structure of the first-year curriculum allows for much pedagogical experimentation and innovation. Of note is the factthat the innovative nature of the college attracts a significant number of faculty interested inimplementing novel teaching practices and curricular design, project-based learning (PjBL)being one of them. Page 14.867.4A semi-structured, open-ended, 1-2 hour in-depth interview protocol was employed with fourmathematics and three physics faculty involved in this curriculum. Only two of the interviewedfaculty were female. Engineering faculty participating in the delivery of the above curriculumwere not interviewed for this study. Future
Paper ID #13840A supplemental instruction model for engineering physics instructionDr. Chris Gordon, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Chris Gordon is an Associate Professor at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, where he serves as Chair of the Department of Construction, Interim Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and co-director of the Construction Leadership Institute. In his research, Gordon investigates engineering ed- ucation and innovation in the construction industry. Gordon earned a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University and both a B.S. and M.S. in Civil
Paper ID #14875Converting Traditional Engineering Physics Laboratories into Self-DesignedStudent ExplorationsDr. Amy Biegalski P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville Dr. Biegalski is a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals Program at The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the CASE School of Engi- neering. She worked as a consulting structural engineer before joining UT. Her research interests include engineering fundamentals courses and project based learning; abiegals@utk.edu.Dr. Kevin Kit, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Kevin Kit is Director of the
Education—Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer?. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2-16. 11. Simonovich, J. A., Towers, E., & Zastavker, Y. V. (2011) Self-Directed Learner Development Through Project-Based Learning Environment: A Comparative Study of Engineering and Physics Courses. Paper presented at the National Associate for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Orlando, FL. 12. Kember, D. (1997). A Reconceptualisation of the Research into University Academics' Conceptions of Teaching. Learning and instruction, 7(3), 255-275. 13. Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement
University, where he received his master’s degree, also in Physics. He received his bachelor’s degree at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, in Astronomy, in 2006. Page 26.967.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Innovating Engineering Curriculum for First-Year RetentionAbstractAn ongoing effort to improve retention rates for first- and second-year engineering students atClarkson University has resulted in the modernization of the curriculum including 1) the design,development, and rollout of a new course that emphasizes the links between engineering andsociety for
- oping and maintaining the hybrid version of that class, and researching improvements methods to teach programming to incoming freshmen using new technologies. She also researches means to incorporate more engineering mathematics and physics into the programming course, as this specific programming course is ”for engineers”.Dr. Heidi M Steinhauer, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Heidi M. Steinhauer is an Associate Professor of Engineering, Department Chair of the Engineering Fundamentals Department, co-advisor for the only all-women’s Baja SAE Team, Founding Member of FIRST (Female Initiative Reaching Success Together), and former director for GEMS (Girls in Engineer- ing, Math, and Science). Dr
Paper ID #5728First-Year Math and Physics Courses and their Role in Predicting AcademicSuccess in Subsequent CoursesDr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an assistant professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Matthew A
Paper ID #9852Multi-Course Alignment for 1st Year Engineering Students: Mathematics,Physics, and Programming in MATLABCaroline Liron, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach Caroline Liron is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department, at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU), where she has been teaching since 2005. She obtained her bachelor’s in aeronautics and space from EPF, Ecole d’Ing´enieur (France), and her M.S. in aerospace engineering from ERAU. She currently teaches Introduction to Programming for Engineers. She is involved in devel- oping and maintaining the hybrid version of
in both the public (as an educator) and pri- vate sectors before returning to postgraduate study and embarking on an academic career. As with many South Africans, growing up under Apartheid has had a profound impact on my worldview and life choices. This has included influencing the choice of a career in education, both as a practitioner and scholar. I cur- rently convene a postgraduate programme in Engineering Management and teach undergraduate courses in Engineering Management. I draw on multiple theoretical constructs for the design of learning contexts, including complexity and systems theory. My research is primarily focussed on student experience of learning events and student learning more broadly both in
lower than many sister colleges inthe CSU system. Significant institutional attention is focused on improving these graduationrates, while remaining an access institution in terms of admission.FYrE Program Introduction and the Need for Introduction to Mechanics CourseFive years ago, the College of Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (ECST) pilotedthe First-Year Experience (FYrE@ECST)[1],[2] program, which included supplementalinstruction[3] workshops for Calculus I, II, and Physics I – (Mechanics) courses, block schedulingin cohorts, holistic advising[4] with focus on academics and career preparation, and a newproject-based Introduction to Engineering and Technology course for a pilot cohort of 30engineering students. The program was
success andpersistence. The decision to use department faculty as the lead members of the ImplementationCommittees had the perhaps-unintended result that focus in the course development process wason what the engineering departments felt the students should know (content), rather than on acourse structure which was aligned with educational research on what methods work to improvepersistence (method.) Somewhat ironically, it was the Physics Department faculty who weremost guided by research findings from the STEM educational literature in their development ofthe lab activities in ENGR/PHYS 216 and 217. These labs were designed as open-endedexplorations of the mechanics and electromagnetics topics, using new equipment developed bythe Physics
