AC 2010-4: IDEAS TO CONSIDER FOR NEW CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGEDUCATORS: SENIOR DESIGNLisa Bullard, North Carolina State University Dr. Lisa G. Bullard is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Studies in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University. She served in engineering and management positions within Eastman Chemical Co. from 1991-2000. A faculty member at NCSU since 2000, Dr. Bullard was named an Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor at NCSU and was awarded the Outstanding New Teacher Award by the Southeastern Section of ASEE, the NCSU Alumni Outstanding Teaching Award, the COE George H. Blessis
. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie did his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University faculty for 30 years and for the past sixteen years he has focused strongly on innovative pedagogy and done technical research in biotechnology. His recent Fulbright exchange to Nigeria set the stage for him to receive the Marian Smith Award given annually to the most innovative teacher at Washington State University.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University-Pullman Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is an assistant professor of Educational Psychology at Washington State Uni- versity
of the46 following four areas: academic and career advising, high school preparation, engineering structure and47 curriculum, and faculty relations[9]. This paper focuses on faculty relations because, historically, 148 universities have relegated retention issues to staff and advisors. The importance of faculty influence on49 student retention is an under-researched and under-explored area. Specifically, faculty relations can be50 shaped through specific teaching practices instructors can use to increase student retention. Research51 supports the claim that student-professor relationships are vital in promoting the success of engineering52 students [10], [11]. One
. Page 22.77.3The objective of this paper is to describe a new inter-college (Villanova College of Engineeringand Villanova School of Business) course at Villanova University : The Global PharmaceuticalIndustry. In this course, technical and business issues from the industry will be examined in aunique interdisciplinary environment, with students and faculty from both colleges involved. Theintended audience is multidisciplinary, reflecting the fabric and organization of the industry as itoperates today. The opportunity created by this course is unique in that engineering, science andbusiness students work together to understand and attempt to solve some of the complex issuesregarding an industry whose life-saving products create significant
AC 2012-4388: A NEW ASSESSMENT METHOD TO EASILY IDENTIFYAREAS NEEDING IMPROVEMENT IN COURSE-LEVEL LEARNING OUT-COMESProf. Thomas Allen Knotts IV, Brigham Young University Thomas Knotts became a faculty member in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Brigham Young University in 2006 after receiving his Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He teaches a va- riety of courses, including thermodynamics, computer tools, unit operations lab, and molecular modeling. He enjoys teaching and discovering ways to improve student learning through problem-based and induc- tive learning strategies. With his research group, Knotts seeks to understand the physics of proteins and DNA at the molecular level with
or lower (≤3) level of knowledge about learning theoriesbefore the workshop indicated that they knew more after the workshop was completed.In addition to asking about knowledge gained, we also asked questions about the workshopcontent. Participants were asked to rate the extent that certain features, including new material,engaging presentations, and useful ideas, were incorporated into the workshop on a Likert scaleof 1 (Not at all) to 7 (Very much). We saw that the average responses were all above 5 (Quite abit), indicating that faculty found that we generally incorporated engaging, novel features intothe workshop. However, a few features had some individual responses that were at level 4(Somewhat) or below which we want to address for
numerous awards for both teaching and advising, including being named as an NCSU Alumni Distinguished Undergraduate Professor, the ASEE Raymond W. Fahien Award, the John Wiley Premier Award for Engineering Education Courseware, NCSU Fac- ulty Advising Award, National Effective Teaching Institute Fellow, NCSU Alumni Outstanding Teacher Award, George H. Blessis Outstanding Undergraduate Advisor Award, ASEE Southeastern Section New Teacher Award, and ASEE-ERM Apprentice Faculty Grant Award. Bullard’s research interests lie in the area of educational scholarship, including teaching and advising effectiveness, academic integrity, process design instruction, and the integration of writing, speaking, and computing within the
AC 2012-3180: USING STUDIOS AS A STRATEGY TO RESPOND TO IN-CREASING ENROLLMENTDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a professor of chemical engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has re- search activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is inter- ested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Dr. Kenneth J. Williamson, Oregon State UniversityDr. Jeffrey A. Nason, Oregon State University
at Rowan University. She obtained her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an assistant professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has made significant contributions to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning. Stephanie has conducted
Page 14.1249.5accreditation, these assessments are seldom rigorous enough for the new quality paradigm ofeducational research. Even as basic a question as, “What are the best assessment methods foreach chemical engineering program outcome?” really requires qualitative research methods forthe ABET professional outcomes 3d, 3f to 3j. Without constructivist inquiry it is not possible todefine and assess outcomes such as “an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams” (3d) sincethere is no standard definition or metric of “function.” Unfortunately, learning educationalresearch tools is considerably more difficult than understanding appropriate educational researchquestions.Although there are examples of ChE faculty who have been successful in
