of knowledge, skills, and expertise between students - participants of the CoP-.Interviews conducted based on the principles of (Kvale, S, 2009). Interviews were thentranscribed and analyzed using definitions from Wenger’s CoP model to clarify and verify howthe Makerspace impacted the cultivation of a makers CoP on campus. We looked for evidence ofidea units that emphasized domain, community and practice.ResultsParticipants shared a common interest in “making”, tinkering, and realizing their designs. Therewere five categories of reasons for participation in the Makerspace: accessibility to resources,professional development, self-efficacy, Networking, social interaction and engagement, andlearning opportunities.Making use of Wegner’s
2 1(Very negative impact) 0% 20% 40% MEEN ECEN Figure 7. Impact on Personal GrowthNext, they were asked about impact on specific areas associated with professional andpersonal growth. Per Table 1, more than 50% of ECEN students have identified six areasof impact: friends, outlook in engineering, skills in design, time management,communication and teamwork. 47% of ECEN students report impact on GPA. Incomparison, there is only one area where more than 50% of the MEEN participants(63%) report impact. There are six additional areas that more than 30% of participantsidentified as
Paper ID #30063To Start or Not: Impact of Engineering Students’ Engagement inEntrepreneurship Competitive Activities on their EntrepreneurialIntentionsMiss Yaxin Huang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Yaxin Huang received a Bachelor’s degree in English language and literature from Hohai University of China (2018), and is studying for a Master’s degree in higher education at SJTU. Her research interest includes engineering students’ international learning experiences, innovation and entrepreneurship edu- cation.Prof. Jiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of
, followed by two projects that serve as case studies. The experience is thenbriefly evaluated and preliminary assessment is presented. The paper concludes with adiscussion on the future plans.Service Learning and Social EntrepreneurshipDefined as “a form of experiential education in which students engage in activities that addresshuman and community needs together with structured opportunities intentionally designed to Page 14.618.2promote student learning and development”1, service learning is not only beneficial to the overalldevelopment of the student but also addresses the hard-to-assess qualitative educationaloutcomes f and h of ABET2. For the
revolutionary changes in thinking, products, processesor organizations. While there are many similarities and interesting differences among theapproaches to innovation in various fields, there is always one common element: The strongdrive to make an IMPACT. This course examines innovation from an interdisciplinary andintegrative perspective. We explore both what makes something innovative and how innovationhappens; whether the innovation is a breakthrough product like the iPod; a new water system fordeveloping countries; an engaging piece of music or inspiring work of art; an emotionaltheatrical event; or a revolutionary film. The course is cross-listed in Engineering, Management,and with a UNIV designation to engage students from diverse backgrounds
students in entrepreneurial companies__ 10%_ Employer surveys_______ Other metrics – please describeThe “Other metrics” included such things as research money raised, profits generated forthe university and the number of companies receiving external funding. While thesemetrics indicate that there is some emphasis on using entrepreneurship centers to generatethe economic benefits of entrepreneurial ventures, most of the metrics seem aimed atstudent engagement and satisfaction with the programs. While everyone agrees thatlongitudinal data after graduation may be more important to assess actual impacts, suchdata is not easy to collect. In addition to the usual barriers to successful surveys, there isa reluctance of alumni offices to bother
addressparticipation from students across campus, we continue not only to look to participationas the metric of success, but also need to formalize mechanisms for evaluating the impactof this program on student’s disciplinary and interdisciplinary development. Therefore,we are expanding the work done previously in evaluating the Sandbox as a resource forengineering students and are looking more broadly at its potential impact across allcolleges that encompass the university. The goal in this initial evaluation is to establish aprocess by which cross-curricular assessment of such spaces can take place in order toallow academic faculty and administration to evaluate and improve over time the impactof such programming.Student Outcomes Across Disciplines and
sophisticated tools that engage students in new forms of thinking, supportexperimentation and advocate for a growth mindset that encourages persistence and the seekingof challenges and learning, all of which represent valuable learning opportunities that align withthe learning outcomes aspired to by engineering schools [3].In this paper, we assessed the impact of integrating making activities into two engineering designcourses on one non-cognitive attribute — implicit theories —. The study presented in this paperfocuses on the integration of making activities into two collaborative project-based-learningengineering design courses that offer students an authentic learning environment where theywork with a real-time client to solve an engineering problem
