page 14.64.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Modular Approach in Development of Curriculum for Aerospace Schools Provides Flexibility and UniformityAbstractThe aerospace industry is going through a period of radical change. As products becomeincreasingly complex, engineering technicians must be more specialized
applicability of the case method for both aircraft performance and other coursesin the aerospace engineering curriculum.IntroductionCase studies are teaching methods based on historical scenarios that typify the practice of aprofession. Cases have been used effectively in fields including medicine, law, and businessmanagement to provide real-world context to curriculum material and to foster a learn-by-doingapproach to practical problem solving. The use of case studies in engineering education appearsto be more limited than in these other professional fields.Inspired by case-based approaches to engineering education, this paper describes an initialexperience of incorporating a case study assignment into an undergraduate course in aircraftperformance
these tools were to be used in their engineering studies.Aerospace Engineering Program ModificationsThe program review that resulted in the initial rearrangement of the curriculum, elimination ofsome courses in favor of the introductory sequence, and the resulting modifications of coursecontent in other courses have been detailed by the authors in the cited references. As in mostimplementations of new courses, particularly sequences such as these, modifications continueuntil a relative balance is achieved between course objectives and assessment that indicates anacceptable level of effectiveness has been attained. More recently, significant programmodifications have been made to allow concentrations in aeronautics and astronautics withbranching
educator is in thestructured approach in incorporating lifelong learning, whatever the definition or location, whichis still part of ABET ETAC and ABET EAC accreditation criteria and therefore an importantelement in these programs.In this paper, the incorporation of lifelong learning in a hands-on, technology focused, standardsdriven, engine systems laboratory course is explored. The current ABET ETAC Criterion 3student outcome on self-directed lifelong learning is translated to specific course activities,assignments, and assessments. An assessment instrument was developed for an engine systemscourse to evaluate the student’s methods of additional learning of existing technical knowledge.Additionally, the instrument asks students to project their
Paper ID #26422UAS Aerospace Projects as a Catalyst for Interdisciplinary EngineeringDr. Michael C. Hatfield, University of Alaska, Fairbanks Michael C. Hatfield is an assistant professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and Associate Director for Science & Education, Alaska Center for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration. He earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from Ohio Northern University; an M.S. in electrical engineering from California State University Fresno, and a Ph.D. in Electrical/Aeronautical Engineering from the University of Alaska
students in the space flight technical area then musttake the following 13 semester-hours of courses: ≠ Applied orbital mechanics (3 semester-hours) ≠ Attitude dynamics (3 semester-hours) ≠ Systems Engineering (3 semester-hours, described above) ≠ Subsystem Performance Lab (1 semester-hour, described above) ≠ Capstone spacecraft/mission design course (3 semester-hours, discussed below)Under the revised curriculum, students are exposed to topics in spacecraft design from fourdifferent perspectives. The SE Course provides students with a big picture perspective andequips them with the systems engineering tools to intelligently approach complex space systems.The subsystem performance lab
Spacecraft Programs in Improving Space EducationIt has been argued and very well documented by professional organizations,federal space research programs and the experience of many schools in the U.S.and around the world that hands-on, project-based education is very effective forrecruiting, retaining and training engineering students [1-4, 15-18]. Since earlyeighties to mid-nineties, only a handful of universities worldwide had even atoken amount of student involvement in real spacecraft engineering. This trendchanged dramatically in the new millennium with programs such as the AFRL-sponsored University Nanosat Program, the CanSat/BalloonSat program, and Page
academic institutions as well as members from the industryparticipate in the CDIO activities. A number of studies have documented the use of such techniquesin redesigning their curriculum in various fields, from operating like a small company (Säisä,2017) undergraduate design projects (Takemata, 2013), a course in electronics (Svensson, 2012)and systems engineering (Hsu, 2007). The most relevant aspect of the CDIO approach in the context of our course curriculumredesign is that it has been shown to be successful in fostering long term retention of fundamentalengineering concepts taught in the classroom. At our institution (as perhaps with others),constraints on time and resources has resulted in a limited, informal adoption of some aspects
