completeness. A major category appearing in the AI contentyet missing from the traditional survey points to an area that needs further investigation. Thecategories found using traditional and AI surveys broadly agree in this work; so, one gains alevel of confidence that this work addresses the outstanding topic areas. Generation of relatedsubtopics in identified categories stands as a second form of value. Especially with AI resultsfrom the first prompt, one finds subcategories and examples of entrepreneurial ideas in themechanical engineering curriculum that require substantial time to manually extract frompublications and to organize into a coherent structure. For instance, an educator wishing to addelements of entrepreneurial thinking to his course
Envision Specialist. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Multi-Tool Approach in Integrating Entrepreneurship into Engineering Technology EducationAbstractEngineering Technology graduates today face the challenge of mastering technical skills whilealso transforming innovative ideas into practical business solutions. The National Academy ofEngineering highlights the importance of entrepreneurial skills for the 21st-century engineeringprofession. Recognizing this, there's a growing shift towards embedding entrepreneurialelements within engineering curricula to meet evolving industry demands. Despite efforts toinfuse entrepreneurship into engineering education, its integration in
schools thataddress the topics of Entrepreneurship and Innovation and looks for evidence of SystemsThinking Teaching within the courses and curriculum.KeywordsSystems thinking, Engineering Education, Canadian Education, Landscape Review,Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Education.BackgroundThere is little doubt on the benefits of entrepreneurship in an economy’s development.Entrepreneurial activities leading to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have beenconsistently shown to create more jobs, wealth, and innovation in a region. In developedeconomies, SMEs make up a large portion of the businesses, responsible for 60-70% ofemployment and up to 50% of gross domestic product (GDP) [1], illustrating the value ofentrepreneurship in job
Engineering and co-founder of the Integrative Learning Portfolio Lab in Career Education at Stanford University. She earned her undergraduate degree from UCLA and her PhD in Communication with a minor in Psychology from Stanford. Her scholarship is focused on engineering and entrepreneurship education, portfolio pedagogy, reflective practices, non-degree credentials, and reimagining how learners represent themselves through their professional online presence.Prof. George Toye Ph.D., P.E., is adjunct professor in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. While engaged in teaching project based engineering design thinking and innovations at the graduate level, he also contributes to research in engineering education
. The self-assessment form can be found in Appendix A. In general, very few students are aware of ABETor of its student outcomes [11]. By having the students participate in the self-assessment processand reflect on their experiences, each student is able to identify outcomes which have not beenachieved and develop a plan to achieve all ABET outcomes prior to graduation. This proactiveself-assessment prompts students to identify weak points in their education and has the potentialto shape better student outcomes, filling all the ABET student outcomes and preparing studentsto be well-rounded engineers.[12]. The two senior semesters of IBL allow the students to directtheir learning and create their own learning experiences to address these
Rowan University seeking a specialization in Engi- neering Education. She began her research in Rowan’s Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, and is currently working in survey, concept map, and narrative inquiry assessment. She was awarded an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship in April, 2022, and aspires to continue in the research field and work for a university as a research professor and advisor.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Dr. Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the
important in the Ag Techindustry due to the technology aspect entering a field, agriculture, that has not had manytechnological components in the past. Both engineers and engineering interns are hired by start-ups to help bring innovative solutions to market. However, even though entrepreneurship hasbecome a topic of interest in academia in general, it is not always a focus in engineeringprograms. Thus, in order to make sure that undergraduate engineering students that want to workin the Ag Tech start-up industry are prepared, it is important to understand both if industryprofessionals believe engineering undergraduates are prepared to work in that area, and whatacademia can do to improve undergraduate engineering student preparedness.Literature