for.Department heads and curricular chairs can foster connections between faculty and advisors ifthey are not the same people by hosting short meetings oriented around sharing information.Advising deadlines and methods of fostering self determination within students as discussedpreviously in this work can be shared with faculty to be incorporated into courses. Facultymembers, in turn, can provide a list of concerns students have voiced about issues relevant tothem, or can help in identifying those students who may face special challenge so advisors canfollow up. Professional staff who have contact with students could also be included in thismeeting. One meeting perhaps once a semester would allow for contact and sharing of thisinformation.At the college
after retirement. This topic will be discussedin more depth in Section 8.3b. What’s in It for Your Family?Some faculty might think that accommodating their family is problematic in taking a SAL.However, the opposite is quite true – SALs can greatly benefit everyone in your family. A SALhas to be an experience for one’s entire family that begins with the planning and then continueswith the daily accommodation to new surroundings, educational systems, culture, climate, etc.Evening meals for the author’s family often involved discussing the interesting aspects ofadapting to these new experiences.Do not think that your spouse cannot also get very much involved in the SL experience. Whenthe author took his first SL at ITU in Turkey during 1974-75
category consists of a classroom/laboratory experiencewhere high school students are exposed to engineering with the expectation that these studentswill then be more likely to enroll in engineering. Typical examples are the “InspiresCurriculum”,9 “Engineering Concepts Curriculum Project”,10 the “Academy IntroductionMission”,11 and the “Texas Pre-Freshman Engineering Program”12. A program to address these issues was started in this department in 1993 with fundingfrom the National Science Foundation. The concept for this activity arose from a conversationamongst chemical engineering faculty members on what influenced them to major in engineering.Almost uniformly the conclusion was that it was an influential teacher at the 5th through 9th
active nanostructured interfaces, nanocatalytic conversion of biorenewables to commodity chemicals and fuels, and nanoscale production of hydrogen on demand.Robert B. Barat, New Jersey Institute of Technology Robert Barat is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at NJIT, where he has been a faculty member for over 20 years. He earned his PhD in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. His current research involves reaction catalysis by fluorinated phthalocyanines.Norman W. Loney, New Jersey Institute of Technology Norman W. Loney is Professor and Chair of the Otto H. York Department of Chemical, Biological and Pharmaceutical Engineering at New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has
independently sought for an additional purpose of the existing network. The endresult was to expand the network to include all of the students, faculty, and alumni in thedepartment, thus addressing the concerns raised by the participants. During the Fall of 2008, the venue for the online social network was changed fromFacebook to Ning. There were several reasons which motivated this change. First of all,Facebook lacked the administrative control required to fully control the network. Morespecifically, the ability of inviting specific members and excluding problematic ones wasidentified, and foreseen to be a necessity. Second, Facebook groups have a fixed appearancewhich has little flexibility. One of the benefits of using Ning is that the site
inremediating these deficiencies. Schaad, Franzoni, Paul, Bauer, and Morgan[3] from DukeUniversity have taken service-learning to the next step by implementing the concepts andlearning objectives into an interdisciplinary course focusing on the aftermath of HurricaneKatrina. Service-learning implementation in traditional classroom settings brings a new set ofchallenges to faculty and students. However, the need for a holistic approach to designingengineering curriculum and learning experiences to create a better-rounded engineer is identifiedand analyzed by Vanasupa, Stolk and Herter[4] through the development of the Four-DomainDevelopment Diagram. Curriculum and learning experience development processes, such as theFour-Domain Development Diagram, as
. Students can only access the problem statements,problem abstracts that provide a context for each problem, a pop-up dictionary of definitions tohelp clarify terms, and downloadable word files of the problems. The website(http://www.bioemb.net) stores the problems in a MySQL secure database and each of thefaculty users obtains a unique "account" once they have been confirmed. Only upon activationof a faculty account can the solutions to the problems be accessed.One of the reviewer concerns of the project was that faculty would not readily develop problemsand submit them to the database for posting. With a few notable exceptions, this concern hasturned out to be quite true. A small number of faculty provided many problems and a few otherssent one or
, the inter-cohort groups work together for approximatelythree weeks to complete a capstone laboratory project. Significant logistical hurdles wereencountered due to the divergent expectations, schedules, and priorities of the two groups.However, effective management methods were developed to address these issues, and mitigateinterpersonal conflicts.Survey results were collected for over 300 students involved in this program. Peer, mentor, andmentee evaluations were also collected, along with faculty evaluations of the senior team’smanagement and use of their freshmen employees. Results reveal significant freshman andsenior satisfaction with this collaborative project, but this satisfaction is greatly dependent uponthe senior team’s use of
Science Foundation grant (#9972758, 1999-2004), entitled Combining Faculty Teamwork, Applied Learning Theory, and Information Technology: A Catalyst for Systemic Engineering Education Reform. Courseware and pedagogical developments have been the focal points of his professional career.Timothy Raymond, Bucknell University Timothy M. Raymond is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University since 2002. He received his B.S. from Bucknell University in 1997 and his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 2002. His teaching and research interests include atmospheric chemistry and physics, aerosol and particle studies, and improving engineering education. He
well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone De- sign courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program
