, we have provided a framework to develop engineering problems with globalcontext through a unique collaboration between biomedical engineering faculty and students anda campus-based global service-learning organization. Considering not all students have theopportunity to engage in experiential learning abroad, these problems allow instructors to exposemore students to global applications of engineering design directly in the classroom.AcknowledgementsWe thank Christopher Kitson, Natalie Muneses, and Tiange Zhang for their assistance indeveloping the problems.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018-2019” [Online]. Available: www.abet.org [Accessed Jan. 26, 2018][2] B. K. Jesiek and K. Beddoes, “From
Paper ID #29177Preparing Early Career Biomedical Undergraduates through Investigationsof Stakeholder Needs: A Qualitative AnalysisDr. Christian Poblete Rivera, University of Michigan Christian earned a B.Sc. in biomedical engineering from Purdue University (West Lafayette, IN, USA) in 2012. He went to go on and received a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta, GA, USA) in joint program with Emory University and Peking University in 2019. There he was a recipient of a Ford Fellowship, and received honors for his role as graduate teaching assistant. Currently, Christian is an
Paper ID #23052Work in Progress: Exploring the STEM Education and Learning Impactsof Socially-relevant Making through the Challenge Problem of Making Pros-thetics for KidsMr. Jeffrey Craig Powell, UNC Charlotte Jeff Powell is a graduate student at UNC-Charlotte studying Biological Sciences. He is a graduate of UNC-Chapel Hill’s Biomedical Engineering program. As a student at UNC-CH, Jeff started The Helping Hand Project, a 501c3 non-profit and student volunteer group which supports children with upper limb differences. This includes using 3D-printers to create prosthetic devices for children. The non-profit includes chapters
dissertation research involves the development of synthetic and natural-synthetic hybrid biomaterials for molecular recognition and targeted drug delivery applications. Additionally, John is interested in the development of new instructional methods tools to both teach Biomedical Engineering in the classroom and laboratory and assess the efficacy of such strategies.Dr. K. R. Diller, University of Texas, Austin Kenneth R. Diller is a Professor of Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering and the Robert M. and Prudie Leibrock Professor in Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. He has been on the faculty at UT for 45 years. He was the founding Chairman of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at UT Austin, UT
] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 17-28, Jan. 1997.[3] S. Howe and J. Goldberg, "Engineering Capstone Design Education: Current Practices, Emerging Trends, and Successful Strategies," in Design Education Today: Technical Contexts, Programs and Best Practices, D. Schaefer, G. Coates, and C. Eckert Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, ch. 6, pp. 115-148.[4] D. G. Brauer and K. J. Ferguson, "The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96," Medical Teacher, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 312-322, Apr. 2015.[5
Paper ID #29602Design thinking concepts in Undergraduate Engineering Capstone ProjectsMr. Michael A Phelan, Department of Bioengineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA I am a PhD student in Bioengineering at Temple University and a predoctoral fellow at the National Eye Institute supported through the Intramural Research Program of the NIH.Mr. Aratrik GuhaMr. Brandon K Harrison, Temple UniversityGeorge Moukarzel, Temple UniversityMs. Abigail A. TettehDr. Yah-el Har-el, Temple University Assistant Professor of Instruction, Department of BioengineeringDr. Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University Ruth S. Ochia received her B.S
/Innovation into engineering curricula. He serves as a director for Pitt’s Design EXPO, the Manufacturing Assistance Center’s makerspace and, a variety of the Mascaro Center’s Sustainability Outreach and Education programs including the Manchester Academic Charter School ”Green week” and the Teach the Teacher program, impacting thousands of students each year. Dr. Sanchez teaches Introduction to Sustainable Water Technology and Design, classes in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department and the Swanson School of Engineering First-Year program. He works directly with K-12 initiatives and outreach programs including Constellation Energy Inventor Labs. c American Society for Engineering
or course, what are the common individual courses and combinations of courses required? How frequently is the initial computer programming course dictated by a uniform engineering school requirement, and how often is it specific to the BME department? How many credit hours are devoted to computer programming courses, and when are courses taken during a student’s program? How many programs have BME courses that focus on modeling and simulation of biomedical systems beyond programming, and how many credit hours do these represent? If a university wishes to cover many types of computing in its curriculum, are there good examples of how this might be done? The terminology for
