, where traditional teachingmethods and curricula are revaluated and updated. Faculty members play a crucial role in thistransition, as they need to embrace new teaching approaches and often step outside theircomfort zones. Despite these challenges, the push towards entrepreneurial education inengineering is gaining momentum. It is being driven by the recognition that the engineers oftomorrow need to be adaptable, innovative, and ready to face the challenges of a rapidlychanging world. This evolution in engineering education is not just a response to marketdemands, it is a necessary step in preparing students to be leaders and innovators in a worldwhere engineering and entrepreneurship are increasingly intertwined.In conclusion, the integration
Paper ID #36765Examining the differences in the grade point average (GPA) forengineering students enrolled in entrepreneurial education programsDr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research focusses on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from
beyond. Four essential learning areas for ENI-SE emerged: Mastery by Doing,Real-world Connectivity, Interdisciplinary Exposure, and Supportive Learning Environment.We discuss how these areas were realized in ME310 and provide examples from otherengineering courses. Furthermore, we hypothesize how features of these four areas might beadapted or adopted more broadly in the engineering curriculum. These findings not onlyhighlight the overlap between entrepreneurship and innovation in engineering education butalso offer a blueprint for integrating these key pedagogical practices into existing curriculardesigns, equipping students to become creators, drivers, and forerunners of novel ideas andchange.Keywords: Embracing New Ideas, Self-Efficacy
award.Multiple introductory design courses were studied and analyzed during the development of thecourse pedagogy, including currently offered introductory design courses in MechanicalEngineering, Electrical Engineering, Robotics Engineering, and Engineering Sciences atWorcester Polytechnic Institute. This was done to identify gaps in curriculum that affect studentoutcomes, as well as to identify course structure and delivery methods that students are more (orless) receptive to.The structure of the course involves the exploration of the multi-faceted engineering designprocess (different ways to approach engineering problem solving), additive and subtractivemanufacturing methods, microcontroller interfacing, ideation, design thinking, value creationand
”. Many factors may account for the failure of new product The needs assessment and requirements engineering domains launches. However, patterns are emerging [2]:involve tasks that help us fully understand a project's motivation.The functions of this domain include exploring the problem or • Products do not match customer needs.opportunity and recommending a possible solution anddevelopment approach to the problem. From a project perspective, • Undeveloped fuzzy front end.this is a critical stage as we can understand the value a viable • Breakdown in communication and collaboration.solution brings to the customer and identify an appropriatedevelopment approach
at the Civil andEnvironmental Engineering and Construction Management Department at a University in theUnited States. The study was a four-week assignment integrated into two senior-level courses: 1.the capstone project course in two semesters, 2. the pre-construction management course in onesemester. This study uses participatory action research (PAR) as a data collection instrument.PAR is a qualitative approach in which researchers work collaboratively with the participantsubject population to collect data, reflect and take action. Photovoice, commonly linked to PAR,is used to collect and explore qualitative data, give a unique depth of understanding to theresearch questions identified, and offer new insights and perspectives toward
leads to a product which is aunique application of knowledge for a particular engineering purpose. This is similar approachtaken across the ST programs and courses delivered in Canadian post-secondary institutions,which direct learners towards becoming familiar with problems in their specific area of practice.This approach provides additional learning outside of the courses that provide specialized subjectknowledge in each field, further developing the learners’ ability to problem solve.Moreover, the integration of ST in the engineering curriculum would allow for thefamiliarization of students with the main stakeholders in a specific field, their understandings andrequirements and their roles in the specific sector. More courses should
presented in this paper seeks to improve engineering education through aprocess of integrating small modules of engaging, active learning pedagogy using real-worldcontext. Modules were developed by infusing said context with EM elements such asstakeholders and the 3 C’s. Development of more Mini-Adventures in EML modules continuesthrough periodic reconvening of the instructor group for modifications and new content creation.Further testing of implementation and ideas will continue as well. The efficacy of the Mini-EMLAdventures will be assessed in the classroom using a mixed methods approach. First, students’perceptions of the activities will be collected via anonymous surveys and the analyzed responses.Second, student performance will be evaluated
