, while meeting and/orexceeding the expectations of the student. The course curriculum herein provides anopportunity to lead by example as well as provide a model for training instructors incontent delivery – promote enduring outcome by using application based delivery.The course proposed by this paper is being developed for the Division ofConstruction Engineering and Management at Purdue University. Motivation is foundin many different forms but unified by the desire of the instructor to create studentsuccess in the construction industry. The course seeks to implement a cognitiveapprenticeship approach as the foundational learning method along with additionalmethods which are implemented on case by case bases. Utilization of the principlesfound
Paper ID #8714A Successful Partnership between Industry and Academia: Curriculum Im-provement, Research, and Outreach through Collaboration with IndustryDr. Ivan Lopez Hurtado, Northern New Mexico College IVAN LOPEZ HURTADO received his B.S. degree in Industrial Physics Engineering from Tec de Mon- terrey, Monterrey, Mexico, 1995. M.S. degree in Automation from Tec de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, 1998 and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA in 2008. He is currently the Department of Engineering, Chair at Northern New Mexico College.Dr. Jorge Crichigno, Northern New Mexico
Paper ID #33584Inclusivity in Engineering Curriculum in the Age of Industry 4.0: TheRole of Internet of ThingsDr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Pro- fessor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
year plan to integrate practicallaboratories in semiconductor testing at all levels of the BSEE curriculum. Past approaches havetraditionally implemented a single technical elective in the senior year. The proposed approach isunique in this regard as the conjecture is that introducing laboratories in semiconductor testacross the curriculum is more effective. An outline of this plan and its rationale along withexpected program outcomes are described in this paper. The experience in the first year of thisplan, including design of the interface electronics, implementation of the first two laboratoryprojects, and interactions with applications engineers, are also discussed.IntroductionAs an increasing number of transistors continue to be
) Global Outstanding Advising Award for Faculty. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Landsharks to Astronauts: Towards a new STEM Culture of ExcellenceAbstractHerein, we present the results of a preliminary study of our proposed holistic approach to STEMoutreach, education, and research facilitates. The "STEM Culture of Excellence" is based onproviding opportunities for high school, undergraduate, and graduate students to interact in arobust research environment with industry and federal professionals through education andtraining. This work contains preliminary data towards addressing the following research question:Will holistically incorporating STEM outreach
and the Undergraduate Program Coor- dinator of the Department of Construction & Operations Management, in the Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering at South Dakota State University. His research interests are in the areas of student learning, assessment of student learning and dissemination of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Page 24.253.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Capstone Project Challenges: How Industry Sponsored Projects Offer New Learning ExperiencesIntroductionThere has been an ongoing debate on the value of
School and Work: A New Stance in the Debate about Engineering Graduates’ Preparedness for Career Success Logan A. Perry, Jeremi S. LondonAbstractThe preparation of engineering graduates for industry careers has been discussed in the engineeringeducation literature for decades. Shifting from claims that students need more practical knowledgeto arguments for a broader, theory-based education, critiques regarding what type of curriculum isbetter at preparing students for work have fluctuated back and forth for over a century. Despitethis lack of consensus, engineering graduates continue to be hired in industry, with employmentopportunities increasing in recent years. This begs the question: are students truly
Industry/Academia IntersectionsAbstractThis theoretically-grounded research paper presents a study out of the University of ColoradoBoulder focused on mapping the use of industry-based problems and examples across theundergraduate core curriculum in Mechanical Engineering. The study uses a material-semioticapproach based on actor-network theory (ANT), which focuses on the interactions betweenpeople, things, and ideas within a constantly shifting network. That approach is used to study theintersections between students’ network of academic practice and the network of industry-basedpractice that they are preparing to enter. Specifically, it looks at how industry-based problemsand examples are represented in material aspects of students’ academic