, adsorption and binding/unbinding processes, nanoscale transport mechanisms, and degradation mechanisms at the nanoscale, 3. Comfortable in estimating orders of magnitude of objects that relate to engineering, 4. Capable of comparing and evaluating research papers related to nanobiotechnology with a critical mind, 5. Able to take a position towards an engineering-related question and defend their position in front of others, 6. Able to describe examples of applications and outline the state of the art in nanobiotechnology, 7. Able to contribute to and build upon team ideas through discussion. 3.2 Designing the course Once the learning objectives were set, the structure of the class was considered as a
importantly, freshmen,many of whom have never “failed” before, learn to appreciate that failure is a crucial componentof creativity and an essential part of solving challenging problems.Previous researchers have shown the significant value of collaborative versus competitivelearning [9]. The importance of developing teamwork skills in college is emphasized by ABETas one of the primary “a through k” objectives: an ability to function on a multi-disciplinaryteam. Both problem-based learning and cooperative learning provide the essential skills requiredfor ABET accredited programs [10, 11]. A critical component of the Modeling and Designcourse success is the collegial atmosphere. Students from diverse backgrounds and educationalexperiences work in teams
that students have the opportunity to show mastery in a particular learning objectivemultiple times over the course. This approach aligns student assessment with the intendedcourse outcomes, rather than the traditional score-based grading. Advantages of this techniqueinclude real-time assessment of progress towards relevant skills, shifting students towardsfocusing on the learning rather than on earning a grade, and providing a means for programassessment.1,2 This technique has been implemented extensively in K-12, but we are just nowbeginning to assess its use in engineering in higher education. Recent work by Carberry, et al.investigated the implementation of SBG by ten instructors at six institutions, work that hasuncovered best practices
Paper ID #23786Work in Progress: Biomedical Prototype Design in Collaborative Teams toIncrease Students’ Comprehension and EngagementKiersten Lenz, University of New Mexico Kiersten Lenz is a graduate student at the University of New Mexico in Biomedical Engineering. She has previous experience as a secondary science teacher at the high school level. Based on her observations as both a teacher and a student, Kiersten believes that the most effective way to teach is through creative lesson plans paired with collaborative problem-based learning.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is an Associate Professor in
Paper ID #29330A Survey of Biomedical Design Projects to Inform Skill Development in aNew Undergraduate Biomedical Engineering CurriculumMs. Kelsey Nicole Warren, Kansas State University Kelsey Warren is pursuing a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. Her interests include biomedical engineering education, leadership training, and hands-on design as a learning modality for K-12 and post-secondary education. Ms. Warren is a member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS).Dr. Charles Carlson, Kansas State
interactionsare important to development of skills that promote independence and self-expression [3].Toy repair and modificationFor the child with severe physical disabilities and movement or coordination difficulties, it may bedifficult or impossible to play with existing, commercially available toys. Interaction buttons may be toosmall or close together to activate. Additionally, due to the need to use a wheelchair and special bodypositioning padding, the child may not be able to reach the toys. In order to provide some level of access,toys can be modified so that they can be activated through the use of “ability switches.” Many childrenwith disabilities have access to these switches that they use for communication, alerting or other activities.While
breadth of BME understanding, particularly for those demographic segments that mayhave less access to learning about BME, the code scheme could be used as the basis fordesigning a quantitative questionnaire that could assess awareness of or interest in BME, muchlike existing career interest instruments. Such an instrument, with appropriate validity evidence,could be administered to a larger, more diverse cross section of students (beyond the coursesetting and university in this study). Results could inform the development of K-12,undergraduate, and other public learning opportunities to raise awareness of the various facets ofBME. Further, similar coding schemes could be developed for other engineering majors based ontheir professional societies
McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering at the Uni- versity of Pittsburgh, where he was an American Heart Association Pre-doctoral Fellow. Dave has been awarded the Early Career Award from the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation, the Scientist Development Grant from the American Heart Association, the NSF CAREER Award, the K Award from the National Institutes of Health (NHLBI), and the Y.C. Fung Young Investigator Award from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Improving programming content delivery in an introductory biomechanics course using a blended classroom
