andethical responsibility in the undergraduate engineering curriculum. The current studyinvestigated disciplinary differences in performance on the ethics and professionalism section ofthe Fundamentals of Engineering Examination. This included application of descriptive andinferential statistics to appraise previously identified differences between the civil engineering,electrical engineering, and mechanical engineering aggregate performance on the ethics andprofessionalism section of the Examination. While this investigation does not portend to identifywhich discipline generates the most ethical or professional engineers, it does clearly identifywhich discipline in this institutional sample is the best at preparing its students for the ethics
topics related to design and professionalism,including ethics, are discussed. Of course, in addition to the project work the student engineersengage in technical learning through participating in one credit competencies which ideallyconnect to and support the project. There are required core competencies in mechanicalengineering (e.g. mechanics of materials, dynamic systems, etc.), electrical engineering (e.g. ACcircuits, electronics, etc.), and engineering broadly (engineering economics, statistics, etc.) aswell as technical electives. For more details about the curriculum please see the work by Ulseth,et al [24].This curriculum connects to this paper’s focus of learning ethics with fiction through a commonread for the seminar class, which is
education as an integral part of ethics education8,9.Despite the diverse methods of delivery and the varied content of the ethics curriculum, facultyface obstacles to integrating ethics into the curriculum. These obstacles include personal factors,such as students’ levels of maturity and faculty attitudes towards teaching ethics, as well assystemic barriers, such as inadequate ethical training in the faculty’s own education15. Thesesystemic barriers can interfere with the ability to incorporate ethics into the curriculum, and thuspotentially hinder students’ ethical development. Therefore, it is important to recognize theseobstacles and develop ways to overcome them.Conceptual FrameworkThe overall research project is guided by a conceptual model of
of ABET as a major contributor[10], [11]. Barry & Ohland [12]have elaboratedon the university or departmental policy as pre-planned curriculum redesign before ABETEngineering Criteria 2000 criteria, influence from administrators, and input from advisory boardsand employer surveys as additional important factors shaping undergraduate engineeringcurricula. Despite accreditation criteria, professional license exams, national reports, andprofessional organizations of engineering have been major factors for incorporating engineeringethics education in undergraduate curricula. Walczak et al. [13]have cautioned that engineeringprograms still struggle to incorporate ethics into the curriculum and there exists a large variationin integrating
meta-analysis, but one of the methods he discusses, servicelearning, is viewed by others10, 29 as a component of a curriculum incorporation approach.There appears to be a significant amount of debate related to methods of incorporation, but verylittle rigorous investigation to determine which methods of curriculum incorporation are mostcommon or most effective. Drake et al.35 performed a comparison of two methods of integratingethics in the engineering curriculum, a stand-alone course and several modules within generalengineering courses (quasi-across-the-curriculum). This rare comparison of two curriculumincorporation methods was unsuccessful in generating conclusive statistics in support of eithermethod. Discussion and debate over curriculum
Paper ID #26367Short Story Writing Requirement for Enhanced Biomedical Engineering Ed-ucation and for Engineering Ethics Competitions — Ethical Twists and CostAssessment RequiredDr. Charles J. Robinson, Clarkson University Director, Center for Rehabilitation Engineering, Science and Technology (CREST), and Shulman Pro- fessor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY. Adjunct Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Short Story Writing Requirement for
describes the planning andactivities undertaken to meet this new requirement along with preliminary results from a recentpilot.Our College is part of the University of Hartford, a private institution with about 4500undergraduate students of which 800 are enrolled in engineering (E) and engineering technology(ET) programs. Bachelor of Science degrees, accredited by the Engineering AccreditationCommission (EAC) of ABET, are offered in 6 majors: Acoustical Engineering & Music (new),Biomedical, Civil, Computer, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering. Within the last 10 years, 3of the above programs were accredited for the first time. Three of five undergraduate ET
