Paper ID #30179Work in Progress: Incorporating interactive modules related to cellculture and plasmid design into introduction to biomedical engineeringDr. Rosalyn Delia Abbott, Carnegie Mellon University Rosalyn Abbott is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering with a courtesy appointment in Ma- terials Science and Engineering. Professor Abbott received her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and her Ph.D. degree in Bioengineering from the Uni- versity of Vermont. She was subsequently a postdoctoral fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Depart- ment at Tufts
component in their design. At the beginning of each course,students interests and aspirations are gaged by providing students with a list of biomedicalengineering projects and challenges. Students were asked to select and rank their top choices. Earlyon, students were encouraged to identify a medical/clinical disease/challenge, and to focus theirefforts on projects related to that specific medical/clinical disease/challenge in multiple courses.This way students could start a project that spans the course of multiple academic years buildingstudents’ knowledge and capacity in a specific area of interest related to a specific medical/clinicaldisease/challenge.A unique laboratory in the program is the Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering Lab. Such
. Notably, there was a significant effect of the program onresponses for each of the presented pedagogy and STEM questions (P ≤ 0.038). Specifically, thelargest changes in confidence levels were observed in relation to using the NGSS (Q6_10; P =0.006) and the engineering method (Q9_5; P = 0.022).Table 3. Paired pre- and post-program survey questions related to pedagogy and Fellows’answers (N = 8). Data correspond to a 5-point Likert scale from strongly confident to not confident at all (scores of 1 and 5, respectively). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05). Please rate your confidence level implementing the following planning
Paper ID #34434Improving Programming Content Delivery in an Introductory BiomechanicsCourse Using a Blended Classroom ApproachMr. Jeffery Ethan Joll II, Vanderbilt University Ethan is in the final year of his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University where he works under Dave Merryman. His laboratory work investigates the mechanobiological underpinnings of cal- cific aortic valve disease and post-menopausal osteoporosis. His education research focuses on blended learning strategies to improve content delivery in undergraduate biomedical engineering courses. He is investigating careers in educational research
systems for neurorehabil- itation. She was a post-doctorate in the Wireless Health Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles, and a research manager in the Center for SMART Health, where she focused on wireless health monitoring for stroke and pediatric asthma. Her current research is on engineering education, specializing in pedagogy strategies to promote learning in design-build-test courses, including senior design, computer programming, and computer-aided-design courses.Prof. Anna Grosberg, Univrsity of California, Irvine Anna Grosberg received her PhD from California Institute of Technology under the guidance of Professor Mory Gharib, where she created a computational model of the myocardium mechanics
Paper ID #27536The Clinical Peer Mentors Program: Student Motivations, Skills and Knowl-edge Acquisition, and Influence on Career PathDr. Rachael Schmedlen, University of Michigan Rachael Schmedlen is Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education and a Lecturer IV in the Biomedical Engineering Department at the University of Michigan. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chem- ical Engineering from the University of Michigan and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Rice University. Dr. Schmedlen has played a critical role in evolving and now leading the U-M biomedical engineering undergraduate curriculum, particularly the BME
Paper ID #34110Work in Progress: Development of a Training Program to Prepare Studentsfor an Immersive Bioinformatics Summer Research ExperienceProf. Mark A. Chapman, University of San Diego Mark Chapman is an assistant professor at the University of San Diego in the Department of Integrated Engineering. His interests lie in the fields of skeletal muscle mechanics, muscle disease, exercise physi- ology, international education and engineering education. He earned his MS and PhD in bioengineering from the University of California, San Diego and a B.S. in biomedical engineering from the University of Minnesota
Paper ID #27198Project-Based Active Learning Techniques Enhance Computer ProgrammingAcademic and Career Self-Efficacy of Undergraduate Biomedical Engineer-ing StudentsMr. S. Cyrus Rezvanifar, University of Akron S. Cyrus Rezvanifar is a Ph.D. student in Biomedical Engineering at The University of Akron. He has also served as a research assistant in Cleveland Clinic Akron General since 2016, where he conducts research on biomechanics of human knee joint and patellar instability. In 2016, he received a doctoral teaching fellowship from the College of Engineering at The University of Akron. Through this teaching program, he
inspire young women to be leaders in engineering and medicine, while Project Lead the Way works to bring engineering and medicine to teachers and students in K through 12 programs. Hannah was a four year club sports athlete for the Clemson University Women’s Ultimate team. She was captain for two years, which taught her team-centered leadership. Hannah used these skills to lead her senior design capstone team to develop and create a functional sports rehabilitation device. Hannah found her drive for design and engineering education during the development of this device and is working to instill students with the same drive and initiative through experimental learning.Dr. John D. DesJardins, Clemson University Dr
Paper ID #30508Spicing Up Instruction of Professional Topics in Biomedical EngineeringDr. Jeffrey A. LaMack, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. LaMack is the undergraduate program director of the Biomedical Engineering program and a fac- ulty member in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at the MIlwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). His areas of specialty include biophysical transport phenomena, biocomputing, physiology, and engineering design. Dr. LaMack holds a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University, and he is an alumnus of the Biology Scholars Program of the American Society of
