. [Accessed April 28, 2023].[5] J. M. Gómez-De-Gabriel, A. Mandow, J. Fernández-Lozano, and A. J. García-Cerezo, “Using LEGO NXT mobile robots with Lab VIEW for undergraduate courses on mechatronics,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2011, doi: 10.1109/TE.2010.2043359. [Accessed April 28, 2023].[6] S. Cevik Onar, A. Ustundag, Ç. Kadaifci, and B. Oztaysi, “The Changing Role of Engineering Education in Industry 4.0 Era,” in Industry 4.0: Managing The Digital Transformation, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 137–151. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57870-5_8. [Accessed April 28, 2023].[7] B. E. Dunne, A. J. Blauch, and A. Sterian, “The Case for Computer Programming Instruction for All
Sophomore Year Cohort 3 HS Juniors HS seniors Freshman YearIn a study of the 100 largest public and private institutions in the United States, researchersfound that policies related to masking and in-person learning were near universal, while collegesand universities varied in their COVID-19 testing requirements, de-densification policies and 5cancelling of intercollegiate athletic activities [20]. At the university where this study wasconducted the following policies were implemented: 1) All classes went remote midway through the spring 2020 semester and remained remote for the summer session
, Epidemiology, and Humanities.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a Technical Communication lecturer and a Engineering Education researcher at the University of Michigan. Her teaching is primarily in team-based engineering courses, and her research focuses on equity in communication and collaboration as well as in group design decision making (judgment) under uncertainty. She is especially interested in how power relationships and rhetorical strategies affect group judgment in engineering design; one goal of this work is to to understand factors that inhibit full participation of students who identify with historically marginalized groups and investigate evidence-based strategies for mitigating these
[1]. Today, manyfirst-year students typically have little hands-on experience related to engineering [2]. Manyhave never used common tools before and do not know how common devices, such as carengines, actually work. Stephen Belkoff, an engineering professor at Johns Hopkins, noted thelack of practical skills for incoming freshmen, “These are all A students, and it took two days tobuild a shelf from Home Depot and get it @$$-backwards” [3]. While they are generally verycomputer savvy, incoming freshmen have little experience with engineered equipment. Studentsdo get experience with equipment in a variety of labs and in their capstone projects during thecourse of their college careers, but neither of these may be with actual equipment used
curriculum, mentoring students, and engineering education research, particularly for project-based courses, the first-year engineering experience, and student professional skills. He is active in the American Society for Engineering Education and serves on the First-Year Programs Division Executive Board and was the past Webmanager for the ASEE First-Year Programs Division and the First-Year Engineering Experience Conference. He is on the Executive Steering Committee for the Vertically Integrated Projects Consortium. Prior to working at Colorado School of Mines, he was the Assistant Dean for Academics and taught Introduction to Engineering and Design at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering.Ms. Victoria Bill, Colorado
thatthe work is assessed on can be specified through a ‘holistic statement’ presented to thejudges. Specified criteria may include judges own perception of professional constructs, forexample quality of design, innovation, etc., or judges may be provided with a specificdefinition of a construct. Previous research has demonstrated validity in both approaches[15]. Figure 1: ACJ pairwise comparison processJudges of ACJ sessions have previously included students, professionals and instructors/faculty [3], [5]–[7], [16]. The number of judgements that must be made in an ACJ session istypically specified as a function of the number of items of work to be assessed [13], with thisnumber typically being divided by the total number of
(18%) Behavior 32 (16%) 14 (10%) Technical Skills 24 (12%) 19 (13%) Teamwork 40 (21%) 16 (11%) Exploration 6 (3%) 12 (8%) No Code 7 (4%) 4 (3%) Total Nodes 195 (100%) 146 (100%)A Pearson correlation test revealed that the distribution of codes between the robot andnanotechnology projects was significantly different (p < 0.030). The code with the highestpercentage in the robot section was Teamwork (21
2 technical speaking skills? Do you believe that having oral exams in a course will 3 help you master the subject material better or provide extra incentive to do so? Do you worry about oral exams because they will cause 4 you undue stress? Do you worry about oral exams because they will be 5 subject to bias from the person conducting the exam? 6 Do you feel comfortable talking to a professor? Survey response rate: 80.9%. Percentages in the table are rounded to nearest whole number.The beginning-of-quarter survey also gathered student gender data. The WMW test revealsstatistical differences in the response distribution to several
prototyping 2 Problems and opportunities 22 Electronic prototyping 3 Engineering problem solving process 23 Work session 4 Teamwork 24 Requirements and specifications 5 Idea generation 25 Decision making 6 Empathy and user-centered design 26 Feedback and peer evaluations 7 Problem identification and validation 27 Systems and subsystems 8 Stakeholder engagement 28 Design Review 9 Literature review 29 Testing and Analysis 10 Idea generation 30 Technical communication
