with this valuable skill. (Source 9)We can all agree that classroom learning is practical and effective but performance or practiceoriented education, where students are able to learn from working in the real world can be muchmore valuable. Northeastern’s renowned Cooperative Education program, where students are able Page 23.16.3to work in a professional setting related to their field of study and attain increased responsibility, isnaturally viewed as an untapped resource. Their co-op program bridges the gap between classroomand real world learning. Northeastern’s Gordon Engineering Leadership program consequentlyreasoned, why not use
AC 2011-1388: OAKLAND UNIVERSITY/ALTAIR ENGINEERING TECH-NICAL BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE CORPORATE INTERNSHIP PRO-GRAMDavid W Schmueser, Altair Engineering Inc. Dr. David Schmueser is the Business Development Manager of University Programs in the United States for Altair Engineering, with primary responsibility for identifying and implementing Altair’s advanced engineering software and grid computing technologies for curriculum and research applications. With more than 30 years of experience in engineering research, project technical management, and en- gineering instruction, Schmueser’s strategic role at Altair focuses on the development and execution of Altair’s university marketing and sales plan, fellowship program
Engineering Strategic Plan, and the combined input of theFaculty Coordinators from the Colleges of Engineering and Technology. The following keyinitiatives were proposed as a means to accomplish the mission and meet the stated goal ofincreasing the overall participation rate in some form of Professional Practice: 1) Utilize and promote a broader definition of “Practice” that includes Co-Op and other forms of appropriate and directed work experience; 2) Provide improved support, recognition, and resources for the departmental component of the program; 3) Enhance the academic element of the program by adding instruction covering topics that relate to the functional utilization of professional skills within
education program. Ethics instruction occurs during arequired cooperative education preparatory course, as well as during each of three semesterswhen students are employed with industry partners to practice engineering in a cooperativeeducation program.Introductory engineering ethics content is provided in the preparatory course, including reviewand assessment of case studies. During the co-op work semesters, online tools have beendeveloped that allow for easy collection and summarization of input related to student outcomes.Students are required to complete online, distance-learning modules during each cooperativeeducation semester which allow for additional direct measurement of student learning outcomes,including five engineering ethics-focused
Paper ID #11152Scholarship Program Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transfor-mationDr. Chip W Ferguson, Western Carolina University Chip Ferguson is the Associate Dean of the Kimmel School and Associate Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina University.Dr. Paul M Yanik, Western Carolina University Dr. Paul Yanik is currently an Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering at Western Carolina Uni- versity. His background includes fifteen years in the development of telecommunication and mobile microprocessor hardware, and avionics. His areas of research include human-robot interactions, assis
co-op programs has been shownto offer numerous benefits related to career advancement in the engineering profession[2] [3] [4] [5],including the acquisition of both technical and non-technical skills. However, despite the earlyand enduring relationship between engineering schools and co-op programs, some groupscontinue to be underrepresented in engineering education and practice. In terms of its ability toattract those from under-represented groups, including women and Aboriginals, the professionlags behind others, including law, medicine and dentistry. In addition, international engineeringgraduates (IEGs) face barriers in having their foreign credentials recognized and achieving fullentry into the Canadian labour market[6] [7] [8] [9] and
AC 2012-4594: EXAMINING OUTCOMES DATA FROM AN UNDERGRAD-UATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAMMr. Bryan E. Dansberry, NASA Johnson Space Center Bryan Dansberry has been involved in experiential education for nearly 30 years as a co-op student, mentor, professor, and now internship Project Manager. As a member of ASEE, he has served actively in the leadership of the Cooperative and Experiential Education Division. Page 25.596.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Examining Outcomes Data from an Undergraduate Internship ProgramAbstractIn 2008 NASA’s Undergraduate Student Research Program
-persisters left because they thought that the study program was too difficult,additionally claiming, too little time was left available to enjoy life. Most of themselected other, non-engineering degree programs, or started degree programs atuniversities with an open-ended period of time permitted to complete their studies. Page 22.439.10andem DraftPaper_1864_2011.doc 9/12Figure 5: Relation between the admission test scores and proportion of persistenceIn (1), the authors suggest that leaving engineering educational fields is usually not aresult of poor preparation or conceptual difficulty, but instead
