Paper ID #37685Enhancing Programming Industrial Robots Course through Integration ofthe Entrepreneurial MindsetDr. Maged Mikhail, Purdue University Northwest MAGED B. MIKHAIL, PhD., is Associate Professor, Mechatronics Engineering Technology at Purdue University Northwest. He received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee (2013), M.S., Electrical Engineering, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Ten- nessee (2009) and B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of El Mina Cairo, Egypt (2001). His disserta- tion title was ”Development of Integrated Decision Fusion Software
representative Hub institution(29.1% of engineering doctorates earned by women, 7.3% by minoritized racial/ethnic groups),but were substantially lower than the state population of this institution. These results haveimplications for ongoing discussions within the field of academic entrepreneurship as well asSTEM education relating to the most appropriate metrics for the goals of broadeningparticipation. Although achieving similar proportions of women and minoritized racial/ethnicgroups in these programs as overall nationwide or regional demographics is a starting point forthe definition of "equity", these results could imply that academic entrepreneurship educationprograms such as I-Corps do not represent substantial barriers to the participation of
. Dr. Huang is one of the key leaders in the RE-ENGINEERED First-Year Program at the University of Saskatchewan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A New Framework on How Canadian Universities Align their Curricular and Co-curricular Programs with Institutional Culture and Entrepreneurial Ambitions Ning Tate Cao, Shaobo Huang Ron and Jane Graham School of Professional Development College of Engineering University of SaskatchewanAbstractThe Canadian economy currently ranks as the 9th largest in the world in terms of GDP. Astechnology-driven
, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignSophie WangKyriaki Kalaitzidou ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Undergraduate Students Are the “Secret Sauce” to Help Research Programs Be SuccessfulAbstractIn most universities, faculty are evaluated on three criteria: teaching, service, and research.While all are important, research is often weighted more heavily, especially at larger R1universities. Even universities that emphasize teaching frequently have research expectationswhether it be disciplinary or documenting novel educational/classroom activities. Either way,undergraduates are one of the most overlooked resources to help with research. This “Work inProgress” makes the
Paper ID #38696Board 104: An Accelerator of Human Innovation Integrating ContinuousImprovement and Lean Philosophy into Innovation Program forUndergraduate StudentsDr. Omar H. Albalawi, University of Tabuk Omar H Albalawi is an Assistant Professor of Industrial engineering at the University of Tabuk’s” Indus- trial Engineering Department.”, Tabuk city, Saudi Arabia. Dr.Omar received his MSc and Ph.D. in Indus- trial Engineering from Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA. His interests include engineering innovation, entrepreneurial engineering, lean manufacturing, engineering economy, renew- able energy
exposure to entrepreneurship practices [1]. While traditional entrepreneurshipeducation has focused on self-employment and venture creation, recent advancements haveshifted the emphasis toward developing entrepreneurially-minded graduates. In particular, EEPsin engineering have evolved to focus on cultivating entrepreneurial skills and mindsets,expanding beyond sole enterprise formation [2]. These EEPs are posited as a means to fosterinnovativeness in students' chosen fields of employment upon graduation [3]. Moreover,engineering EEPs have advanced from business-oriented programs to more immersive, real-world-oriented approaches that aim to help students acquire entrepreneurship-related traits,skills, and mindsets [2]. Alongside existing EEPs
;bringing their full selves to team experiences, extra-curriculars, or internships; or continuingtheir studies at all.Storytelling is one tool that can be used to address concerns about belonging. Telling personalstories allows students to explore their reasons, ideas, hopes, fears, and feelings related to theiridentities as engineers and scientists. Students can connect their past selves with their current andimagined future selves to be able to understand their roles and paths forward in their careers [3].Storytelling can be leveraged this way because stories tend to exhibit similar general themes thatinclude redemption, contamination, or agency which can impact the storyteller’s mental health.Redemption stories exhibit a negative to positive
of the accreditation process for engineering programs. ABET, the leadingaccreditation body for engineering programs, has four professional skills and three technicalskills used in program evaluation that were developed with academic and industry partners.ABET includes communication, professional responsibility, professional growth, andcollaboration as professional skills. Most definitions of 21st-century skills have the technical andprofessional skills mandated by ABET but also include creativity, cultural competency, andentrepreneurial mindset, which ABET does not currently require [3,4]. Entrepreneurial thinkinghas become very popular in the engineering curriculum due to the efforts of KEEN and theEngineering Unleashed network. Their
