stress and deformation analysis to members subjected to centric, torsional, flexual, and combined loading. Introduction to theories of failure, buckling, and energy methods, Crystal structure, imperfection in solids, mechanical properties of metals, dislocation and strengthening, failure, phase diagrams and transformations, metal alloysTextbook J. T. Black and Ronald A. Kohser, DeGarmo's Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, current edition.Course Objectives 1. To gain an understanding and appreciation of the breadth and depth of the field of manufacturing
a machine designassignment on co-op, the student was required to follow the design processreasonably and logically. School trained him in the importance of planning outand organizing the machine design structure before implementation. The co-opexperience continued to reinforce the importance of following a design process.School taught engineering language and terminology. Thus, the student was ableto enter the work place and confidently talk about detailed drawings, a bill ofmaterials, or different structural mechanisms because of classroom exposure tothese topics. For example, a bill of materials for the project in electrical circuitsclass was required. The project consisted of designing and fabricating an
AC 2008-368: INTERACTIVE LEARNING IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONJean-Claude Thomassian, State University of New York, Maritime College Dr. Jean-Claude Thomassian received his BS degrees in Electrical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering from the University of Toledo in 1992 and 1993, respectively, and MS and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from The University of Toledo in 1995 and 2002. His main professional interests are in mixed mode IC design and electrical engineering education; his recent research activity concentrates on symbolic analysis of circuits and MOS models.Anoop Desai, Georgia Southern University Dr. Anoop Desai received his BS degree in Production Engineering from the
AC 2008-821: PRELIMINARY FINDINGS FROM A QUANTITATIVE STUDY:WHAT ARE STUDENTS LEARNING DURING COOPERATIVE EDUCATIONEXPERIENCES?Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Pierrakos holds a B.S. in Engineering Science and Mechanics, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests are cardiovascular fluid mechanics and engineering education research, which includes engineering assessment, undergraduate research, design education methodologies, epistemologies of interdisciplinary education, and K-12 engineering education.Maura
benefit and use of written standards used in practice; 4. provide new employee plant safety training to all students; 5. discuss the need in design of the IEEE Code of Ethics and the National Code of Ethics for Engineers; 6. provide direct hire co-op and internships to students.GE wanted the partnership to expose students to: 1. failures and failure rates; Page 13.1135.3 2. cutting-edge technology; 3. how mechanical systems integrate with electrical systems; 4. the importance of quality and reliability; 5. interactions with mechanical and electrical engineers; 6. working in a multidisciplinary team that includes
. And finally, the flexibility to find ways tostep outside the artificial timelines associated with university educational practice. This isessential to beginning a dialog with industry, or other external partners. Based on the results atthe Project Based Learning Institute (PBLI), our external partners find project based learningvaluable enough to underwrite a major portion of its direct costs as well as to support it with theparticipation of their employees. The partnership satisfies three critical objectives. First, itenhances the curricular objectives of the college and satisfies the learning outcomes required ofour students. Second, it provides a mechanism to underwrite educational costs by deliveringvalue to industrial partners, a vital
AC 2009-789: A LEARNING-OUTCOMES SURVEY OF ENGINEERINGCOOPERATIVE-EDUCATION STUDENTS: PRELIMINARY FINDINGSJennifer Johrendt, University of Windsor Dr. Johrendt obtained her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering in 2005 from the University of Windsor after working for almost ten years as Product Development Engineer. Currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering at the University of Windsor, she previously worked for two years as an Experiential Learning Specialist in the department. She serves as both the Faculty and Departmental Cooperative Education representative at the University. She has co-authored several journal paper publications and conference
, biomedical, civil, computer,electrical, mechanical, etc.) that vary in emphasis and environmentxiii, xiv. The participants for thequalitative component of this study was limited to students majoring in electrical engineering(EE). The rationale for limiting this sample to EE students includes the researcher’s expertise inthe domain (I have a bachelor’s and master’s degree in electrical engineering) and the prohibitivecosts (money and time) associated with expanding the study to the other engineering fields. Thetrade-off to limiting the analysis to electrical engineers is that the conceptual frameworkdeveloped as a result of the study may not be generalizable to the other engineering professions.The goal of the qualitative component, however, is to
AC 2010-1524: LEARNING OUTCOMES ACHIEVEMENT IN COOPERATIVEEDUCATION: A SURVEY OF ENGINEERING STUDENTSJennifer Johrendt, University of Windsor Dr. Johrendt obtained her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering in 2005 from the University of Windsor after working for almost ten years as a Product Development Engineer in the automotive industry. Currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering at the University of Windsor, she previously worked for two years as an Experiential Learning Specialist in the department. She serves as both the Faculty and Departmental Cooperative Education representative. She has co-authored several journal paper publications and conference
engineering courses must be taken in a specific order.Therefore if a student takes time off to participate in a study abroad program it is very likely that their graduationdate will be delayed at least a semester. Compounding this problem is the fact that many junior and sophomorerequired engineering courses are only offered once a year. The root cause of this situation is the small number ofengineering students. The engineering school graduates only 70 students per year spread over four emphases;Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Product Design and Manufacturing. Astudent who misses a required course that is only offered once a year, will have to wait an entire year before theclass is offered again. In addition
