sek28@psu.edu or http://linkd.in/PkzJeQ c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A Model for Development of Employer Engagement at a Small CampusAbstractRetention of engineering students is a key issue in engineering education, particularly withrespect to motives of training a diverse engineering workforce. In addition to other academic andindividual factors, student feelings of community and career awareness are contributors toengineering students’ persistence toward degree completion. As part of developing retentionefforts for a new engineering Bachelor of Science degree program at Penn State Hazleton, wehave created a recurring program of employer engagement to center students’ focus on the
design and build the cages. The paper also describes the lessons learned and the benefits to students, Community College faculty, and the company. Finally, the paper discusses future collaboration with the company and broader impact on programs at the college. Introduction Numerous studies have been done on the benefits of experiential education and student participation in relevant internships. Community College students, however, often face several challenges in finding and being able to participate in typical experiential learning opportunities, such as internships and co‐op experiences. Internships in a technical field, such as manufacturing and engineering are often only available to upperclassmen moving to their third year of college
-ops, andcapstone projects with industry partners. It is well recognized that practical hands-on experienceoutside of the classroom has a positive impact on student success after graduation. Capstoneprojects are an effective way for students to experience the real-world challenges facing businesswhile simultaneously enhancing a school’s reputation. Building strong industry partnerships canlead to more opportunities for students, allowing graduates to enter the work force withconfidence and through understanding the job requirements and the impact of company culture.Bibliography1. Benigni, V., D. Ferguson, and B. McGee, Establishing a “Renown-Gown” Relationship: The Role of Advisory Boards in Communication Programs. Journalism &
Chancellor for Strategic Initiatives.Dr. Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Terri Talbert-Hatch Dr. Terri Talbert-Hatch is the Assistant Dean for Student Services in the School of Engineering and Tech- nology, IUPUI. In this position she is responsible for recruitment of undergraduate students, scholarships, career services, and the schools residential based learning communities which include two apartment buildings on campus and one floor in the newest residence hall on campus – IUPUI Tower. She is the faculty advisor to the school’s Student Council and the Society of Women Engineers student organization but, also supports all the school’s student organizations. Dr. Talbert-Hatch
. Buch, 2009.2 “First-Year Engineering: A Comprehensive Approach,” American Society for Engineering Education; T. Hinds,A. Idema, C. Davis-King, N. Buch and T. Wolff, 2010.3 “Successes of an Engineering Residential College Program Within and Emerging Residential Culture,” AmericanSociety for Engineering Education, S. Miller, P. Pyke, A. Moll, M. Wintrow, C. Schrader and J. Callahan, 2009.3 “An Evaluation of a New Residential College Initiative,” American Society for Engineering Education, R. Ricks,L. Graceson-Martin, R. Kowalchuk, J. Nicklow, J. Mathias, K. Pericak-Spector, L. Gupta, J. Tezcan, 2009.5 “Impacts of Living and Learning Communities on Engineering Student Engagement and Sense of Affiliation,”American Society for Engineering Education
instructor after weekly one-on-one-phone calls with the industry professional, i.e. a “consultant” version.In the “heavy” version, the industry professional would attend one of two weekly face-to-facelectures with the instructor. The main professional responsibility was to transmit expertise andlearning through critique and feedback of student work in progress and project presentations, i.e.a “participant” version.In either case, the model’s design exploits each participant’s expertise. It is the joint planningbetween faculty and professional, plus the professional’s interaction and feedback role thatdistinguish Industry Fellows from a “guest speaker” series. When the model is enacted, there iscontinual industry professional engagement throughout
of professional identity. This qualitative study explores theassumptions of potential professional benefits from early internships, including the developmentof professional engineering identity and the social cognitive impact that these internships had onthree participating students during a recent undergraduate internship semester. Students completeself evaluations on insights into the industry, future career opportunities, and interactions withinthe professional community. This qualitative study explores the assumptions of potentialprofessional benefits from early internships, including the development of professionalengineering identity and the social cognitive impact that these internships had on three TexasState University’s Engineering