advocate, and as a window to the campus with knowledge of academic advising andcampus procedures.Early data suggest that the mentoring and other community-building activities within theHillman Entrepreneurs Program have had a positive impact on students’ social adjustment. TheFebruary 2008 transfer survey found that 100 percent of the transfer students felt that they werepart of a strong community at UM, and that 100 percent of the students felt supported as part ofthe Hillman program.Documentation and AdaptationThe Hillman Entrepreneurs Program has taken deliberate steps to document the lessons learnedduring its start-up phase and to adapt to those lessons. The process of ensuring adequatedocumentation and adaptation, however, often introduced
responsibilities; 6. Communicate effectively with a range of audiences; 7. Analyze the local and global impact of your design on individuals, organizations, and society.Lean LaunchPad Innovation and Engineering Design ProcessNew Mexico State University has innovation and entrepreneurship programs to support studentswith their preparation for careers in engineering design, innovation, and the creative economy.For example, the College of Engineering has an “Innovation Space” that is both managed andstaffed by engineering students. The workshop’s emphasis on innovation and working in teamsdovetails well with the need to promote an innovation mindset and get students thinking aboutentrepreneurship. As it would turn out later, several students
aligned with engineering in much theories and practices, it is reasonable toassume that the visions of future computing professionals would be similar to those of futureengineers. Therefore, it is realistic to expect that while in college future computing professionalsshould at least be similarly educated and trained in business practices that expose them toentrepreneurship in the context of teamwork and innovation. This paper discusses the design,implementation, learning outcomes, and student engagement in a National Science Foundationfunded technology entrepreneurship course offered in an urban university computing program.This course primarily focused on teamwork, innovation, and entrepreneurship. It sought to trainstudents in becoming well
B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from The University of California, Merced. She earned her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering with an emphasis in Robotics and Mechatronics from Santa Clara University (SCU). She is currently employed by SCU where her responsibilities include or- ganizing student engagement activities focused on entrepreneurial mindset and managing the SCU Maker Lab. Recently, she launched the SCU Mobile Maker Lab for outreach with K-12 schools. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Santa Clara University Maker Lab: Creating the Lab, Engaging the Community, and Promoting Entrepreneurially Minded Learning
sophomore level two-coursesequence (required for engineering students in all disciplines) in which the primary learningoutcomes are engineering design and technical communication. These courses are team-taughtby faculty from Engineering and from Communications; specifically, Writing Arts in the fall andPublic Speaking in the spring. Historically, the fall course has featured three major coursedeliverables: (1) a “research sequence” consisting of a rhetorical analysis, an annotatedbibliography, and a literature review, (2) a humanities assignment in which students explore theimpact of technology on societal needs, and (3) laboratory and design reports stemming fromhands-on engineering projects completed in lab.During the summer of 2019, the faculty
Test concepts quickly via customer engagement Assess policy and regulatory issues Communicate an engineering solution in economic terms Communicate an engineering solution in terms of societal benefits Validate market interest IMPACT Develop partnerships and build a team Identify supply chains distribution methods Protect intellectual propertyIntegrating the e-learning modules into courses consists of four components: (1) Using a flippedclassroom model, students complete the e-learning module outside of class over a two-weekperiod; (2) During the second week, instructors engage students with the content
to create this sought-after learning environment in the context of a single-semester laboratory course?Students in engineering laboratory courses experience hands-on, open-ended, inquiry-basedlearning. This type of learning is pedagogically favorable to the passive learning that sometimesoccurs during lecture-based content delivery. The problem with labs, however, is that studentsmust often invest much time in data collection, reduction, and analysis for the sake of learningwith no tangible outcome, artifact, or external benefit. Contemporary student populations valueand engage better with learning activities that have some impact complimentary but external totheir own learning [1].Project-based educational laboratory courses can be