AC 2012-5106: ON INTEGRATING APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY RE-SPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY CAPABILITIES: A CASE STUDY FROMHAITIDr. William Joseph Frey, University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez William Frey teaches business, computer, and engineering ethics at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagez. For several years, he directed the university’s Center for Ethics in the Professions. His interests, besides practical and professional ethics, include moral pedagogy and moral psychology. He is active in the So- ciety for Ethics Across the Curriculum and the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics and has presented and participated in workshops at ASEE since 2000. He is also a Co-investigator on the project Graduate Research and
Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work," Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 16, 2007: 335.35. D.H. Jonassen and W. Hung, “All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning,” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 2, pp. 6-28, 2008.36. O. Pierrakos, A. Zilberberg, and R. Anderson, “Understanding Undergraduate Research Experiences through the Lens of Problem-based Learning: Implications for Curriculum and Translation,” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 4, pp. 35-62, 2010.37. A. Strauss, "The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process," The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 163-178, 1988.38. A. Strauss, "The
issues of societal impact having to do with cultural issues, accessibility issues, computing and public policy, the impact of free and opensource software, and so on. The authors argue that one approach for introducing such topics into a curriculum is through capstone projects, e.g., that develop products to serve the 1, 2, 7, 8public good. A number of authors have developed “best practices” for teaching computer science ethics. Best practices typically involve the use of case studies, handson exercises, roleplaying, discussion sessions, written assignments, and project work. 2 Quinn surveyed 50 ABET accredited computerscience departments (out of 200 programs at
Paper ID #33737Partnerships and Pedagogies for Introducing Neuroethics to SecondarySTEM Classrooms [Poster]Dr. Kristen Clapper Bergsman, University of Washington Kristen Clapper Bergsman is a learning scientist, STEM program manager, and curriculum designer. She is the Engineering Education Research Manager at the Center for Neurotechnology at the University of Washington and the Curriculum Design Project Lead at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Dr. Bergsman owns Laughing Crow Curriculum, a consulting firm offering support in STEM curriculum design and publication. Previously, she was a graduate researcher at the
explaining how ethical judgment and behavior in engineering can be promoted.ETHICS EDUCATIONFinelli et al. (2012) emphasize the need to better promote ethical development in engineeringstudents [18]. As the field of engineering advances, ethical dilemmas that come with thisadvancement are becoming more complex [19]. For example, an engineering project on improvinginfrastructure within a refugee camp by the United Nations (UN) requires the engineers tounderstand the needs and perspectives of the refugees in this camp towards the project. The projectmight, for instance, face resistance from some refugees if they feel that the UN has thereby givenup on helping them return to their home country. Refugee camps are supposed to be temporary;but
the case studies included in the larger project, the subset included in the present study waspurposefully selected. All three courses that serve as the three case studies were for students intheir senior year and thus the students had progressed through most of their undergraduateeducation, had been socialized in the discipline for the greatest amount of time, and could reflecton the majority of the curriculum and broader academic experience. Additionally, all three of thecourses were required, thus eliminating the effect of students’ self-selection bias. Lastly, thecourses were embedded in different institution types, which enabled the exploration of potentialdifferences across institutional setting. The course characteristics are summarized
will discuss its assigned case for tenminutes, with reporting out to the larger group before moving on to another case. Keyissues will be highlighted by the leader as the groups report.Online ResourcesThe online resources described below are taken from Bates et al., 201215 and include the EthicsCORE (Collaborative Online Resource Environment), the National Academy of Engineering’sOnline Ethics Center, the E3 project, and a list of other sites with ethics information.The Ethics CORE (Collaborative Online Resource Environment) project is an Internet portalsupporting ethics education in science, social science, engineering and math. It is beingdeveloped by National Center for Professional and Research Ethics at the University of Illinois-Urbana
thanavoiding plagiarism [2, p. 18], nor are any of the topics for ethical study described beyond acursory mention.The ethical topics raised in the report can be summarized in three categories: 1. data management: privacy and security/stewardship, 2. analysis: transparency and reproducibility, and 3. software development: avoiding plagiarism.2.3 International Data Science in Schools Project (IDSSP)The curriculum proposed by the International Data Science in Schools Project (IDSSP) isintended for deployment in high schools rather than undergraduate programs, but is includedhere because it contains the most detailed curricular specifications of the examined proposals; itintegrates ethics into the learning modules on technical material rather than