AC 2011-2762: ASSESSMENT OF SERVICE LEARNINGMysore Narayanan, Miami University DR. MYSORE NARAYANAN obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several encyclopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional , national and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a senior member of IEEE and is a member of
institution,offering degrees in civil, mechanical, electrical, computer and biosystems engineering to anundergraduate enrolment of approximately 1100 students. Developed in 2003, IEEQ is aqualifications recognition program that provides an alternative licensing pathway to IEGs and isrecognized by the provincial engineering association, the Association of Professional Engineersand Geoscientists of Manitoba (APEGM) as leading to IEGs’ professional registration inManitoba. It was the first such program in Canada until 2007, when Ryerson University beganoffering a similar initiative. The IEEQ program responded to the need for a more time-effective,alternative licensing pathway with lower attrition rates to the traditional confirmatory exampathway. In
different atmosphere is critical. No longer is this the normal, learn material and repeat that material; this is discovery of material that has not been seen before and the importance of conveying the findings to an audience that is not looking for regurgitated material but material that is fresh and new. The preparation for this activity has taken four years. During the student’s undergraduate years, communication activities have been an integral part of the engineering curriculum. As is shown in Table 1, the student has been provided with multiple opportunities to investigate and practice his/her communication skills within all of the required mechanical engineering courses and many of the elective courses. By the time the student takes the
thesame employer, and additional work experiences by the same students at another employer werenot used, to eliminate duplication within the data set. These experiences included students frombiomedical, chemical, civil & environmental, computer, electrical, engineering mechanics,engineering physics, geological, industrial, materials science, mechanical, and nuclearengineering programs. They were located throughout the United States, but were heavilyconcentrated in Wisconsin, Illinois and Minnesota. Twenty-two percent of the students werefemale (67 out of 304), a slightly higher rate than expected from the overall 19% femaleundergraduate enrollment in the College. Collaborating with the program directors, our research team created an
Paper ID #16968The Effect of Cooperative Education on Retention of Engineering Students& the Transition to Full-Time EmploymentKatelyn Elizabeth Gunderson, Rochester Institute of Technology Katelyn Gunderson received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the Rochester Institute of Tech- nology, Rochester, NY. She has a background in aerospace engineering, having completed numerous cooperative education assignments spanning both industry and government organizations. Work assign- ments have included several with GE Aviation and NASA’s Johnson Space Center as well as an internship with the United States House of
assessment and review their efforts to date. The next segmentwill present the needs of the Purdue Engineering College in an undergraduate workexperience assessment system. An informal focus group made-up of some of theAssociate Heads for Undergraduate Education, other parties interested in assessment, andthe Director of Professional Practice produced the guidelines for the development of oursystem. Our proposed plans for implementation will be discussed in the subsequentsection. This will include the mechanisms we plan to utilize and the safeguardsassociated with them. The next segment will examine how we tentatively propose toanalyze the information we collect. Although this information will be primarily forinternal use, our hope is that the
. CredibilityInformation levels explicitly stated. of the source and timeliness of the information is always an issue. Given by an authority May have to invent a new method as part figure, usually to of the problem solving process.Solution methods reinforce material recently Authority figure often projects his/her presented. Veracity and solution as the method of approach
have to invent a new method as part figure, usually to of the problem solving process.Solution methods reinforce material recently Authority figure often projects his/her presented. Veracity and solution as the method of approach. efficacy never an issue. Same group of members New members join the team and old, Design team from beginning to end of experienced members leave the team, project (14 weeks). sometimes at the worst possible times
AC 2008-154: THE ACADEMIC VALUE OF COOPERATIVE EDUCATION: ALITERATURE REVIEWTylisha Baber, Michigan State University At the time this paper was written, Dr. Tylisha Baber was serving as a National Academies Christine Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow. She earned a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from North Carolina State University and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Michigan State University. Tylisha’s dissertation focused on the design and implementation of a biomass conversion process for improving the fuel properties of biodiesel. She is currently an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering at North Carolina A&T
student recruitment, retention and diversity, as well as professional development of middle school math and science teachers.Dr. Micah Hale, University of Arkansas Dr. Hale is a Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His research interests include concrete materials and structural concrete. Page 24.532.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Enrichment Activities in Support of a Student Integrated Intern Research ExperienceAbstractA national need exists for increasing the number of United States citizens who
primarily on research related to job acquisition, job satisfaction, and jobprogression, there has been correspondingly limited research on the academic impact ofcooperative educational experiences (7). With its roots in the progressive educationalphilosophy of John Dewey (4), cooperative education is designed to provide experiences thatforge direct linkage between student learning and student experience. In trying to expound onthe relationship between material learned in the classroom and students’ understanding and usageof that information in the real world, Dewey makes a strong argument for integrating more real-world applications into a student’s education.More recent work in cognitive learning theory provides supporting evidence for
