%202030. (accessed Feb. 26, 2023).[2] D. White, et al. “An innovative hybrid electric drivetrain concept and student project” in Association for Engineering Education - Engineering Library Division Papers, American Society for Engineering Education-ASEE, Honolulu, HI, June 2007, p. 12.212.1–.[3] K. Blair, D. W. Miller, D. Darmofal, C. P. W. Young, & D. Brodeur. Problem Based Learning In Aerospace Engineering Education Paper presented at 2002 Annual Conference, June 2002, Montreal, Canada. 10.18260/1-2—10974[4] “Velis Electro”. Pipistrel Velis Electro. https://www.pipistrel- aircraft.com/products/general-aviation/velis-electro/ (accessed Feb. 6, 2023).[5] “Joby completes second of four system reviews
2022.[10] Hyeonmin Jeon et al. “A study on the development of job training curriculum for operation of electric propulsion ships”. In: Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping 6.1 (2022), pp. 91–98.[11] Athula Kulatunga and Ajith Wijenake. “Power Electronic Skills for Electric Powertrain in Marine Propulsion”. In: 2023 CIEC. 2023.[12] Robert Lea. Vertical Aerospace shrugs off Rolls-Royce exit from flying taxis — thetimes.co.uk. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/vertical-aerospace- shrugs-off-rolls-royce-exit-from-flying-taxis-q3cns86m3. [Accessed 10-01-2025]. 2023.[13] Pitambar Paudel. “Online education: Benefits, challenges and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher
, and the ability tosupport modular equipment.Students are enrolled in a research course and get credit for their work. They have the option touse the credits towards technical electives for their degree program. This course is open to allstudents from all engineering disciplines, including undergraduate freshmen all the way to seniorstudents. They are taught the research methods and processes and apply those techniques on a real-world project. Senior students also serve as mentors to junior students.Literature Review & MethodologyResearch shows that students actively working on hands-on engineering projects learn above andbeyond the traditional classroom instruction. Kokotsaki et. al. [1] indicate that active student-centered form of
engineering curriculum ranging from structural engineering and steel design to infrastructure systems and construction management. Each spring, he co-teaches Project Management Professional prep classes to the Department of Defense community. His research interests include topics in structural engineering and engineering education. He serves as the Chair of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Committee on Education Chair and the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Partners in Education Committee Vice Chair. Additionally, he serves as the Head Officer Representative for Men’s Basketball. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Project Management Professional.Drew Alan Curriston
curriculum, and incorporated newtechnologies to enhance the learning experience. We aim to ensure the program remains relevant,engaging, and meaningful to students.Background informationThe Make to Innovate (M:2:I) program began in the fall of 2011. The program aims to providestudents with hands-on experience in solving real-world problems. The Make to Innovateprogram launched with around ninety students working on fifteen projects. The program aimed toinclude projects operating independently in the aerospace engineering department and provide amore structured environment for the students working on those projects. It also helped tofacilitate additional resources that could be earmarked for said projects. As seen in Figure 1,enrollment has grown and
. Twigg et al. points to the use of technology in the classroom, which hasgrown substantially over the past few decades [6]. Integrated learning systems, grading softwaresuch as Gradescope, and online assessments can often be implemented to streamline large lectureclasses. However, project-based design classes require the assessment and feedback be tailoredto a specific team’s project and progress. Data science courses have utilized peer-graders andmeta reviewers with clear rubrics to successfully scale projects [7]. These techniques lendthemselves well to software projects that fall into the same technical field. However, open-endedcapstone design projects have interdisciplinary solutions. Therefore peer-graders, TAs, orreviewers may not have
maintenance workload, and promote the reuse of ontologyknowledge across different projects within the aerospace industry [26]. Moreover, Arista et al.(2023) presented an ontology-based engineering system for aerospace manufacturing as acountermeasure to the deficiencies in existing Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (RMS)design approaches within the aerospace sector [27]. They illustrated the use of ontologies incollaborative engineering for the aerospace RMS design and highlighted its prospectiveimplementation in practical scenarios.Researchers have also employed ontologies in materials design databases that could be used inaerospace engineering. Li et al. (2020) introduced the Materials Design Ontology (MDO) toaddress challenges in the materials
approach, coveringmaterial from multiple courses, facilitates a comprehensive measure of learning progression,encouraging deeper understanding (den Boer et al., 2021).Cumulative assessments ensure minimal competency, identify knowledge gaps, and fosteraccountability for cumulative knowledge and skills (Vyas et al., 2015). These assessmentsplay a crucial role in shaping comprehensive learning outcomes and aiding educators inrefining instructional strategies (Muniasamy et al., 2015). Various forms of cumulativeassessments, such as exams or projects, prompt students to integrate knowledge, enhancingcritical thinking and problem-solving skills. Educators benefit by gaining insights into theeffectiveness of teaching strategies and curriculum design
from aviation,engineering, and management disciplines work together on problem-solving projects, will furtherenhance their ability to address complex industry issues.The competency matrix provides a clear framework for aligning academic coursework withindustry needs. By incorporating experiential learning, technology-driven applications, andindustry engagement, the curriculum will not only fulfill ABET student outcomes but also ensurethat graduates are equipped with the practical skills and analytical capabilities required in theevolving aviation sector.By integrating these exercises and projects, students will gain the applied knowledge necessaryto bridge theoretical concepts with real-world aviation challenges, ensuring they meet
practical relationships betweencourses, prerequisites, and skills development, whereas the top-down instructor perspective helpsalign course objectives and overall curriculum structure [32]. This dual perspective ensures theontology-based reasoner can become comprehensive in its knowledge representation, making itvaluable for all stakeholders in the education process.One of the key advantages of the ontology-based framework is the flexibility it offers to studentspursuing diverse academic and industrial projects based on their chosen career paths. Prior workon supervised homework sessions in aerospace structural mechanics courses demonstrated thatstructured, outside-the-classroom academic support can enhance student engagement andperformance
/s11948-005-0006-3.[6] N. A. Andrade and D. Tomblin, “Engineering and Sustainability: The Challenge of Integrating Social and Ethical Issues into a Technical Course,” 2018.[7] A. Benham et al., “Developing and Implementing an Aerospace Macroethics Lesson in a Required Sophomore Course,” in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637172.[8] A. Gupta, “A Practitioner Account of Integrating Macro-ethics Discussion in an Engineering Design Class,” Jul. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2–27498.[9] B. Jimerson, E. Park, V. Lohani, and S. Culver, “Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Perception,” Jun. 2013, p. 23.530.1-23.530.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2–19544.[10] Palmer