Paper ID #14416How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Anotherfrom a Student Perspective?Dr. Jed S. Lyons, University of South Carolina Dr. Jed Lyons is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina. His passion is developing authentic engineering learning experiences for students from grades K through Ph.D. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How are Social Media, Engineering and Leadership Related to One Another
(represented in 20 codedunits of text) also mentioned the related issue of ownership. Some had observed challenges withdepartmental feelings about ownership of the new program: “I think the biggest challenge was they wanted to try and have one of our current engineering departments take ownership of it, and none of them was willing to, partially, again, because they felt it was being foisted on them. And part of it is they had doubts about the proposed method of delivery and so on, being more individualized kind of learning. I mean, they were worried that their accreditation might be at risk if they also were sponsoring that. … So, I think that was probably the toughest part of it, and I'm still not sure [the
leadership pedagogy, but are also confronted with disciplinespecific needs and a rapidly changing world. Given the breadth of the engineering profession,and the lack of an engineering leadership domain definition, specific program objectives in placetoday depend in large part upon the worldview of those administrating the program or teachingthe course. A literature review on the topic revealed a broad field of perspectives indicative ofthe early stages of domain definition.2 Thus, program facets related to engineering leadership(e.g., innovation and technology product design, and managing complex systems) requireprogram-specific assessment to determine efficacy. Other outcomes such as knowledge ofleadership theory, leadership skills, and project
. Stephanie Hladik, University of Calgary Stephanie Hladik is a M.Sc student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary. Through her research she is exploring topics related to the integration of engineering into K-12 curricula. In particular, she is interested in bringing electrical engineering, programming, and the engineering design process into K-12 education. Aside from her research, Stephanie also participates regularly in outreach programs to promote STEM topics in classrooms and beyond.Mrs. Marcela P Rodriguez, University of Calgary PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering, MSc in Elctronics Engineering, B.Eng. in Electronics Enge- nieeringProf. Laleh Behjat, University of Calgary Dr
Paper ID #10897Hoshin Kanri X-Matrix Drives Engineering Leadership Program SuccessDr. Bruce DeRuntz, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Bruce DeRuntz, PhD, is a Professor in the College of Engineering at Southern Illinois University Car- bondale where he teaches classes on project management and leadership. He consults with universities and companies on their leadership development of human resources for six sigma and project manage- ment teams. He is the Director of SIUC’s Leadership Development Program and the former Editor of the ASQ’s Quality Management Forum. He is a Fellow with the American Society for Quality
additional information regarding your program type(e.g., a registered student organization devoted to Engineering/Technical Leadership, etc.). Participants were asked to respond yes, no, under development, or don’t know regardingif their university’s engineering leadership program utilizes, a degree, minor, certificate,coursework, or a component that could be classified as “other”. Participants were then promptedto answer specific questions about each specific program component separately includingquestions concerning cross-cultural education among other questions of interest. Skip logic wasapplied to the questions, thus only participants who respond yes to a category would receive theitems related to that category. Next, participants
Page 26.539.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Work in progress: Development of the James Madison University Undergraduate Engineering Leadership ProgramAbstractThe Department of Engineering (Madison Engineering) at James Madison University has asingle baccalaureate engineering degree program that is aimed at engaging students anddeveloping their engineering knowledge, skills, and values through a project-based curriculum.One recent development is the Madison Engineering Leadership (MadE Leadership) program.The engineering leadership idea grew from the first lines of the Harvard Business Review BlogNetwork June 7, 2010 article entitled “British Petroleum (BP)’s Tony Hayward and
Paper ID #7314Purdue University’s Engineering Leadership Program: Addressing the Short-fall of Engineering Leadership EducationAmadin Osagiede, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amadin Osagiede is a master’s student in civil engineering at Purdue University and a graduate research assistant for Engineering Leadership at Purdue’s newly created engineering leadership development pro- gram.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Monica F. Cox is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and is the inaugural director of the Engineering Leadership Minor. She
organizational project management. Stephen has worked within PMI since 1999 in the areas of member services; chapter/community relations; business/government relations; and PMI’s global development activities. Stephen has almost 30 years of experience in non-profit leadership and management. He has also con- sulted with associations on their global development and community strategies. He is a long-term member of and volunteer within the American Society of Association Executives.Dr. Edivandro Carlos Conforto, Massachusetts Institute of Technology - MIT Dr. Edivandro Conforto is a Research Associate (Postdoc) at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Consortium for Engineering Program Excellence (CEPE), and
leadership talent. His work with young professionals has included a number of Canada’s top companies and he is the co-founder and primary consultant to the Maier Student Leadership Program at the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary. Page 26.486.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Developing a New Generation of Leadership at the University of Calgary Case Study on the Maier Student Leadership ProgramAbstractThere is an increasing understanding amongst engineering academic institutions of theimportance in educating engineers not only to