degrees in History and in Construction Engineering and Management are from North Carolina State University. Dr. Talley teaches courses in the Construction Science and Management Program, and her research focus is in student en- gagement and retention in engineering and engineering technology education. Contact: kgt5@txstate.edu c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Multi-Disciplinary Summer Orientation Sessions for First-Year Students in Engineering, Engineering Technology, Physics, and Computer ScienceAbstractThis work in progress is motivated by a self-study conducted at Texas State University. Thestudy revealed that the average second year
Materials Labs and the University of New Mexico as a research intern. Currently she is a research assistant for the Modestino Group at NYU Tandon help- ing develop and optimize a new type of process system for Nylon 6,6. She is the President of the NYU chapter of Society of Advanced Materials Science and Process Engineering and is the composites lead for the NYU baja competition team.Dr. Jack Bringardner, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is an Assistant Professor in the General Engineering Department and Civil Engineer- ing Department at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He teaches the First-Year Engineering Program course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is also the Director of Vertically
AC 2010-2298: EARLY UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH AT THE UNIVERSITYOF SOUTHERN INDIANAZane Mitchell, University of Southern Indiana Engineering Department ChairMarco Lara Gracia, University of Southern Indiana Assistant ProfessorRonald Diersing, University of Southern Indiana Assistant ProfessorGlen Kissel, University of Southern Indiana Associate Professor Page 15.435.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Early Undergraduate Research at the University of Southern IndianaAbstractThe University of Southern Indiana (USI) is a participant in a National Science Foundation grantproject to expose talented freshman STEM majors to research
of technology in the classroom and improving student outcomes through hands-on and interactive experiences.Debra Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She holds a B.A. in Physics from Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, MN and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She teaches freshman design and senior-/graduate-level classes in microscale engineering and organic electronics.Robert Roemer, University of Utah Robert B. Roemer is currently a professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. He received his B.S. degree
AC 2012-3165: PARTICIPATION IN AN UNDERGRADUATE TEACHINGASSISTANTSHIP: EXPERIENCES, INFLUENCES, AND OUTCOMESDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is a professional faculty member in the College of Engineering at Notre Dame and an in- structor and Co-coordinator in the First-year Engineering program, and she is also involved with students at a variety of levels, including a graduate student teaching apprentice program, an undergraduate peer mentoring program, and STEM outreach. She has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Purdue Univer- sity, M.S. in mechanical engineering from Oakland University, and completed her Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University. Meyers has several years of
(6.1%), Engineering Physics &Physics (2.0%), Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies (2.0%), BiomedicalEngineering (2.0%), and Military and Veterans (2.0%). Three papers (4.1%) published in 2005were not published within ASEE divisions as they currently exist.Analysis of Results by Target ClassesMost frequently faculty implemented innovations within typical first-year calculus courses(Table 5). Specifically, 59.2% and 30.6% of retained records reported modifications to or insupport of Calculus I and II, respectively. Fewer retained records reported modifications to or insupport of Calculus III (18.4%) and Calculus IV (4.1%). As some students arrive to engineeringprograms with insufficient math preparation, 26.5% of retained records
California, San Diego in Computer Science Engineering.Mr. Ramakrishna Sai Annaluru, University of Texas at Austin Ramakrishna (Sai) Annaluru is a 3rd Year MS/PhD student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, researching at the intersection of machine learning and signal processing. Sai’s educational background include 1 semester of graduate Teaching Assistant experience for Signals and Systems and Introduction to Computing, 2 semesters of head instructor experience for a 1 credit hour spatial visualization course, and 2 years of undergraduate tutoring experience in introductory electrical engineering and mathematics classes. American
AC 2009-538: INNOVATION AND INTEGRATION IN AN IN-HOUSEFIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING PROGRAM: A FAST TRACK TO ENGINEERINGENCULTURATIONElizabeth Godfrey, University of Auckland Dr Elizabeth Godfrey has a Ph.D. in engineering education from Curtin University of Technology, Australia. Her career that has included university lecturing in Chemistry, high school teaching and 10 years as an advocate for Women in Science and Engineering, and most recently completing a 9 year term as the Associate Dean Undergraduate at the School of Engineering at the University of Auckland She has been a contributor to Engineering Education conferences, and an advocate for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning since the
electrical engineering projects consist of three labs. The first lab-Digital Half Adder- isintended to teach students how to read digital schematics and translate them to a hardwiredcircuit. Students are exposed to the basic digital gates, the basics of computer design, and truthtables. At the end of this lab, the students are asked to simulate and verify their design usingXilinx IDE, and physically build the circuit using their newfound knowledge of switch design,microchip layout, and basic signal concepts.The second electrical engineering lab- AC/DC Conversion- focuses on alternating currentcircuits, direct current circuits, their differences and everyday applications. In this experiment,students accomplish AC/DC conversion with both a half-wave
