Paper ID #43745Report on a Student Community of Practice Program’s Impact on CareerPreparedness and Sense of Belonging Among Underserved UndergraduateStudents in the Electrical & Computer Engineering MajorDr. Rachael E Cate, Oregon State University Rachael Cate received her M.A.in rhetoric and composition from Oregon State University in 2011 and her Ph.D. in higher education leadership and research from Oregon State University in 2016. She joined the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University as a member of the professional faculty in 2016. In this role, she provides engineering
barriersthat impact their access to and success in higher education [5]. One significant issue is the growingnumber of students in poverty. Community colleges, for instance, have seen a notable increase inthe number of dependent students from impoverished families, rising from 13% in 1996 to 27% in2016 [6]. The rising cost of college coupled with the slow rise of income and lack of awareness offinancial support can lead some families to believe that college is out of reach [5]. The purchasingpower of the Pell Grant, developed for students whose families meet certain income criteria, hassignificantly declined over the past few decades further exacerbating these challenges [7].Academic preparation is another barrier, as disparities in college completion
Agency. (2019). Community-port collaboration. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/community-port-collaboration 3. Mendoza, D. L., Pirozzi, C. S., Crosman, E. T., Liou, T. G., Zhang, Y., Cleeves, J. J., Bannister, S. C., Anderegg, W. R. L., & Paine III, R. (2020). Impact of low-level fine particulate matter and ozone exposure on absences in K-12 students and economic consequences. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 114052. DOI 10.1088/1748- 9326/abbf7a 4. Cserbik, D., Chen, J.-C., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Sowell, E. R., Schwartz, J., Hackman, D. A., Kan, E., Fan, C. C., Herting, M. M. (2020). Fine particulate matter
they engage in interdisciplinary discussions, explain how multiple factors have contributed to infrastructure inequities and how they can be part of the solution. This also emphasizes the importance of relying on multiple disciplines in different fields of knowledge to address JEDI issues. Additionally, the framework proposed includes, in its structure and suggested activities, multiple opportunities for students to evolve from foundational understanding to thinking in multi- disciplinary ways and being creative in the design of solutions. Collaborative efforts and increased visibility of these narratives among the engineering students, and the community at large, will amplify the potential for meaningful change
Research Ethics Training Institute (RETI), Associate Editor, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Board Member for Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIM&R), and Board Member and Secretary, Open Door Free Clinic, a community resource Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin. Prior to joining Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, she was Endowed Chair in Ethics at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work-in-Progress: Studying the Impact of Humanitarian Engineering Projects on Student Professional Formation and Views of Diversity, Equity, and
improve the field’s diversity, adaptability, and competitiveness, the Year of Impact on Racial Equity is focused on creating organizational change to address the culture, policies, and racial and ethnic representation within engineering student organizations, colleges of engineering, and pre-college outreach efforts. These 12 months will move us beyond action to focus on the impact of the actions we take. We expect that actions in these domains will result in three concrete forms of impact: (1) empowered engineering student organizations, which will make engineering education more inclusive at the level of peer-to-peer interactions; (2) actionable organizational policies and effective practices
, SaP can also support STEM students’ engagement in DEI efforts. For example, in2015, Bunnell et al. [26] developed a course titled “Being Human in STEM (HSTEM)” atAmherst College, which engages students in action research projects on topics related todiversity and inclusion in STEM. In personal reflections, HSTEM course alumni noted that theirparticipation in the course supported them in making sense of their own and other students’experiences of marginalization, combatting feelings of isolation, and feeling empowered aschange agents within the Amherst STEM community [26].3. FrameworksThe design of the JEDI was guided by notions of liberative pedagogy [27]-[28]. From a Freireanperspective, liberative education facilitates conscientização, or
