Science at Western Washington University.Dr. Ujjal K. Bhowmik, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign https://ece.illinois.edu/about/directory/faculty/ubhowmikProf. Yuting W. Chen, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Dr. Yuting W. Chen received the B.S. degree from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 2007, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 2009 and 2011, all in Electrical Engineering. She is currently a Teaching Associate Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-served students in STEM, professional development for graduate students, and curriculum innova
its two-course sequence. We compared the two to evaluate the efficacy of EM insupporting students’ ability to create connections from each project experience. The first projectis a design-build robotics project [14] and the other is a nanotechnology research project focusedon implementing a lab-on-a-chip (LOC) device [15].The robot project provides students a realistic and hands-on experience with a mechanical,electrical, and programming emphasis [14]. The project is conducted in groups of four whereteams design, build, and program an autonomous robot to complete tasks on a competitioncourse. The project requires teamwork, budgeting, project planning, oral and writtencommunication, documentation, microcontroller programming, prototype
curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based courses, the first-year engineering experience, and student professional skills. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and serves on the First-Year Programs Division Executive Board and was the past Webmanager for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engineering Experience Conference. He is on the Executive Steering Committee for the Vertically Integrated Projects Consortium. Prior to working at Colorado School of Mines, he was the Assistant Dean for Academics and taught Introduction to Engineering and Design at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering.Ms. Victoria Bill, Colorado
create power. Students measure various system states about the performance ofthe system. In the Spring 2023 semester, the final project for students was a water filtration system.The final project had students pumping water between various tanks and measuring how clean itwas in real time. Students would use this information to determine if the water should be allowedto leave the system. Figure 1 in the appendix shows teams of students working on each project.The ENGR 111 curriculum has six key features that are fundamental to the learning objectives ofthe course. Each of these features is described in detail below. The difference per feature betweeneach Cornerstone varies.TeamworkIn ENGR 111, students are assigned to teams of 3-4 within the
on Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering Technologies, this courseaddresses the challenges students face in understanding the engineering curriculum andprofession. It aims to guide students to make informed decisions when selecting their academicmajor. The course, developed collaboratively by faculty across three engineering technologydepartments and the First-Year Programs, centers on a hands-on project involving an automatedrobotic system for testing and sorting light bulbs, simulating real-world engineering applications.This paper discusses the course's design, objectives, and pedagogical strategies. It includes aliterature review on factors influencing engineering major choices and highlights the importanceof addressing
their current or prospective major. Within the field, the curriculum aims to cultivateskills that can be applied across different engineering disciplines. The University is committed to enhancing the student learning experience. We have facultyfrom all engineering departments (Biomedical, Chemical and Biomolecular, Civil andEnvironmental, Electrical, Material Science, Aerospace and Mechanical, and Department of FineArts) as part of a robust, multidisciplinary team. ENGR 1166 also appoints six full-timeGraduate Teaching Assistants and approximately 20 Undergraduate Teaching Assistants fromthe departments to help with the course and the project-based lessons.ENGR 1166 is an ABET-accredited course that carefully follows the ABET learning
. During the first year of the NSF project (2020) the new GEEN 1201 course was addedto the curriculum for freshmen students in three departments: Electrical Engineering andComputer Science (EECS), Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (MIEN), and Chemical andNatural Gas Engineering (CHNG). The new course replaced an existing one that was previouslyrequired for those students, UNIV 1201. While the UNIV 1201 course consisted of mainlygeneric student success material applicable to students of all majors, the new GEEN 1201 courseadded engineering and discipline specific content relevant to a student’s intended major field ofstudy to that curriculum.Each of the three departments (EECS, MIEN, and CHNG) designed their own version of theGEEN 1201 course