device prototyping and innovation center that he co-founded in 2013. He has served as a faculty member of general and mechanical engineering for 12 years with the UW-Platteville Engineering Partnership and worked as an industrial consultant and research affiliate through his company Critical Flux LLC. In 2016, Ranen was invited to the Wisconsin State Capitol to give a workshop on Solidarity to the Wisconsin Legislators. Topics from this workshop became his 2019 book, The Science of Solidarity. Over his career, Ranen has earned multiple educational awards and nominations for his teaching, outreach, and innovation.Dr. Stephanie M. Gillespie, University of New Haven Stephanie Gillespie is the Associate Dean at the
Outstanding Mentor Award.Dr. Deborah M. Grzybowski, The Ohio State University Dr. Deborah M. Grzybowski is Asst. Dean of Teaching and Learning and Professor of Practice in the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University. She has been involved with developing and assessing curriculum for nearly 20 years. Her research focuses on making engineering accessible to all.Dr. Bryant Hutson, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDr. Megan Morin, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Megan Morin (she/her) graduated from the University of Dayton with a bachelor’s degree in Middle Childhood Education and completed her Master’s and Ph.D. at NC State in Engineering and Technology Education. Megan’s research interests in
data for three introductory curricular experiences.All courses utilize the same learning management system and have distinct grading rubrics forthe assessments. Each of the three courses is described in further detail in the following sections,which include an overview, specific course topics, and summaries of the primary assessmentmechanisms.4.1 TE 100: Introduction to Innovation, Leadership, and Engineering EntrepreneurshipThis course serves as the general introductory course in engineering entrepreneurship and is opento students of all undergraduate levels from disciplines across campus. It is also the first coursein the curriculum for the BS in Innovation, Leadership, and Engineering Entrepreneurship dualdegree offered through the Grainger
renewable energy, small wind turbine aerodynamics, and noise generation as it applies to the urban environment. Currently, he designs small Unmanned Aerial System propellers, reducing noise and power requirements.Dr. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, engineering education, engineering leadership, and professional identity development.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu is an associate
acompetencies in teaching students to generate ideas for constructive dialoguecreating a technological application and having students Sustainability; Decision making Agile managementpractically build it. This approach is also known as project- UN Global processesbased learning (PBL) in engineering education [7, 8]. PBL is goals; Ethicsan instructional method in which students learn by activelyengaging in investigating and solving real-world problems, Problem Collaboration within Time and activityoften focusing on creating a technological product or formulation, teams and
. In addition to his academic endeavors, Njoroge is deeply interested in the realm of Building Control Systems, showcasing a profound passion for optimizing system performance and functionality. His journey is uniquely characterized by the intricate balance of work and school, a testament to his perseverance and commitment. As a first-generation college student, Njoroge’s path is mapped with resilience and determination, marking him as a trailblazer in his family. Furthermore, Njoroge’s dedication to empowering others is evident in his founding of a mentorship program tailored to guide immigrant students navigating the complexities of engineering education and acclimating to a new academic system. Through this
the role of academic researchers, including graduate students in technologycommercialization and entrepreneurship (Astebro et al. 2012; Hayter et al. 2017; Shah andPahnke 2014).Launched in 2011, the nationwide or "Teams" program originated from the Lean LaunchPadapproach to entrepreneurship education and startups developed at Stanford University (Nnakweet al., 2018). The I-Corps curriculum centers around a market research and validation processknown as “customer discovery”, which requires participants to interview 100 potential customersand stakeholders (Nnakwe et al., 2018) to assess the product-market fit of their technologies(National Science Foundation, 2019; VentureWell, 2019). Participants apply to the program inteams of three
to ensure that graduates fit into Ghanaian industry and competelocally and globally. Palm has small classes to ensure every student gets the required attentionthey deserve from faculty.The Palm GreenLab seeks to provide an array of offerings and support for studententrepreneurship, including co-curricular workshops and special events. In Fall 2022, theGreenLab ran its first Startup Weekend - a two day intensive experience in which studentspitched and evaluated ideas, formed teams, worked to identify and address important elementsand issues for their project, and presented their project to a panel of judges. The main goals wereto generate student interest and enthusiasm in entrepreneurship, and to help students appreciatethe knowledge, skills