first survey whosuccessfully completed the second survey) was 54% and represents 886 students. The responserate for Time 3 (calculated as the number of respondents from the second survey whosuccessfully completed the third survey) was 79% and represents 699 students. The Time 3 Page 24.1202.3response rate as a proportion of the full dataset at Time 1 is 43%.The overarching model for the study proposes that retention is shaped by self-efficacy. Self-efficacy, in turn, is based on the impact of students’ demographic characteristics, the effect ofwork experience – in particular cooperative education, and the contextual support provided bythe
technical knowledge they canstill be limited in their ability to apply it1. Some studies suggest that engaging students in Problem Based Learning (PBL) activitiescan improve students’ motivation2 and work readiness1. While there is much literature andresearch regarding implementation of work-related capstone courses for engineers, most of these Page 24.1083.2focus on the logistics of setting up the program, and not the conceptual underpinnings of how tomake it an effective work-related experience for each individual student3,4. There is bothdocumented and anecdotal evidence for the fact that when many engineering employers think ofwork-ready
effective and appealing tostudents; however, sustaining student engagement is a challenge.IntroductionMentorship is critical to professional development [1]. The impact of engineering mentorshipprograms on students, such as related to their perceptions and self-efficacy, is nebulous [2];impacts are undoubtedly influenced by confounding factors, including the participants involved,contexts, techniques, and mentoring procedures applied. Educators have implemented a plethoraof engineering student mentorship program structures, ranging from formal to semi-formal andapplying various techniques, such as experiential based workshops [3] and one-on-one mentoring[4]. These diverse mentorship approaches are being applied to and studied for the full age
, especially among young women and underrepresentedminorities2-5. Evidence from university service-learning experiences support this hypothesis inprograms such as EPICS (www.purdue.edu/epics) and chapters of Engineers Without Borders,which are attracting higher percentages of women than the overall engineering population. Further evidence comes from the Changing the Conversation study which is finding thatthe way engineers talk about engineering with the emphasis on the technology does not connectwell with young people. What resonates much better is when connections are made between thetechnology and the impact on people and communities. If students who want to make adifference in their communities see the technology as a tool to accomplish
students will be exposed to a wealth of University programs and services, including, but not limited to: engagement in student affairs, financial aid regulations, Department of Education compliance, and awareness of the numerous student organizations and activities at Northwestern State University. o ENGL 1010. COMPOSITION AND RHETORIC (ON-LINE). The short paper; rhetoric, with emphasis on writing. o MATH 1020. COLLEGE ALGEBRA. A graphing treatment of the essential topics of college algebra with emphasis on functions, graphing, and applications. o ADMT 1100. SAFETY CULTURE. Introduces the importance of cultivating daily safe work
. Along with the mutually beneficial aspect, the industrypartner was able to provide students with projects in which the company would otherwise beunable to engage due to time limitations. This model for capstone design presented additionalchallenges in that it required collaboration between faculty at Howard University that traditionallywould not collaborate. In addition to the challenges on the academic side, considerations had tobe made for ownership of rights to the final design projects, which ultimately resided with theindustry partner 10 . Other efforts in external collaboration through capstone design projects havebeen explored that include working with community partners 11 , interdisciplinary designchallenges 12 , and cooperative
, and hands-on activities (11). This is to say: the higher the level of studentinvolvement, the greater is his/ her comprehension and the higher is his/ her retention. Indicatorshave shown that an active learning environment has a positive impact on student’s personality. Ittends to boast self-confidence, improves communication skills, and makes the student a betterteam member.For cooperative learning experience to be successful, it is imperative that the following beintegrated into the class activity: (9, 12, 13, and 14) • Interdependence- Students should perceive that they need each other to complete the planned activity; • Interaction- Students should work together in planning, executing, and arriving at conclusions. They
. At a time when local, state, and national resources for education are becomingincreasingly scarce, expectations for institutional accountability and student performance arebecoming more demanding. There is a need for more educational innovations that have asignificant impact on student learning and performance5.ABET requires institutions to establish an advisory board to provide input on educationalprograms and curricula6. One challenge that is typically faced by a higher-education institution ishow to determine which new programs to develop and curriculum changes to implement amonga diverse set of constituents7. This research takes a pragmatic approach to determine newacademic program development needs. The paper proceeds by discussing the
