biomedical problems. During biomedical design, a range ofstrategies can be used to identify a problem and to generate and evaluate solutions. At ColumbiaUniversity, we have an established program for teaching biomedical design to undergraduateswhich culminates in our capstone ‘Senior Design’ course. However, no specified designexperience exists for terminal degree BME Master’s students. Design courses are traditionallytaught utilizing a textbook, lectures, and a team design project, with often limited time forinteractions between and among teams and instructors in the classroom. We also recognized thatthe background and educational and professional goals of undergraduates and graduate studentsare unique. Therefore, we saw a valuable opportunity to
Paper ID #20018Educating Biomedical Engineering Graduate Students about Teaching (Workin Progress)Dr. Robert A. Linsenmeier, Northwestern University Robert Linsenmeier is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Neurobiology, and Ophthalmology. His interests are in the microenvironment of the mammalian retina and engineering education. His teaching is primarily in physiology for both biology and BME majors. He is a fellow if the Biomedical Engineer- ing Society, American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, and Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. He is the administrative leader of CIRTL at
, echocardiography lab,and patient monitoring lab. For example, students use a St. Jude Medical pacemaker andprogrammer to identify the capture threshold in a simulated patient. In this patient and twoothers, they also identify the patient’s arrhythmia and observe how pacemaker therapy affectseach patient. In consideration of equipment costs, other labs use low-cost and academicequipment. These labs are the electrocardiograph design lab, electrocardiograph filtering lab,thermometry accuracy lab, surface characterization lab, and entrepreneurship lab.Curriculum Implementation ExampleWithin the curriculum of Keck Graduate Institute’s (KGI) Professional Science Mastersprogram, these textbook topics are taught in a medical device survey course. The majority
Paper ID #18173Design in Biomedical Engineering: Student Applications of Design Heuristicsas a Tool for Idea GenerationMiss Anastasia Katharine Ostrowski, University of Michigan Anastasia Ostrowski is a graduate student in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Michigan, con- ducting research with the Daly Design and Engineering Education Research Group. Her undergraduate degree is in Biomedical Engineering focusing on electrical engineering. Her current research focuses on understanding how engineering students in biomedical engineering engage in the design process.Mr. Jin Woo Lee, University of Michigan Jin Woo Lee is
ASHRAE.Brian Frushour, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) Brian Frushour is an Intellectual Property Associate at the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. He works with researchers in engineering and the physical sciences to identify and protect inventions re- sulting from research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He received his B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of South Carolina in 2000 and his M.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of California-Berkeley in 2003. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work in Progress: Development of a Graduate Project Management Course where Graduate Students Manage
Paper ID #7878From the Undergraduate Student Perspective: The Role of Graduate Stu-dents in an Undergraduate Research ProgramMegan E. Faurot, Illinois Institute of TechnologyMr. Frederick Doe, illinois institute of technologyMs. Elana Rose Jacobs, Illinois Institute of Technology Elana Jacobs is a first-year doctoral student in Science Education at the Illinois Institute of Technology. With an M.Ed. in Instructional Leadership from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a B.A. in Envi- ronmental Science from Hampshire College, she has over five years of experience working as a teacher in middle school science, math, and
AC 2007-482: SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATIONVladimir Genis, Drexel University Dr. Vladimir Genis, Associate Professor and Program Director of Applied Engineering Technology in the Goodwin College, Drexel University, taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses in physics, electronics, biomedical engineering, and acoustics. His research interests include ultrasound wave propagation and scattering, ultrasound imaging, electronic instrumentation, piezoelectric transducers, and engineering education. He serves as a member of the Drexel’s Faculty Senate
Director of the BME Design Studio - a facility that supports design efforts in many bioengineering courses at the University and within the Center for Bioengineering Innovation and Design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The best of both worlds: an integrated online/on-site Master’s program in biomedical engineeringAbstractA high quality graduate education should combine the development of advanced analytical skillstogether with the practical application gained through collaboration between faculty and otherstudents in a practical hands-on environment. We recently developed a new online Master’sprogram in biomedical engineering at the Johns Hopkins University