influence an athlete’s drive and performance. Inlater years, organizations noticed the potential impact of coaches and coaching on manager andemployee behavior. 6 Employees who were “coached” were said to have higher job satisfactionand commitment to career and their organization. Within engineering and technology relatedcompanies—leader coaching behavior was associated with high productivity and processimprovement. 7For those engineering and technology firms integrating leader/manager coaching competencydevelopment, coaching has emerged as a leader’s obligation. Consultants developed leadershipcoaching programs, books and related trade publications. 3 Researchers have begun to establishthat employees value leader coaching which are viewed as
Paper ID #14123Engineering Leadership: A New Engineering DisciplineDr. Roger V. Gonzalez P.E., University of Texas, El Paso Roger V. Gonzalez, Ph.D., P.E., is the Director of the Leadership Engineering program for the College of Engineering and Professor and Chair of Engineering Education and Leadership. Dr. Gonzalez earned a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering in 1986 from UTEP. He earned his M.S. in Biomedical Engineering and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and was a Post-Doctoral Fellow and the premier Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago and Northwestern Medical School. Professor Gonza
studies in leadership is the mostpractical and effective method of training tomorrow’s technical leaders.”“The leadership labs and activities set a strong tone for how I should act and behave as aleader. At the end of this program, not only did I learn the class material, but I have grown. Ihave become more confident and proactive.”“What I enjoyed most about GEL is how applicable it was to industry. I have always had adisconnect between the knowledge learned in school and what is needed in industry. Schoolteaches all of the technical theories behind the engineering, but does not focus much onapplication. I have enjoyed how almost everything I have learned in GEL has related to a realsituation I have encountered in my career.”Industry
Center (ERC) program to provide both a theoretical framework andtangible recommendations to educators interested in engineering leadership development. Inaddition to producing impressive and economically important innovations, the ERC program isan exemplar model for educating engineers who are also uniquely positioned as leaders. ERCsexpose students to real-world practices of engineering, providing them with on-the-job trainingin critical leadership and technical areas. Students often act as the “glue” that binds together ERCresearchers from different domains, thereby catalyzing communication across disciplines,organizations, job levels, and cultures. ERC-trained students also learn how to manage projects,engage in strategic problem-solving, and
engineering leadership.Brigham Young BYU’s Weidman Center for Global Leadership focuses onUniversity (2011) developing leadership and global agility in engineering students. The Center supports core faculty in teaching a core course on engineering leadership for all second year engineering students and supports a few small co-curricular initiatives.McMaster McMaster’s SELECT is a small co-curricular program offeringUniversity (2011) tangible skill development related to leadership for students who self-select into the program. The program has recently gone through a strategy shift towards more career-oriented topics in its offerings.Cornell
regarding the distinction or definition of"engineering leadership". Program faculty benchmarked literature and held discussions over a 1- Page 26.633.10year period and developed a suite of engineering leadership educational objectives and outcomesthat were mapped to the existing curriculum12.Between 2000 and 2005, many quality leadership-related simulations (e.g. Star Power; Kivulini)had been integrated within the leadership curriculum and effectively employed in the classroom.Although some simulations were engineering-centric, many were not. Consideration was givento expanding these classroom simulation experiences, enhancing the engineering
Page 26.1424.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Student Perspective on Defining Engineering LeadershipAbstractMany definitions and theories of leadership that have evolved over the past few centuries.However, only recently has the term engineering leadership been introduced and there is alack of a clear definition. A stronger understanding of the different perspectives of this termwill help institutions to develop and improve engineering leadership education programs. Theaim of this research project is to answer the following: from the perspective of engineeringstudents, academics, and professionals, what is engineering leadership and what skills arerequired to be a leader in
LEAD activities did not share the same background as the typicalengineering educator. Specifically, participants appeared to have a far greater level of non-academic experience than most engineering faculty. This appears to indicate the curricular andresearch activities related to engineering leadership are being led by nontraditional backgroundacademics. If true, this observation would run counter to the commonly held notion that too fewengineering faculty have the needed professional experience to effectively train the skills neededby the engineers of the future. Or more bluntly, as noted by William Wulf, former president ofthe National Academy of Engineering (NAE), and George Fischer, former chair of the NAEcouncil, “Present engineering
Page 26.631.3 Accreditation is one of the most distinctive features of and influential processes inundergraduate engineering education. As the ABET website describes it, “accreditation is proofthat a collegiate program has met certain standards necessary to produce [emphasis added]graduates who are ready to enter their professions. Students who graduate from accreditedprograms have access to enhanced opportunities in employment; licensure, registration andcertification; graduate education and global mobility.”8 A sympathetic reading of this descriptiontakes accreditation to be a process of quality control achieved through the
19%Variables and AnalysesThree questions on our faculty, program chair, and administrator surveys related to professionalskills—and leadership more specifically—on a broad level. Two of these asked about theirperceptions of undergraduate engineering: Do you agree or disagree with the following statements about undergraduate engineering? 1. Emphasizing professional skills takes time away from teaching technical content. 2. Students’ leadership skills are best developed in extracurricular activities.One related question asked these same individuals to report on the undergraduate engineeringcurriculum: Do you agree or disagree with the following statements that the undergraduate engineering