network incorporatedand assessed EM on their campuses, interviews were then conducted with 44 participants from28 Engineering Unleashed member institutions. Participants were asked about the integration ofEM into the curriculum at their institutions, the approaches they use to teach EM in coursework,and the methods they use to assess students’ learning of EM. The interviews also inquired intoparticipants’ experiences with the assessment tools currently available through the EngineeringUnleashed network and what additional assessment needs they feel remain unmet. Interviewtranscripts were analyzed inductively, with emergent themes identified and coded throughiterative review.In addition to uncovering how EM is taught at Engineering Unleashed
her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.Dr. Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University Dr. Adam Carberry is an associate professor at Arizona State University in the Fulton Schools of Engi- neering, The Polytechnic School. He earned a B.S. in Materials Science Engineering from Alfred Univer- sity, and received his M.S. and Ph.D., both from Tufts University, in Chemistry and Engineering Education respectively. His research investigates the development of new classroom innovations, assessment tech- niques, and identifying new ways to empirically understand how engineering students and educators learn. He currently serves as the Graduate Program Chair for the Engineering Education Systems and
owncompany right out of college. The goals of this program include: (1) increasing the number ofminority and low-SES students who are trained and aspire to be innovators and attain leadershippositions, (2) producing graduates who understand how both company culture and employeeactivities contribute to new product development, and (3) providing hands-on entrepreneurexperiences. The curriculum includes understanding the various ways intrapreneurship ismanifested in various companies, how to take initial steps to commercialize a product or service,and hearing from experienced entrepreneurs to better appreciate all the successes and challengesthat come with launching a new endeavor. The program includes mentorship, internships, andmultiple hands-on
. Dr. Huang is one of the key leaders in the RE-ENGINEERED First-Year Program at the University of Saskatchewan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A New Framework on How Canadian Universities Align their Curricular and Co-curricular Programs with Institutional Culture and Entrepreneurial Ambitions Ning Tate Cao, Shaobo Huang Ron and Jane Graham School of Professional Development College of Engineering University of SaskatchewanAbstractThe Canadian economy currently ranks as the 9th largest in the world in terms of GDP. Astechnology-driven
technical andaffective capacities. Effective means of developing technical skills exist; they form the core oftraditional engineering curriculums. Development of affective capacities traditionally receivedless attention despite indications of their importance. Stolk and Harari, for instance, identified aneed for further investigation of connections between engineering college students’ motivationand cognitive development [1]. Introduction of entrepreneurship in engineering design offersone approach that may enhance these traits. Prior research conducted in an introductoryengineering course suggests that interaction with a “real” customer, other than the courseinstructor, enhances students’ perceived capacity to perform design tasks such as
Paper ID #38068Work in Progress on a Case Study of Preparedness in Engineering forAgricultural Start-ups (PEAS)Mrs. Katie Marie Mowat, University of Nebraska - Lincoln I am an engineer who loves to work with people, learn about new ideas and developments in my field, and spend quality time with friends and family. My goal is to inspire the next generation of engineers to be curious, excited, and passionate about engineering and life. In my free time I enjoy playing flag football, crocheting, cooking, and gardening.Dr. Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Perry is an Assistant Professor of Engineering
their academic careers.Students who engage with this content in the classroom will be surveyed to assess theeffectiveness of the modules. There is a plan to conduct student surveys at the end of each courseand one-year post exposure to evaluate both the immediate and long-term impact of thematerials. The project team hypothesizes that students who engage early with the videos andpaired curriculum will be more likely to participate in research and remain engaged for longer.Preliminary survey results support this hypothesis, showing students self-report learning gainsand an increased interest in research and research-related careers.This project is part of a Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) initiative to infuseEM into UGR
