Entrepreneurship (1) (1) ENG3971 Seven Habits (1) ENG4951 Budgeting (1) ENG 4951 Global Competition ENG2963 Electric Circuit (1) Design & Fab (1) ENG3955 Conceptual Design / ENG3956 Industrial Health and Problem Solving (1) Safety (1) ENG3957 / 3967 Product and Process ENG3958 Engineering Ethics Development (1) in Design (1) ENG3966 Design for ENG3968 Manufacturing Manufacturing (1
publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Enrique D. GomezProf. Scott T. MilnerMs. Yu Xia Yu Xia is a doctoral candidate in Learning, Design, and Technology program in College of Education and research assistant in Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education in College of Engineer- ing at Penn State. She is currently doing research of collaborative learning in various learning contexts. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-in-Progress: Evaluation of a Remote Undergraduate Research Experience in Chemical
incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curricu- lum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential.Dr. Arthur Felse, Northwestern UniversityDr. Karen A High, Oklahoma State UniversityDr. Jason M. Keith, Mississippi State University Jason Keith is the Interim Dean and Earnest W. and Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Chair in the Bagley College of Engineering at
face once they enter the workforce. Typicalquestions that an employed young engineer can face include: How should I invest my money?What issues will I face now that my work has sent me to a foreign country? How do I negotiateand when is it acceptable to negotiate? How do I create my own company? Although anacademic course is unable to address all of these issues in an in-depth manner, exposure to theseand other non-technical issues will be of great benefit to students. To address these voids in student knowledge, a 3 credit hour course at the University ofMichigan at Ann Arbor, entitled Problem Solving, Troubleshooting, Entrepreneurship andMaking the Transition to the Work Place, was created to address some of these aforementionedissues
engineering students.To incorporate changes, it was important to understand the challenges and potentialopportunities, so our team, comprising the course instructor and teaching assistants, explored theexisting literature and supporting information prior to developing the modified Design Thinkingapproach. Current instructors are seeing a massive difference in the atmosphere between onlineand in-person modes of instruction. Many students find the online class settings daunting due toa lack of social interactions and difficulties concentrating [23]. They face additional challengesas many instructors are not properly trained to adapt their curriculum to an online setting [16].To combat inefficient classroom settings many researchers have studied the
lower percentage disagreed post-course (13%) compared to pre-course (28%). A significant emphasis was placed on developing a conceptual understandingthroughout Engineering Thermodynamics and, given the high percentage of reflective learners inthe class, this approach was likely appreciated (at least in terms of learning) because a thoroughexplanation of the correct answer was given for every concept test implemented in the course.Case Study 2 indicated a possible significant change in thinking by Student Y from pre- courseto post-course regarding learning from a correct answer. The small sample size of very strong“sensors” does not allow for any conclusions to be drawn, but an explanation for the noticeablechange by this student regarding this
Phenomena, Professional Development / Ethics and Mathematical / Compu- tational Methods. He is the recipient of various teaching and educational research awards, including the 2015 Raymond W. Fahien Award from the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching and assessment, conceptual and inductive learning, integrating writing and speaking into the curriculum and professional ethics.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as
relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curriculum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential.Prof. Eric J Beckman, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Beckman assumed his faculty position at the University of Pittsburgh in 1989, was promoted to as- sociate professor in 1994, and full professor in 1997
market for the product(s) and other revenue generating streams was discussed (Outcomes 2 and 6). e) A clear recommendation as to whether the project should be considered in more detail was made. This recommendation was based on the I/O economic assessment, as well as on environmental and social measures. It was also made clear which process alternative(s) were viable, if any (Outcomes 1 and 4). f) The proposal was written in a logical format. There were minimal typos and formatting errors, the figures were clear and readable, and the references were cited correctly (Outcome 1).Students were assigned the prompt on the first day of class and were allowed eight weeks tocomplete the
Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he teaches courses in Senior Design, Unit Opera- tions, Transport Phenomena, Material & Energy Balances and Mathematical/Computational Methods. Dr. Cooper’s research interests include effective teaching, process safety education and conceptual learning.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the