AC 2011-2386: CHOICES FOR PH.D.S IN ENGINEERING: ANALYSESOF CAREER PATHS IN ACADEMIA AND INDUSTRYMonica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West LafayetteJiabin Zhu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jiabin Zhu is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She obtained a B.S. in Physics from East China Normal University, a M.S. in Optics from Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and a second M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Purdue University. Her primary research in- terests relate to comparative study methods and frameworks in engineering education, global engineering, professional development and mentoring of engineering graduate students. She is a student member of American Society
2006-393: DEVELOPING GLOBALLY-MINDED ENGINEERS THROUGHEDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: A PANEL DISCUSSION ON INTERNATIONALCO-OP/INTERNSHIP PROGRAM MODELSDebbie Gulick, Georgia Institute of Technology Debbie Gulick is the International Practicum Coordinator at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her responsibilities include developing and sustaining a large, broad-based program of international internships and cooperative education opportunities for students. Debbie has worked in the field of international education with a specialization in international technical internships for the past five years. She has sent students from over 50 universities to internships in approximately 40 countries. Debbie
AC 2009-491: DEFINING THE IMMEDIATE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF ANUNDERGRADUATE INTERNSHIP PROGRAMBryan Dansberry, University of Cincinnati Page 14.403.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Capturing immediate learning outcomes of undergraduate internships:NASA’s Undergraduate Student Research ProjectAbstractGovernment internship and co-op programs fluctuate greatly in size and scope from year-to-year.A major source of this instability comes from volatility in the administrative priorities set at thehighest levels of these agencies. In the face of rapidly shifting administrative priorities, it isessential that experiential program managers capture data defining the full
. Page 25.523.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Employing Strategic Communications to Accomplish Outreach Goals for Experiential Programs Authors: Anthony Zippay (USRA-USRP Program Manger) and Heather Ogletree (USRA-USRP Program Coordinator)AbstractIn 2010 NASA’s Undergraduate Student Research Program (USRP) implemented a uniquecommunication strategy to recruit STEM students, develop deeper University partnerships, anddocument/publicize program activities through the use of multimedia products, social media andweb/print periodicals that resulted in national media attention including Forbes online andenhanced University and industry
AC 2012-5150: CREATING A WATER AND WASTEWATER EDUCATIONALPROGRAM WITH INCORPORATED EXPERIENTIAL TRAININGMr. Joseph Lee Gutenson, Western Kentucky University Joseph Gutenson is an Environmental Support Specialist with the Center for Water Resource Studies at Western Kentucky University. During his brief professional career he has participated in the construction of TMDL reports for the Panther Creek and Long Falls Creek Watersheds and site reconnaissance for the Bacon Creek TMDL. He has also participated in research related to the water industries workforce and serves as a presence for the Water Training Institute’s recruitment efforts. His present work includes aiding in the creation of a software packaged, created
partnerships can provide multiple types of measures andfeedback mechanisms to assess student learning outcomes in an engineering program. At GrandValley State University, a cooperative education program is the catalyst for developing andmaintaing industry partnerships that provide consistent and regular external constituent input onstudents‟ knowldege, skills and abilities related to ABET student learning outcomes[1].Constituent input regarding students‟ knowledge and preparation is provided in multiple andvaried ways through direct feedback mechanisms in the workplace.Input is obtained at various levels, ranging from student-specific to program-level feedback.Individual employers are engaged in student and curricular assessment at various levels
improved degree program stu- dent learning outcomes and measures to align to national accreditation standards and state mandates. Dr. Bhati’s research interests include assessment of student learning outcomes, teaching and learning, survey design and research methodology, and research related to human performance.Mrs. Kim A Small, University of Central Florida College of Engineering and Computer Science Kim Small is the Director of Academic Support Services for the College of Engineering and Computer Science. She holds a BS in Business Administration and a MA in Educational Leadership. She joined the University of Central Florida in 1995 and has served in various advising roles for the College of Engineering and
