Paper ID #27698The Search for the Commercial Space Technologist: A Comparison of Avia-tion and Commercial Space-related Postsecondary ProgramsMs. Tracy L. Yother, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Tracy L. Yother is an instructor in Aeronautical Engineering Technology and a PhD candidate in Career and Technical Education in the College of Education at Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Ms. Yother currently teaches the undergraduate Powerplant Systems and Design Supportability courses in the Aeronautical Engineering Technology (AET) program. She possesses a B.S. and M.S. in Aviation Technology. She also holds an
, andsustainability.” Another outcome states that students shall have “an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams,” and “recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-longlearning.” While faculty can teach these items to a certain degree, industry can enhance thelevel of these outcomes if ways can be found that effectively allow industry professionals tointeract with faculty and students.The capstone engineering design class at The University of Alabama in Huntsville hasexperimented with the integration of industry mentors in the classroom for the past 15 years.The mentors have been identified by specific disciplines related to the project, provided onelecture on the topic, and been available to advise the students during the project
proficiency.Spacecraft Detail DesignThe ERAU Spacecraft Detail Design course is the final of a sequential series of courses leadingto graduation in the Astronautical Engineering track in the AE Department. In this track, thestudent concentrates on a specific spacecraft related subsystem and follows through with the Page 12.826.9design and building process. This process is closely related to the NASA Program & ProjectLife Cycle, which is explained in the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook3. The preliminarydesign course precedes this class, but has generally no hardware component. In the preliminarydesign class the students conceptualize a mission and perform
. Page 13.227.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Assessing Progress: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Three Course Introduction to Aerospace Engineering and Related Curriculum ModificationsAbstractA three semester introductory sequence in Aerospace Engineering was implementedconcurrently with the 1999 ABET evaluation under ABET 2000 criteria, and was modifiedconsiderably to account for curriculum changes through the evaluation period of 2005. Asfurther program modifications have since been made to allow concentrations in aeronautics andastronautics with branching occurring during the last semester of the lower division, thisintroductory sequence has become a very important
Paper ID #29520Student Paper: An Engineering Pedagogy for Developing PracticalKnowledge and Hands-On Skills Related to 5-Axis Milling and ComputerAided Aerospace Parts Manufacturing Using Current TechnologyMr. John Vincent Kronenberger, Oregon Institute of Technology John Kronenberger is a senior undergraduate student at the Oregon Institute of Technology dual majoring in Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering Technology. Academic interests include CNC programming, 3D design and modeling, and the application of additive manufacturing technology.Dr. David E. Culler, Oregon Institute of Technology Dr. Culler has an
year with the gap showingincreasing trends from 2013 onwards (figure 2). To aggravate the situation further, thepercentage of women graduates in engineering have steadily increased over the past decade(more than 3 %) but has remained effectively same for AE (at 14%) which is lower than thatof engineering. The trends give an important insight into how minorities are affected in AE.The initiatives by government and universities have increased the percentage of womengraduates in engineering but not in AE. The trends for AE fall behind those of engineering atevery measure discussed above. The discussion while quantitative in nature reveals thatwhile institutional and governmental actions are working for engineering programs, AEprograms and
particularly relevant in a professional major such as engineering, where manystudents enter industry after graduation. While these outcomes are distinct from outcomes tied toframeworks such as CDIO or ABET, much of the underlying intent is the same.3,4 A broadperspective on the curriculum can be gained by looking at the integrated set of outcomes thatwere collected. Students will take different paths (e.g., different technical electives), but in eachcase the subject-level outcomes will in aggregate fulfill higher-level program objectives.An interesting area of future work would be to augment this subject-based outcome mappingwith a higher-level aggregated mapping to ABET or CDIO outcomes. While the majority ofoutcomes captured in this framework fall