innovation. Since working on these projects, I have a greater interest in volunteer teaching, and perhaps even academia” (Lacey).Mentors were able to network with engineering professionals. “By working with the project sponsors and project mentors, I was able to learn to make personal contacts and relationships with those above my own skill level” (Travis). “As a civil engineer interested in public works engineering, I appreciated the opportunity to work with the director and staff of the Public Works Department. Since I hope to work in the same state after graduation, I was glad to learn about local standards and operations” (Lacey).InterpersonalEngineering mentors practiced and developed team
, Universidad EAFIT, Medellin, Colombia - Purdue University, West Lafayette,IN ´ Juan David Ortega Alvarez is an assistant professor at Universidad EAFIT and served as the Head of the Process Engineering Department from 2010 to 2014. He holds an MS in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven (Germany) and is currently enrolled as a first-year graduate student in the Engineering Education Doctoral Program at Purdue University. Before his full- time appointment with EAFIT, he served as Engineering Director for a chemical company for 7 years. His research interests are focused on the practice and teaching of process design, simulation and control and also on faculty and
AC 2012-5176: REAL-TIME MONITORING OF STUDENT PROCRASTI-NATION IN A PSI FIRST-YEAR PROGRAMMING COURSEDr. Mitchell Pryor, University of Texas, Austin Mitch Pryor graduated with his Ph.D. from the University of Texas, Austin, in 2002 with an emphasis on robotics. He is currently a Research Scientist/Lecturer at UT, Austin, where he has taught since 2002. He has taught a variety of courses from first-year introductory programming to a graduate course in robot dynamics. His research has focused on applied robotics with an emphasis on hazardous, uncertain environments. In 2008, he co-created a graduate interdisciplinary program for developing automation solutions for nuclear applications
, introductory materials science, electronic materials, kinetics, and microelectronics processing. She has been involved in a number of innovative curriculum development programs and educational research projects on improving student learning in engineering through the use of active learning and service learning. In 2010, she was awarded the College of Engineering Award for Excellence in Service. In 2007-2008, she was an SJSU Teacher Scholar. In 2002, she was awarded the College of Engineering Excellence in Teaching award.Katherine Casey, SJSU College of Engineering Katherine graduated with a B.A. in Psychology and an M.A. in Experimental Psychology from SJSU. She now works in the College of Engineering as Engineering
and the Naval Research Laboratory investigating atmospheric propagation in the marine environment. Page 15.734.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Influencing Sense of Community in a STEM Living-Learning CommunityIntroductionThe STEM pipeline continues to shrink. Called a “quiet crisis”, 1 the effects of the shrinking poolwill only be felt “in fifteen to twenty years, when we discover we have a critical shortage ofscientists and engineers capable of doing innovation…” (Jackson in Friedman, p. 253). Importantto this crisis, K-12 students are much less interested in science and engineering than in the pastand are
learning tool improves students’ conceptual understandings, literacy, and representation competencies in science. His second research focus is on how in-service teachers develop their knowledge for teaching science and engineering in argument-based inquiry classrooms. This research is aimed at developing measures of teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) for adopting the argument- Page 26.578.1 based inquiry approach, as well as developing tools to capture the interactive nature of PCK.Ms. Kendra Rae BeeleyProf. Robert J Culbertson, Physics Department, Arizona State University c
University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. Upon completion of her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering in 2012, Krista became a lecturer at Ohio State in the First Year Engineering Program.Dr. Kathleen A Harper, Ohio State University Kathleen A. Harper is a faculty lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University. She received her M.S. in physics and B.S. in electrical engineering and applied physics from Case Western Reserve University, and her Ph.D. in physics from The Ohio State University. She has been on the staff of Ohio State’s University Center for the Advancement of Teaching, in addition to teaching in both the physics department and college of engineering. Her
Paper ID #21677Gallup StrengthsFinder in EngineeringDr. Brenda Read-Daily, Elizabethtown College Dr. Brenda Read-Daily is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylva- nia. She holds a BS in Civil Engineering from Bradley University, and a MS and PhD in Environmental Engineering from the University of Notre Dame.Dr. Kurt M. DeGoede, Elizabethtown College Professor of Engineering and Physics, Elizabethtown College. His research interests in biomechanics include developing clinical instruments for rehabilitation. Dr. DeGoede teaches upper-level undergraduate mechanical engineering and design
, teaching bioengineering design and several bioengi- neering laboratory courses. Prior to this, she was on the faculty at UT-Houston Medical School in the Department of Orthopedics and also worked as an Engineering Consultant for the oil industry with Sage Engineering. She currently coordinates engineering design education initiatives at Rice University that provide students from all departments in the George R. Brown School of Engineering, Wiess School of Natural Sciences, and the School of Humanities with unique hands-on design experience and opportuni- ties to test and carry their ideas to practice. In addition, her current interests focus on encouraging students to innovate medical and global health technologies. She
(SEM) disciplines have provided astarting point for addressing issues related to persistence in engineering. Criticisms ofpedagogical effectiveness, assessment, and curricular structure accounted for 36.1% of allswitching decisions. Students strongly believed that faculty did not like to teach, did not valueteaching as a professional activity, and valued their research above teaching. Some of thespecific attributes of poor instruction, as identified by students in the Seymour and Hewitt study,were ill prepared and dull presentations, predominant use of one-way lectures, lack of discussion,assessments focused on rote memory, faculty reading directly from textbooks, and no indicatedapplication or implication of material. There is an undeniable