credibility and cite the answersproperly. Within the work writing and obtaining information on a topic, students emphasizedtheir belief that it is ok to use generative AI to supplement the work but not to completely do thework for one.Generative AI can impact academic integrityIn the answers to Pre-Q3 - “When is it NOT OK to use AI in education”, many studentsmentioned the impact that generative AI can have on academic integrity. Below is an examplequote that follows this theme: “I think that the academic use of ChatGPT is a slippery slope because the fact that the work of countless other individuals (within ChatGPT’s dataset) is then used to ‘bake’ a new piece of information/media. Because this is technically the product of somebody else’s
Texas at El Paso Diane works diligently to support minorities, especially women in STEM and preparing future educators to be STEM strong in knowledge and skills. She is an assistant professor at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) and serves as the director for the University of Texas El Paso’s YES! She Can and STEMShine programs.Victor Manuel Garcia Jr., Victor Garcia is a doctoral student at The University of Texas at El Paso and a research assistant of the Yes She Can program from the College of Education. His research topics are in the areas of characterization and design of pavement materials, civil ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 “Work-in-Progress
include the intersections between the teaching and learning environments; identity; and equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Student-generated infographics and videos for learning about professional obligations and the impact of engineering on societyIntroductionBoth professional and non-professional programs identify the importance of providing studentswith opportunities to develop professional skills as an outcome of higher education [1]-[3]. Thisis especially relevant in engineering, where accreditation bodies require engineering programs tobe designed to include professional skills development, in addition to focusing on scientific
exploresand documents experiential learning in the field of engineering within an inclusive periodbetween 1995-2020.Since Harrisberger’s study in 1976, much has changed in undergraduate engineering education.It is clear that the use of experiential learning has increased exponentially over the past fortyyears, as has pedagogical research in the topic. Our choice of studying the period 1995-2020 forthis research article stems from two important points. First, our research showed that criticaldevelopments between the early 1970s to late 1980s (Table 1), both in North American and inEurope, facilitated a great spread of engineering education research across higher educationinstitutions (HEIs) in this time-period. This spread would have impacted
belonging, identity, inclusion, privilege, power, oppression, and allyship as well astechnical topics such as 3D visualization, design process, orthographic projection, and the role offailure in design. This paper presents the course model, shares learning objectives, details theunique features of the course, and shares research findings related to the course. Courseassignments make use of a flexible grading structure that allows students to tailor their learningto align with their prior knowledge and educational goals. The paper discusses how the authorsblend the social and technical to create continuity and connection between the course topics tohelp students develop a sociotechnical mindset. A student survey was developed to assess theimpact of
span from 2010 through October 2022. The initial scoping review resultedin 61 full source texts. It included a topic search of the following terms: “transfer student capital”AND (“engineering education” OR “STEM” OR “engineering”). To expand the literaturereturned and understanding of the theory being utilized, an additional search was conductedusing only the search term “transfer student capital.” Results were analyzed first inductively, allowing the data collected to suggest codes andthemes of importance. Multiple rounds of inductive analysis were done to reduce data andidentify significant codes and themes are discussed further in the results below. The inductiveapproach was used in this study due to its power to condense raw data
Engineering EducationBackground/MotivationThe research on self-concept has been occupying a significant portion of the studies contributingto the advancement of educational psychology. As much as the topic has gained popularity in thepast decades, it suffered due to the lack of a concrete definition in its early years of advent [1].As interest in it grew, self-concept also gained strength, clarity, and structure. It grew strong as itgained a definition explaining how it might play an important role for a student and for aneducator [1]. Clarity was provided when it was differentiated from some parallel concepts inself-theory and affixing a space for self-concept in an individual’s perceptions, and not a justplaceholder [2]. Structure was added by