University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his in-depth research on Engineering Ed- ucation. He is one of two scholarships awarded by NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Program for Managing Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Engineering Education ABSTRACTUnmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) are an increasingly important aspect of technology. As aresult, they have become a very important tool in engineering education for a variety ofdisciplines. While many physical laboratories or training aids have regulatory and administrativerequirements, the considerations related to UAS are multifaceted and include Federal AviationRegulations, airspace requirements, and privacy considerations. Furthermore, UAS pose aphysical hazard that must be taken into account to protect students, staff, faculty, and
Engineering Edu- cation (ASEE) and conducts research in engineering education.Darius Fieschko, University of Wisconsin - Platteville c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 PLC Training in First Year Electrical Engineering ProgramAbstractProgrammable Logic Controllers ( PLCs) have had a profound impact on industry and society atlarge. PLCs are an integral part of a wide variety of control systems, ranging from industrialmanufacturing to amusement park rides and filmmaking. Programming languages like ladderlogic allow technicians and engineers without formal programming experience to build anddebug complex automation systems much faster than if they needed to physically build arrays ofrelays and
recruiting, retaining and training engineering students. In thelast decade, programs such as the AFRL-sponsored University Nanosat Program,the CanSat program, and especially the CubeSat standard have dramaticallychanged spacecraft engineering education. In an incredibly short period of time(especially by aerospace standards), such activities have helped foster strongaerospace education programs in schools with no history of space activity. Infact, it can be shown that the 'success' of these programs was a direct result oftheir satellite-building activities. In this paper, we will discuss three related topics,(1) the status of the student-built space missions over last ten years, (2) thesignificance of these programs and their contributions to
, inventionand design. The program model has demonstrated its capability in encouraging students to studyand seek careers in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math [STEM] related fields; infurthering faculty research and teaching opportunities; and in promoting the inclusion of hands-on project design to coursework required for graduation.Design Challenge goals and objectives purposely align with those identified by TSGC, the Stateof Texas, NASA, and on a National level as significant in improving and/or maintaining studentinterest in STEM-based educational and career pursuits. Sound program objectives and interestin meeting set goals have enabled the Design Challenge to provide a consistently high qualitystudent experience. o Goal: provide
measuring GRBs on a future satellite. As the challengesfor developing student satellite hardware are significant, a precursor balloon flight will providethe necessary heritage to enable a more costly and complex project. The HEMI was included asan instrument for the Joint Astrophysics Nascent Universe Satellite (JANUS) mission to NASASmall Explorer program. If selected, the HEMI will provide meaningful science to the JANUSmission on the energy of gamma ray bursts.Integration with the Curriculum: The Space Systems Engineering CertificateIn 2007, a Certificate in Space Systems Engineering was made available for students, primarilyin the CoE, who wish to obtain recognition for completing a core set of courses in Space SystemsEngineering–related topics
ofengineering. Details of the minor program are discussed. Various equipment related to thediscipline are gradually acquired through internal and external funding, endowments and gifts.Additionally, other related equipment already present on campus is gathered at one centralizedlocation. As a result of the establishment of the lab several research, academic and related projectshave started and are currently in progress. Some of these projects and their implications arediscussed. Vast majority of these projects involve students. Student perspectives on the advantagesof the lab and future potentials are also discussed.Key Words: Minor, Laboratory, Equipment, Projects, Research, Education, Students 1. IntroductionA new AERO (Aerospace Engineering and
their career. Focused development of the mind is not limited towork-related activities. For instance, reading for enjoyment or learning to play a musicalinstrument, contributes to a person’s life in areas outside of their profession and may influencehow they view challenges in their profession. This paper focuses on lifelong learning as a part ofprofessional development.In 2018-2019 and previous years, the ABET Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission(ETAC) identified student outcomes in lifelong learning as part of Criterion 3 in one of the a-koutcomes [8]. The expectation is that students should know how to achieve the items listed asoutcomes by the time they graduate [8]. Criterion 3(h) for baccalaureate programs stated