resources.Instructors can choose from short textbooks11,12 and full-length textbooks.13,14 They can findsupplemental resources, such as cases and scenarios, through two online ethics centers: theOnline Ethics Center for Engineering and Research at the National Academy of Engineering(www.onlineethics.org), and Ethics CORE, a project of the National Center for Professional andResearch Ethics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(www.nationalethicscenter.org). The National Institute for Engineering Ethics (www.niee.org)offers videos that dramatize engineering ethics cases; see Loui et al.15 and Loui et al.16 forsuggestions for using the two most recent NIEE videos.Ethics CORE also supports several online communities. As of this writing, one of the
skills have been widely studied withinengineering ethics, often as components of a larger project of ethics enculturation or thedevelopment of moral literacy within a student’s discipline. Yet little is known about whetherand to what extent ethics enculturation is linked to the moral foundations that describe theimplicit values through which individuals orient themselves to problems. In this work-in-progress paper, we report preliminary findings regarding the extent to which members ofengineering subdisciplines at one large research university share moral foundations. In fall 2018,the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ), a validated survey instrument, was administered tostakeholders across engineering subdisciplines. The survey of faculty
,” Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, San Diego, CA, October 2006, pp. T2H-24 to T2H-29.5 VanderSteen, J., “Humanitarian engineering in the engineering curriculum,” PhD Dissertation, Queen's University (Canada), 2008.6 Moriarty, G., The engineering project: its nature, ethics, and promise, University Park, PA, USA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.7 Jamison, A., Mejlgaard, N., "The Shadow of Commerce," ASEE Prism, Vol. 19, No. 3, November 2009, pp. 84.8 Sheppard, S., et. al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2009.9 Katsouleas, T, "New Challenges, Same Education?" ASEE Prism, Vol. 18, No. 8, April 2009, pp. 60.10 Accreditation Board
ethics in a disciplinary context and included anextensive discussion with a philosophy professor about ethical frameworks. The learningapproach was through ethical case studies, long used as an approach to teaching ethics (e.g.,Harris et al., 2013)11. Discipline-based teams discussed and critiqued ethical case studies andwrote reflections. The multidisciplinary context was examined through 1) class-wide discussionsand 2) multidisciplinary, small group discussions where students presented their discipline-basedcase to fellow scholars in other STEM disciplines. The second semester (fall 2013) usedmultidisciplinary projects to explore the broad topic of “garbage”. This is a topic important tosociety that STEM students, especially engineers, will
to help students to view ethics as central to engineering [17].Ethics-across-the-curriculum helps students understand the link between engineering work andits positive and negative impacts, and in turn see ethical considerations in tandem withengineering, rather than as an add-on [1-3].Design as a setting for understanding ethicsResearchers have previously proposed that ethics can be brought up naturally within thecurriculum [13], in contrast to contrived cases. As design is increasingly incorporated into first-year and core engineering courses, these offer an opportunity to efficiently thread ethicseducation throughout the curriculum [5]. Research on students participating in a service learningdesign project showed that they used ethical
. A survey conducted by Carpenter et al.also found that the effectiveness of co-curricular experiences for students’ ethical developmentwas conditional on the quality of instruction, but such instruction was also rarely satisfactory forstudents who already had higher levels of ethical reasoning capabilities.31Regarding how community-based learning impacts students’ ethical development, Prichard citesthree approaches that have been verified as successful: 1) a specific design project within asenior design course, 2) engineering course with a service-learning component, and 3) studentinitiated organization for students across the engineering curriculum.32 Even more specifically,other studies have shown that students engaging in core
andconclusion [10], which is expected to hold 4C standards (clarity, coherence, consistency, andcompleteness).Ethical behavior is the resulting behavioral action(s) which are intended to be positively in-line with a soundethical reasoning process, which is also indicated in the findings of the Finelli et al. (2012) and the follow-up work, summarized in section 7 of SEED project (Sutkus et al., 2008). In fact, educational psychologistsand other social scientists clearly argue that only rule-based ethical reasoning education will not createeffective and sustainable ethical behavior in the upcoming engineering workforce.The list of Engineering Ethics Education (EEE) methods and techniques are summarized as follows [12][13] [8] (Balakrishnan et al., 2018