technical and exclusive to human-centered and inclusive; 3. Change how and when engineering students learn mathematics such that they are better able to apply and retain their learning; and 4. Help students develop a sense of belonging and a professional identity in engineering earlier in their academic career.Our work is guided by four main research questions, which mirror our objectives: 1. Are we better able to retain students on a Human-Centered Engineering pathway? 2. What are student perceptions of engineering? Do student perceptions differ depending on the path they take? on gender identity? on background and preparation? 3. Are students better able to apply and retain key mathematical concepts on the
motivation: Connections between first‐yearstudents' engineering role identities and future‐time perspectives," J Eng Educ, vol. 109, (3), pp.362-383, 2020.[13] D. Rae and D. E. Melton, "Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in US engineeringeducation: an international view of the KEEN project," The Journal of EngineeringEntrepreneurship, vol. 7, (3), 2017.[14] J. Blake Hylton et al, "Working to instill the entrepreneurial mindset across the curriculum,"Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, (1), pp. 86-106, 2020.[15] R. S. Harichandran et al, "Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset in Engineering StudentsUsing Integrated E-Learning Modules." Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 7, (1), pp. n1,2018.[16] D. R. Riley et al, "First-year
V2: 2 min 55 sec 12 min 30 sec V3: 2 min 53 sec V4: 3 min 53 secAs seen in Table 2, the duration of each video ranged from one to 10 minutes. The mostextended video session was 23 minutes.As a strategy for self-evaluation and motivation after watching the videos on Canvas, thestudents had to answer a questionnaire about the concepts learned [20]. This questionnaire was aformative assessment. Formative assessments aim to gather information about the student'slearning situation to review the learning process [21]. Students were eligible for a bonus whenanswering a total of nine questionnaires.When arriving at the classroom, each team member brought their learning, thus creating adynamic between
, The Pennsylvania State University Justin Lavallee graduated from the Harvard Graduate School of Design in 2010 with a Master in Architec- ture. After working as a researcher studying novel applications for industrial robots in custom manufac- turing processes, he joined the MIT Department of Architecture in 2011 as an instructor and eventually director of the MIT Architecture Shops. He joined the MIT New Engineering Education Transforma- tion as a lead technical instructor in 2019. Throughout his time at MIT he has focused on developing and teaching courses at the intersection of design, technology, and making, while also participating in a number of research projects focusing on new fabrication techniques.Dr
currently working on Terahertz generation using Lithium Niobate crystals. He has published over twenty peer-reviewed journal articles, and two book chapters. Dr. Ummy has presented his research to several international conferences. In addition, he has three U.S. Patents. He is a Co-PI been sponsored by DOE, NSF and CUNY Strategic Investment Initiative (SII). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Engineering Technology: A Multi-Disciplinary, Project-Based Introductionto Engineering TechnologyAbstractThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper presents 'Exploring Engineering Technology,' amulti-disciplinary, project-based course designed to introduce new and prospective engineeringstudents
Table 3. As can be seen from thetable, there were 7 female participants, 20 male participants, and 2 LGBTQ participants. Most ofthe students participating in the survey were from under-represented minority groups since thesummer bridge programs target these students' participation. With most students of non-Hispanicorigin, there were 15 black or African American students, 6 multiracial, 1 Asian, and 5 whitestudents. There were only 4 international student participants, and most of them were domesticstudents. Only two students had a different route to college. The rest of the 27 students wereplanning to join college without any delay after completing high school. The sample alsoincluded 6 first-generation students, meaning that none of their
important take-aways included (1) the multi-disciplinary nature of engineering, (2) that engineers require both technical proficiency as well as professional skills (particularly teamwork and communication), (3) engineering involves more than just technical work, (4) making ethical decisions, (5) the importance of accountability and responsibility, (6) the impact of engineering on society and sustainability, and (7) EDIA, a point that squares with their thinking included a (1) a commitment to engineering for sustainability, (2) ensuring EDIA and social responsibility in engineering work, (3) a strong sense of ethics, and (4) being able to communicate, and a topic that is still circling included (1) ethics and making a decision that balances
in Nigeria” was awarded the best DEI paper in the International Division of ASEE at the 2023 Conference. He is the Founding President of the African Engineering Education Fellows in the Diaspora, a non-governmental organization that leverages the experiences of African scholars in engineering education to inform and support engineering education policy, practice, and pedagogies in Africa. His research revolves around the professional development of STEM educators and researchers in low-resource contexts for which he employs culturally relevant pedagogy and the contextualization and validation of measurement instruments with a keen interest in sub-Saharan Africa.Tierney Harvey, University of OklahomaHaley Taffe
55, no. 5, pp. 21-28, 2015, Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online].Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44430404.[3] A. Zida, J. N. Lavis, N.n K. Sewankambo, B. Kouyate, and S. Ouedraogo. “Evaluating theProcess and Extent of Institutionalization: A Case Study of a Rapid Response Unit for HealthPolicy in Bukino Faso,” International Journal of Health Policy and Management, vol. 7, no. 1,pp. 15–26, Janurary 2018, doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.39.[4] G. Blumenstyk. “Dozens of Colleges Pledged to Enroll More Low-income Students. So WhyDid Their Numbers Go Down?” The Chronicle of Higher Education.https://www.chronicle.com/article/Dozens-of-Colleges-Pledged-to/248069?cid=cp211 (accessedMar. 29, 2024).[5] G. Blumenstyk. “The Higher Ed We Need Now”. The
