faculty tend to be very capable researchers, but too many areunfamiliar with the worldly issues of ‘design under constraint’ simply because they’ve neveractually practiced engineering.”2 This study investigated both the accuracy of this observationand the perceptions of EL held by a sample of engineering faculty through a national survey.Findings from the LiteratureThe concept of engineering leadership is a relatively new one in engineering education, withmost publications on the topic and formal programs to develop it appearing in the last ten years.3In fact, a 2009 formal review of engineering leadership programs found only eight worthy ofconsideration for best practices.4 While in 2007 a seminal text on improving engineeringeducation addressed
Department of Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on student learning outcomes in undergraduate engineering, interdisciplinary teaching and learning, organizational change in colleges and universities, and international issues in higher education. Page 24.401.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Developing engineers who lead: Are student, faculty and administrator perspectives aligned?IntroductionAs society becomes increasingly globalized and technologically
working on leadership and teaming activities for engineers.Dr. Robert R. Klein, Western New England University Robert R. Klein, Ed.D., is a Professor of Education at Western New England University (Springfield, MA). He completed his doctoral work at Harvard and collaborated with the Center for Applications of Psychological Type (CAPT) to develop an assessment tool, the Klein Group Instrument for Effective Leadership and Participation in Teams (KGI). He trains people internationally in leadership and group skills and is a faculty member of the C.G. Jung Institute in Zurich, Switzerland. Page 26.1598.1
leadershipprograms, Tonkay, G., and Zimmers, E.9 remarked that they “migrated their honors engineeringleadership program to the general engineering population because they found it was the middleof the class (who) tended to do quite well years after graduation, often advancing into positionsof leadership.”Although engineering leadership is viewed as important to a student’s professional skill set, thereare issues: limited room in engineering curriculums to dedicate time for a leadership course(s) 10;or engineering faculty may lack the background and training to effectively teach team skills tothe students11. These problems provide the impetus for new and innovative engineeringleadership programs.With leadership so closely intertwined with personal traits of
there are numerous books devoted to some aspect of negotiation (e.g.1-6), little is found inthe literature concerning negotiation in the academic setting. One article focuses on thenegotiating strategies and tactics deemed useful by a dean as he worked with faculty on a day-to-day basis; in this article the author, a dean for eight years, reports on successful strategies heused (where and when to negotiate with faculty, and more).7 To help provide examples ofnegotiation in the academic setting, a panel discussion was organized, held June, 2016 in NewOrleans by the Women in Engineering Division of the American Society for EngineeringEducation. This paper contains material presented during the panel discussion which wasfocused on negotiation as
management, and new mechanism technologies. He teaches design at the graduate and undergraduate level, and is interested in educational partnerships with industry and international issues in design. As associate dean of undergraduate studies he has promoted and supported the structuring and expansion of leadership development and international programs. He is an active member of ASME and ASEE. Page 24.874.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Longitudinal Evolution of an Inclusive, College-Wide Integrated Engineering Leadership
the new program could be placed as a strategy for overcomingbarriers. These “new boxes” strategies directly addressed the challenges discussed above relatedto credentialing, as well as some ownership and institutional culture issues. “We came up with the idea to…rather than using existing programs that Mankato already had, we would create a new engineering program, a general engineering degree. And I think that was less threatening to the Mankato faculty because…I don’t think they worried as much that it would jeopardize their accreditation. And there were enough faculty at Mankato who were kind of interested in this idea and were kind of willing to participate that if it was this separate program, they
-home mothers like almost all of our mothers.Later, I attended a UMC meeting where presentations on unintended biases were part of theprogram. In one video presentation, you are supposed to count the number of basketballpasses made by a group of players. In the middle of the video, a gorilla walks though thegroup, something almost everyone fails to see when they first view the video. It makes youquestion how our minds work. Later, we were shown a board room scene and asked toidentify the boss. Basically everyone picks the man in the suit even when a woman sits atthe head of the table. Absolutely eye-opening.We can all become more aware of gender equity issues by being more observant. Howmany white males are on your faculty? How many are
when hiring engineeringundergraduates1-4. Although there has been progress on developing engineering undergraduates’leadership skills during their college years, faculty members have encountered many challenges5.One of the challenges includes ways to incorporate leadership development into engineeringcourses. This paper describes a leadership course which used case studies to develop engineeringstudents’ leadership skills.Usually written in narrative forms, a case study is a situation or issue that includes facts andopinions that contribute to the decisions made by involved people6. In the engineering educationcontext, case studies can help convey the complexity and ambiguity of the practical world,develop students’ positive attitudes towards
development and Hispanic workforce safety in the construction industry.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, and an affiliate faculty of the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She holds a B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in civil engineering and a graduate certificate in engineering education – all from Clemson University. Until 2012, she was the director of the Savannah River Environmental Sciences Field Station. Dr. Simmons has nearly fourteen years of engineering and project management experience working with public