. Table 5: Examples from student responses on the direct curiosity assessment. Curiosity Construct Examples Information Seeking Is programming a big part of engineering? Do all engineers use some form of the design process? Information Seeking- What will the field of engineering look like 50, 100, 1000 years from Joyous Exploration now? Why don't we have flying cars yet? Information Seeking- Do engineers actually use calculus? Deprivation What is the best way to learn CSE related skills outside of class? Sensitivity Stress Tolerance How do I know I’ll be good at engineering? Should I continue my schooling after undergraduate
communicate their unique perspectives and values. Anothercontribution of the paper is how faculty can relate the students' photovoice responses andnarratives to the ABET student learning outcomes. It also helps to highlight areas for continuousimprovement in courses and engineering programs as part of an effort to increase access toengineering.The paper also highlights the process of engineering minority students hands-on learningengineering process of concept, design, and build in the engineering sophomore and junior years.This process will provide students with authentic engineering experience to stimulate theircreativity and curiosity and enable them to gain meta-skills, including leadership,communication, lifelong learning, entrepreneurship, and
Engineering Technologycurricula specifically needs further attention. This gap highlights the need for enhancingentrepreneurship education in this field, considering the industry's demand for graduates whoare both technically skilled and entrepreneurially minded. This research explores theintegration of entrepreneurship into an Engineering Technology (ET) program, with a focus ona sustainable building course. It employs innovative educational strategies such as micro-moments, bisociation, virtual reality, entrepreneurial tasks, and a project-based approach todevelop real-world problem-solving skills. The effectiveness of this approach was assessedthrough a quantitative and qualitative survey to understand student perceptions. Findings revealstudents
students in STEM majors [5]. Active learning experiences are broadlydefined as activities that students do to further knowledge and understanding of a topic and canbe anything from brief pauses during lectures to allow for reflection to semester-long off-siteprojects. Active learning can be particularly beneficial for the most challenging aspects of acourse, such as the analysis of frames and machines in a statics and dynamics course for whichstudents must apply their knowledge of several previous topics to systems with complexstructures and multi-force member(s). Additionally, entrepreneurial mindset learning (EML) has been incorporated intoengineering programs. Through EML, student learn how engineering principles combinedcuriosity and a
Technology from the Technical University of Munich, with specializations in Mechanical Engineering, Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Finance. She is also an alumna scholar of the entrepreneurial qualification program at Munich’s Center for Innovation and Business Creation (UnternehmerTUM). Professionally, Nada currently works as a Senior Corporate Strategy Manager at a SaaS company. Her student practical experiences include roles as venture capital investment analyst, startup strategy consultant and entrepreneurial coach, alongside being team lead for innovation projects in the automotive industry.Dr. Helen L. Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a Research Scientist in the Designing Education Lab in Mechanical
entrepreneurship programsare often more correlative to increases in student motivation, productivity, and even creativitythan courses developed in other contexts such as higher education. They write: “After collectingand analyzing the data, the results indicated that there was a meaningful relation betweenstudents’ creativity and entrepreneurship. There was also meaningful positive relation betweenachievement motivation and entrepreneurship. Among the components of creativity, fluency andinitiative had positive relation to entrepreneurship. Among components of achievementmotivation, hard-working, purposefulness, and insistence had positive meaningful relation toentrepreneurship.” (p. 1291). This increase in skills for the high school programs are
education and Latinx engineering entrepreneurship.Ms. Magdalini Z Lagoudas, Texas A&M University Magda Lagoudas, Executive Director for Industry & Nonprofit Partnerships, has been at Texas A&M University since 1992 and served on several capacities across the College of Engineering, including Director for the Space Engineering Institute and Associate Director for the Space Engineering Research Center. Current responsibilities include pursuing strategic partnerships with industry to provide engineering students with opportunities to collaborate on multidisciplinary teams addressing real world challenges and with industry engagement. College signature programs include the Texas A&M I-Corps Site, AggiE Challenge