learn and develop the same skills. With the fact thattenure track faculty are usually committed to research, publications, and demanding teachingpractice in technical aspects of engineering, the latter could be a critical systemic weakness inengineering departments that works against the success of this future.The previously-mentioned NSF-RED project has enabled the BSU Department of ComputerScience to engage a tenured social scientist (first author of this paper) to facilitate, design,development, and threading of ethics content throughout its undergraduate curriculum. Closepartnership between this faculty member and other departments has aided identification ofopportunities for adapting innovations from the NSF-RED project into other courses
practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Dr. Megan Kenny Feister, California State University, Channel Islands Megan Kenny
quantitative measurement of ethical reasoning skills. There isgrowing attention paid to measurement of ethical sensitivity but there has been no methoddeveloped for the measurement of ethical commitment or engagement that has been tested anddisseminated for widespread use. For this project, the final paper written by students thatanswered the question, “What is it to be an ethical engineer?” was used for qualitativeassessment of ethical commitment/engagement. Essays were examined for the development ofthemes that would evidence such ethical commitment/engagement.Table 1 shows the DIT-2 pre-and post-test results (P score and N2 score[3]) for students in eachof the three terms during which the phenomenological curriculum was used. The scores ofstudents
Paper ID #16905Integrating Ethical Considerations In DesignDr. Megan Kenny Feister, Purdue University, West Lafayette Megan is a postdoctoral researcher in EPICS at Purdue University with a Ph.D. in Organizational Commu- nication from the Brian Lamb School of Communication from Purdue University. Her research focuses on design, organizational identity, identification and socialization, team communication, innovation, and technology. She is currently working on an NSF grant examining ethical reasoning and decision-making in engineering project teams, and examining the relationship between teams and individuals in engineer
Paper ID #6396Global Portrayals of Engineering Ethics Education: A Systematic LiteratureReviewJustin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Justin L Hess is a Ph.D. student at Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. His research focuses on the role of individual values in engineering decision making, such as the role of empathy in stakeholder perspective taking, motivating student interest in sustainability, and deconstructing dominant worldviews within engineering. He currently is a research and teaching assistant for an NSF-funded project which uses reflexive principlism as an ethical framework for
appropriatecontent? What teaching methods and curriculum models are preferable? Which works best:required course, ethics across-the-curriculum, integration of ethics and science, technology andsociety, or integration of the liberal arts into the engineering curriculum? Which outcomeassessment methods are most suitable?According to a “Survey of Ethics-Related Instruction in U.S. Engineering Programs”4, it wasfound that only 27 percent of ABET-accredited institutions listed an ethics related courserequirement, even though an increasing number of philosophers, engineers, and ethicists focustheir research and teaching on engineering ethics. What complicates the problem is that differentfaculty have provided varying definitions for what “understanding ethical
in thePublic Research populations. All essays selected for this analysis were from native Englishspeakers in order to reduce the confounding effects of language proficiency on the analysis.C. Instruments1. AssignmentThree highly similar writing assignments were provided to the students in this study. For PublicResearch 1 students, the writing assignment consisted of three components: a scholarly article,writing directions, and guiding questions. The article students were to read and write about is a14 page scholarly article by Sepulveda et al. entitled “A review of the environmental fate andeffects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronics equipment duringrecycling: Examples from China and India”.37 This article
implementation of humanitarian-related curricula in a number of engineeringschools; and 3) undertaken the development and implementation of HE initiatives in graduateengineering education. The paper outlines the literature review and philosophical analysisconducted in different areas related to humanitarianism, how these activities were incorporatedin a faculty development workshop, and how they are being used in curriculum development andimplementation of a Humanitarian Engineering Ethics Introductory Seminar and electrical andenvironmental engineering courses.OverviewHumanitarianism and engineeringAs has been previously outlined by Mitcham, Lucena, and Moon [1], the social philosophy ofhumanitarianism developed during the same time frame as