. IntroductionThis evidence-based paper assesses strategies for Research Experience for Undergraduates(REU) social program success. REU programs typically bring together students from across thecountry – or even around the world – to a university campus for the summer. While at thisuniversity, the students learn how to conduct real research in their discipline by actually doing it,under the supervision of a faculty mentor. Giving students exposure to conducting bona fideresearch allows them to determine whether they may be interested in pursuing a research career(and, to support this, continuing on to graduate-level education).Many students who participate in REU programs remember these programs long after theprogram is complete. The initial experience
Paper ID #33589A Call to Create an Open-source Project Initiative for CybersecurityVirtual LabsDr. Radana Dvorak, City University of Seattle Dr. Dvorak received her Ph.D. in computer science from the University of London, Queen Mary College and Master’s in AI from the University of Sussex. Dr. Dvorak has been working in IT, higher education, academic industry and program development for over 25 years. She has served as a researcher, university professor and Dean in the US, UK, and the Cayman Islands. Currently, Dr. Dvorak is an associate professor and program manager at the School of Technology & Computing at City
principles for conducting research responsibly within engineering domains • Gain experience in working in research teams and communicating with individuals from different backgrounds, cultures, and research disciplines • Reflect on their initial research experience and develop goals for the remainder of their undergraduate research appointmentAll course materials were available via the university’s online learning platform on the first dayof the semester, and students had until the last day of final exam week to submit assignments andearn points for the course. Students were able to “build their own course” by selectingassignments and activities that best fit their academic, research and personal goals
study. The course learning objectives began through a multi-institution FacultyLearning Community, with the detailed development of the course taking place at a singleinstitution, Kettering University, under the auspices of a grant from the university’s teachingcenter.Course Learning Objectives and PrerequisitesThe course learning objectives were initially set forth within a Faculty Learning Community(FLC) focused on undergraduate research advising. This FLC included both two-year and four-year institutions, with faculty coming from a range of different academic disciplines. Discussionsamong the faculty members focused on what aspects of research were most important andneeded to be understood before students were able to be effective on
Paper ID #32524Operations of a Research Experience for Undergraduates Program During aPandemicDr. Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University Jeremy Straub is the Director of the NDSU Institute for Cyber Security Education and Research and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the North Dakota State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Scientific Computing, an M.S. and an M.B.A. and has published over 40 journal articles and over 120 full conference papers, in addition to making numerous other conference presentations. Straub’s research spans the gauntlet between technology, commercialization and
Andriessen’s[4] dual purpose of DBR model as illustrated in Figure 1. The focus of the program design isprogressive refinement through the problem statement; defining the design and learningobjectives; planning (project management) of the curricular design, development of thecurricular ideation and selection of a design for initial implementation; and ultimately acontinuously reformed model with a curricular model improvement process. The focus of theresearch design is to establish the research questions; identify the learning theories applicable tothe research work; design of the research work that influences the curricular implementation andimprovement; and ultimately to disseminate what is learned and add to the body of knowledgeon engineering
study was the experience of participating in engineeringresearch as either an undergraduate student researcher or graduate student mentor. Both graduateand undergraduate students were interviewed during this study to understand the effect of thephenomenon of research on the participants. These interviews were conducted in a semi-structured manner such that the interviewer was free to ask the participant to expand on pointsthat might hint to their feeling of efficacy toward engineering practice. The interview questionsfocused on the student’s feelings toward engineering research and how they personally felt theirabilities were influenced by their experience.During the initial phase of this study, four interviews were conducted and coded [1
Paper ID #29221Design-Based Research: Students seeking co-op in new educational modelDr. Dennis Rogalsky, Minnesota State University, MankatoDr. Bart M Johnson, Itasca Community College Bart Johnson is the Provost of Itasca Community College. He is active in engineering education research and is a former engineering instructor and program coordinator at Itasca. Dr. Johnson is a co-founder of the ABET Innovation Award recognized Iron Range Engineering program. Prior to Itasca, he was a design engineer in John Deere’s Construction and Forestry Division.Dr. Ronald R Ulseth, Iron Range Engineering Ron Ulseth directs and
salary. The other two thirds of their salary is typically paid throughexternal research contracts. The stipend funds come from a variety of different sources includingmoney from the university earmarked for experiential learning experience, departmentendowment funds, Chip Camp tuition income, and industrial sponsors.5. Discussion and ConclusionsThe undergraduate research program called IMMERSE has four key aspects. (1) Single pointentry with an online application process provides a better way for advertising of the program. Italso provides more efficient initial research training. (2) Authentic research is attained byplacing undergraduate researchers into existing projects, maintaining a reasonable student-faculty ratio, and providing for a
Paper ID #29106The Community-Engaged College: Grand Valley State University’s Industryand Community Partnership ModelCasey Thelenwood, Grand Valley State University Casey Thelenwood is the Assistant Dean for the Grand Valley State University (GVSU) Seymour and Esther Padnos College of Engineering and Computing. Casey received her B.A. in Education from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, her M.Ed. from Grand Valley State University, and is currently pursuing a MBA degree. She is a Certified Research Administrator through the Research Administrators Certification Council.Dr. Paul D. Plotkowski, Grand Valley State