Ohio State University in Columbus, OH in 2002 and her MS and PhD from NC State in 2008 and 2010. Dr. Melvin held a number of positions in industry with companies such as Dow Corning (now Dow), Johns Manville, and Hospira. Her passion is helping students succeed in engineering and getting the next generation of students interested in pursuing engineering degrees.Dr. Roberto Champney ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Full Paper: Evolving Engineering Education: A strategy to improve studentperformanceAbstractImproving student performance is an evolving element in engineering education and this fullevidence-based practice paper will discuss some practices that contribute to student
, during which she was an NRT Resilient Infrastructure and Environmental Systems Fellow. Libby is currently a Graduate Teacher of Record in the General Engineering program at Clemson and will start as a Lecturer in the Fall.Ms. Madison Pollock, Clemson University Madison Pollock is a third year Biological Sciences Major and Psychology Minor at Clemson University. She has been conducting research with Clemson’s Department of Engineering and Science Education (ESED) since August of 2021 under Dr. Karen High. With ESED, she focuses on STEM education research that highlights the details of the curriculum given to students in her position. She also pursues research with Clemson’s Department of Psychology. She serves as an
Program (STEMTalent Expansion Program), the CEAS at WMU offers two student success courses for first-yearstudents entering at the Algebra II placement level. One course focuses on applications ofAlgebra II topics with the goals of helping students understand the importance of mathematics intheir desired career and improving their mathematical knowledge. The second course, ENGR2100, integrates concepts of study skills, career preparation, and student engagement to facilitatestudent success. Student feedback on ENGR 2100 has been generally very positive. However,the previous structure of ENGR 2100 had two significant limitations. The first was that ENGR2100 does not count towards graduation. The second was that enrollment in ENGR 2100 waslimited to
a BEng in Computer and Communications Engineering from the American University of Beirut. Aya is a graduate research assistant with the Designing Education Lab at Stanford, led by Professor Sheri Sheppard, and her research explores the accessibility of introductory electrical engineering education. She is supported by the Knight-Hennessy Scholarship and the RAISE Doctoral Fellowship.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard teaches both undergraduate and graduate design-related classes, conducts research on fracture mechanics and finite element analysis, and on how people become engineers. From 1999 to 2008, she was a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
Agarwal, University of Cincinnati Jutshi Agarwal is a Doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Cincinnati. She has a Master’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from University of Cincinnati and a Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering from SRM University, India. Her research areas of interest are graduate student professional development for a career in academia, preparing future faculty, and using AI tools to solve non-traditional problems in engineering education. She has published in several international conferences.Dr. P.K. Imbrie, University of Cincinnati P.K. Imbrie is the Head and Professor of the Department of Engineering & Computing Education and a Professor in the Department of
across disciplines of physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering. He is interested specifically in the interactions between ferroelectric, ferromagnetic, and ferroelastic materials on the nanoscale, with emphasis placed on the applications of these materials to electronic devices. Dr. Carvell is also interested in research in engineering and physics education and has presented research on multiple topics in this area, with more projects moving forward. While at Marian, Dr. Carvell has taught eleven courses across the physics and engineering programs. He also received the Marian University Advisor of the Year and the E. S. Witchger School of Engineering Award for Service Excellence, both in 2022, and the E. S
Singer, The Ohio State University Amanda Singer is a second-year Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She graduated in 2021 from Michigan Tech with a Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Environmental Engineering. Her current research interests include engineering identity formation, community college engineering education, and mixed methods research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Evaluating Students’ Entrepreneurial Mindset Attributes in First- Year Design ProjectsAbstractEngineering education has been focusing on incorporating the Entrepreneurial Mindset (EM)into First-Year Engineering Programs
to undergraduate engineers. Past re- search projects include studies of governance in engineering education and the influence of educational technology on engineering education.Prof. Stu Thompson, Bucknell University Stu is an associate professor and chair of the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Buck- nell University, in Lewisburg, PA. His teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer- related electives, and engineering design. His research focus is on the application of mobile computing technology to interesting problems. My broadly he is interested in the continued evolution of engineering education and how the experience can help create graduates who will go on to make
, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://edtechbooks.org/hyflex[2] G. Heilporn and S. Lakhal, “Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies?,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 100454, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454.[3] S. Lakhal, D. Bateman, and J. Bédard, “Blended Synchronous Delivery Modes in Graduate Programs: A Literature Review and How it is Implemented in the Master Teacher Program,” Collect. Essays Learn. Teach., vol. 10, pp. 47–60, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747.[4] B. Beatty, “Hybrid Courses with Flexible Participation: The HyFlex Course Design,” Practical Applications and Experiences in K-20 Blended Learning Environments, 2014
Professor of Process Engineering at Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colom- bia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process En- gineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. In addition to teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for more than 10 years, Juan has over 6 years of experience as a practicing engineer, working mostly on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants.Dr. Jennifer Lyn Benning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jennifer Benning is an Instructor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech.Dr. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Natalie Van Tyne is an
faculty member for the Scientista Foundation and ASEE student chapters at Binghamton University.Mr. Koenraad E. Gieskes, State University of New York, Binghamton Koen Gieskes currently serves as the Watson College Interim Assistant Dean for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Interim Director of the Engineering Design Division. He is also director for LSAMP and co-director for STEP and UBMS. Koen first joined the Engineering Design Division at Binghamton Uni- versity as a graduate student in 2004, then, in 2009, he was hired on as a full-time lecturer, in 2017 he became the Assistant Director, and in 2022 began serving as the Interim Director. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Labs and Air Force Research Labs). Dr. Vijlee has been at the University of Portland since 2014.Molly Hiro, University of Portland ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Improving Writing Instruction, Practice, and Feedback in an Introduction to Engineering CourseIntroductionThis Work in Progress (WIP) project’s motivation was to create stronger engineering writers inthe Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering at the University of Portland (UP) and to infuse thecurriculum with a healthy understanding of and respect for good writing as an aspect of asuccessful engineering graduate. UP is fundamentally a liberal arts university with a robust Corecurriculum. Still
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and a Visiting Professor of Engineering at Universidad EAFIT (Medellin, Colombia). Juan holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University and an M.S. in Process Engineering and Energy Technology from Hochschule Bremerhaven. In addition to teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for more than 10 years, Juan has over 6 years of experience as a practicing engineer, working mostly on the design and improvement of chemical processing plants.Cassondra Wallwey, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cassie Wallwey, PhD is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research interests include studying effective
tactile activities as well as anypotential combinations of the three.The teaching styles of the instructor or educator can also impact the ability for students to learn.While taking into consideration traditional methods of teaching, the focus is placed upon theinstructor who follows a set curriculum with topics arranged in a linear fashion to meet pre-determined goals set forth for the course by the school or university [2]. This common lecturestyle is referred to as a “transmission approach,” one which most educators are familiar withbecause it is the general norm among academics according to Osborn and Nag [2]. However,they believe that a constructivist approach is more conducive to learning, because it removes thefocus from the instructor and
interventions (Boostcamps) in higher education (Hite & Spott,2022; Reena, 2018; Tomasko et al., 2016, Orozco, 2023). Research and publication on this topicare relevant and in need. Producing enough numbers of graduates who are prepared for STEMoccupations has become a national priority in the United States (Chen, 2015; The White House,2016; The White House, 2022). Hence, future research on how to retain these students in STEMprograms has great potential to support this national priority.While any university STEM program can improve its STEM intervention based on the findingsin this study, future research could work toward finding a larger number of students completingthe STEM intervention comparable to the number of students who did not complete