, after the event, five of the highest scoring teams were contacted bythe Innovation Institute and the UCI senior design programs to continue the projects throughtheir respective senior design programs. Following that, a survey was sent to all participants todetermine whether the event stimulated creativity and discussion, and whether they would attendagain in the following years. For those projects that decided to continue beyond the hackathonevent through the senior design programs, pre- and post- surveys were provided to all teammembers to assess whether the ideas generated from the hackathon created any viable healthcaresolutions. Viability of the solution is currently being assessed by determining the status ofintellectual property (IP
c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Direct incorporation of research articles into undergraduate biomedical engineering courses to contextualize complex topicsAbstract. This work-in-progress paper presents our introduction of a journal club activitydirectly into undergraduate biomedical engineering (BME) courses. This activity is aimed atcontextualizing complex topics in BME through peer-reviewed articles. Our journal club activityis composed of a written assignment focused on summarizing and evaluating the assigned articleand an in-class discussion of the article. In this paper, we present how we structured the writtenassignment and classroom discussion. Additionally, a skill that we aimed to develop in
biomaterials courses during the 2019 January intersession and2019 spring semester, respectively.In Biomechanics, the topics covered include physics and math themes applied to the humanmusculoskeletal system, orthopedic trauma, bioethics, global outreach and medical device designare considered. Typical anatomical, free body diagram, and other biophysical problems areaddressed in homework, quizzes, and tests. An exploration of sociotechnical topics is integratedthroughout the course through a daily reflection journal with prompted questions and a finalindependent review paper with instructions to explore diversity and the inclusion of vulnerablepopulations. The daily reflection journal includes prompted questions concerning various topicsand
furtherincreasing motivation and engagement with the challenge problem beyond what was seen in Phase1. We hypothesize that gamification can be combined with student-led investigation toimprove students’ learning of core course concepts and students’ engagement in the learningprocess. We will test this hypothesis by comparing data from team challenge problems (prompt-led), student learning through the IDEAL challenge problem Phase 1 (student-led), and studentlearning through the IDEAL challenge problem Phase 2 (student-led and gamified).Implementation of Phase 2 The premise of the IDEAL Forensics Challenge Problem was the same as whenimplemented in Phase 1 [3]: 17 unique scenarios involving five witnesses and one patient injureddue to a witness’ action
variety of subjectmatters in different class environments.The desire for hands-on activities was evident in Quantitative Systems Physiology, a required, 1-semester, sophomore-level course in our BME curriculum. The class size is approximately 60students. In this course, students learn how engineering fundamentals (e.g., mass transport, fluidmechanics, linear and non-linear tissue responses, gas exchange and solubility, ion transport, andmathematical models) apply to the cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal systems of the humanbody. In the same survey, 95% of respondents agreed strongly (54/91 responses) or somewhat(32/91 responses) that a hands-on module that depicts fluid flow through channels, mimickingthe circulatory system, would benefit
value in leading to a career in BME, which is consistentwith outcomes-focused prior studies. Beyond that, students discussed the ability to connect howthey see themselves as a biomedical engineer and a general interest in the work and non-careerrelated opportunities available to them through their co-curriculars. While the discussion of costwas minimal in our study, time was also a factor for students’ decision to participate in co-curriculars. These additional findings indicate that students can also be motivated to participatein co-curriculars through other means than just the outcomes studied in prior co-curricularliterature.IntroductionStudent engagement in higher education settings has long been studied as a predictor for collegestudent
documented online at https://www.bucknell.edu/news-and-media/current-news/2016/august/follow-bucknell-engineers-on-an-educational-adventure-through-chile. 8As part of the trip, the students and faculty stayed in a Ruka (a large round, traditionalChilean structure) where they engaged in a Sustainable Development Challenge for fourdays. The format was similar to the Senior Capstone and K-WIDE described above, withone notable exception; The Ruka was out of cell phone range, did not have internetaccess and the nearest source of building materials was approximately 50 kilometersaway. Appendix B contains the two pre-assignments used to prepare students for