; createassessment measures for individual events and for the program and document them; and thinkthrough funding plans. Provide and support student leaders with retreats and planning times todiscuss and set goals for being involved and ways to ensure goals are being met and students stayengaged. By planning early for these areas of programmatic expansion, it will help address bothlonger-term successes for the program and provide fodder for return-on-investmentconversations with both university administrators and event sponsors.Future Research and ConclusionWith this initial research, the authors acknowledge that there are many opportunities for futureresearch including additional surveys or focus groups of student leaders as the programs growsand produces
, commercialization and technology policy. In particular, his research has recently focused on cybersecurity topics including intrusion detection and forensics, robotic command and control, aerospace command and 3D printing quality assurance. Straub is a member of Sigma Xi, the AAAS, the AIAA and several other technical societies, he has also served as a track or session chair for numerous conferences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessment of Cybersecurity Competition Teams as Experiential Education ExercisesAbstractThis research paper presents initial work on characterizing the educational value of cybersecuritycompetition teams to their student
design projects andexperiential learning in the makerspace while growing the overall sense of community.Considering these strategies, this research study addresses the following questions. 1. How has the demographics, in terms of student major, gender identity, and racial identity changed over the first three years of use? 2. To what extent have these three strategies, and the initiatives they spawned, impacted that change? a. Early exposure b. Structured learning opportunities c. Marketing and communicationBackgroundFirst opened in the spring of 2017, the Anderson Student Innovation Labs at the University ofMinnesota are a set of makerspaces designed to give the people in the College of Science
Paper ID #31387Evaluation of the Second Year of a REU Program on Cyber-physical SystemCybersecurityDr. Jeremy Straub, North Dakota State University Jeremy Straub is the Associate Director of the NDSU Institute for Cyber Security Education and Research and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the North Dakota State University. He holds a Ph.D. in Scientific Computing, an M.S. and an M.B.A. and has published over 40 journal articles and over 120 full conference papers, in addition to making numerous other conference presenta- tions. Straub’s research spans the gauntlet between technology
47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, 2011.[35] N. Hotaling, B. B. Fasse, L. F. Bost, C. D. Hermann, and C. R. Forest, “A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 630–656, 2012.[36] J. Straub, R. Marsh, and D. Whalen, Small Spacecraft Development Project-Based Learning. New York, NY: Springer, 2017.[37] J. Straub, R. Marsh, and D. Whalen, “Initial Results of the First NSF-Funded Research Experience for Undergraduates on Small Satellite Software,” AIAA/USU Conf. Small Satell., 2015.[38] J. Straub, “Initial results from the first national survey of student outcomes from small satellite
. Scholars have created many models of the engineeringdesign/innovation process, many of which include practices from initial understanding of projectspecifications all the way through product delivery. As our purpose was a model that could beinterpretable and digestible to undergraduate engineering researchers, we distinguish betweenonly three practices central to engineering innovation: designing, running tests, and analyzingresults (the latter two are sometimes combined in lab or technical courses16).In our model, the practice of designing entails problem scoping, problem framing, and solutiongenerating17, 18. It requires defining problems or research questions that are not only interestingbut also important, and assessing the impact of possible
integrating scientific communication activities within an existingcommunity of practice (SC-CoP) in the context of a research lab. After 11 months, activities arestill held weekly and are now organized mostly by graduate students from the lab, with littleinput from our staff. Results from our surveys suggest that students appreciate these activitiesand find that the activities address the needs they have related to scientific communication.These findings demonstrate that formalizing knowledge transfer in an experiential environmentusing a community of practice is possible by integrating regular, structured activities.This project is still ongoing and will continue to evolve with the feedback and initiative of labmembers. We plan to increase the
Paper ID #23905Exploring How Engineering Internships and Undergraduate Research Expe-riences Inform and Influence College Students’ Career Decisions and FuturePlansKayla Powers, Stanford UniversityDr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a research scientist in the Designing Education Lab in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Director of ePortfolio Initiatives in the Office of the Registrar at Stanford University. Chen’s current research interests include: 1) engineering and entrepreneurship education; 2) the pedagogy of ePortfolios and reflective practice in higher education; and 3) reimagining
with mentorStudy designThis study was a descriptive study that used a single group, pretest and posttest design, andmixed methods concurrent embedded strategy. The single group was the INSuRE class. Theclass structure was predetermined prior to the research and the team members were assigned bythe instructor of the class. This study utilized the pretest and posttest design [45] to address theinvestigation of the relationship of cybersecurity active team-based learning research experienceand research self-efficacy; and examined whether the relationship was different between genders.The mixed methods approach was used to explain the pretest and posttest results based on threecriteria introduced by Creswell and Clark: (1) to explain initial
Paper ID #27552Students’ Self-Assessment of Modern Making SkillsDr. Diana R. Haidar, Carnegie Mellon University Diana R. Haidar, Ph.D. is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. Her background spans industry work in manufacturing, research efforts towards developing nanocomposites for advanced tribological performance in extreme environments, and prototyping experience designing-fabricating-building-testing-implementing various custom experimen- tal equipment. These experiences led to a passion for using makerspace resources to bring more hands-on