-third of ETDC.Later in the survey, respondents were asked to provide examples from their school or departmentof how Making has increased access to engineering and engineering technology. Respondentsindicated a variety in interpretation of the word access; while some related this term to issues ofdiversity and inclusion, more focused on access within the university space (e.g. offering accessto students from different departments and majors). Related to diversity and inclusion, onerespondent reported a significant increase in female enrollment in engineering due to Makingactivities. Another shared that a program associated with their makerspace has “providedsignificant increases” to student access, “helping to triple the number of
AC 2011-1204: IMPLEMENTING A CEAB GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES BASEDCO-OP WORK TERM CURRICULUMAnne Marie Coolen, Dalhousie University Ms. Coolen has been the director of the Engineering and Computer Science Co-operative Education Program for 22 years. She is a former president of the Canadian Association for Co-operative Education (CAFCE) and secretary the CAFCE Accreditation Council. She has been spearheading a project in the Faculty of Engineering to enhance the educational value of co-operative education for three years in an effort to shift the program’s focus from placement outcomes to learning outcomes. Page
Paper ID #11158Increasing Student and Faculty Participation and Student Learning in an Un-dergraduate STEM Summer Research Program in a Government Institutionthrough a Higher Education PartnershipDr. Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Augsburg College Dr. Lanzerotti received her A.B. from Harvard College, M. Phil. from University of Cambridge (U.K.), and her Ph.D. from Cornell University, all in physics. She is an Assistant Professor of Physics at Augsburg College, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Previously she was a faculty member in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright
Cooperative Education: A Literature ReviewAbstractCooperative education began as an experiential education program for engineering students atthe University of Cincinnati in 1906 and remains a key component of many engineeringprograms nationwide[1]. Cooperative education provides opportunities for students to engage inexperiential education, integrating academic course work with practical work experience. Whilemany sources have commented on the affective benefits of cooperative education, this paperexamines the literature to assess the academic value of cooperative education.Faculty, Student and Employer Views on Cooperative EducationRelatively little is known about how engineering faculty value, account for, and
classroom environment of engineering colleges in the Arab GulfRegion. At the start, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks of engineeringeducation in the Region. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings on teaching/learningpractices in engineering colleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros and cons of the lectureformat, and examines the literature on meanings and substance of different active learningprotocols focusing on cooperative engagement strategies. The paper, also, sheds light on:theoretical roots, research support, current practices, and suggestions for redesigning classes-ifneed be- to stimulate interaction and help break the traditional lecture dominant pattern whencooperative learning protocols are deployed. The
subjects.Although the students can only participate for three to four weeks, the brevity does not seem to Page 14.557.8negatively affect the sponsors’ perception. When students are matched well with their interests,sponsors often include free text responses on their surveys similar to the following: “Although we only had Gabby for 3 weeks, her skills and ability to work were as strong as coops who had returned for a second summer”7.A project sponsor survey was sent to our mechanical engineering related AIADs. The samescale in Table 1 was used. This abbreviated chart shows that the institution’s mechanicalengineering program is meeting its program
cooperative education program. In fall 2006 these mentors were either on campus doing their “school” rotation, or were out on a “work” rotation. 3. Each mentee was assigned a mentor based on gender and engineering curriculum of choice. NC State Engineering has 18 engineering majors. 4. The program was implemented in the E101: Intro to Engineering and Problem Solving course. All first-semester engineering students are enrolled in this course each fall. Page 12.1056.3MENTOR Expectations – Year 2:At a minimum, for each mentor-mentee pair, one interaction was required specifically related tothe Resume Assignment (see Appendix A) in the E