welfarehas also become critical to ensure solutions being developed not only support end users but alsoaddress the problem as identified by end users [2], [5]. Moreover, beyond applying the technicalknowledge gained in the coursework, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)highlighted that graduating engineering students must know how to “work as part of teams,communicate well, and understand the economic, social, environment, and international contextof their professional activities” [6, p.1]. Stemming from this point is the need to instill societalperspectives into graduating engineering students so they holistically understand the impact oftheir products locally and globally [7].With the scope of engineering expanding past the
) industry, and discussesthe benefits of doing this when students graduate into industry. Harris and co-authors [5] notedthat relevant case studies could take the form of either newsworthy events or smaller, low-profilescenarios that introduce students to ethical dilemmas they might encounter in their careers. Thecurrent paper shares the goal of using realistic situated experiences such as case studies forengineering education, and specifically explores game-based interventions.Gamification is a pedagogical strategy that has been implemented across a range of settings.One example [10] was a gamified learning approach to introducing a library orientation tool thatmany engineering students had to use. The approach was found to be linked to an increase
Paper ID #43904Work in Progress: Transforming the Freshman Engineering Experience throughPeer-Mentorship and Professional Competency WorkshopsTristan Hernandez, University of Texas at El Paso Tristan Hernandez is an Undergraduate Researcher for the Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Education at the University of Texas at El Paso. Tristan is pursuing a Multidisciplinary degree with concentrations in Engineering Education and Leadership, Mathematics, and Communication at the University of Texas at El Paso, with an expected graduation date of May 2024. He is a former school board member for a local school
Delson, eGrove Education Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is a Senior Teaching Professor at the University of California at San Diego. He received a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from MIT and his interests include robotics, biomedical de- vices, product design, engineering education, and maker spaces. In 1999 he co-founded Coactive Drive Corporation (currently General Vibration), a company that provides force feedback solutions. In 2016 Nate co-founded eGrove Education an educational software company focused on teaching sketching and spatial visualization skills.Dr. Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego Saharnaz Baghdadchi is an Assistant Teaching Professor at UC San Diego. She is interested in scholarly
Paper ID #36827Meaningful Moments: First-year Student Perceptions of Mindfulness andMeditation in the ClassroomDr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame, Northeastern University Dr. Kathryn Schulte Grahame is a Teaching Professor at Northeastern University and the Associate Direc- tor of the First-Year Engineering Team at Northeastern University. The focus of this team is on providing a consistent, comprehensive, and constructive educational experience that endorses the student-centered, professional and practice-oriented mission of Northeastern University. She teaches the Cornerstone of En- gineering courses to first-year students
Preuss, EdD, is the Co-founder and Lead Consultant for Exquiri Consulting, LLC. His primary focus is providing assistance to grant project teams in planning and development, through external eval- uation, and as publication support. Most of his work is on STEM education and advancement projects and completed for Minority-Serving Institutions. He also conducts research regarding higher education focused on the needs and interests of underserved populations and advancing understanding of Minority- Serving Institutions.Dr. Matthew Lucian Alexander P.E., Texas A&M University - Kingsville Dr. Alexander graduated with a BS in Engineering Science from Trinity University, a MS in Chemical Engineering from Georgia Tech
the makerspace lab for first-year engineering students and isresponsible for designing some prototypes.Sean Hirt, School of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Manufacturing Engineering, Universityof ConnecticutSean Hirt is a 4th year Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Student at the University ofConnecticut. He helps to maintain the makerspace lab for first-year engineering students. Work in Progress: Project-Based, Multilevel Teamwork for First-Year Engineering ProgramAbstractThe long process of educating a new generation of engineers requires more than just theprogressive accumulation of classes as students move through a departmental curriculum.Engineering education goes beyond solving equations and retaining
design concepts to reality. Working on theproject also allows for discussion and practice of team interaction processes and skills, as well asbasic project management processes and skills. Another goal in project creation is to givestudents a design project that: addresses aspects of engineering and computer science thatrepresent some of the more recent trends in engineering; covers topics that are not normallycovered in their high school background; are inexpensive to implement; and enables faculty tomanage the project in a way that is both challenging yet obtainable to students with a semester orless of MATLAB programming. Machine vision has uniquely fit this list of goals.Machine vision is a general term that refers to the integration of both