. Jennifer Olson, University of Illinois at Chicago Jennifer Olson is a clinical assistant professor in the College of Education at University of Illinois at Chicago. She coordinates the Secondary Education program and teaches curriculum, instruction, & as- sessment courses to undergraduate and graduate secondary education students. Jennifer’s research focus on urban high school reform is informed by nine years of teaching in Chicago Public Schools, giving her an informed perspective of how policy moves from theory to practice. Dr. Olson’s current research interests include urban teacher preparation, teacher professional development and student voice. Her most recent publication in Journal of Urban Learning
setsdeveloped while taking the research project course.Students participate in research for a variety of reasons, including the desire to become a scientistor to clarify, confirm, or refine their educational and career goals2. At The Ohio State University,participation in research is approximately 22.4% for undergraduate students3. According to the2012 US Census, 18.6% of students are continuing education in graduate schools4. STEMgraduate programs in the US have enrollments between 40%-70%+ international students5. Thisresearch course may train a generation of domestic students to attend graduate school and reducemany universities’ dependence on international applicants.This study was conducted under IRB exempt protocol # 2013E0570 in accordance with
AC 2007-591: CONVERTING ENGINEERING FACULTY TO EDUCATORS OFENTREPRENEURSJohn D. Gassert, Milwaukee School of Engineering John D. Gassert is currently a Professor and Biomedical Engineering Program Director at Milwaukee School of Engineering. He received his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering in 1995 and his MS degree in Electrical Engineering in 1974 both from Marquette University. Gassert is an AIMBE Fellow, a Senior Member of the IEEE, and an ABET EAC program evaluator for Biomedical Engineering. He has developed and taught courses at both the graduate and undergraduate level in Biomedical Engineering, Medical Informatics, Perfusion, Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, and
reform of undergraduate science, math, engineering, and technology (SMET)education at research universities. Growing evidence shows that hands-on discovery experienceis more effective at teaching complex concepts than traditional lectures.1 The National Academyof Sciences issued a call for SMET courses that enable students to “understand science,mathematics, and engineering as processes of investigation – as ways of knowing; to have hands-on experiences with investigations and to discover the joy and satisfaction of discovery.”1 Webelieve programs of this kind will create undergraduate students who are prepared to become thenew generation of translational researchers. By reinforcing their abilities to think critically, towork in teams, and to
a bachelor’s degree1. According to asurvey by the Chronicle of Higher Education and the American Public Media’s Marketplace, adegree is more important than ever to employers. On the other hand, half of the employers Page 26.672.2surveyed complained of difficulty in finding qualified job candidates. Thirty-one percent ofemployers indicated that recent graduates are unprepared for their job searches2. There is a bigskill gap between employer needs and what graduates have, especially on communication andproblem-solving. This is consistent with the findings from the earlier Wingspread ConferenceReport3. At the conference, leaders from government
bioengineering pedagogy. While it would be difficult to replicate theVaNTH REU program in its entirety, many of its components are transferable and could helpstudents who are considering faculty careers or graduate school in engineering education.1. Introduction1.1 The VaNTH ERC The VaNTH Engineering Research Center (ERC) in Bioengineering EducationalTechnologies was founded in 1999 to do research in learning science, learning technologies, andbioengineering curriculum. A partnership of Vanderbilt University, Northwestern University,the University of Texas at Austin, and the Division of Health Sciences and Technology atHarvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, VaNTH has investigated many areas ofengineering education, with a focus on
between technological progress on the one hand, and existinglimitations in educational and socioeconomic resources on the other, a varied number ofvisionary frameworks and strategic plans have been put forth by commissions of theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET)1, the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE)2, and the National Science Foundation (NSF)3. A strong, consistentrecommendation in these reports is the need for engineering graduates to have professionaldevelopment, or “soft” skills. The visions of these reports have particular relevance tobioengineering, a discipline whose explosive international growth is generating abundant careerdevelopment, professional development, and humanitarian development opportunities