Professor in Bioengineering. She holds a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering, has served for sixteen years as teaching faculty/staff in biomedical/bioengineering and nine years in departmental/institute educational administration, and is an ABET program evaluator for Bioengineering/Biomedical Engineering. She focuses on identifying and evaluating mechanisms to enhance the educational experience and develop students into engineers and researchers. Her work includes interventions to enhance training for high school students, undergraduate students, and predoctoral (graduate students) and postdoctoral trainees through training programs such as NIH T32s. These programs include curricular, extracurricular, and professional and
in innovation, leadership, and engineering entrepreneurship that is open tostudents of all majors and levels; 2) a year-long innovation course designed for first-yearstudents who must apply and be accepted into this academic program; and 3) a semester-longintroduction to innovation course that is available exclusively to students living in a certainresidential living-learning program for first- and second-year students. The first two courses havetypical enrollments of 40 students or less while the third course enrolls between 100-150 studentswhen it is offered each fall. This exploration will discuss the importance of formally introducingstudents to innovation and entrepreneurship early in their academic careers, specific curriculumand
Outstanding Mentor Award.Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University Dr. Carpenter is Founding Dean of Engineering at Campbell University. She is 2022-23 ASEE President and a co- recipient of the 2022 National Academy of Engineering Bernard M. Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Engineering Technology Education for her role as a co-founder of the Grand Chal- lenges Scholars Program. Dr. Carpenter is an ABET PEV and member of the Executive Committee for the Global Engineering Deans Council and co-past chair for the Undergraduate Experience Committee of the Engineering Deans Council.Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez, The Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering
Entrepreneurship in the Carle Illinois College of Medicine. His research focuses primarily on engineering design/Bio Design collaboration in transdisciplinary teams. He has used and developed tools to study the alignment of products and services with organizational processes as an organization seeks to address needs and bring new products and services to the market. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Opportunities for Innovative Professional Impact: Implementation of a Multidisciplinary CourseAbstractEngineering programs offer programmatic opportunities for students to develop the necessaryknowledge, skills, attitudes to be prepared as holistic
faculty development, pedagogies, assessment, and teaching developed because of her previous work with NC State Education and Workforce Programs and as a North Carolina middle school teacher. Dr. Morin will start as the Associate Director for Engineering Faculty Advancement in June 2023.Dr. Nicole Ralston Dr. Nicole Ralston is an Assistant Professor and co-Director of the Multnomah County Partnership for Ed- ucation Research (MCPER) in the School of Education at the University of Portland in Portland, Oregon. She received her Ph.D. in Educational PsychologyDr. Michael J. Rust, Western New England University Michael J. Rust received his B.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of
technologies are increasingly automating simple, common,repetitive tasks liberating engineers to perform complex, unusual, novel tasks and giving them thetime to innovate and create products, processes, and systems to improve human lives. In thiscontext, creative thinking emerges as an increasingly more important core competency for theengineering workforce. Currently, although creativity is deemed to be important in engineering [1,2], creative thinking skill development is addressed haphazardly or not at all in engineeringeducation.Evidence suggests that personality traits that are related to creative characteristics and behaviors(e.g., out-of-the-box answers to standard questions) are not favored in classroom settings that aredesigned for
their academic careers.Students who engage with this content in the classroom will be surveyed to assess theeffectiveness of the modules. There is a plan to conduct student surveys at the end of each courseand one-year post exposure to evaluate both the immediate and long-term impact of thematerials. The project team hypothesizes that students who engage early with the videos andpaired curriculum will be more likely to participate in research and remain engaged for longer.Preliminary survey results support this hypothesis, showing students self-report learning gainsand an increased interest in research and research-related careers.This project is part of a Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) initiative to infuseEM into UGR