the audience hear the song beneath their words17. The course manifests openness and lateral thinking, making students’ latent needs andstorytelling wishes explicit through the exercises. One student engaged the group to work on anart and visual perception focused activity. He genuinely believed in the power of art to changehis chosen field, medicine, and tested out his theory with a survey he offered before and after aplanned campus gallery viewing of Pollack’s “Lucifer.” He constructed a design interaction withthe intent to find the unspoken story of art’s impact on mood. Results and more detailedexamples of exercises and responses will be provided in the next section, Story Messages. For students with backgrounds mainly in
stories are created during class. Recent work also includes theoption of making short videos featuring individual and paired student short, stories.Conversational Storytelling Engagement Concerns This section outlines the relationship between ambiguity in conversationalstorytelling and engagement for successful new creation through four concerns. Areview of student work, and both student and founder self-reports suggested specificroadblocks, referred to as concerns. We provide the concerns, and offer the results withaction guidelines for structuring and supporting change by showing reaction to theprocess. The following four examples, uncovered from exploring conversationalstorytelling and an SBL approach in multiple offerings of one class
where she was responsible for the structural and thermal analysis of payloads. She served as Director of the Space Engi- neering Institute and in 2010 she accepted a position with the Academic Affairs office of the Dwight Look College of Engineering where she oversaw outreach, recruiting, retention and enrichment programs for the college. Since 2013, she serves as the Executive Director for Industry and Nonprofit Partnerships with responsibilities to increase opportunities for undergraduates engineering students to engage in experiential learning multidisciplinary team projects. These include promoting capstone design projects sponsored by industry, developing and teaching the Engineering Projects in Community
the Space Creating the innovation space was nearly a yearlong endeavor. Several key factorsenabled the space to become a reality. First, it was the composition of people who initiated theidea. It began to develop into a concept during biweekly meetings between a highly engaged andstrategically focused associate dean who oversees outreach and public service for the college, ahighly experienced department head, a caring and progressive tenured full professor, and a newlyhired assistant professor. The meetings were intended to spur innovation across the college andin alignment with an on-campus startup incubator. The associate dean wanted to create a spacewhere students could gather individually or in groups and work on projects. The
effects that these systems have on the community provide a very compelling reason for students to join and pursue these projects. • Large, Vertically-Integrated Teams: Each EPICS team consists of eight to twenty students, thus enabling projects of significant scale and potential impact on the community to be undertaken. The large team size also enables them to be vertically- integrated; that is, to include freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors. In general, the seniors provide technical and organizational leadership, the sophomores and juniors perform the technical work organized by the seniors, and the freshman learn about the project partner’s needs and participate in teams tasks as
entrepreneurshippractices into the educational change process. The Entrepreneurial Mindset for InnovativeTeaching (EMIT) Academy is based on the tenet that the practices and mindset associated withquality teaching mirror practices of entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial mindset. As part ofthe EMIT Academy, faculty engage in a series of workshops and activities intended to have themcritically reflect upon a course that they teach. One of the key elements of the Academy is thatfaculty engage in “customer” discovery process in which they collect feedback from keystakeholders of their course, usually students. This paper describes the Academy, discussespreliminary assessment data, and provides information on future directions.IntroductionThis work-in-progress
Schedule (time to market) Other Business or Organizational Impacts PerformanceEarly Start on Market-driven Product RequirementsStarting early is the key to having market-driven product requirements availablejust in time for the engineering team. Starting in 2006, the business teams,composed of Master of Science in Management (MBA) students, werecommissioned six weeks prior to the start of the fall semester. With this headstart, the business teams are now able to do focused research on the market, the Page 12.853.8competition, and key legal issues before
Enterprise) and C-E-O (CollegiateEntrepreneur Organization) respectively and these have been very active, with weekly meetingsand experiential activities and local competitions. Some of the community-wide forumsorganized by Florida Tech and the UCF and TRDA Technology Incubators and USF such asIntellectual Property workshops, Engineering Entrepreneur in the Spotlight Seminar Series, andthe alumni entrepreneur panel discussion on “Turning Technology into Value” have seen recordattendance from faculty, students and the Central Florida Community. The SBIR workshopsconducted by the TRDA / Florida-NASA Business Incubation Center and the Space Coast EDCand the UCF Incubator drew entrepreneurs and inventors from North, South and West Florida.The NCIIA