second year students, who are referred to as Mavericks,worked closely with Engineering Leadership faculty, as well as Franklin W. Olin College ofEngineering (Needham, MA) faculty, to develop new curriculum for the incoming class. Thegoal of the redesigned course was to create an immersive learning environment that was alsosocial, relatable, and inspiring to the instructors and the students. In order to achieve that goal,Mavericks were given the opportunity to also teach the course. As a result of this experience, the hypothesis is that the Mavericks would be able topractice their leadership skills and directly impact the Engineering Leadership program by:enhancing their own leadership capabilities though mentoring the incoming class
University of Notre Dame. She holds a BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and a MS and PhD in Chemical Engineering from Notre Dame. Her research focuses primarily on Engineering Education issues, especially focused within the first-year engineering experience.Mr. Gary Allen Gilot P.E., University of Notre Dame Gary A. Gilot is the Director of Engineering Leadership and Community Engagement at the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. Gary is a Fellow at the University Center for Social Concerns. Gary earned his Bachelor of Science degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Clarkson Uni- versity in Upstate New York (1978), and Masters in Business Administration from
are encouraged tobecome involved in extracurricular activities including college and university-sponsored clubs togain hands-on leadership opportunities. In addition, all freshmen participate in a new studentleadership seminar. The Weidman Center for Global Leadership sponsors a Leadership LectureSeries three times each semester which provides an opportunity for all students, faculty and staffto learn from respected industry leaders and gain insights into leadership principles.During their sophomore year students participate in the Foundations of Global Leadership Page 24.157.7course. The course was initially optional but now is required
the firstdone by the author to bring hands-on leadership experience to the students in an assessableenvironment. The second evolution of the capstone leadership experience was as an individualeffort integrated into the S-triangle pedagogy throughout the entire semester as described in [4].This third-evolution capstone program relies on individual milestones for assessing development,but does so in a team environment consisting of engineering and business students solving aproblem they have identified in the community or campus related to a sustainability issue. Thispaper will discuss the methodology of implementation, results of both external stakeholderassessments and student learning and satisfaction surveys, and present conclusions
: Ottawa, ON. p. 3. 2. NAE, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, 2004, National Academies Press: Washington, DC. p. 118. 3. Baranowski, M., Rebranding engineering: Challenges and opportunities. The Bridge 2011. 41(2): p. 12-‐16. 4. Bonasso, S.G., Engineering, leadership, and integral philosophy. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2001. 127(1): p. 17-‐25. 5. Cassin, R.B., Leadership and communication in civil engineering: Past, present, and
yet to learn that with limitedresources they cannot realistically address every concern, and that they need to prioritize. Mostof the students failed to think outside of the box – in a scenario in which protesters weregathering outside of a police station to protest the lack of action to help local residents, insteadof, say, issuing a public statement to outline major known risks, most groups automatically sendpolice to detain peaceful protesters.2015 Crisis Simulation Exercise: Memorial Hospital in New Orleans during HurricaneKatrinaParticipants in this simulation assumed roles of various staff members and medical personnel ofthe Memorial Hospital in New Orleans, Louisiana over a period of five days, beginning withAugust 29th, 2005, when
Paper ID #6028Learning Expectations and Outcomes for an Engineering Leadership Princi-ples ClassKirsten S. Hochstedt, Penn State University Kirsten S. Hochstedt is a graduate assistant at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineer- ing Education. She received her M.S. in Educational Psychology with an emphasis in Educational and Psychological Measurement at Penn State University and is currently a doctoral candidate in the same program. The primary focus of her research concerns assessing the response structure of test scores using item response theory methodology.Mr. Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State
called Real Colors,11 which like the MBTI requires trained administrators. It is true that the assessments do not pin down values, but they often allow an individual to consider their own preferences and begin to question their underlying values and the congruency of their values to behaviors. There are many more similar assessment tools, and they should be administered as early in the semester or new-hire process as possible. One of the classroom topics here can be conflict resolution and contract negotiations among dissimilar personality types. 5. Modeling the desired behaviors means using the faculty member as a both educator and model for values congruency. The faculty member, and later the
skills while creating a world-class workforce.In another report from the National Academies, Rising to the Challenge: U.S. Innovation Policyfor Global Economy, the authors pointed out that the U.S. is still a world leader in innovationcapacity however there is concern that we are not translating this capacity into economic growthand employment. The authors of the report further added: “the United States is not payingsufficient attention to the essential pillars of the innovation ecosystem that have helped make theU.S.”21 This includes America’s research universities, the high-tech manufacturing base, and itsphysical infrastructure. They pointed to the United States ranking of “total competitiveness”from the World Economic Forum slipping from No