creativity, EM, and cultural competency, throughout the engineering curriculum?Research MethodologyThe researcher employed a descriptive qualitative methodology to describe and explore howengineering faculty provide opportunities to develop professional skills in technical coursesoffered by the mechanical engineering department. A descriptive method is commonly used inqualitative research to provide a detailed account of phenomena under study. The researcherutilized two data collection methods: one-on-one semi-structured interviews and a focus group.A qualitative approach was selected to “uncover participants' understandings of theirexperiences” and is particularly useful in an educational context [6].SiteThe study site is a private four
. In addition to his academic endeavors, Njoroge is deeply interested in the realm of Building Control Systems, showcasing a profound passion for optimizing system performance and functionality. His journey is uniquely characterized by the intricate balance of work and school, a testament to his perseverance and commitment. As a first-generation college student, Njoroge’s path is mapped with resilience and determination, marking him as a trailblazer in his family. Furthermore, Njoroge’s dedication to empowering others is evident in his founding of a mentorship program tailored to guide immigrant students navigating the complexities of engineering education and acclimating to a new academic system. Through this
). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: Theconstruct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963–989.[13] T. J. Kriewall, "Instilling the entrepreneurial engineering mindset in college undergraduates:A panel presentation," in Proceedings of Open, the Annual Conference, National CollegiateInventors & Innovators Alliance, 2010.[14] R.E. Kleine, J. Yoder, Operationalizing and Assessing the Entrepreneurial Mindset: ARubric Based Approach. Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 57–86, 2011.[15] M. V. Anand, A. C. Sabuncu, and C. Abel, "Innovation through Making Course: Creating aDistinctive Prototyping Experience as Part of a New Entrepreneurial Pathway (Work inProgress)," Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference &
of logic toarrive at one correct solution [3]. Several studies have shown that the thinking approach used toanalyze traditional problems in the engineering classroom does not provide students with therequired skills to solve real-world problems [4]. In contrast, authentic, open-ended projectsrequire divergent thinking which includes independent thinking, creativity, and innovation, all ofwhich are rarely encouraged or practiced in classes leading to capstone design courses. Althoughcreative problem-solving in engineering requires both convergent and divergent forms ofthinking [3], the current curriculum provides students predominantly with the former over thelatter.Likewise, traditional approaches to engineering education rarely provide
not able to appreciate the value of learning these “boring” theorems, principles, and governingequations, even though they clearly understand that these mathematical fundamentals are essential to theirfuture careers. 1The problem that this paper addresses is how to engage students by connecting theories to practice whenteaching mathematically-intensive engineering courses.1.2 Current Approaches to the Problem (and Gap)It is important to acknowledge there are several approaches (or initiatives) currently underway to engagestudents within the higher education environment. First, many engineering schools/programs offer two veryimportant courses in their engineering curriculum: one is
Education at The Ohio State University. She earned her B.S. and M.S. degrees in Civil Engineering from Ohio State and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the inter- section between motivation and identity, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. She is the principal investigator for the Research on Identity and Motivation in Engineering (RIME) Collaborative.Dr. Brooke K. Mayer, Marquette UniversityDr. Shane W. Rogers, Clarkson UniversityProf. Ben Tribelhorn, University of Portland Ben Tribelhorn teaches Computer Science at the University of Portland. His research includes machine learning for chaos in Lorenz
, the algorithm might identify a "politics" topic. Thespecific topic modelling approach utilized is Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) [11]. LDA usesBayesian Inferencing to identify topics that emerge from a set of corpus, of which each possessesa set of words.2. Background One of the primary goals of engineers and innovators is to generate new technology inaddressing societal needs. This is a challenging task as societal needs are often volatile [12], orill-defined. To address such challenges, an entrepreneurial mindset is required. Beyond thetraditional innovation and engineering efforts, those with an entrepreneurial mindset seek to findopportunities of unmet needs in the market that could yield a successful implementation and/orgrowth in