less, and those who are part-time students see no benefit. When the tuition isincreased to cover the cost of the discount, the students with lower credit hour enrollments areeffectively subsidizing the discount for those with higher credit loads. Clearly, students frommarginalized communities who tend to be low-income and transfer from community collegebenefit less and are effectively subsidizing a benefit for higher-income, non-transfer, whitestudents.Looking at the three-part test laid out by the U.S. Department of Justice for Title VI [20], thisanalysis shows that this policy has a measurable disparate impact on students of color. Thejustification for this policy is to encourage higher credit loads and improve graduation rates, butthere is
university. And so those are the first choice and then […] what discipline do you want to go into, do you want to go into engineering […]I think that that might be a problem that, that community [underrepresented local community] they're not well informed of engineering and professionally becoming an engineer, so just because it's not stressed at a specific time in their youth, it's going to affect later on where they can like literally, they don't have the choice because they haven't taken the appropriate steps to get there. (John, 15)There is an information asymmetry amongst the high school students, as John as noticed. Theknowledge of closely involved adults - of these required ‘choices’ for pre-university
effective approaches for incorporatingsocial impacts into technical courses.ContextWe have known for a while that the time spent training to become an engineer is an importantand formative time for engineering students. Engineering education is the ‘causal relationship’that links education to the development of technology and products for consumer use andcompany profit [16, pg. 149]. To ensure students feel safe enough to learn in their programs andtruly engage in that formative process, engineering educators must communicate precisely andwith care to address the lack of positive student engagement. We refer to these communicationtechniques as rhetorical practices. Building on Perrault [10, pg. 64] who states that, “...rhetoricalknowledge is just
workshops to practitioners around the world. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Health Equity: Perspective and Pedagogy of Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning and Impact on Learners’ Social IdentityAbstractThis research explored the beliefs related to the health disparities, systems, and innovation ofhonors/engineering students enrolled in a course on Health Equity. This course aims to bringtogether undergraduate students across disciplines from engineering, public health, pharmacy,anthropology, sociology, and other social and basic sciences to learn from each other throughco-designing solutions to address health disparities. The
to engineering technology edu- cation and the whole profession through excellence in teaching, research and service to the engineering technology community. Dr. Uddin is a proponent of project-based learning and developed innovative teaching strategies to engage his students in solving real-world problems and prepare them with skills and knowledge that industry requires. Dr. Uddin is active in research and scholarship. He has been awarded grants from National Science Foundation, Tennessee Department of Transportation, Tennessee Board of Regents, DENSO and ASEE (ETD mini-grants) and several other organizations for a total of more than $2 million. His current research interest focuses on risk-based estimation in
tackle these issues. Furthermore, it reflects a more comprehensive understandingamong academic and healthcare professionals regarding the enduring effects of pandemics onmental health (Singh, Kumar, & Gupta, 2022) and the increased demand for mental health servicesamidst their diminishing availability (Wasil et al., 2021).Missing from these studies are acknowledgments of the additional impact that systems of exclusionand marginalization have an impact on the mental health of marginalized communities during andafter (and before) the COVID-19 pandemic (Coley & Thomas, 2023; Farra, et al., 2024; McGee,et al., 2019; Wilkins-Yel, et al., 2022). While the heightened focus on graduate student mentalhealth after the pandemic is an important step
in their local context that can block the change theyseek to achieve. [Simply] adding ‘equity’ to the collective impact agenda is not enough. Organi-zations engaged in collective impact initiatives should first consider and act on how they need tochange within by applying an equity lens to their own people and practices” [14, p. 2]. This in-cludes navigating through the discomfort often experienced when discussing concepts associatedwith equity, such as racism and misogyny [38, 39]. Regardless of the uncomfortable conversa-tions that may arise, it is important to develop common language, as well as shared methods fordisaggregating student data [14] based on the demographic changes sought by the CI.3 MethodologyOur research questions were
Paper ID #34872Your Views Can Be My Views: Understanding Differences in Paradigms Heldby Traditionally Marginalized Students in EngineeringQualla Jo Ketchum, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the