prepared to class were observed to beeffective. Students improved their critical thinking skills and cognitive strategies, reduced testanxiety and were engaged in learning in the classroom. These results show that the approach hada positive influence on students’ attitudes toward learning. The effectiveness of a properlydesigned implementation was demonstrated.Additional courses in mathematics and aerospace engineering are being prepared for deliveryusing the flipped class approach with active-learning strategies. The learning materials are beingdeveloped to incorporate the lessons learned from the data analysis discussed in this paper.AcknowledgementThis research is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF), Improving UndergraduateStudents
applied due to inherentassumptions that are inaccurate enough to cause problems in the “real world.” This focus onmodeling is commonly implicit in engineering curricula [6], [7], but research has shown thatstudents best learn modeling practices through their explicit inclusion in the curriculum [8].One approach to explicitly incorporating mathematical modeling into undergraduate engineeringeducation is through Model-Eliciting Activities [9]. Instead of an instructor-centered pedagogy,Model-Eliciting Activities are student-centered activities in which students work in a small groupto develop mathematical models that describe a particular problem. These activities “requirestudents to mathematize (e.g. quantify, organize, dimensionalize) a situation
ofengineering. Details of the minor program are discussed. Various equipment related to thediscipline are gradually acquired through internal and external funding, endowments and gifts.Additionally, other related equipment already present on campus is gathered at one centralizedlocation. As a result of the establishment of the lab several research, academic and related projectshave started and are currently in progress. Some of these projects and their implications arediscussed. Vast majority of these projects involve students. Student perspectives on the advantagesof the lab and future potentials are also discussed.Key Words: Minor, Laboratory, Equipment, Projects, Research, Education, Students 1. IntroductionA new AERO (Aerospace Engineering and
Paper ID #19671Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineeringcourseMr. Devayan Debashis Bir, Iowa State UniversityDr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineering courseAbstractDue to the advent of technology and the world wide web, online engineering courses have gainedprominence and have become a popular way to learn new content. Universities around thecountry, in addition to traditional face-to-face courses, are taking advantage of technology andthe web to
advanced but strongly specific to aerospace technicaldetails, compared to the general engineering content of the lower division courses. Consequentlystudents must learn many concepts and analysis techniques which are new to them. Theobjective of the work described in this paper is to improve student understanding and masteryand retention of specific technical theories, concepts, and methods as defined by specific ABEToutcomes. The approach is to develop a series of Khan Academy style videos which are specificto aerospace engineering topics which students historically find challenging to understand andmaster.IntroductionAerospace engineering students frequently encounter difficulty in their upper division coursesbecause the course material is not
, G., “Capturing the imagination: High-priority reforms for engineering education” in Educating theengineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington,DC: National Academics Press,2005, pp. 146-450.[4] Seymour, E. and Hewitt, M. N., Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. WestviewPress, 1997.[5] Buning, P.G., Gomez, R.J. and Scallion, W.I., “CFD Approaches for Simulation of Wing-Body StageSeparation,” AIAA 22nd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Providence, RI, 2004, AIAA-2004-4838.[6] Intelligent Light, http://www.ilight.com, January 19, 2011.[7] Cobalt Solutions, LLC, http://www.cobaltcfd.com, January 19, 2011.[8] Chan, W.M., Chiu, I.-T. and Buning, P.G., Users’ Manual for the HYPGEN
reference previous test programs as well as their ownknowledge of aerospace engineering to create new test programs that will properly evaluatemodern aerospace vehicles.While a typical Master’s level graduate degree often takes 18 months to 2 years to complete, thegraduate program at USAF TPS is accomplished in just 11 months. This compressed schedulerequires a very rigorous and disciplined approach to creating the new curriculum. Due to the Page 26.193.2nature of the school requiring both educational as well as training outcomes, and the need tomaximize efficiency of learning, the new curriculum was designed with learning objectives thataimed to