theirtransition to college and improving their fluency in the use of mathematics, communicationskills, and study skills and is led by a professional math educator who also serves as director ofthe ESA program. The pedagogy of the program is designed to support its ideals as an academicsuccess and empowerment program. The program is tailored to each student and his or her ownacademic progress. Some students work one-on-one with the ESA Director on specific math,study, or organizational skills. ESA provides peer tutor hours to students for whom this seemsmost helpful and appropriate. The ESA program also recognizes the research5 demonstrating theincreased power of positive, community-related activities and instruction over more traditionaltutoring and
concerns thatstudents and instructors had was about the impact of remote learning on student outcomes,especially in the context of team-based work, as all three courses involved teamwork. To addressthis concern, instructors had to ensure that students had a way to engage with teaching assistants(TAs), industry mentors, and their design team in order to complete their project. Moreover,some students and TAs were in different time zones as a result of relocating due to campusclosures, which created further communication barriers. Structured online meetings wereconducted to facilitate interaction among peers and between teams and mentors. Having astructured and consistent online meeting format ensured that a healthy amount of communicationwas
, graduate, and faculty member socialization in the academic environment[20-24]. Fewer researchers have utilized the framework in an industry environment or academic-industry partnership context. Although, few researchers have examined the engineering contextdirectly, we highlight one example to illustrate the utility of the framework.Cech et al. [25] used professional socialization to argue that experiences that occur duringprofessional training, e.g. co-op or internship experiences, cause men and women to developdifferent confidence levels about participating in the engineering community. Authors analyzedsurvey responses from 288 students at four institutions to examine behavioral and intentionalpersistence among students who enter an engineering
, Page 22.459.2engineering, insurance, banking and retail companies.These students take courses in the evening and on weekends. They have many demands on theirtime, from work to family to community, in addition to their educational commitment. Most areunder great pressure to balance their life and add value to their organizations, and they expect alot from investing in continuing their education. They are highly motivated and want to make adifference. These working adults come to the University of St. Thomas School of Engineeringgraduate programs to learn to think differently, to see more possibilities in the complex globaleconomic environment in which they are immersed, to become more innovative, and to identifyand develop their inherent
differences in perspective and expected result of all participants.8,9The greatest benefit for both industry and the research communities is the ability to engage inacademic research that benefits both society and the economy.10 Research focusing on academicengagement normally does not consider the industrial environment or policy making because theresearchers receive more attention from commercialization as opposed to policy makers.10Mutter and Pruett11 affirm that the benefit of the industry university collaboration goes beyondthese basic benefits. They share that faculty are given the opportunity to stay updated on currenttrends in industry, students are made ready for the workplace as they encounter authenticexperiences, university resources are
Page 22.1546.4attitudes among their employees.Among the Criterion 3 Program Outcomes, there are six that relate directly to leadership. Theseare: d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g) an ability to communicate effectively h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning j) a knowledge of contemporary issuesIndustry needs to articulate the specific competencies it wants in its leaders. Those competenciesneed to be communicated to academic leaders. Just as important
from Figure 5 above that time management issues were only a minor stumblingblock for students as they transitioned to the Capstone program. However, many comments (n =74) were specifically related to how time management impacted teamwork or colluded with thedifficulties of project ambiguity. For the sake of simplicity, during the data review and codingprocess, comments were assigned one category or another. Therefore, had comments beenassigned multiple categories, the time management challenge would have risen much higher onthe list of key difficulties students confronted. The sub-category breakdowns for timemanagement challenges are nearly evenly divided (see Figure 7). Alumni identified the need toset check points while balancing all