design, facilitation and evaluation. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergraduate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering as well as broader engineering curricu- lum. In addition, she is actively engaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential.Dr. Renee M Clark, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Renee Clark serves as the Director of Assessment for the Swanson School of Engineering at the University of
for curriculum reform identified above are alsothe possibilities for improvements in both mechanisms for delivering educational contentthrough the web as well as methods for more effective in-class or blended education whichcurrently our University is in the process of implementing.Given our existing capabilities both in faculty and infrastructure, the main educational andtechnical drivers chosen for implementation were: • Process/product design as a unifying principle for integration into hands-on experiences currently implemented • Multi-scale analysis as organizing principle for core Chemical Engineering Courses • Basic Innovation and Entrepreneurship content in specific coursesIn what follows we
, chemistry and mass balance computation skills, time management, report • Lecture and in-class activity: Concept of writing, concept of entrepreneurship, brain entrepreneurship storming, oral presentation skills7 Final presentations: poster and final report Oral presentation skills, team work, time management, poster preparation, executive summary writing Before all experiments and laboratory activities are conducted, safety is highlyemphasized among the students. The students are made aware of an emergency egress routes,safety showers, eye
Paper ID #17752Chemical Engineering Student Perceptions of Communication Developmentfrom Participation in Game-Based ActivitiesAbigail Jane Kulhanek Abigail Kulhanek is an undergraduate student studying Chemical Engineering at the University of Pitts- burgh.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering
pre-Engineering curriculum. Dr. High is involved with the development of an undergraduate entrepreneurship program at Oklahoma State University.Eric Maase, Oklahoma State University ERIC MAASE is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Chemical Engineering at the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University. He received his B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Maryland and was AIChE Student Chapter President and AIChE Local Chapter Student of the Year in 1993. He completed an M.S. in Chemical and Petroleum Engineering from Colorado School of Mines and his PhD from Oklahoma State University in 2005. His research interests include computer and mathematical modeling and
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his B.S. in chemical engineering from Lehigh University in 1998, and his M.S.C.E.P and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2000 and 2003, respectively. His primary areas of interest are game-based education, engineering ethics, and process safety education.Dr. Cheryl A Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game- based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into
is certified as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD). Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques in undergradu- ate classes (problem based learning, games and simulations, etc.) as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the Chemical and Petroleum Engineering curriculum. In addition, she is actively en- gaged in the development of a variety of informal science education approaches with the goal of exciting and teaching K-12 students about regenerative medicine and its potential.Dr. Joseph De-Chung Shih, Stanford University Dr. Joseph Shih is a Lecturer in the Department of
Education. Dr. Keith has taught courses in transport phenomena, separations, fuel cells, and hydrogen energy fundamentals during his academic career.Mr. Gerald C Nelson, Mississippi State University Gerald Nelson is director of the Office of Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer. He currently man- ages OETT for Mississippi State University to protect and maximize value of IP on MSU campus. He also manages MSU Entrepreneurship Center, and the Hatcher Engineering Entrepreneurship Certificate Program. He is director of the Thad Cochran Endowment for Entrepreneurship at Mississippi State Uni- versity. Since March 2006, he has mentored and funded campus-based start ups at MSU. He manages the endowment budget to
KEEN project and global studies. Curtis Abel, PhD in MaterialsScience and Engineering, is Professor of Practice in Innovation and Entrepreneurship at WPI, alsoinvolved in KEEN and Humanitarian Engineering. Although DiBiasio did the calculation details, the entireteam was involved in developing all aspects of the rest of the project including questions and promptsshown in the box below, project organization, and assessment survey prompts and analysis. The module was a team-based project imbedded in the traditional sophomore year introductoryChE course. We implemented the module in a class of 94 students in the first fall quarter of the 2017-18academic year. The basis of the project was the PBS American Experience documentary Command