learning platforms.Despite the clear value of increasing access to a variety of students, there is strong evidence thatmany students find succeeding in online courses challenging[1]. In the Department ofBioengineering at the University of Washington, we have recently moved our professionalprogram to a fully online format. Here, I present the structure being used for two fully onlinecourses in the Master in Pharmaceutical Bioengineering program that promotes the success ofour students.Many online programs rely entirely on recorded material, assignments, and discussion boards.This delivery method is effective and allows students to progress through the courses atindividual paces. However, this format does not provide a strong learning community
activities and feedback sessions instead of Zoom (or similar platforms). Mozilla Hubsis a 3D virtual social experience in which students can create their avatar, move about the scene,talk with others, upload media, and much more. Through interactions that more closely mimicnatural human engagement coupled with a video game-like platform Mozilla Hubs has thepotential to create a refreshing break from the typical virtual discussion format and reduce thefatigue from online classes or meetings. The use of Mozilla Hubs is recommended for informalgroup discussions or feedback sessions, such as the poster rough draft feedback session examplegiven in this work. Students are reporting increased stress, isolation, and mental health concerns [1
: JosseyBass Higher and Adult Education. CookSather, A., Matthews, K. E., Ntem, A., & Leathwick, S. (2018). What we talk about when we talk about Students as Partners. International Journal for Students As Partners , 2 (2), 19. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v2i2.3790 Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2014, July). Engagement Through Partnership: Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. The Higher Education Academy . MercerMapstone, L., Dvorakova, S., Matthews, K., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felton, P., & Knorr, K. (2017, May). A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education. International Journal for Students as Partners , 1 (1). (n.d.). In
upon and directly assesses theinstructional methods used to incorporate engineering standards beyond a single course. Inaddition, abundant literature highlights the need for students to have repeated exposure andpractice when learning new skills [14], suggesting the benefits of incorporating engineeringstandards throughout the biomedical engineering curriculum.The objective of this study is to assess how increasing exposure to engineering standards in thebiomedical engineering curriculum improves students’ abilities to find and use relevantstandards. We evaluated whether in-class lessons in a formative course improved student useand application of engineering standards. Then, we evaluated whether this increased exposurethrough formative
the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[12] F. J. de Ana, K. A. Umstead, G. J. Phillips, and C. P. Conner, “Value Driven Innovationin Medical Device Design: A Process for Balancing Stakeholder Voices,” Annals of BiomedicalEngineering, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1811–1821, 2013.[13] D. Kaufman-Rivi, J. Collins-Mitchell, and R. Jetley, “Design considerations for medicaldevices in the home environment,” Biomed Instrum Technol, vol. 21, no. 6, 2010.[14] I. Hosking, K. Cornish, M. Bradley, and P. J. Clarkson, “Empathic engineering: helpingdeliver dignity through design,” Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, vol. 39, no. 7,pp. 388–394, Mar. 2015.[15] E. Liljegren, A.-L. Osvalder, and S. Dahlman, “Setting the
need to learn embeddeddevelopment comes up repeatedly in the context of our capstone senior design experience, and hasresulted in the individual instruction of many students at our institution, over many years, often in theform of guided tutorials. While effective enough to support the capstone course, this approach does notexpose every student that wants to acquire this skill set with the opportunity to do so; such instruction islimited to those students that need to learn the skills to support a project. It also lacks the efficiency of aclassroom approach.Microcontroller skills can be acquired today without formal instruction. Students can learn much of thismaterial on their own through the “Maker Movement” [2], in which makers learn through
analyzed for enrollment, as well as diversity of courses available in the tracks. Adiversity score was calculated for each track by counting how many of each mechanics,electrical, programming, cell, and materials science classes were in each track offering andcomputing the standard deviation of each track, where high numbers meant less diversity incourses.In addition, faculty, alumni and current student surveys were collected through an online surveysystem asking a variety of questions about importance of skills, topics, ranking of courses andpreference of topics, as well as career alignment with track area. The survey was sent to 400people and a 34% response rate was achieved with an even gender split amongst participants.The survey of both