assess overall student leadership development through the Minorwere limited to periodic surveys. This approach has been satisfactory in observing general trendsand in identifying organizational issues of concerns. They lack, however, the level of detail Page 26.632.3needed to comment on the effectiveness of the engineering leadership courses on students’overall engineering leadership development. For this reason, the student profile assessment toolwas created. This new survey-based instrument described in this study aims to measure an individual’sleadership development, based on a previous study performed by Ahn et al.1
for the students to apply and reflect on their developing leadership abilities.Experts in the engineering leadership programs however expressed concern about the ability ofcurrent engineering faculty to deliver effective leadership programs and the difficulties ofidentifying external and suitably qualified staff.Graham et al.’s study also identifies strong themes in engineering leadership education. Theglobal theme was found to be particularly strong within U.S. programs: the ability to workeffectively across cultures in an international sphere was seen by many as an increasingly vitalattribute of an engineer-leader, and is reflected in many of the programs. Another strong themewas student empowerment in their own leadership
Management Conferences in Brazil and U.S.A., and guest Professor in Executive MBAs and trainings in Brazil and Europe. He holds a Ph.D and a Master degree from University of S˜ao Paulo, EESC, EI2. Page 26.356.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Collaboration Across Linked Disciplines: Skills and Roles for Integrating Systems Engineering and Program ManagementAbstractIn new product development programs, systems engineers and program managers must oftenwork together closely to define the product, the program structure and objectives, and allocateand define the focus
outcomes, and determine competency, via Bloom’s Taxonomy,levels. Course material is aligned with an embedded indicator process described in Table 4.Evaluation tools are determined prior to instruction. Average class grades are calculated for eachembedded indicator and compared with an adopted Departmental Standard of 75% or higher. Ifthis is achieved, students are deemed to have collectively achieved the requirement of the coursegoal and to have met the departmental standard. When the standard is not met, faculty arerequired to flag as “not met”, identify problems, address concerns, implement improvements, andreflectively track progress in future offerings of the course.Table 4 Summary of Embedded Indicator Tools and Bloom’s Taxonomy Linkage
Center in the StudentSuccess Center located on campus. This assignment followed a lecture on ethics where they wereasked to look at their personal beliefs and compare them to the values of the department. Thistopic was introduced in an application session discussion concerning negligence of GeneralMotors and the ignition switch recall.At midterm, the leaders were given new groups of randomly selected first-years for four weeks.This allowed the first-years to meet and interact with other students and leaders. During this timein the semester, an activity was assigned with tasks that required the first-years to meet and get toknow the faculty and staff in the engineering department. The purpose of this assignment was toengage them in the community
provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places including North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medical Technology fortune 500 Company. In this capacity he worked as a product development engineer, quality
(TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu]Dr. William C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and Professor at Purdue University. He is one of the founding faculty members in the School of Engineering Education with courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He has received numerous awards for his efforts at Purdue including being elected as a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers. He was the
in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr. Jordan also founded and led teams to two collegiate National Rube Goldberg Machine Contest cham- pionships, and has co-developed
thosewho may be slower to learn new things than they are and genuinely listen to the concerns ofothers. Based upon the survey results presented in Table 7, most students realize the importanceof empathy. Students in some cases have difficulty showing patience with those who are slow tolearn or catch on, but in all other cases both before and after the class students are indicating thatthey exhibit empathy for others. Survey results indicate that students have made improvementsin listening to others and are more likely to genuinely listen to others and embrace alternateviewpoints.Table 7 Pre and post survey results indicating student's empathy and understanding ofothers Rarely Sometimes Neutral Often
Paper ID #18372Observations of the Application and Success of Leadership Development Toolswith Undergraduate Engineering EducationDr. J. S.. Shelley, California State University, Long Beach J. S. Shelley, Ph.D., P.E. Detailed from the Air Force Research Laboratory on an Intergovernmental Per- sonnel Agreement, Dr Shelley is the Faculty Lead in Mechanical Engineering for CSU Long Beach’s Antelope Valley Engineering Programs, ABET assessment coordinator and Student Success Champion. She has been teaching for CSULB since Fall 2011.Dr. Kenneth Wayne Santarelli P.E., California State University, Long Beach Dr. Santarelli
returning members and two were first-year members. Theyoungest had completed 3 semesters at the university; all others had completed at least 5semesters. With the exception of the new members, all participants were team officers.Experience on the team ranged from about 6 months to almost 5 years. One student had brieflyparticipated in another collegiate engineering competition team.The InterviewInterviews have been used to explore leadership development among several groups, includingathletes,5 members of the military,6, 7 and college student leaders.7, 8 The technique is especiallyvaluable for uncovering participants’ implicit leadership theories, allowing researchers tounderstand “what people actually mean when they attribute actions to