Harrington is a professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Univer- sity of Wisconsin, where he has been since 1996. His research and teaching interests primarily involve drinking water treatment, distribution, and regulatory policy. He is currently the department’s associate chair for the undergraduate program and the Suzanne & Richard Pieper Family Foundation Servant leader chair for the university’s College of Engineering. Page 23.847.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013
Professional Engineers(NSPE) covers a wide variety of concepts and will be used as reference. The definition states thatengineering leadership is “the ability to assess risk and take initiative, the willingness to makedecisions in the face of uncertainty, a sense of urgency and the will to deliver on time in the faceof constraints or obstacles, resourcefulness and flexibility, trust and loyalty in a team setting, andthe ability to relate to others” 8 (p.1).Engineering Leadership EducationWith the growing interest in engineering leadership education, over the last decade many differentprograms have arisen that focus on leadership development. There have been a few reportspublished which summarize the main program elements of current engineering
minor advisor and related to location of student’s international experience) International Engineering Experience (0-6 credits; study abroad, research abroad, service learning or internships)In addition, the literature was searched for broad trends in engineering leadership education andglobal engineering education. Graham et al. (2010), a study on U.S. and internationalengineering education programs conducted by professionals at the Bernard M. GordonEngineering Leadership Program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology between September2008
toexercise their leadership due to “the growing interdependence between technology and theeconomic and social foundations of modern society”16. ABET’s (2011) criteria for accreditingengineering programs for the United States in 2012–2013 include not only strong analyticalskills but also other skills indirectly related to leadership (e.g., the ability to communicateeffectively, to function in multidisciplinary teams, and to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in global and societal contexts)17. Unfortunately, Vandeveer found that manyundergraduate students within engineering departments do not receive the leadership ormanagement skills that are needed for them to succeed as leaders within future engineeringpositions 18.Engineering
Paper ID #9181A Method for Assessing Engineering Leadership Content in the EngineeringCurriculum: A First Look at Civil Engineering Project Management CoursesDr. Richard J Schuhmann, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyJames N Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyElizabeth Huttner-Loan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Elizabeth Huttner-Loan, Ed.M., is an Instructional Developer with the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineer- ing Leadership Program. Her current interests are project-based learning, simulations involving leadership scenarios, and the intersection of technology and education
from. In 2010 the college started aninitiative to enhance the college’s efforts related to engineering leadership education. The resultof this effort is eli2. The mission of eli2 is to: Help students discover their burning desire and confidence to create, innovate, and collaborate to deliver world-changing solutions.To deliver world-changing solutions, the eli2 program believes the engineering leader needs toknow how to create, innovate, collaborate, and deliver. There are many skills within these keycompetency areas. The specific skills depend on the current career expectations of the students.By students eli2 means anyone looking to explore, study, and learn about engineering leadership
]. While this literature presents us with important insights about therationale for including leadership education in engineering programs, descriptions of the contentand pedagogy used by instructors and faculty members beginning to implement these programs,and assessments of engineers’ work in relation to managerial leadership theories, very fewresearchers have stepped back to conceptualize engineering leadership from the perspective ofprofessional engineers. In phase one of our study we attempted to fill this gap by exploring howengineers working in industry thought about leadership, how they characterized leadershipexemplars in their profession and how they oriented themselves to professionally relevantconceptions of leadership [41, 42]. After
Paper ID #17468Developing Engineering Leaders Using a Reflective Autobiographical Exer-cise ˜ Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. David Nino, David Ni˜no, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer in the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program, where he has a strong commitment to the development of leadership among undergraduates and graduate students across MIT and among engineers, more broadly. In addition to MIT teaching, he is active in an international consortium of engineering leadership centers and a founding officer of the Engineering Leadership Development Division of the American Society of
Paper ID #13734Implementation of an Undergraduate Engineering Curriculum to Prepare21st Century LeadersMs. Katherine Agnew Trevey, Marquette University Ms. Trevey currently serves as the Director of Engineering Leadership Programs in the Opus College of Engineering at Marquette University. She has more than 10 years of experience creating leadership development programs for undergraduate students. In early 2014, she was hired to run the newly created E-Lead Program (a three-year people-focused, technical leadership program offered to undergraduate students in the College of Engineering). Her responsibilities include
of the effort to a certificate program was needed.The results to be discussed include formal assessment by students of experiential learning,compilation of data from six years of class exit interviews, ‘360 degree’ assessments of studentleadership efforts, and alumni surveys. In addition to the results and methodology, preliminaryconclusions will be discussed related to the curriculum and structure of the current leadershipdevelopment program.IntroductionLeadership education for engineers is a rapidly expanding and developing field, as evidenced bythe formation of a constituent committee within ASEE in 2012 and over 200 affiliated membersby 2013. With many programs and approaches, specific outcomes for each of these efforts vary.However