Paper ID #27411Work In Progress: Improving Student Views of Medical Device Standardsthrough Implementation in a First-term Biomedical Engineering CourseDr. Jeffrey A. LaMack, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. LaMack serves as undergraduate program director and course instructor in the Biomedical Engineer- ing program in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at the MIlwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). His areas of specialty include biophysical transport phenomena, biocomputing, physiology, and engineering design. Dr. LaMack holds a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University, and he is
Paper ID #22982Work in Progress: Spicing Up Instruction of Professional Topics in Biomedi-cal EngineeringDr. Jeffrey A. LaMack, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. LaMack is Program Director of Biomedical Engineering in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at the MIlwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). His areas of specialty include biophysical transport phenomena, biocomputing, physiology, and engineering design. Dr. LaMack holds a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University, and he is an alumnus of the Biology Scholars Program of the American Society of Microbiology. Prior to becoming
Paper ID #26771Incorporating Engineering Standards Throughout the Biomedical Engineer-ing CurriculumDr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Sarah I. Rooney is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Undergraduate Program in the Biomedical Engineering department at the University of Delaware, where she seeks to bring evidence-based teaching practices to the undergraduate curriculum. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomed- ical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) and her Ph.D. (2015) in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania.Dr. Jeannie S. Stephens-Epps, Terumo
expectations among both instructors and students. This has been a positiveresult of the course change in 2015 and has also helped prepare students for a morerigorous laboratory and design experience in their Capstone Senior Design course.ConclusionInquiry-based learning is a proven method to immerse students in an iterative design andresearch process that helps build critical thinking and design skills. The Biotransportlaboratory course at X University’s Biomedical Engineering program has re-developed atraditional lab- lecture sequence into an integrated experience that combines inquiry-basedlearning, active learning and a flipped classroom to more fluidly relate theory to practice. Wehave shown that flipping the classroom and bringing active learning
be a better mediator of affect – how one feels about a task – while thelatter is a better mediator of academic achievement [4]. Further, self-concept may positivelyinfluence self-efficacy.We hypothesized that BME students’ self-concepts and feelings of self-efficacy might relate totheir unusual career goals (relatively speaking, among engineering fields). We therefore soughtto explore BME students’ career self-concept as engineers and as clinicians, and the relationshipof those self-concepts to engineering design self-efficacy [5]. Both constructs are measured viainstruments that rely on self-declarations – also known as explicit measures. Self-declarations, orexplicit measures, of self-concept carry with them the concern of unreliability
Paper ID #34988Teaching Social Justice to Engineering StudentsDr. Dianne Grayce Hendricks, University of Washington Dr. Dianne Hendricks is a Lecturer in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering and the Director of the Engineering Communication Program at the University of Washington. She designs and teaches courses involving universal design, technical communication, ethics, and diversity, equity and inclusion. She co-founded HuskyADAPT (Accessible Design and Play Technology), where she mentors UW students in design for local needs experts with disabilities. She also leads STEM outreach activities for
with the Bioengineering Department, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa. Her research interests have included Biomechanics, primarily focusing on spine-related injuries and degeneration. Currently, her interests are in engineering education, curriculum development, and assessment. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Design thinking concepts in Undergraduate Engineering Capstone ProjectsIntroduction: Part of the successful assessment of an engineering program includes thedescription of a “major design experience that prepares students for engineering practice”(ABET EAC 2019-2020 Criterion 5 A.7). In addition, the revised student outcomes for the2019-2020 cycle and beyond
and engineering. Of these, recognitionwas the most closely related to professional identity in engineering and science. Race and gender were notfound to affect perception of BME, but gender was found to have a significant effect on individual engineeringidentity.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to thank Cameron Monroe for her role in developing the survey and data collection andDr. Alanna Epstein for her data analysis mentorship.References[1] R. T. Hart, “Biomedical Engineering Accredited Undergraduate Programs: 4 Decades of Growth,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1713–1715, 2015.[2] R. A. Linsenmeier, “What makes a biomedical engineer?,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 32–38, 2003.[3] T. R. Harris
and associate director of BME’s undergraduate program. In this role, she will strengthen the department’s connection with the local medical community, both in clinical and industrial settings, in order to foster undergraduate design projects as well as internship and employment opportunities for our students.Dr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Sarah I. Rooney is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Undergraduate Program in the Biomedical Engineering department at the University of Delaware, where she seeks to bring evidence-based teaching practices to the undergraduate curriculum. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomed- ical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann
to Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Mechanics, and Transport of Materials at Carnegie Mellon University. She also worked for Epic Systems Incorporated as an Implementation Consultant for Electronic Medical Records in Madison, Wisconsin. Mrs. Roberts’s primary area of study for her doctorate degree is extending the lifetime of oxygenator usage in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and incorporating a fully ambulatory system as a bridge to transplant therapy. Mrs. Roberts’s research interests extend to mentorship within biomedical engineering and designing programs to instruct and prepare students for surgical research study design and implementation.Ms. Melanie Alexis Loppnow, Carnegie Mellon University
impact of the program on the participants’ careers.In the long term, we intend to expand the applicant pool to other engineering majors with BME-related research experience.