practices, a key objective of theHPL model (Schwartz et al.6). As such, it is not possible to use standardized learningoutcomes. Moreover, individual studies are, by necessity, limited to specificoperationalizations of cause-effect relationships. An important set of inferences involvethe generality of the results across types of students, materials, topics or content areas,and time. Further, conducting experimental tests of educational innovations in classroomsettings often result in small-sample sizes for intervention and control conditions, makingit difficult to detect effects (due to low statistical power). To summarize what has been learned from this diverse collection of innovations,it was necessary to capture consistent information
seen in the medical deviceindustry. The idea to incorporate QSR and FDA design control guidance was generated largely throughthe Department’s industrial advisory board. Members of our board from the medical deviceindustry see a knowledge gap in QSR and design control in recent hires from the general pool ofengineering graduates. The incorporation of these elements into our capstone design course, notjust in theory, but in practice, seeks to alleviate this gap.Introduction According to the 2009 AIMBE biomedical engineering placement survey, 49% ofbachelor-level graduates obtained employment in industry.1 The U.S. Department of Laborprojects an employment growth rate of 72% for biomedical engineers in the decade 2008-2018.This growth rate is
manufacturing processes and equipmentEach lecture covers an aspect of modern design practice and a manufacturing process. Thelecture topics are outlined in Table 1. Table 1 – Lecture topics, BME Design and Manufacturing II Modern design practice Manufacturing processesThe Process of Modern Design, Overview of ManufacturingReverse EngineeringProblem Definition & Design Spec. FDM (Fusion Deposition Modeling)Concept Generation & Selection Laser machiningFunctional decomposition Machining processes: mill & lathe, hand toolsBenchmarking Welding, brazing, solderingGantt charts Casting and
in BME. He is interested in hands-on instruction – teaching and developing courses related to biomaterials and tissue engineering, as well as design. He was awarded the BMES Student Chapter Teaching Award in 2011, 2013-2015 and the Polygon Outstanding BME Instructor Award in 2012 and 2015. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Peer-mentoring through the Biomedical Engineering design curriculumBiomedical Engineering (BME), has been listed as the number one best job by CNN Money in2012-2014,1-3 best job in healthcare4 and most valuable college major by Forbes,5 among othertop listings,6-10 and is a rapidly growing field. This growth is
AC 2010-2065: ENGINEERING DESIGN, CAD AND FABRICATION SKILLSWITHIN A BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CONTEXTEric Kennedy, Bucknell UniversityDonna Ebenstein, Bucknell University Page 15.482.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Engineering Design, CAD and Fabrication Skills Within a Biomedical Engineering ContextAbstractThe challenge of exposing biomedical engineering (BME) students to the broad array of coreengineering and biology topics often makes it difficult to adequately address supporting skillssuch as computer-aided design (CAD) and fabrication in the undergraduate curriculum. Thispaper will present a six-week module from a course
presented.Related strategies have been shown to be effective in ethics education in engineering. Forexample, previous work has utilized a case-based approach to engineering ethics, where studentswere required to solve authentic engineering ethics problems using a set of guidelines thatoverlap with some of the components of the Four A’s strategy. Students needed to consider theperspectives of the different stakeholders involved, generate multiple solutions, and ultimatelydecide upon a “best” solution7. Though quite different from the Four A’s strategy, there is also a“Four Quadrants Model” for decision-making in medical ethics, which provides health careprofessionals with a method of considering all aspects of an ethical issue by considering qualityof life
undergraduate biomedical engineering students to participate in clinicalresearch are limited, and in most cases, offer only individual training. Research opportunitiesusually involve mentoring and it is difficult for faculty to extend themselves beyond one or ahandful of students. Labs are usually equipped with facilities designed for use by only a fewresearchers and often require substantial training and this too, contributes to limiting the amountof students who can participate in research. As a result, most students who participate in clinicalresearch are graduate students, and opportunities for undergraduate participation in clinicalresearch are generally scarce.It is particularly challenging to offer a clinical experience to students in
librarian with an expertise in research ethics). An ABETstyle syllabus was developed for the course (see the appendix). While topics varied somewhatfrom one year to the next, the topics were generally composed of the areas shown in Table 1. Thedetails of the course have evolved over the lifetime of the program as described below. Table 1: Typical Topics Covered in Ethics Course Codes of Ethics Advisor/student relationships Issues facing women and underrepresented groups Intellectual Property Authorship Conflicts of