Paper ID #10968Integration of Alternative Fuels and Turbine Research in an UndergraduateClassroomDr. Nadir Yilmaz P.E., New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology Nadir Yilmaz is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Istan- bul Technical University (1999), Bradley University (2001) and New Mexico State University (2005), respectively. His work is in the areas of combustion and CFD. He has been a noted author of about 60 technical papers and reports in these fields. Dr. Yilmaz is
AeromechanicsII. AAE 20401 is an aerospace structural mechanics lab course for second-year students wherethey had the opportunity to use the Virtual Lab software. When implementing the Virtual Labs,we characterized the content, assessment, and pedagogy of the course under the BackwardCourse Design Model to identify how the Virtual Lab software could be integrated into thecoursework. After a year of getting feedback on the software from the students and investigatingthe pedagogical approaches on how to use it, we introduced a new format on the use of thevirtual lab in Fall 2019. This paper describes the latest version of the lab course with theintegration of the Virtual Lab software. The curriculum design, presented in this paper, is auseful reference for
the perceptions of their employers. The surge ofthe modern pedagogical practices in academia such as student-centered learning, active learning,co-teaching, problem/project based learning, entrepreneurial mindset learning, flipped classroom,etc., have helped current millennials to maneuver within the workforce but the gap between theacademic preparation and employers’ expectations still remains at large [1]. This may be becausethe majority of the graduate engineering curriculum trains students to perform straight forwardanalysis with complex equations and does not provide enough emphasis on other skills that areneeded and expected from graduate students in the workforce. Being a part of KEEN (KernEntrepreneurial Engineering Network), most of
was to learn physics principles behind electric propulsion, todevelop computational modeling skills, and to apply the theoretical physics from this study(supplemented by material from the standard engineering curriculum) to real thruster designdecisions; we did not originally plan to actually build such a thruster. As the project progressed,however, we developed skills in many fields beyond those we initially set out for, including CADmodeling, design for manufacturing, fabrication techniques, and interaction with externalmanufacturing facilities. We also gained experience with performing a literature search, as, out ofnecessity, we sought out and compiled sources of information on electric propulsion, and weeventually interfaced directly
Paper ID #30516Acquiring and Implementing an Air Traffic Control Simulator in a HigherEducation Aviation ProgramDr. Meron Lindenfeld, Farmingdale State College, State University of New York Meron Lindenfeld has been teaching in aviation since 2004, and has been with the full-time aviation faculty at Farmingdale State College since 2017. Over his years of teaching, Dr. Lindenfeld has exercised his FAA AGI and IGI privileges in Part 141 ground school courses, covering private pilot, instrument, commercial and multi-engine content. Dr. Lindenfeld also teaches courses in aviation history, airport management, and aviation safety
and grades.7 In this case,the exam averages and grades are also maintained, but are accompanied by an increase in thelevel of exam difficulty.With regard to the homework-quiz approach, the only obvious downside, although a minor one,is that the quizzes take up approximately ten minutes of instructional time. On the positive side,research demonstrates that quizzes facilitate learning, while the reduced instructor workload isundeniable. Some of the student negativity indicated in the survey results seems to comeprimarily from the fact that it is a new approach and they are just not used to it. Interestinglysince initially being employed several years ago, other faculty in the department have adoptedsimilar strategies and, as the students become
, R. E. H. (2016). How do first-year engineering students experienceambiguity in engineering design problems: The development of a self-report instrument, 2016ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana,https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25474[20] A. Abell & K. DeVore (2017). Embracing Ambiguity: A Framework for Promoting IterativeDesign Thinking Approaches in Engineering and Design Curricula, ASEE 124th AnnualConference & Exposition, Jun 25-28, 2017, Columbus, OH[21] J. Hertz (2018). Confidently Uncomfortable: First-year Student Ambiguity Tolerance andSelf-efficacy on Open-ended Design Problems, ASEE 125th Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun24-27, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT[22] S