Biomedical Engineering include Innovation and Design in Medicine, Design Seminar, and Introduction to Rehabilitation Engineering. He also teaches medical students through the Medical Innovation and Human Centered Design Program in the School of Medicine. Mr. Chen’s research interests include design in pediatrics and surgery. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Patient Centered Design in Undergraduate Biomedical EngineeringAbstractDesign in engineering is not only a core competency for students but is also a useful frameworkfor collaborating across the university. In particular, contextualized patient-centered design basedupon immersion and deep empathy are increasingly important skills
- Cost Brain Computer Interface TechnologiesAbstract:Advancing an interest and literacy in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)fields in high school students through summer and after school programs has been widelypopular since the 1990’s, and these programs are effective at improving retention and persistenceafter graduation. However, there still remains a lack of designing programs to increase interestand literacy of biomedical engineering (BME) related applications that are scalable at otherinstitutions. This is typically due to the challenges of providing costly resources that areavailable only in specific laboratory settings and require graduate level expertise to operate. Toprovide a low-cost and scalable approach to
- disciplinary Medical Product Development. She also serves as co-Director of the Freshman Engineering Success Program, and is actively involved in engineering outreach for global health. Miiri received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a B.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Prof. Susan Stirling, University of Illinois at Chicago Susan Stirling is a a designer, researcher and educator. She has an undergraduate degree from the Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison and a graduate degree from the Institute of Design at the Illinois Institute of Technology. At the University of Illinois at Chicago she teaches
(from a school that scores poorly on theToronto District School Board’s learning opportunities index) to integrate IBBME teaching labfacilities into their biology, chemistry, and physics curriculum and have their grades 11 and 12students address biomedical engineering design challenges in this environment. Each graduatestudent project team was required to accomplish 4 tasks: 1) propose a theme related tobiomedical engineering based on a single thesis and 2, 3, 4) propose suitable activities that couldbe used in the Discovery program for biology, chemistry, and physics high school students. Graduate Course Discovery Program Knowledge translation Activities completed by
Paper ID #28916Work in Progress: Lab-bench-marking: How are we using lab courses inBMEcurricula?Michael P Rathslag, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Michael Rathslag is a third year bioengineering undergraduate at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.Miss Brittany R Van Vleet, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Brittany is a sophomore in Bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign concen- trating in Cellular and Tissue Engineering. She is currently doing research in Biomedical engineering education in hopes to continually improve upon BME programs across the country. She
environment and consequently may not align with all necessary learning objectivesimplemented in our bioengineering program. For example, both the Department ofBioengineering and the larger School of Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh have a closephysical and collaborative relationship with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center(UPMC). As a result, undergraduate students are continually exposed to and participate in arange of medicine and healthcare-related research activities that may influence their particularunderstanding and expectations for design-related activities.The survey developed as part of this initiative was administered at the beginning of the fall termand captured input from sophomores, juniors, and seniors. Importantly
for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE), and is a Senior Member of both the IEEE and the SPIE.Prof. Henry Grady Rylander III P.E., The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Rylander is a professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, and the Harry H. Power Professor in Engineering and a William J. Murray, Jr. Fellow in Engineering. Dr. Rylander is a co-director, with Dr. Mia K. Markey, of the Department of Biomedical Engineering’s Imaging Science and Informatics Portfolio program, a comprehensive imaging science training program for doctoral stu- dents funded by a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award training
report of a three-year study of engineering education led by Leah Jamieson andJack Lohman [2], one of the seven recommendations was: Expand collaborations andpartnerships between engineering programs and a) other disciplinary programs germane to theeducation of engineers as well as b) other parts of the educational system that support the pre-professional, professional and continuing education of engineers. The 3D frameworkaddressed these recommendations.This is a process that aligns the attributes of graduates with their post-graduate plans in a waythat is customized for each student in the program. In the first dimension, the academicfoundation, core courses required of all students have been converted into course bricks thatinclude
-Milwaukee.Dr. April Dukes, University of Pittsburgh April Dukes (aprila@pitt.edu) is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Inte- gration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. April studied at Winthrop University, earning a BS degree in Chemistry and BA degree in Psychology in 2000. She then completed her PhD in 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh, studying oxidative stress in in vitro models of Parkinson’s disease. During her prior graduate and postdoctoral work in neurodegeneration, April mentored several undergraduate, graduate, and clinical researchers and