, computer, electrical, and mechanical engineering. Besides this, EngineeringFundamentals utilizes additional elements to fulfill the First-Year Engineering Seminar Corerequirement in various programs. A detailed account of the activities and outcomes of the "Missionto Mars" project has been compiled in a KEEN card [5]. This paper focuses on results from theEngineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment.Introducing All Six Engineering MajorsBefore this course was created, first-year engineering students enrolled in one of five differentintroductory courses; four were focused on specific majors (aerospace and mechanical, electricaland computer, civil, biomedical) and the fifth introduced all six. From the outset, this course wasintended to
’ satisfaction with the teaching strategy, b) students’ achievements in their academicoutcomes, and c) reinforced learning experiences and reflections according to surveys andinterviews with students, instructors, and community and industry partners. These key insightsinclude:3.1) Relevance and collaboration with stakeholders, students, academe, industry, andsociety.There was a need to match engineering curriculum with industries’ holistic process from designto production to delivery [54, 55]. Additionally, an urgent call was put forward to educate futureengineers regarding changing market demands and emerging technologies [56, 57]. Emphasiswas placed on designs, projects, and content with social relevance [58, 59]. Finally, there was anurgent
community partnered projects inengineering revealed several studies previously conducted to understand how they affect students’learning outcomes. While most studies focus on the technical and professional skills thatengineering students gain because of participating in community-partnered projects (Siniawski etal., 2015; Zarske et al., 2012), a few highlight the challenges as well (Forbes & Hoople, 2023;Lucena, 2020). CPPs have been shown to improve students' attitudes toward community service(Zarske et al., 2012) and impact identity formation within engineering (Won et al., 2017).Furthermore, students report having improvements in their curiosity, commitment to hard work,and core understanding of the subject matter (Duffy et al., 2008
look at how to broaden students’ conception of the field ofengineering in a first-years honor classroom at [omitted]. Currently, much of the curriculum isgeared towards robotics, programming, and physics in the context of mechanical, civil, andcomputer engineering. As part of this research, new projects are being developed that intersectwith a diverse range of fields of engineering, such as bioengineering, chemical engineering,biomedical engineering, environmental and ecological engineering, and industrial engineering.The expectation is that these projects will allow students to experience a more diverse look at theengineering profession in their first year and incorporate a deeper sense of belonging. As such,the research project has two main
, top universities are shifting their focus to design-centered instruction using technicalskills as a toolbox [3], [4]. These concepts are often taught during the early stages of engineeringeducation, typically in the first year of instruction. Students are expected to demonstrate designabilities in classes and projects throughout their education [3]. For instance, a cohort ofuniversity professors from the University of Malaga implemented robotic integration into theirundergraduate course to promote hands-on learning using Lego NXT, something that was quitenovel at the time [5]. The response from students showed improvement in identifying problemsand designing solutions [5]. Moreover, a study by Onar et al. [6] claimed that
Human-Centered Engineering (HCE) pathway? 4. Which activities, support mechanisms, and programs help students to develop a sense of belonging and professional identity in engineering?A New Human-Centered Engineering (HCE) Curricular PathwayThe traditional introduction to our engineering curriculum—and that of many of our peerinstitutions—requires that students take prerequisite courses in mathematics and physics prior toenrolling in project-based engineering courses. This pathway works well for some students butexcludes many. We decided to focus on math classes since our campus data indicates that over60% of students who start in precalculus or single variable calculus never take an engineeringcourse, despite indicating an interest in
a community ofinclusion is particularly important for building engineering identity and retention [6]. Forexample, Knight et al. [10] found a statistically significant increase in first-year engineeringidentity in underrepresented students that participated in an inclusive summer bridge program.Service learning can be defined as experiential learning in which students participate incommunity-based work [14], [15]. Incorporation of service-learning projects in curricula mayimprove students’ attitudes toward self and school, civic engagement, social skills, and academicperformance [16]–[19], which can strengthen engineering identity. For example, communityservice and volunteering for service-learning projects were associated with engineering
motivation: Connections between first‐yearstudents' engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives," J Eng Educ, vol. 109, (3), pp.362-383, 2020.[13] D. Rae and D. E. Melton, "Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineeringeducation: an international view of the KEEN project," The Journal of EngineeringEntrepreneurship, vol. 7, (3), 2017.[14] J. Blake Hylton et al, "Working to instill the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,"Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, (1), pp. 86-106, 2020.[15] R. S. Harichandran et al, "Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering StudentsUsing Integrated E-Learning Modules." Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, (1), pp. n1,2018.[16] D. R. Riley et al, "First-year