technical competence and a broader array of technical skills that come with increased participation of underrepresented populations in engineering disciplines[1]. By being conscious of those attributesthrough the development of the 10-week summer research program, the intentionality is to create a cohort of burgeoning engineers who are prepared both academically and experientially for a lifetime of innovation and commitment to their field. Combining this varied topics approach with experiential learning opportunities results in scholars producing electronic portfolios (e-portfolios) that are comprehensive and include all five completed competencies of Talent (Research), Interdisciplinary, Entrepreneurship
organizations to extend the program to different communities across thenation. As a result, the program has become widely recognized as a leading summer enrichmentprogram emphasizing STEM with over 389,000 students participating in 2023. Of those, over289,000 were from underserved communities and over 2,000 summer camps were available withlocations in all 50 states. The program continually designs new curriculum and activities to alignwith current educational trends and advancements in innovation, STEM, and best practices.Each year, Camp Invention introduces a brand-new series of curricular modules to keepparticipants engaged and excited about learning. For example, MimicBot, is a module wherestudents explore nature, genetics, and adaptive innovation
optical imaging and spectroscopy approaches for endoscopy applications, and metabolic imaging of the tumor microenvironment.Prof. Jeff Wolchok, University of Arkansas BS/MS in Mech Eng from UC Davis PhD in Biomed Eng from University of Utah Worked in the medical device industry - 8 years Capstone Design instructor - medical device design There are other authors for this abstractDr. Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas Dr. Mostafa Elsaadany is a Teaching Assistant Professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Dr. Elsaadany teaches Introduction to Biomedical Engineering, Biome- chanical Engineering, Biomolecular Engineering, Senior Design, and Entrepreneurial Bioengineering
Paper ID #43287Empowering Engineering Students: Blockchain Learning Tokens for AssessingABET Student Outcomes and Enhancing Quality Control in Innovation-BasedEducationIsaac Heizelman, University of North Dakota Isaac Heizelman is a senior undergraduate engineering student at the university of north of Dakota.Nicholas M. Bittner, University of North Dakota Nick is currently a Biomedical engineering student at the University of North Dakota since graduating with a associates in engineering from Cankdeska Cikana Community College located on the Spirit Lake nation. Utilizing the innovation based learning model found in his new
Developing Engineering Identity through StoryAbstractThe narratives we tell ourselves influence our behaviors and actions. However, engineeringstudents may not even know what those narratives are and how those stories affect them. Inmany cases, students are subjected to a rigorous technical curriculum as soon as they step foot oncampus and sometimes find themselves in fields that are predominantly white and male to whichthey may not feel they fully belong. For some students, these environments may make themquestion if they belong in engineering, on our campus, or in higher education at all.Story is a tool that can allow students to make connections between their past, current, andpotential future selves to develop their identities as engineers. A
and earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the inter- section between motivation and identity, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. She is the principal investigator for the Research on Identity and Motivation in Engineering (RIME) Collaborative. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Multi-Method Analysis of Engineering Student CuriosityAbstractCuriosity, an ability vital to the process of invention and innovation, has also been correlatedwith a variety of desirable outcomes in education and is recognized as a desirable characteristicin engineering students and
such as that found within engineering. Art can be incorporated throughpieces, processes, and movements. Explain how participating in the newly developed curriculumincluded STEAM (specifically, the arts), and lessons learned relevant to STEAM (specifically,the arts).3. Bio-inspired design uses the nature-focused context of sustainability, security, and/orbiomedicine and health outcomes to motivate analogical thinking and improve the engineeringdesign process. Explain how participating in the newly developed curriculum incorporated bio-inspired design and lessons learned relevant to bio-inspired design.Part 2 - Open-Ended Reflection Prompts for module reflection essay as follows: (how werethese implemented?)1. The interdisciplinary approach of
beliefs about math, English, science, and social studies. Other research interests of hers include the formation of career aspirations, the school- to-work transition, and the differential participation in science, technology, engineering, and math fields based on social identity groups such as gender and Racial/Ethnic identity.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and a Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023