access to university facilities and its human resources,and by receiving the services and products that faculty and staff generate. In turn, jointcollaboration can provide the College with additional revenue and access to industrial equipmentand setups not available on campus. Successful ventures also help overcome the complaintsabout engineering education: lack of hands-on experience, not enough teamwork, and textbookproblems rather than real-world applications. Students’ involvement in such collaborative effortscan boost their self-confidence and help in improving their communication skills. Jointundertakings could provide professional development to faculty members as well- by exposingthem to practical situations and relevant technologies. As
disabled IoT Technology to improve classroom engagement IoT as personal learning aids/commpanions Figure 8: Some of the strategies of using IoT applications to make the world of education more inclusive. 2. IoT enabled data gathering on individual learners can connect a need with a resource. For example, a student learning about history can chat with an archaeologist. Language students can communicate with native speakers via blogs or wikis. IoT creates additional opportunities, such as data on individual students and what they are
they are likely to encounter in the industry and better equip them for professional practice,by defining problems more comprehensively and solving them in a more holistic fashion 3. Basedupon feedback from students and employers, it has been seen that educational programs that arein tune with the industry’s needs and provide opportunities for practical, hands-on learningexperiences result in highly motivated students that are engaged in the learning process.Graduates of such programs are well equipped with the tools needed for success in theirprofessional lives3.Van Hattum-Janssen and Mesquita4 conducted interviews of teachers exploring the benefit ofusing project-oriented courses in teaching engineering students. They found that the
majors as well as at NAU since 2012. Before that, her own career path has been dotted with many exciting and rewarding ventures, some of which include 7 years as a high school science teacher (2 of which were at an international school in Mongolia), and 6 years in logistics and other science support for NSF grantees in the Antarctic. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 To Infinity and Beyond: Boosting URM Students’ Career Trajectories Through Professional Experiences Abstract It is hard to deny the impact of experiential learning through internships on
their worktoward becoming culturally competent engineers.2) Are they aware of how cultural differences impact team functioning, project productivity andindividual performance?Students also seemed to understand that one cannot impose one’s beliefs, values and patterns ofbehavior on others11. This is another sign of gaining cultural competence. This became obviousto them when they lived, attended classroom activities and worked with students from theMiddle East. The different approaches to learning and projects helped underscore the importanceof being open minded to other ideas and ways of working as well as how to find common groundwith team members. “I am more open and responsive to new ideas.” Among the participants,team work and communication
utility companies in themid-west with an eleven-state footprint serving more than 5.4 million customers, to strengthenthe pipeline of future electric utility professionals. What makes this partnership so unique is thatthere is an intentional blending of all three generations currently in the workforce.This paper will focus first on the industry drivers that led the electric utility company tocollaborate with EASi to develop a unique services model. Second, this paper will discuss theobjectives of the model to (1) create a culture of learning, (2) re-engage retired electric utilityworkers in the workforce, (3) develop midcareer electrical engineers and entry-level two-yearelectrical engineering technologists and four-year electrical engineering
capstone programs may enhance student learning and engagement. For students, industry partnerships in capstone are seen as providing an intersection ofstudents’ academic learning and their future careers in industry. Our institution supportssponsored projects that can prepare students to approach open-ended problems, improve designand communication skills, incorporate stakeholder needs, and work effectively on teams. Theconnections they build with industry partners can also be the beginning of a professionalnetwork. Furthermore, experience working on a real-life project can help students identify orclarify their career path within engineering. For engineering programs, these industry partners can serve as a resource to benefit
its impact on the community. They explain how retaining and valuing community-engaged faculty who can both represent the academy to the community and bring the community into the academy are essential to helping secure the common good. (Freeman, Gust, & Aloshen, 2009, p.88)3 Page 24.965.4The faculty member, the student team, and the sponsor generally form a symbiotic relationshipthat also improves the sponsor’s operation over time. This relationship also helps buildconfidence in the quality of the students in the program and in the academic program overall.Once this symbiotic relationship is developed among the