Paper ID #18045The Students’ Experience Coming Back After Cooperative Education Expe-riencesDr. J. C. McNeil, University of Louisville JC McNeil is an Assistant Professor for the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at University of Louisville. Contact email: j.mcneil@louisville.eduMrs. Mary Andrade, University of Louisville, J.B. Speed School of Engineering Mary Andrade is the Associate Director of the Career Development and Cooperative Education office at the University of Louisville JB Speed School of Engineering. In this role she oversees the mandatory co-op program for more than 1000 students each year.Alex
class time. They canalso be held responsible to finish the work if they don’t show enough interest to complete thetasks. The learner-centered pedagogy of incorporating projects into formal instruction is assessedand some observations pertaining to this experience are cited. To achieve this goal, a designproject is chosen at the beginning of the course in order to motivate and verify/go over coursecontent and to make students work in teams. The experience will be measured by student’sresponses to a survey and their ability to complete a wide variety of tasks related to the subjectmatter.IntroductionWe decided to introduce Active/Cooperative Learning techniques in engineering education toengage and motivate students in the learning process inside
theyencounter reflect work in the engineering world. The questions that require reflection on the level ofengineering performed by the student can bring out a whole spectrum of valuable experiences, butthey also may reflect a more elementary experience that may not be acceptable to some members ofthe faculty. If these faculty members are evaluating the reports, bias may slip into the process.Students carefully relating their experiences may discover negative responses that defyunderstanding. If an experience is very mundane, students have difficulty in making it more than itis. Here the coordinators of the program can step in to provide a supplementary avenue that willprovide the technical direction for the faculty member and another valuable
Page 25.347.2enjoys a unique relationship with employers in business and government as suppliers ofmotivated and educated students in exchange for paid on-the-job learning experiences. Theimpact of co-op education on engineering students has been examined by many professionals.For example, Blair et al.3 results indicated that engineering students who completed a three-semester co-op education program earned higher GPAs than non-coop students and earned morein terms of starting salaries, but took two semesters longer to complete their undergraduateprogram. In addition, at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW): 94% of Co-op students persist to graduation 91% of Co-op graduates land career-related jobs within 1-2 months
designproblems related to specific courses have become common tools for teaching skills such asworking in teams, solving open-ended problems, and communicating both technical and non-technical information. While these methods have met with significant success, continuedexpansion of curricular-based approaches is constrained by competition for limited class timewith the varied other demands on the undergraduate engineering curriculum. In addition, “open-ended” projects often require significantly higher demands on faculty than traditional structuredlectures and assignments.External design competitions, either independent or sponsored by a professional society or otherorganization, provide an additional approach to augment the engineering education
Paper ID #10333Engineering Students’ Experiences of Workplace Problem SolvingDr. Rui Pan, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering and Education at Texas A&M. After studying philosophy and information science at three universities in Germany, he received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri- Columbia. He worked at Concordia University, Montreal and has been the director of the Institute of P-12 Engineering Research and Learning at Purdue
in Engineering (PACE) program from 2006-2008 atMorgan State University. In addition to pre- and post-assessment test scores from the Cornell Page 22.403.3Critical Thinking Test, the researcher added a qualitative inquiry to the study which looked atfaculty and students’ perceptions of critical thinking. The researcher was curious aboutindividual student’s perception of the critical thinking intervention and the manner in which theengineering faculty perceived the importance of integrating critical thinking into engineeringcurricula. The overarching goals of this research were to: provide a critical thinking course thatwould increase
presentations that have featured experiential learning and engineering education topics as well as her engineering research in vehicle structural durability and the use of neural networks to model non-linear material behaviour.Schantal Hector, University of Windsor Ms. Hector is currently pursuing her Bachelor's Degree in International Relations and Economics at the University of Windsor. She is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Career Education and has applied her knowledge and skills as part of the project to develop learning outcomes for the cooperative education program over the past two years. She has been instrumental in the collection and statistical analysis of the learning