were the two STEM majors thatincluded manufacturing courses [10]. Many of these courses used to include a lab to complimentthe course to provide students the opportunity to simulate the manufacturing process (casting,machining, bending, etc.) learned in class. However, there is a recent decline in the number ofengineering technology programs. This has resulted in a situation whereby most manufacturingcourses are taught using the same methods as other engineering courses (lecture heavy) and lackthe real-world learning experience necessary for students to understand and immerse themselvesin the content.1.1. Study Overview This paper presents a curricular assignment for use within manufacturing courses that cancompliment the course in the
Bello (UNAB). She graduated as physics teacher (for middle and high school), physics (M.Sc.) and Ph.D. in Physics at Universidad Nacional de C´ordoba, Argentina. In 2013 she obtained a three-year postdoctoral position at the Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Her focus is set on educational research, physics education, problem-solving, design of instructional material, teacher training and gender studies. She teaches undergraduate courses related to environmental management, energy and fundamentals of industrial processes at the School of Engineering, UNAB. She currently is coordinating the Educational and Academic Innovation Unit at the School of Engineering (UNAB) that is engaged with the continuing teacher
innovation in engineering education, design thinking, prototyping, program development, crafting inter- active curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 8 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabri- cation technologies. He has taught lectures and workshops on advanced subjects to more than 1000 undergraduate engineering students and 150 graduate students, while advising on over 500 student and faculty research projects. His academic credentials include an M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and a B.E in Mechanical Engineering from
, prototyping, program development, crafting interactive curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 8 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabrication technologies. His academic credentials include an M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and a B.E in Mechanical Engineering from Anna University.Dr. Curtis Abel, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Curtis Abel, PhD, MBA is the Executive Director of the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Center (I&E) at WPI. He is responsible for the I&E eco-system, Value Creation Initiative, Maker Space &
her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her research interests focus on the intersection between motivation and identity, first-year engineering programs, mixed methods research, and innovative approaches to teaching. She is the principal investigator for the Research on Identity and Motivation in Engineering (RIME) Collaborative.Dr. Krista M Kecskemety, The Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University and the Director of the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors Program. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State
significantly improved)process” (Medina et al., 2005). Sometimes the concept of innovation in engineering seems to beused almost interchangeably with creativity and/or entrepreneurship. Knowledge aboutinnovation in industry has been embedded in higher education programs with the understandingthat engineering students need to be prepared to become the next generation of innovationleaders (Cropley, 2015; Law and Geng, 2019). Previous research found students’ self-rated skillsand abilities related to innovation were strongly correlated to creativity (0.816), moderatelycorrelated with product development (0.614), start-up processes (0.619), leadership (0.545), andfinancial value (0.517), and weakly correlated with risk (0.354) and teamwork (0.269
Paper ID #38542How to engage engineering students in teaching linear elasticity throughentrepreneurially minded bio-inspired projectsDr. Jeffrey Jianfeng Ma, Saint Louis University Dr. Jeff Ma is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Saint Louis University. Dr. Ma at- tended KEEN Foundation-funded programs and workshops to learn fundamental pedagogical techniques of EML, ACL, and PBL to instill entrepreneur mindset into engineering students.Dr. Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Bosman holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering. Her engineering education research interests include
and social science to understand evolution of resilience capacity at family and community level to sustainable practices utilizing quantitative and qualitative research methods.Dr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for UndergraduateRichard W Saxton, University of Colorado BoulderAnvie Gowrishankar, University of Colorado BoulderMaya Leizerovich, University of Colorado BoulderShane Gavney, University of Colorado Boulder ©American Society for