AC 2009-1312: WEB-BASED CLASSES FOR ENHANCEMENT OFPRELABORATORY LECTURESTiffany Hesser, University of New Haven Tiffany Hesser is currently a Visiting Instructor and Organic Laboratory Coordinator at the University of New Haven in Connecticut. She is also involved with the The Summer Institute for Young Women in Science and the Chemistry and Math Enrichment Program.Michael Collura, University of New Haven Dr. Collura, Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of New Haven, received his B.S. Chemical Engineering from Lafayette College and the M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Lehigh University. His professional interests include the application of computers to
grow in wastewater heavily influenced our decision to use Chlorella because it allows us to use farm runoff water, an abundant resource in Roosevelt." • "As mentioned previously, we want to be environmentally conscious and reuse as many sources as we possibly can. The great thing about New Mexico is the availability of land that is not currently being used for a source of agriculture. In Socorro, New Mexico the source of fossil fuels is decreasing. Producing algal biofuels in Socorro will simultaneously solve all these issues. Algal Biofuels provides an economic alternative to conventional biofuels while also improving Socorro’s environmental sustainability. Socorro also has
Undergraduate Curriculum Com- mittee, as well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone De- sign courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information
about assignment deadlines). Likewise, even in large enrollment classes,faculty can signal their interest in student wellbeing through opportunities for students to sharetheir experiences and concerns, such as in muddy point questions, minute papers, and briefsurveys. If possible, peer learning facilitators—undergraduate students who previously competedthe course—can be helpful in scaling caring practices, informing faculty of issues that areemerging.Third, as student behavior appeared to be shaped by faculty OCBs, faculty who display learner-centered altruism may also benefit team dynamics and academics. Past research has shown thatstudents who display OCBs benefit academically as they are able to learn more from peerinteractions [19
solutions become "locked": they may no longer modify them, but they nowhave access to the solutions of other students. Following their submission of a solution, aperiod of on-line review can begin. Students are encouraged to view the solutions ofothers, to identify issues with those solutions, and to comment on those issues.To test the impact of SBL implemented using the ChemProV/OSBLE combination, sevenother universities have agreed to participate in a multi-year quasi-experimental study. Atthese seven schools the participating faculty agreed to teach their material/energy balanceclass in their normal fashion during the 2012-2013 academic year. This would befollowed by using a SBL approach, implementing ChemProV/OSBLE, during the 2013 –2014
student additional XP (effectively extra credit), butalso another resource, called Reputation. While reputation did not affect a student’s gradedirectly, by working collectively with other students in their guild, students could poolReputation to effectively ‘win’ the game. In this context, the guild with the most reputation at theend of the semester was allowed to choose from several rewards (dinner out with the faculty, theability to choose an experiment the following semester, a small boost to one of their best grades,etc.). Optional tasks were ones that the instructors thought would benefit the students, but inpractice, without incentivization, few students attempted. Examples include peer evaluation oftheir work, seeking out and using
to provide more direct feedback on this issue. Once we had this information, it wasdiscussed at a general faculty meeting with the use of literature on this subject 2,3 (most notablyfrom NJIT) 4 as a reference. At the end of several iterations, a syllabus was designed.Pre-AssessmentIn order to get a profile of a typical student who chooses chemical engineering, we gave thosestudents who attended the first session of ChE 1010 a pre-assessment. Thirty-two studentscompleted this survey and the questions with answer frequency are provided in Table 1. Notethat, because of space limitations, we have used an “others” heading which group all of thoseanswers that were mentioned only once by a student. Additionally, for some questions, responsesare
2006-1354: THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT: CATALYST ORINHIBITOR TO STUDENTS' CONFIDENCE IN SUCCESS?Deborah Follman, Purdue University Deborah K. Follman is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University in 1994 and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University in 2000. Her research interests include engineering education and gender equity, specifically regarding self-efficacy, issues of gender on student cooperative learning teams, and curriculum development.George Bodner, Purdue University George M. Bodner is the Arthur E. Kelly Professor of Chemistry, Education
process is toencourage life-long learning skills. A crucial component of this endeavor is to follow thegraduates and to observe whether the stated outcomes of an undergraduate curriculum are metfollowing graduation.3. Course StructureThe three consecutive UOL courses offered in chemical engineering curriculum have twopurposes: firstly, introducing fundamental transport concepts to students enabling them toreinforce core courses and secondly, teaching how to design/implement experiments and lastlyemphasizing critical thinking on the processes. In industry, engineers are often responsible forpractical laboratory issues in order to meet the requirements for experimental data in developinga new product and to test a product whether the product or
Paper ID #11636What should every graduating chemical engineer know about process safetyand how can we make sure that they do?Dr. W. David Harding, University of New Haven W. David Harding is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Accreditation in the Tagliatela College of Engineering (TCoE) at University of New Haven. He has more than twenty years of academic experience after spending nine years in chemical manufacturing and envi- ronmental consulting. He has been an active participant in the Multidisciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral Curriculum (MEFSC) efforts in TCoE and the