diverse workforce withour various partners. Collectively, we identified a need to expand student learning at theundergraduate level beyond the classroom, thus a model for pop-up professional developmentworkshops soon followed. These workshops were developed as an outcome of our multi-yearparticipation in the Pathways to Innovation program, which was funded by the National ScienceFoundation and managed by Stanford University and VentureWell to integrate innovation andentrepreneurial skills across the engineering curriculum. The Pathways program has become achampion of the pop-up model as a flexible format for enhancing student learning across multi-disciplinary areas. The specific pop-up model adopted at New Mexico State University
learningopportunities. This enhanced understanding not only benefits employers’ hiring practices, butalso it can help Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs improve curricula and expandlearning opportunities to best meet students’ and employers’ needs. In this study, we triangulatedindustry competency model content with rural employer perspectives on new advancedmanufacturing (AM) professionals’ desired competencies (i.e., the level of skill sophistication ina particular AM work area). To extract competencies for entry-level AM rural jobs, we used adeductive approach with multiple methods. First, we used Natural Language Processing (NLP)to extract, analyze, and compare the U.S. Department of Labor’s AM 2010 and 2020Competency Models because they reflect
Engineer of 2020,13 we are developing a new BS degree program that includes a broad-based curriculum of engineering design, project management, and innovation, along with business, communication, ethics, and social sciences.14 For optimal preparation for professional engineering practice, it is recommended that this foundation be followed by post-graduate study, via a professional Master’s degree program, in a specific discipline or concentration. Our first professional Master’s degree program is in Systems Engineering. Incorporation of Clinical Experiences into Program Learning Outcomes The Systems Engineering program requires a 3 credit hour mandatory practicum in which students are hired full-time by partner
Paper ID #32316Exploring a New Mentorship Model: From One-on-One to Flash MentoringDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of San Diego Marissa Forbes, PhD is a Research Associate in the University of San Diego Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, where she works on the Engineering Exchange for Social Justice (ExSJ). Her research ar- eas include broadening participation in engineering education, engineering for social and eco-justice, and water justice. Dr. Forbes earned her MS and PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder in Civil (envi- ronmental) Engineering. She previously served as the project manager and lead editor of
executetrade-offs, balancing competing priorities, and communicating with colleagues that havedifferent technical backgrounds. This paper presents the implementation of a system-based,sponsor-partner, collaboration focused, learning approach within the curriculum of theDepartment of Automotive Engineering at Clemson University which meets these real-world design engineering needs.The program implementing this real-world approach is called Deep Orange (DO). TheDeep Orange initiative is an integral part of the automotive graduate program at theClemson University International Center for Automotive Research. The initiative wasdeveloped to provide first-year graduate engineering students with hands-on experience ofthe knowledge attained in the various
. Page 22.825.4 The MEP will meet the demand from employers for engineers that can immediatelycontribute to the current needs of a company. These engineers will be trained in the skills offinance, communication, technical management, world marketing, systems engineering,innovation and entrepreneurship. Furthermore, they will gain a hands-on experience of applyingthese skills in practical industrial projects in various engineering disciplines.5. Symposium at NJIT Before finalizing the curriculum for the new program, employers, faculty, students,representatives from the military, and college administrators will be invited to attend asymposium to be held at NJIT. The purpose of this meeting will be to establish a consensusabout the skills and
AC 2012-5087: ARTICULATION OF CURRICULUM ACROSS UNIVER-SITIES, COMMUNITY COLLEGES, AND ADULT AND CAREER CEN-TERS TO MEET THE EMERGING INDUSTRY REQUIREMENTS IN CLEANAND ALTERNATIVE ENERGYMs. Margaret Anna Traband, University of Toledo Margaret Anna Traband, M.B.A., is the Grant Director for the National Science Foundation Partnership for Innovation grant entitled An Innovative Model for a New Advanced Energy Workforce. Traband earned a bachelor’s of arts from Bowling Green State University and her master’s of business adminis- tration in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization from the University of Toledo. Previously, Traband worked as the Program Manager for the University Clean Energy Alliance of Ohio (UCEAO