Paper ID #19671Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineeringcourseMr. Devayan Debashis Bir, Iowa State UniversityDr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineering courseAbstractDue to the advent of technology and the world wide web, online engineering courses have gainedprominence and have become a popular way to learn new content. Universities around thecountry, in addition to traditional face-to-face courses, are taking advantage of technology andthe web to
AC 2012-4754: HYBRID COURSE DESIGN: LEADING A NEW DIREC-TION IN LEARNING PROGRAMMING LANGUAGESDr. Lulu Sun, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Lulu Sun is an Associate Professor in the Department of Freshman Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aero- nautical University, where she has taught since 2006. She received her B.S. degree in mechanical en- gineering from Harbin Engineering University (China), in 1999, and her Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from University of California, Riverside, in 2006. Before joining Embry-riddle, she worked in the consulting firm of Arup at its Los Angeles office as a Fire Engineer. Her research interests include pedagogy in engineering education and fire behavior
programs and Not to Accredit (NA) for new programs or initial accreditation.A “Weakness” would in general lead to Interim Report (IR) for reportable correctiveactions and Interim Visit (IV) for non-reportable corrective actions. A “Concern” ingeneral does not affect the accreditation and the duration of accreditation would be for afull term although the corrective actions are expected at the time of Next General Review(NGR). While all these findings are required to be related to a specific criteria of ABET,the finding “Observation” is in general not related to any criteria but offered for the goodof a program. It does not require any corrective action.The accreditation statistics for 2006 indicates that 90% of Applied Science programs,48% of
AC 2008-337: PARTNERSHIP FOR MENTORING: THE GEORGIA TECH CSEMSPROGRAM AT AGE SIXNarayanan Komerath, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor of Aerospace Engineering. Directs the Experimental Aerodynamics and Concepts program. Served as Fellow of the NAIC, Boeing Welliver Fellow in 2004, Sam Nunn Security Fellow at the Center for Strategy, Technology and Policy, 2004-06, and Hessburgh Senior Teaching Fellow, 2005.Marilyn Smith, Georgia Institute of Technology MARILYN J. SMITH Marilyn J. Smith, an Associate Professor in the School of Aerospace Engineering at Georgia Tech, joined the faculty in 1997 after fifteen years of industry experience at Lockheed-Georgia (now LMAS), McDonnell
engineering education from Texas A&M University. Her research areas of focus are faculty perspectives and growth through curriculum design and redesign, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, reflective eportfolios and professional development of graduate students related to teaching.Dr. Nate Poling, Texas A&M University As an educator and faculty developer, Nate is interested in leveraging the power of popular culture and multimedia to help facilitate effective learning. In a teaching career that has ranged from the K12 to the Ph.D. levels, he has always stressed the importance of using relevant material in motivating and engag- ing students in the learning process. At the Center for Teaching Excellence at Texas A
following specific goals: Expose high school students, especially those from underrepresented groups, to career paths related to aerospace engineering; Conduct research about the effects of the GFA program to enable rigorous assessment of this and other student and teacher outreach projects; and Contribute to the research knowledge base about STEM career preparation through dissemination of information about the program and its resources, and insight gained from the program’s development and implementation.Selection ProcessThe selection process is an extremely important part of the entire project. Results from surveysof technology students (Figure 1) indicate that math and science teachers can have a
Paper ID #17719Summer Research Program to Motivate Undergraduates for Careers in Un-manned Aerial SystemsDr. Subodh Bhandari, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Dr. Subodh Bhandari is a professor in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Cal Poly Pomona and the Director of its Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) Lab. He received his PhD from University of Kansas in 2007. His current research emphasis is on increased autonomy of unmanned aerial vehi- cles (UAVs), UAV-UGV collaboration, robust and intelligent control, collision and obstacle avoidance system for UAVs, and developing capabilities for widespread use of