to creating opportunities for undergraduates to engage in K-12 education and outreach. At both Duke University and the University of Washington, Dr. Hendricks has developed and taught summer camp curricula for middle school and high school students.Ms. Lucy L. Pick, University of Washington Lucy L. Pick is Curriculum Coordinator for the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Wash- ington where she serves as Bioengineering Summer Camp Director. Pick received a Bachelor of Arts in Social Science from Western Oregon University and is pursuing a graduate certificate in Biomedical Reg- ulatory Affairs from the University of Washington. Pick’s interests include educational outreach, STEM education policy, and
from the University of Iowa. His research involves musculoskeletal biomechanics with a focus on computational methods. He is also deeply interested in engineering education and especially creating opportunities for underrepresented minorities and women in the field.Miss Heather Rae Aschenbrenner Page 26.415.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Coordination of Pre-College Summer Programs to Create a Pipeline into BiomedicalEngineeringIntroductionCurrent political and academic discourse is riddled with a call for more students to graduate andenter into Science, Technology
Engineering Department and Associate Dean of the College of Engineering and Business. She earned her Ph.D. and M.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Notre Dame. Her B.S. is in Marine Systems Engineering from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy. Her primary teaching responsibilities are in the solid mechanics and materials areas, including biomaterials. She was awarded the 2012 ASEE NCS Outstanding Teacher Award, 2013 Gannon University Distinguished Faculty Award and 2013-2014 Gannon University Faculty Award for Excellence in Service-Learning. Vernaza does research in the area of alternative fuels (biodiesel), engineering education (active learning techniques), and high-strain deformation of materials. She is
subsequentofferings of the Global Health & Technology course. Additionally, students in the next courseoffering will identify another set of healthcare needs that will be used to generate more designprojects, thus engaging the campus community in an ongoing cycle of project development andimplementation.The results obtained from the pre- and post-course surveys represent a short-term measure of theimpact of the course on student attitudes and interests regarding global health issues. Follow-upstudies are planned to measure the long-term impact of this course on student-centered topics,including whether these attitudes and interests change as a function of time. Additionally, theeffect of the course on educational and professional choices of students will
-framed question, “When am I ever going to use this?”Students can be insufficiently motivated to work consistently in their Calculus courses in pursuitof undefined educational or life-long goals. Consequently, they can under achieve in thesefundamental STEM courses and possibly leave their STEM field. Too often, this STEM-attritionscenario disproportionally involves women, underserved minorities, first-generation collegestudents, and community-college transfer students [2]. They may be less knowledgeable abouttheir career options and less prepared for the rigors and pace of college mathematics. Theauthors believe that one benefit of using medical applications in applied learning environments istheir appeal to a broad range of students, as most
Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 87–101.7. AIHA, Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems, in ANSI/AIHA Z10-2005. 2005, American Industrial Hygiene Association: Fairfax, VA8. DoD, Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects and criticality analyses (FMECA). 1980, Department of Defense: Washington, DC9. Johnson, D.H., M.W. Bidez, and L.J. DeLucas, Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment in the Development of Biomedical Drug Formulation Equipment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2012. 40(4 (April)): p. 898-90610. ANSI, ANSI B11.0-2010 Safety of machinery, General requirements and risk assessment. 2010, American National Standards Institute: Washington, DC11. Reineck, S., Safety improvement and incident reduction using
, an Adjunct Professor of Engineering at Austin Community College in Austin, TX, and an Assistant Profes- sor of Surgery and Bioengineering at The Pennsylvania State University in Hershey, PA. He also worked for CarboMedics Inc. in Austin, TX, in the research and development of prosthetic heart valves. Dr. Zapanta’s primary teaching responsibilities are Biomedical Engineering Laboratory and Design. Ad- ditional teaching interests include medical device design education and professional issues in biomedical engineering. Dr. Zapanta’s responsibilities as Associate Department head include overseeing the under- graduate curriculum and undergraduate student advising. Dr. Zapanta’s research interests are in developing