to traditional forms of prejudice, in that the discriminatorybehavior is clear, but the target is left unable to defend themselves, such as derogatory graffitipainted on a wall. Sue later created a taxonomy which further categorized microinvalidations andmicroinsults into themes (see [13]).Critical Race Theory CRT draws from several domains to explain racial disparities in the United States, as wellas what measures must be taken to eradicate these disparities. When discussing the use of racialmicroaggressions targeting Latinx students in an engineering education setting, it can be arguedthat the most relevant aspects of CRT are the positions that racism is the U.S. has beennormalized and is ubiquitous. CRT also points to the impact of
Paper ID #42751WIP: In Search of Community: A Collaborative Inquiry Among NeurodivergentEngineering Education ResearchersDr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University who leverages mixed-methods research to explore neurodiversity and identity and motivation in engineering. They completed their Ph.D. in Engineering Education where they focused on motivation and identity for engineering graduate students.Theo Sorg, Purdue University Theo Sorg (they/them) is a fifth-year PhD student and National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow in the School
focus on community building within engineering. Thenuances of my experiences inside and outside of the classroom over the course of my four yearsat this university inform my following recommendations and speak to the impact of positive andnegative teaching experiences encountered during my educational journey.Preliminary Findings and RecommendationsOur analysis of the instructors’ guide revealed that several policies have been implemented withthe intent of supporting student learning, but their impact falls short in terms of aligning withhigh-impact teaching practices and fostering inclusive learning environments. Syllabus languagewas the first item addressed in the instructors’ guide, with the following recommendationsstanding out to us: 1
demonstrate, women often face uniquedifficulties in these male-dominated and male-identified professions. Studies find that womenmust engage in certain practices and behaviors in order to prove that they are competent andprofessional members of the profession. For example, in one study by Heather Dryburgh, shefinds that female engineering students learn to adapt to engineering culture by accepting sexism,working hard in order to prove their competence, and by performing masculine behaviors, suchas acting tough. As she argues, this adds a layer of extra work for women who must learn topresent a confident image to be taken seriously as an engineer. Dryburgh describes how womenmust work to manage others’ expectations of them and they do this on top of
diverse students and support varied career paths(Brawner et al., 2012). To probe these distinctions, our study, grounded in Social Cognitive CareerTheory (SCCT; Lent et al., 1994) and Critical Race Theory (CRT; Crenshaw et al., 1995),investigates the career pathways and attitudes of engineering graduate students. Leveraging adataset of 847 engineering graduate students, we examine differences across these threeengineering disciplines and the impact of demographic factors like race and gender on careerdecisions and attitudes. Findings suggest that clear demographic distinctions emerged at theintersection of race and gender: female students across all disciplines displayed a greaterpreference for nonprofit careers compared to their male
could represent any one (or more) of the seven individuals who participated inthe interviews [35], [36]. We used the singular form of “they/them” pronouns to represent theamalgamated participant.Author PositionaltyThe first author (they/them/theirs) was a Ph.D. student at the University of Colorado, Boulderwhile the study was being conducted. As a dis/abled, queer, nonbinary person, who at timespasses as an able body/minded, white, heterosexual, cisgender person they found themselvesdrawn to the models of disability that affirmed their experience. This likely impacted thetheoretical frameworks of disability they found and chose to explore. Their experience ofdisability influenced how they interpreted the participants’ statements even as they
question asks, when students exertmicroaggressions on their teammates, what do they look like at scale so that instructors of largecourses can see them? Based on current data collection and analysis, our project’s original intentto provide instructors with observation tools to identify at scale when teammates are engaging inharassing behavior in order to interrupt it, seems insufficient and perhaps even damaging in howtrivial it treats the depth of engineering’s marginalization of minoritized students.Our paper briefly describes three current findings that lead us in this direction: 1. We see that teammates enact microaggressions and selective incivilities against their minoritized teammates frequently and predictably. 2. We see that
engineeringpipeline to attract, retain and support underrepresented groups. Thus, to the extent that studentswho struggle in engineering are disproportionately underrepresented students [3]-[4], it isimportant to examine all aspects of engineering education that could potentially weed thesestudents out, including assessment.Little research has been done to examine the effect of assessment practices on underrepresentedgroups in engineering. Oftentimes, underperformance has been thought of as a failure of thestudent rather than a product of inequities and harmful practices within the methods ofassessment and reporting themselves [5]. As this research reveals, students report that assessmentand reporting practices greatly impact their confidence levels, and