School, he learned about the technology of aircraft and earned FAA Certification as an Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic. He continued his studies at the State University of New York Agricultural and Technical College (S.U.A.T.C.) in Farm- ingdale, New York, studying Aerospace Technology, following this by obtaining BS and MA degrees in Technical Education from New York University. Lou began his career as collegiate aviation educator at the Vaughn College of Aeronautics, as an aircraft maintenance technical instructor, and returned ”home” to Farmingdale State College in 1982. During his tenure at FSC, Professor Lou, has taught many sub- jects related to aircraft and engine technology, the history of aviation
Paper ID #31048Assessment of programming pre-requisites and interventions for studentsuccess in an aerospace curriculumDr. Kathryn Anne Wingate, University of Colorado at Boulder Dr. Kathryn Wingate is an instructor at University of Colorado Boulder, where she teaches design and mechanics courses. She holds her PhD in mechanical engineering, and worked at NGAS as a materials scientist.Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Colorado Boulder Aaron W. Johnson is an Instructor in Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences at the University of Col- orado Boulder. He teaches courses in structures and vehicle design, and his research
Paper ID #30393The Implementation of Virtual Labs in Aerospace Structures EducationWaterloo Tsutsui, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Waterloo Tsutsui, Ph.D., P.E., is a Lecturer and Lab Coordinator in the School of Aeronautics and As- tronautics at Purdue University. Tsutsui’s research interests are energy storage systems, multifunctional structures and materials design, fatigue and fracture, and scholarship of teaching and learning. Before Purdue, Tsutsui was an engineer in the automotive industry for more than 10 years.Mr. Ruben D. Lopez-Parra P.E., Purdue University at West
design and space systems engineering. Dr. Fowler’s has received over a dozen local, regional, and national teaching awards. He is a Fellow of both the ASEE and the AIAA. He is a member of the University of Texas Academyof Distinguished Teachers. He served as President of ASEE in 2000-2001. He was the recipient of the 1985 AIAA/ASEE John Leland Atwood Award and the 1994 ASEE Fred Merryfield Design Education Award. He currently directs the NASA Texas Space Grant Consortium. He has served as an ABET visitor for 24 programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Approaching ABET Preparations as a Design ExerciseAbstract Much of the preparation of the self-study
Paper ID #17929Promoting Student Success: Goodbye to Graded Homework and Hello toHomework QuizzesDr. Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Kathy Jackson is a Faculty Programs Researcher at the Pennsylvania State University’s Teaching and Learning with Technology. In this position, she collaborates with faculty on the Scholarship of Teach- ing and Learning through various research projects. Particular current areas of collaboration include instructional design, evaluation, engineering education and learner support. In addition, Dr. Jackson is an Affiliate Faculty in Penn State’s Higher
through various applications. Some of the mathematical conceptsbecome more tangible and relatable for the students if certain applications are attached to it. Afterall, the class is a part of the engineering curriculum, so it is only prudent to expose the students notjust to the equations but also to the real life applications.Example: More often principles such as conservation of mass, momentum and energy are taught froma pure mathematical perspective and very little insight is given to students based on their real worldapplicability. When the author asked a question in the compressible aerodynamics class, “How isconversation of momentum applicable for engine design?”, there was no response to the questionand when asked what is the
Paper ID #18903Integrating Aviation Database Use in Non-engineering Aviation Course De-velopmentProf. Mary E. Johnson, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Mary E. Johnson earned her BS, MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from The University of Texas at Arlington. After 5 years in aerospace manufacturing, Dr. Johnson joined the Automation & Robotics Research Institute in Fort Worth and was program manager for applied research programs. Fourteen years later, she was an Industrial Engineering assistant professor at Texas A&M - Commerce before joining the Aviation Technology department at
mentoringrelationship with professionals working in the STEM fields; (Goals 2 & 3), (ii) engaged studentsin inquiry and project-based hands-on learning to show why science and math are necessary toobtain careers and succeed in science and engineering fields; (Goals 1 & 2), (iii) educatedstudents utilizing a STEM curriculum that meets national and NC standards for science andmathematics; (Goals 1 & 3), (iv) promoted awareness of engineering-related careers andopportunities among K-12 educators, students, and parents and guidance counselors; (Goals 2 &3), and (v) integrated computer technologies and simulation tools to develop 21st century skillsand increase student interest in STEM disciplines (Goals 1 & 2). The three program goals andthe