sizeable enrollmentranging from 150 to 225 students per semester, the ECE Discovery Studio program relies heavilyon the utilization of Peer Leaders (PLs), a cohort of 15 to 20 upper-level EE and CmpE studentsselected to a stipend-eligible academic-year-long fellowship. The Peer Leader Fellowship (PLF)is facilitated in parallel to ECE Discovery Studio with the goal of providing easily accessiblementorship from students who have gone through similar experiences and have commonacademic interests within the expansive ECE curriculum. Each PL is assigned a mentee group of10 to 15 ECE Discovery Studio students and the course is designed to promote networkingamong small groups through interactive studio activities, peer reviews, team projects
Paper ID #43573Work in Progress: A Comparative Case Study Exploring Sense of Belongingin First-Year SeminarsDr. Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh, The Johns Hopkins University Dr. Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh is a faculty member in the Whiting School of Engineering at The Johns Hopkins University. Prior to joining Hopkins, she worked in industry as a software engineer, and then went on to teach in the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She holds a BS and MS in Electrical and Computer Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research centers on empathic development for engineers and community-based design
students' motivation topursue a career in microelectronics differ after this limited curriculum intervention?Literature ReviewThe Role of Interest in Career DevelopmentSocial Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) [9] is an overarching conceptual framework that guidesall of the decisions of the Scalable Asymmetric Lifecycle Engagement (SCALE) project. SCCTemphasizes the role of relevant interests in career development. Within SCCT's Choice Modeland Interest Model, interest directly links self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and career-relatedchoices [9]. Because of this, many studies seeking to affect student's interest in engineeringcareers focus on increasing student self-efficacy and outcome expectations. In SCCT, interestsdirectly relate to choice
Paper ID #39848Analysis of Student Motivation in an Introductory Engineering TechnologyGateway CourseHernan David Moreno Rueda, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)Kevin Michael SimonsonProf. Jeffrey J. Richardson, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) At Purdue, Professor Richardson teaches courses in electric vehicle technology, prototype construction / project development and management, and courses in embedded microcontroller sequence. In addition to his teaching responsibilities, Professor RichardProf. Eddy Efendy, Campbell University Eddy Efendy currently teaches Mechanics of Materials in the Engineering
teamwork, experimentation, design challenges,programming & circuitry, and the Cornerstone Project), was disseminated upon completion of theremote course iteration [7]. Given the unique circumstances, efforts in remote redesign weredeemed overall satisfactory; supporting details are included in the following text.Since student perceptions related to PBU [11] and IIE [12] have been collected from students sinceENGR 111 inauguration, responses from the 2019 (pre-COVID, in-person) cohort versus the 2021(during COVID, remote) cohort were compared. Specific details pertaining to survey items forPBU and IIE are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. As discussed in the Robinson et al. study[7], the IIE survey items can be further grouped into a 2
to undergraduate engineers. Past re- search projects include studies of governance in engineering education and the influence of educational technology on engineering education.Prof. Stu Thompson, Bucknell University Stu is an associate professor and chair of the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Buck- nell University, in Lewisburg, PA. His teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer- related electives, and engineering design. His research focus is on the application of mobile computing technology to interesting problems. My broadly he is interested in the continued evolution of engineering education and how the experience can help create graduates who will go on to make
Paper ID #39098Data-driven Strategy for Maintaining an Effective Team Collaboration ina First-year Engineering CourseDr. Rui Li, New York University Tandon School of Engineering Dr. Rui Li earned his Master’s degree in Chemical Engineering in 2009 from Imperial College of London and his Ph.D in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2020 from the University of Georgia, College of Engineering. He is currently an industrial assistant professor, who works in General Engineering program at New York University. He taught first-year engineering course as well as vertically integrated project. He has strong interests in