- Page 24.1298.4president of TI and alumnus of TTU determined that there was a lack of engineers with trainingin product engineering. To initiate a program at TTU, a $1M donation was made to establishfacilities and curriculum to train product engineers.Product engineers are responsible for interacting with the design, development, testing,production and maintenance teams of new and existing products. Hiring product and testengineers is a particularly strong need for the semiconductor industry. These engineers must bebroadly trained, as they must be skilled in testing circuits, and they must interface with circuitdesigners, wafer fabrication and assembly personnel, and customers. These engineers have to betechnically diverse and have good
Engineering Course for Fundamental Automobile Body Design American Society for Engineering Education Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA June 26-29, 2016IntroductionThe structure of the vehicle that you drove to work today protected your life. This simple“skeleton” of the car or truck is actually a highly complex multi-material, multi-degree of freedomstructure that can fail in millions of different ways. As the automotive industry drives designs forlight-weighting, the vehicle body is becoming even more of a complex structure that must operaterobustly for 20 or more years.For the development of this new course, a major US university teamed together with a major
capability to adapt to new, different, orchanging requirements.1.5.1 Entertaining new ideas 1.5.1.1 Is open to considering new ways of doing things. 1.5.1.2 Actively seek out and carefully consider the merits of new approaches to work. 1.5.1.3 Embrace new approaches when appropriate and discard approaches that are no longer working.1.5.2 Dealing with ambiguity, complexity, and rapid change 1.5.2.1 Take proper and effective action when necessary without having all the essential facts in hand. 1.5.2.2 Easily adapt plans, goals, actions, or priorities in response to unpredictable or unexpected events, pressures, situations, and job demands
Paper ID #9959College and nonprofit industry partnership: coupling undergraduate projectswith K-12 outreach program to enhance engineering educationDeeksha Seth, Drexel University Deeksha Seth received her B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Mathematics from California State Poly- technic University, Pomona in 2009. She is currently a PhD candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Drexel University. Her research focuses on determining the compliance of Bluegill Sunfish’s tail dur- ing natural swimming by conducting perturbation studies on live fish. Her research approaches include fluid-structure interaction and applied
Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2008, pp. 235-236.4. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.5. Sattler, Melanie; Chen, Victoria; Dennis, Brian H.; Mattingly, Stephen; Rogers, K. Jamie; Weatherton, Yvette Pearson. "Integrating Sustainability Across the Curriculum: Engineering Sustainable Engineers," Accepted for the American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas, June 2012.6. Mattingly, Stephen; Chen, Victoria; Dennis, Brian H.; Rogers, K. Jamie; Sattler, Melanie; Weatherton, Yvette Pearson. "Multi-Disciplinary Sustainable Senior
the preparation of new entrants to the fieldto educators rather than practitioners.” They go on to describe two cultures starkly different butclaiming a common moniker – engineering. In essence they had identified the ethos of theacademy and industry as culturally dissimilar - each having separate values, languages ofacronyms and requirements for advancement; all of which obstruct collaborations andcommunications between them. They concluded: “The gap between practice as typified bydesign and academe as typified by the scientific approach has grown too great. Closure willdepend largely upon the willingness and ability of young academics to assimilate the industrialpoint of view and to build bridges between the two cultures. It is critical to
beneficial, we have found the career center’ does not offer tailored programs for engineering and technology students2) The Continuing Education4 offers programs or courses for a fee and their target audiences typically are degreed engineers or the general public looking to engage in life-long learning.While both of those units/organizations serve an important role in the higher educationenvironment, they normally do not offer specialized in programming specifically for currentlyenrolled engineering and technology undergraduate students.At university X’s College of Engineering, our comprehensive approach has been to take fullcharge of the employer outreach and professional development for all currently enrolledundergraduates. Unlike other
research was conducted, and anun-descriptive overview of the final product.Summary of Research Project. The overarching goal for the study was to gather information thatinforms a robust engineering solution for TI Education Technology. The stakeholders in K-12engineering education approached to contribute to this goal are (in no particular order): policymakers, academic researchers, teachers, administrators, and developers of curriculum andprofessional development. Volunteer participants were recruited in three different ways. Theywere either identified through the researcher’s (Meagan’s) network, were recruited at an eventwhere the researcher was observing, or they completed an online survey distributed to contactswithin the business’ database or