The Citadel. She holds a B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering from Rice University as well as a M.S. and Ph.D. in Materials from the University of California Santa Barbara where she studied stresses in thin films. She previously developed nanoparticle-modified glass and automotive coatings (at PPG Industries, Inc.), conducted Raman spectroscopy of materials under static high pressure (at Los Alamos National Lab), studied the physics of electrochromic devices (at Uppsala University, Sweden), and taught science, math, and reading to 4-year-olds (at a Charleston preschool). Now she enjoys teaching upper-level undergraduate and graduate Materials courses and encouraging students. Her research interests include
recognized as important in engineering fields,particularly manufacturing [20]. One such way to achieve this is through active learning to givethe students authority over what they are learning. The definition of active learning and how itvaries from conventional engineering education are still topics of confusion for many facultymembers. Engineering professors often struggle to distinguish between the many types of activelearning, and most of them are not inclined to search educational literature for clarification,which furthers the confusion [21]. Active learning is a general term used to define any type ofpedagogical instruction that provides students with an active role in the learning process which isthe core element of these methods. Students
Environmental Engineering from Missouri University of Science and Technology, and her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla (same school, different name). At Rose-Hulman, Michelle is co-leading a project to infuse an entrepreneurial-mindset in undergraduate students’ learning, and a project to improve teaming by teaching psychological safety in engineering education curricula. Michelle also mentors undergraduate researchers to investigate the removal of stormwater pollutants in engineered wetlands. Michelle was a 2018 ExCEEd Fellow, and was recognized as the 2019 ASCE Daniel V. Terrell Awardee.Dr. Liping Liu, Lawrence Technological University Liping Liu serves as the Associate Dean of Graduate
research project are more likely to commit to engineering, thus higher retention rates, increases in course grades, and greater persistence in the major, all of which combine to result in higher graduation rates when compared to their counterparts who did not engage in an undergraduate research program[21]. pecific to the GCSP-REU 10-week program, we have cultivated an interdisciplinary approachSto our weekly meeting topics to educate on the foundational ideas of research and facilitate interesting discussions (Appendix B). This is built with the Grand Challenge Scholars Program competencies at the forefront, specifically Talent (Research), Multidisciplinary, Entrepreneurship & Viable Business Models
Paper ID #37077Statistical Validation of Growth in the Entrepreneurial Mindset ofStudents Resulting from Four Years of InterventionsDr. Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven Nadiye O. Erdil, an associate professor of industrial and systems engineering and engineering and opera- tions management at the University of New Haven. She teaches at the undergraduate and graduate level and has held several academic positions including administrative appointments. In addition to her work in engineering education, her background and research interests are in quality and productivity improve- ment using statistical tools, lean
generated research topics, although they practicedgenerating research questions aligned with a specific topic.ConclusionsAfter analysis of the CURE data for the mechanical engineering program we return to our researchquestions.RQ1: How do UWT mechanical engineering students participating in CUREs experiences differfrom research students at other institutions?Student demographics were similar for TME students and other institutions based on comparison with thelarger student population. The sample size for the TME students is small enough that only a fewstatistically significant conclusions are appropriate at this time. Analysis of the larger full data set isplanned for future work.In general, TME mechanical engineering students had slightly higher
, professional development of science teachers, and issues of college student retention. He teaches coursework in science and research methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Promoting Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering Students Using IoT- Focused Project-Based Learning1. Introduction1.1 Problem IdentificationIn a recent report by the Society of Human Resource Management, over 50% of industryexecutives reported that recent college graduates lack problem-solving, critical thinking,innovation, and creativity. The report also identified communication and teamwork skills asother missing attributes in recent engineering graduates [1]. In its 2019 Job Outlook survey, theNational
-year university in the mid-Atlantic region that focuses ontechnology education. The School of Engineering at the university has nearly 200 facultymembers, of which 20% are female. The School of Engineering offers nine departments and 11engineering programs, and it is committed to providing a multidisciplinary, design-basededucation that prepares the next generation of technology leaders. It is important to note that thisuniversity is not part of the KEEN network of schools.PopulationThree engineering faculty members with similar teaching experience from the site's MechanicalEngineering department participated in the study. The researcher has previous workingrelationships with the invited participants, and these same three faculty members