engineering courses and workplaces.”Connections appears to be a valuable means of supporting and enhancing the experience of atleast some first-year engineering students. It requires essentially no resources (other than ameeting space) and thus similar efforts can be tried or adapted relatively easily. It alsorepresents a unique way for students to meet together, discuss, share insights, and support eachother since it is related to a course (unlike most extracurricular activities) but is not formally partof the course. The Connections model can be used as a starting point for other potential effortsfor supporting first-year engineering students.References[1] E. A. Chapman, et al, “Innovating Engineering Curriculum for First-year Retention,” in
assess students, as academicachievement is not a good stand-alone indication of student persistence in engineering [32]. Anexample from the Stanford University outreach program is the application question “Describesomething you made or created that you were proud of, from a hobby or as part of a club/group -for example an item, a design, a project, or even an idea you've been working on. Tell us aboutwhat you enjoy doing!”, to explore applicants’ self-motivation and ability to apply their technicalknowledge to practical work (key skills for successfully completing an aerospace researchproject). Application materials should also explicitly define terms that applicants may nothave come across before, to remove a barrier of a ‘hidden curriculum’ by
incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the retention and academic success of talented engineering students from economically disadvantaged families. She’s also involved in a project that explores the relationship between the institutional policies at UPRM and faculty and graduate students’ motivation to create good relationships between advisors and advisees.Dr. Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Nayda G. Santiago is professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM) where she teaches the Capstone Course in
York University Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is the Assistant Dean for Academic and Curricular Affairs at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He is an Industry Associate Professor and Director of the General Engineering Program. He teaches the first-year engineering course Introduction to Engineering and Design. He is also the Di- rector of the Vertically Integrated Projects Program at NYU. His Vertically Integrated Projects course is on the future of engineering education. His primary focus is developing curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based curriculum, first-year engineering, and student success. He is active in the American Society for
, CA, 2021.[2] National Science Board, “Higher Education in Science and Engineering. Science and Engineering Indicators 2022.,” Alexandria, VA. Available at https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20223/., 2022.[3] M. W. Nielsen et al., “Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1740–1742, 2017.[4] Jonathan Vespa, Lauren Medina, and David M. Armstrong, “Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060,” in Current Population Reports, Washington, DC.: United States Census Bureau, 2020, pp. 25–1144.[5] National Academies of Sciences, Barriers and Opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to
. He obtained his MS and Ph.D. degrees from the Rice University in 1997 and 1999, respectively. He currently serves as the Associate Chair for the Mechanical Engineering department at UTRGV. Among his research interests are engineering education, materials, stress and thermal finite element analysis, dynamic response analysis.Dr. Javier Ortega, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Dr. Javier A. Ortega is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (UTRGV). His research interests include Tribology, Lubrication, Biomaterials, Additive Manufacturing, and Engineering Education. Dr. Ortega has been involved in different research projects, including
Freshmen withEngineering through Hands-on Projects,” American Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 2,no. 2, pp. 31-41, 2011.Appendix Lab Report TemplateLast Name: _________________________________ First Name: _______________________________Date: ________________________Circle Equipment Investigated:carburetor compressor engine printer vacuum cleanerBackground Information -write a brief description of the purpose of this equipment (e.g., the purpose of a hairdryer is to dry hair). Use the internet as appropriate – make sure to reference your sources if you use any (1 pt).Safety PrecautionsIf the device is electrical, it should not be
teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Dr. Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego Dr. Phan received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California San Diego with a specialization in medical devices. He is currently an instructor for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering focusing on hands-on education.Dr. Maziar Ghazinejad, University of California, San Diego Maziar Ghazinejad is an Associate teaching professor in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Depart- ment at UC San Diego. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from UC Riverside in 2012 and holds M.S. degrees in mechanical and electrical engineerDr. Nathan