Paper ID #10484Assessing the Role of 21st Century Skills on Internship Outcomes in a SteelMultinational EnterpriseMr. Jose A Galvan, Carnegie Mellon University Jose Galvan is a Ph.D Candidate in Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon University. Galvan holds a BS in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering and a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Mon- terrey TEC, and a MS in Engineering and Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. He worked in engineering education as a professor, and consultant for over 15 years.Prof. Elizabeth Casman, Carnegie Mellon University Elizabeth Casman is an Associate Research Professor
partnerships can provide multiple types of measures andfeedback mechanisms to assess student learning outcomes in an engineering program. At GrandValley State University, a cooperative education program is the catalyst for developing andmaintaing industry partnerships that provide consistent and regular external constituent input onstudents‟ knowldege, skills and abilities related to ABET student learning outcomes[1].Constituent input regarding students‟ knowledge and preparation is provided in multiple andvaried ways through direct feedback mechanisms in the workplace.Input is obtained at various levels, ranging from student-specific to program-level feedback.Individual employers are engaged in student and curricular assessment at various levels
design (and in the competitors’ design), the pump vane and shaft seals are made ofbrass alloy. The new design proposed to use a new carbon filled polymer material for the sealswhich promised much lower friction and improved life in a corrosive chemical environment.The result is a new “Model 2000” feed pump that will run longer between overhauls, generateless heat loss and use less electrical power than the old design at the same operating conditions.One key issue with the new design was that the new carbon seals are more expensive than thebrass seals. The initial cost estimate by the team was $12.00 cost increase per pump. Theproject team decided to set a target to keep the cost of the “Model 2000” at the same level as thecost of the Model 1000
Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, Systems Engineering, ComputerScience, Materials Science, Mathematics, Operations Research, and Physics.As described in our paper8 published in 2013 in the Proceedings of the American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Meeting, student demographics are: In the 2012 Summer Research Program, both undergraduates and graduate students participated in the Program: Sophomores (2), Juniors (5), Seniors (17), and Graduate Students (2). The participating students are from colleges and universities in Ohio (18), Indiana (4), Illinois (1), Tennessee (1), and Virginia (1). All of the student respondents are majoring in STEM fields: Computer Engineering (6), Electrical Engineering (7), Mechanical Engineering (5
the Improvement of Postsecondary Education to Develop a Corporate Feedback System for Use in Curricular Reform.Anita Todd, University of Cincinnati Anita Todd, Assistant Professor in the Division of Professional Practice, is the faculty co-op coordinator for electrical and the mechanical/nuclear ACCEND program and assists with the IT and data compiling needs of the division. Professor Todd has been actively involved in many local, regional, and national cooperative education organizations. Professor Todd is currently the president-elect for the Cooperative Education and Internship Association (CEIA), has presented and held board positions in the American Society of Engineering Education
impacts of their work as professional engineers. The design challenges arestructured to take advantage of the large class size through project management trainingand multi-faceted project outcomes.The Capstone project for the 2009/2010 academic year is a collaboration with TheMustardSeed (hereafter MS), a non-profit outreach group that runs shelters, food andclothing banks and education and retraining programs for the homeless. The partnershipis aimed at assisting the MS’s educational division with GED studies and life skills. Asmany of the clients of the MS have difficulties with focus and with understanding andrelating to material, the students’ challenge will be to use their engineering knowledge todevelop physical or computer-based aids
. Page 15.574.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Facilitating Engineering Students in the Language Classroom: MultipleIntelligence Profiles to Improve Foreign Language CompetenceThis is the first part of a study aimed at improving English language classroom materials forstudents of an engineering degree programme at a non-English speaking university. Intechnical subjects at tertiary level, 2nd language competence, (in this case English) has becomehighly important due to the need for communication in a global workplace. However, aslanguage learning is usually neither the primary goal nor a particular academic of linguisticstrength of students who have chosen such a degree path, motivation can be low.In this study, the theory of
described by a three-pillar model. Figure 1: Three-pillar modelPraxis-oriented learning includes project and problem based learning, as well as a focus on theapplication of theories and methods learned in core engineering subjects (i.e. mathematics,mechanics, electrics). The main challenges are the coordination of the lectures with regard tocontent and timing, and lecturers’ motivation. Furthermore, project and problem basedlearning demands much more time in terms of supervision than standard lectures. Involvingstudents in industrial projects is not without risks and we have to ensure that such projects arecompleted to the satisfaction of our partners in industry.All departmental staff who teaches engineering
Policy Studies in Education from the University of Pittsburgh investigating the outcomes of education and outreach programming.Rory A Cooper, University of Pittsburgh Rory A. Cooper, Ph.D. received the B.S. and M.Eng degrees in electrical engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo in 1985 and 1986, respectively. He received the Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering with a concentration in bioengineering from University of California at Santa Barbara in 1989. He is FISA & Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) Chair and Distinguished Professor of the Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology, and professor of Bioengineering, Mechanical Engineering, Physical