is shown in Figure 1. One goal of this module is to help faculty thinkabout alignment of service and teaching with research.Module 2. Structuring Undergraduate Research to Help Yourself. Building on the concept map ofModule 1, we ask faculty to brainstorm specific activities that engage undergraduate research students ina way to create value for their own research, teaching, and service activities. Examples might be toengage summer undergraduate research students in the generation of preliminary research data for newresearch ideas, development of K-12 or other education and outreach program materials, or evendevelopment of an effective teaching laboratory or maker space at their institution. Participants are taskedwith drafting an
replicated by instructors of other institutions. This studyconcludes with recommendations for improving the curriculum design and student performance.It also recommends further studies in engineering education and the AEC(Architecture/Engineering/Construction) industry using other research methods and investigatingthis study topic in depth.KEYWORDS: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship, Engineering Education1. IntroductionAccording to the 2022 Global Status Report for Building and Construction, buildings areresponsible for 34% of global energy consumption and 37% of energy and process-related CO2emissions in 2021 [1]. However, the built environment also has the most significant economicpotential for carbon dioxide emission mitigation compared to other
innovation in engineering education, design thinking, prototyping, program development, crafting inter- active curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 8 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabri- cation technologies. He has taught lectures and workshops on advanced subjects to more than 1000 undergraduate engineering students and 150 graduate students, while advising on over 500 student and faculty research projects. His academic credentials include an M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and a B.E in Mechanical Engineering from
Professor in Bioengineering. She holds a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering, has served for sixteen years as teaching faculty/staff in biomedical/bioengineering and nine years in departmental/institute educational administration, and is an ABET program evaluator for Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering. She focuses on identifying and evaluating mechanisms to enhance the educational experience and develop students into engineers and researchers. Her work includes interventions to enhance training for high school students, undergraduate students, and predoctoral (graduate students) and postdoctoral trainees through training programs such as NIH T32s. These programs include curricular, extracurricular, and professional and
case for using undergraduates in research by discussing the benefits of usingthem in research programs; it also identifies some pitfalls. Based on these observations and theliterature, the recommendation is made to engage undergraduates in research early in theiracademic career, during their first or second year. Benefits for undergraduates in research overtheir academic career can result in these students continuing with the graduate program at theirhome institution or at other institutions.The Kern Foundation recognized the importance of undergraduates in research and sponsored aRequest for Proposal (RFP) to address this topic. A collaboration of five universities from theKern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) answered the RFP and
for your development of vital skills that can be enhanced by learning. You enhance your skills by becoming proficient with a set of techniques and developing a mindset that favors impact generating behaviors [aligning with the KEEN 3Cs]. It is expected that you will attend every class, participate in discussions and activities, and complete the assignments to the best of your ability.The learning objectives of the course included that upon completion of this course, studentswould be able to: 1. Apply a variety of frameworks to view their research and educational goals. 2. Detect and assess atypical professional development opportunities. 3. Define the entrepreneurial mindset, and understand how it can help guide
Paper ID #39759Development of entrepreneurial mindset-driven training materials forundergraduate researchersDr. Maysam Nezafati, Georgia Institute of Technology I am a lecturer in the department of biomedical engineering at Georgia institute of technology /Emory University. I have been working on educational research since 2016. My main focus is on problem based learning core courses. But specifically I work onDr. Irene Reizman, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Irene M.B. Reizman is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and the Al- fred R. Schmidt Endowed Chair for Excellence in Teaching at the