to other engineering areas. Introduction The emergence of the global economy has changed many of the business practices ofengineering employers in the United States and around the World. Due to recent changes relatedto trends in the global market, both business and industry now need work-ready engineers whocan function immediately in a complex engineering social environment1. Extended trainingperiods for newly hired engineers are not broadly available anymore, especially in smaller, mid-sized companies. New hires must contribute to the bottom line immediately. Corporate“engineer in training” programs may be too expensive for some companies. Another problemidentified by various researchers is that although students acquire
worldeconomy is going to be defined by a New Normal - one that may require us to adopt game-changingstrategies for industry to remain competitive in an interconnected world and for academia to equipengineers with the appropriate competencies. That is, engineers must be equipped with the ability toperform a specific task, action or function successfully. These competencies are the result of integrativelearning experiences in which skills, abilities and knowledge interact to form bundles that have currencyin relation to the task for which they are assembled. 1Internships and co-op are two approaches widely used by companies to attract and train engineeringstudents for the work environment, sometimes
, they need to be prepared to benefit from the knowledge beingproduced in this field and to interact constructively with colleagues in this field. As a basicintroduction to this field, our new semester curriculum will include an introduction toengineering education, as well as assignments requiring participants to read and report on at leastone experimental study whose results could be applied to a class they are teaching or might teach.In addition, faculty from the UC Engineering Education Department will be invited to makepresentations to participants on their research. These faculty will also be asked to participate inthe mock review panel to which PFF participants are required to submit abbreviated NSF REUgrant proposals. Thus the new
importantcontributing factor to student and program success. Our mentors, titled peer leaders, areengineering students beyond the first year, who serve as role models for those in the living-learning program. They assist first-year engineering students with time management skills, studyskills, social issues, family and friend problems or tensions, and other difficulties typically facingstudents new to the college academic and social environments. A peer leader can also simply besomeone for a student to hang out with or from whom a student can learn more aboutengineering majors, the curriculum, college research, engineering career fairs, engineeringstudent organizations, college faculty and staff. Peer leaders do not serve in any disciplinaryrole, so the
Learning,” Palo Alto, CA: Davies-black Publishing11. Dale, E. (1969), “Audiovisual Methods in Teaching,” (3rd ed.), New York: Dryden Press.12. Wankat, P.H. (1999), “Reflective Analysis of Student Learning in a Sophomore Engineering Course,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol.88, (no.2), 195 -203.13. Finelli, C., Klinger, A., & Budny, D.D. (2001), “Strategies for Improving the Classroom Environment,” Journalof Engineering Education, Vol 90, (no.4), pp. 491-497.14. Smith, K.A., Sheppard, A.D., Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (2005), “Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94 (no.1), pp. 87-101
is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering. Dr. Sticklen has lead a laboratory in knowledge-based systems focused on task specific approaches to problem solving. Over the last decade, Dr. Sticklen has pursued en- gineering education research focused on early engineering; his current research is supported by NSF/DUE and NSF/CISE.Ms. Cindee DresenKysha L. Frazier, Corporation for a Skilled WorkforceLouise Paquette, Lansing Community College Louise A. Paquette Lansing Community College Mathematics and Computer Science Department Degrees EdS in Curriculum and Instruction with a minor emphasis in Systems Science, Michigan State University, 1982 MAT in Mathematics Education with a
. toestablish the Engineering Success Alliance (ESA). The ESA focuses on first-year engineeringstudents from various inner-city recruiting programs and students from under-represented groupsin engineering whose admissions materials suggest they might need extra support during the firsttwo critical years in an engineering curriculum. Students are invited to participate in the ESAprior to their arrival on campus. Those who accept the invitation are then offered a variety ofsupport activities targeted primarily at building mathematics skills, study skills, and academiccapital. It is expected that these activities will assist in the retention of these students inengineering during the critical first two years of intense preparation for their engineering