enrolled students early in the summer and invite them to define their own projectsubject to some constraints on what the project should include. If your campus has anEngineering Entrepreneurship class, partner with them to include your students.11, 12Industrial partners, especially if the department is located near industry or researchorganizations, can serve as sources of design projects and mentors. The local AIChEsection could be a good resource for local practitioners who would be willing toparticipate. Industrial alumni who have been through the course can be excellent mentorsbecause they are familiar with the deliverables required. In addition, industrial advisoryboards may be helpful in identifying key skills expected for new employees
research university in the American Southwest. Students worked in pairs onhomework assignments to support peer learning. We replaced one question from each of the sixhomework assignments with design challenge deliverables. Students worked in subteams on oneof the three algal production phases (i.e., growth, harvest, extraction). They also developedindividual accountability through jigsaw sessions in which they explained their subteam’s workto students from other production phases. They built whole-class consensus through “parley”sessions that involved decision matrices.We describe the design challenge and our study, in which we investigated how a designchallenge threaded through a sophomore course might provide students with a picture ofauthentic
percentage of students selecting ratings from 1-8 are shown with 1 being “strongly disagree” and 8 being “strongly agree”.Examples of student comments related to problem-solving included: One of the other ways that this course has contributed to my education is that it provided me with opportunities to explore new problems and find creative solutions to problems that don’t already have a clear defined answer in the back of the book. (2016-17) This class was very empowering; I realized that I can solve problems, that I can do something new; that I can create. (2016-17) 10The third aspect in Figure 8 relates to global engineering where 84% of students felt confident
design focus. Class size is 35-40 in one section. Three additional general engineering courses are required: Introduction to Engineering and Design, 3 credits with 1 h to 1 week for ChE activities, class size 445, 15/section; Engineering and Technology Forum, 1 credit, focus on invention, innovation and entrepreneurship, size 460 with 33/section; and Engineering Problem Solving and Programming, 3 credits, class size about 460 spread over different semesters, lecture about 60 per lecture section, maximum of 15 per lab section. (36)- South Dakota School of Mines and Technology has two required courses specific for ChE. One is the 2 credit Professional Practices in Chemical Engineering that is an introduction to chemical
process economics. In order to provide our students the opportunity to effectivelycommunicate their work, critically analyze and critique open-ended designs, the projects arerotated between teams for each section of the design. For the final design, each team is returnedtheir original design project and critiques in order to complete the final analysis. During therotation of projects, the teams have the opportunity to work on the design of three differentprocesses, to evaluate one another’s work, integrate design reviews into their final analysis andlearn by critically analyzing the work done by other design teams. This is the second year of this approach to teaching our capstone design I class. Thiswork in progress presentation will
a CHE-ME elective entitled, “Interdisciplinary Studies inCeramic Materials Processing,” and a CHE-ECE-ME elective entitled, “Introduction toMicroelectromechanical Systems (MEMS). Designed with more than one pedagogical focus,these courses were implemented not only to provide real interdisciplinary team-based activities,but also to be true design experiences with either laboratory and computational experiences orboth. Over the past ten years, this pair of courses have been test-beds for examining theeffectiveness of various team selection strategies, the integration of inquiry-based learning, andeven the introduction of a novel inter university collaboration on entrepreneurship. These twoexperiments in interdisciplinary instruction provided
, minds-on”approach through in-class cooperative problem solving, experiments and demonstrations,computer exercises, and small-scale and semester-long projects.40 Also, Hamilton et al.describe the successes and challenges of starting an engineering college at the NationalMilitary Academy of Afghanistan.41 They highlight the use of face-to-face and distancementoring, cultural and ethical challenges, faculty development, providing resources andequipment, and ensuring the continuity and sustainability of programs. Finally, thereader may want to consult the article by Rugarcia et al. on methods to establish a culturefor a research university that maintains a strong engineering education emphasis. 42It must be noted that there are unique issues