ease accreditation metric creationAbstractBackground: Research has shown that students from underserved groups are more likely topersist when they see the link between their coursework and improving society [1], [2].Simultaneously, human welfare and social impacts have become a part of accreditation protocolsfor engineering programs [2], [3], [4]. These two factors result in a need for faculty tostrategically create inclusive classrooms where students 1) are engaged in the field of studythrough application to their personal, social, and global knowledge contexts and 2) aredemonstrating proficiency on subject matter sufficient to demonstrate accreditation andprogrammatic requirements. In prior work the authors have shown strategies that exist
project incorporatingcentering Indigenous ways of knowing and being within an engineering education context. Cal PolyHumboldt’s new master’s program in Engineering & Community Practice is among the first of its kind inthe United States as an Indigenous-centered graduate engineering program. This program is a one-year,project-based degree where STEM students will work through the relationship-building process with anIndigenous Nation to develop and complete an engineering project. As such, the potential impact of theprogram could be significant as we start to engage with the decolonization process as a field. Thisresearch attempts to capture and communicate that impact in a way that centers Indigenous ways of beingand storytelling. This will
Paper ID #41362Redefining Engineering Literacy with Generative AI: Impacts and Implicationsfor Diverse Languages and Expertise in Engineering EducationDr. Clay Walker, University of Michigan Dr. Walker is a Lecturer III in the University of Michigan’s College of Engineering Technical Communication Program. He regularly teaches first-year, intermediate, and senior writing courses for students in all engineering disciplines, but especially Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science Engineering. His research focuses on the interplay between identity, experience, and agency in language and literacy practices in technical and
displaced engineering students, understanding the supports and barriers to educational continuity for engineers in a disaster context, and preparing engineering students interdisci- plinarity to address disasters in their work. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication, collabo- ration, and identity in engineering
Native American PacificIslander-Serving Institutions Program.” Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023. [Online].[20] L. Whiting, “Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers,” NursingStandard, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 35–40, 2008.[21] S. Secules et al., “Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: Acollaborative inquiry and call to the community,” J of Engineering Edu, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 19–43, Jan. 2021.[22] J. A. Leydens, K. E. Johnson, and B. M. Moskal, “Engineering student perceptions of socialjustice in a feedback control systems course,” J Eng Educ, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 718–749, Jul.2021.[23] M. E. Cardwell, “Examining interracial family narratives using critical multiracial theory,”Review of Communication, vol. 21
Association[1], the U.S. society has made a series of economic, sociopolitical, and moral decisions that havehad a cumulative impact on communities of color, particularly Black, Indigenous, andHispanic/Latinx communities. When we see differences in academic outcomes between Whitestudents and students of color, it is not an indication of an “achievement gap,” but rather anindication of the debt owed to groups that have been racially subjugated since the early days ofpublic education. By shifting focus away from discussions of why students of color are failingwithin the dominant paradigm and toward ways that the dominant paradigm fails students ofcolor, Ladson-Billings and other Critical Race scholars challenge us to expand our thinkingabout the
(cultural)In the following section, we start by presenting how CoP leadership impacts resourcemobilization. We then describe how change teams employ each means of access to mobilizeresources for their changemaking efforts.How CoP Leadership Moderates Resource MobilizationCoP leadership employs various pedagogical techniques to moderate the mobilization ofresources during the community of practice meetings. We find that their techniques impact thestructure of the conversation, how participants engage with the subjects and each other, and howthey connect to external resources.To facilitate the change-focused conversations, CoP leadership employs rehashing and repetition,probes silent teams to share out, supports reflection exercises and the