issues and proposedattributes for successful engineers of 2020, these attributes and issues may almost alwaysbe couched within the following pedagogical concerns: There is a need to construct engineering curriculum so as to serve more diverse learners. There is a need to help students develop better complex thinking skills. There is a need to provide learning environments that more actively engage students on multi-disciplinary team projects. There is a need to create an opportunity for value added curriculum, particularly in the areas business, management, and leadership skills.To do this is going to require more active and engaged pedagogies that usually providesome opportunity for experiential
spirit, create a sense of community and cooperation, andpositively impact the way that students see their career opportunities. Living and learning withother aspiring and practicing student entrepreneurs, enjoying ready access to mentoring andcoaching from experienced advisors and instructors, and gaining the skills to actually startcompanies combine to foster a rich entrepreneurial experience.Affiliate ClassroomAnik Singal is the founder and president of Affiliate Classroom, Inc., a leader in the affiliatetraining industry specializing in training entrepreneurs on increasing their online revenuesthrough affiliate marketing. The Company is focusing on bringing together reputable internetmerchants and webmasters who can successfully promote their
engage in social entrepreneurial Ventures that seek to improve theQuality of Life of people in the (developed and) developing world by advancing high-tech, high-impact products and services.Mashavu41 is one example of a high-tech system being advanced towards a pilot implementationin Tanzania for Summer 2008. Mashavu enables medical professionals to e-adopt children in thedeveloping world using modern technology and communications infrastructure. Trainedoperators at Mashavu stations in developing communities collect essential medical informationincluding images, body temperature, lung capacity, blood pressure, and stethoscope rhythms foreach child on a regular basis. Web servers aggregate this information from various Mashavustations over a cell
education and a culture of entrepreneurship within engineeringeducation and university involvement in technology commercialization both lead to moreopportunities for doctoral students in engineering to be entrepreneurial during their studies. Thispaper explores the experience of two doctoral engineering students who co-founded a companybased, in part, on their research. The case for entrepreneurship within engineering education andthe trends in university technology commercialization have been developed in the literature andprovide the perspective for examining the experiences of these two students. University assets,community connections, an NCIIA E-team grant, courses and competitions were all connected insupport of entrepreneurship education and
providing students a rich academic experience, a goal of this project is forthe students to gain practical, “hands-on” knowledge of how to create a commercial product,both from a technical and business perspective. We follow the project as it progresses frominception to commercial promise and share experiences of technical ups and downs, teamworkand communication issues, problem-solving activities, the overlap between academic and non-academic interests, benefits to students, and lessons learned. The paper includes discussion ofinnovative, entrepreneurial, and practical components of the project. Students were engaged in both technical and business development, includingprototyping, customer relations, product testing, and financing. We
implemented in a sophomore level course in biomedicalengineering at Western New England University. Results from assessment using pre- and post-module surveys showed increased student-reported knowledge/ability regarding a variety ofEML concepts, including opportunity recognition and communicating solutions in terms ofsocietal benefits. Additionally, while the present activity used QS to investigate a biomedical-related problem, the module could be tailored to fit the needs of a variety of engineeringdisciplines so as to engage other students in EML.IntroductionRecently, there has been significant interest within the engineering education community toproduce engineers with an entrepreneurial mindset.1-3 Students with this mindset are oftenhighly
Director of Research and Professional Development at the Center for CriticalThinking and Chair of the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking, Dr. Richard Paulis an internationally recognized authority on critical thinking. Dr. Paul has written books forevery grade level and has done extensive experimentation with teaching tactics and strategies,and devising, among other things, novel ways to engage students in rigorous self-assessment.The author has largely benefited from the principles of Socratic Taxonomy outlined by RichardPaul. The author has utilized these principles in his previous ASEE conference presentations.The author has also incorporated several ideas from these outlines while he experimented withthe discovery approach