of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State University, an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in education, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of K-12, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include assessment, team development, outreach and education research for DC Col- orado’s hands-on initiatives. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Push and Pull: Integrating Industry Across the Student ExperienceAbstractThis work-in-progress paper focuses on
Paper ID #32812A Cocurricular Framework for a Multinational, Vertically IntegratedEngineering Design ProjectDr. Lelanie Smith, University of Pretoria Dr. Lelanie Smith is an Aeronautical engineer in the applied aerodynamic field. Currently she is a senior lecturer in the Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering at the University of Pretoria. Her research primarily focuses on application of computational fluid dynamic methods for modelling alterna- tive aircraft configurations. In addition to her technical research, Lelanie is also involved in development of sustainable co-curricular models that not only
Paper ID #29095Longitudinal Study to Develop and Evaluate the Impacts of a”Transformational” Undergraduate ECE Design Program: Study ResultsandBest Practices ReportDr. Rachael E Cate, Oregon State University Rachael Cate: Dr. Rachael Cate received her MA in rhetoric and composition from Oregon State Univer- sity in 2011 and her Ph.D. in Higher Education Leadership and Research from Oregon State University in 2016. She joined the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University as a member of the professional faculty in 2016. In this role, she provides engineering communications
, encourage, and assiststudents in the development of their professional competencies and efforts to reach their goals.This approach to implementing the PFE course series helps faculty meet the following sixobjectives for the department’s undergraduate students:1. Improving career planning process by requiring active participation in industry, research and community organizations or experiential practical learning initiatives.2. Increasing engagement, retention, diversity, and potential for professional career success.3. Inspiring a greater interest in professional and social impact.4. Introducing engineering ethics and methods of evaluating risk and resolving conflicts.5. Increasing involvement in design-oriented projects during sophomore
paper considers the value of robotics competitions from the perspective of theirexperiential education value. Each year, thousands of students across the United States andaround the world participate in a wide variety of robotics competitions. It is generallyrecognized that student participants find these experiences highly enjoyable and have theopportunity to gain and demonstrate skills in a variety of areas directly and peripherally relatedto the project. However, despite the prevalence of these activities, insufficient research has beenperformed to characterize their specific value and the sources that it comes from.This paper presents initial work on the characterization of the value of participation in roboticscompetition teams. Modified
, community engagement and research profile.Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto Lisa Romkey serves as Associate Professor, Teaching Stream and Associate Chair, Curriculum, Teaching and Learning with the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto. In this position, Lisa plays a central role in the evaluation, design and delivery of a dynamic and complex curriculum, while facilitating the development and implementation of various teaching learning and assessment initiatives. Lisa teaches undergraduate courses in engineering & society, and graduate courses in engineering edu- cation. Her research interests include teaching and assessment practices in engineering. Lisa also serves as Associate Director for
Paper ID #29303Developing a Framework for Experiential LearningDr. John H Callewaert, University of Michigan John Callewaert is Director of Strategic Projects in the Office of the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education, College of Engineering, University of Michigan. He previously served as a program director with the University of Michigan’s Graham Sustainability Institute, Director of the University of Michigan- Flint’s Office of Research, and the Director of the Institute for Community and Environment at Colby- Sawyer College. He completed doctoral study in Resource, Policy and Behavior at the University of
variety of brainstorming techniques including think-pair-share, a post-it board,and large group discussion. In contrast to later focus groups and interviews that were led by theprimary researcher, the initial focus group was led by a faculty partner in order to free up theprimary researcher to observe and take notes. The outcome of the focus group was a substantiallist of issues related to the internship search process and a corresponding list of potential ideasfor beginning to address those issues.Following the initial focus group, a test interview was conducted with a student who hadpreviously expressed an interest in providing input. That interview was used both to collect dataand to test potential interview questions. After completing that
to make relevant design decisions and run a pilot virtualinternship. At the completion of the virtual internship the research team conducted interviewswith students, employer partners and facilitators before evaluating the initial design decisionsmade (duration, number of feedback points, number of reflections) in light of data captured aboutthe experience of each stakeholder. The research team then discussed potential changes with thefacilitators and made adjustments to the design before re-running the virtual internship again. Asa result, educators can now select one of the four pre-built structures that emerged and embed itinto their course or use the pre-built structure and make adaptions to suit their needs. Developingthese pre-built
. Andrea L. Welker, PE, is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and a Professor in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University. Her research focuses on the geotechnical aspects of stormwater control measures and the use of recycled materials in plastic pipes. In addition to teaching and performing research, she is the director of the GeoVideo competition for the Geo-Institute of ASCE and is the Program Chair of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE.Gayle F. Doyle, Villanova University Ms. Gayle Doyle is the Assistant Director for Undergraduate Student Services and Operations in the College of Engineering at Villanova University. In this capacity, Ms