fairlywell defined required and elective courses in their technical focus areas. Teaching theintroductory course several years into their careers, the authors realized that introductory coursesare not nearly as well defined or standard across academic institutions. The challenges ofdesigning the course were compounded by including a design project. The intent of this paper isto simplify the process of selecting a design project for instructors developing or updating anintroduction to engineering course.Following a survey of ASEE Divisions and KEEN partner institutions likely to include memberswho have taught introduction to engineering courses, a database of 32 design projects wascompiled. All projects include common features, such as the
sequence of the projects. Furthermore, the study demonstrated the narrowing ofthe initial gaps in student comfort of these topics for various subgroups of students (female vs.male; students with prior experience with the technology vs. those that had no prior experience,etc.).References[1] M.E. Andrews, M. Borrego and A. Boklage, "Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of auniversity makerspace," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, pp. 1-18, 2021.[2] V. Wilczynski, "Academic maker spaces and engineering design," in 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, pp. 26.138. 1-26.138. 19, 2015.[3] E.C. Hilton, K.G. Talley, S.F. Smith, R.L. Nagel and J.S. Linsey, "Report on engineeringdesign self-efficacy and demographics of makerspace
check for potential differences in (1)pragmatic interest factor, (2) affective interest factor, (3) overall interest, and (4) belongingbetween cohorts. Table X2 reports on the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha, α),the ANOVA F-statistic, the statistical significance of the ANOVA test (p-value), and the omegasquared (ω2, an ANOVA effect size parallel to Cohen’s d for t-tests with two groups). Allconstructs were computed by summing the Likert-scale responses to items in that construct.Table 3. Comparison Between Pre-COVID, COVID, and Post-COVID Cohorts Ratings of Interest inEngineering and Sense of Belonging PRE-COVID COVID POST-COVID F p ω2 M(SD) α
activity exposurechallenge through the implementation of new educational science procedural standards thatincorporate engineering thinking such as SEPS (Scientific and Engineering Practices Standards).The challenge is that K-12 (high school focus) is still very siloed, so a difficult roll-out [1], [2].Some colleges are implementing pre-course trainings to help incoming students better preparefor college, such as summer bridge courses and pre-course preparation sessions [3], [4], [5], [6].These tend to focus on a particular topic and typically do not explore interdisciplinary elements[7], [8].Extracurricular student organizations and clubs are assembled to foster student engagement ofspecific topics. These are often student run with limited faculty
- December, 2005,” tax.ohio.gov. https://tax.ohio.gov/business/ohio-business-taxes/sales-and- use/information-releases/st200505 (accessed January 3, 2023).[30] J. M. Bekki, M. Huerta, J. S. London, D. Melton, M. Vigeant, and J. M. Williams, “Opinion: Why EM? The Potential Benefits of Instilling an Entrepreneurial Mindset,” Advances Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-11, Fall 2018.[31] “Jim's Donut Shop - A Real-World Scenario for Introductory Programming,” Engineering Unleashed. https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/3540 [32] Creative Commons. “Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). License.” Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (accessed January 3, 2023).Appendix A. Survey
to other passive teammates. Some teamswith mix-gendered teammates were found to have unequal work distribution with men doingmore technical work, while women were doing more work related to communication or planning[3]. Thus, in order to ensure students are able to enjoy the benefits of TBL, teamwork assessmentand support tools such as CATME or Tandem can be used to monitor the students’ performancesand notice any changes within the team [4]–[7]. By using teamwork assessment and support tools, learning analytics can be performed tooptimize students’ learning experiences. The large amount of data collected by the teamworkassessment and support tools provide an opportunity for researchers and instructors to detectvarious changes and
,” Journal of College Counseling, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 6-20, 2014.[13] G. M. Walton and G. L. Cohen, “A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6023, pp. 1447–1451, 2011.[14] A. Godwin, “The development of a measure of engineering identity,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jan. 2016.[15] S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and M. Bartlett, “Engineering Identity Development: A Review of Higher Education Literature,” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 254-265, 2018.[16] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to
EAS199: Engineering Principles. The course prioritizes the retention ofincoming engineering students at the university by providing students with the opportunity tostrengthen their academic skills such as time management and metacognition, while alsointroducing them to the engineering process. We have previously reported on the goals of thisiterative redesign, which was motivated by the goal of making the course a more equitable,accessible, and socially just learning environment as the mindset and profile of incoming first-year engineering students has changed with time [3]. Generation Z is known to be one of themost diverse populations with a growing desire to learn to lead and make positive changes intheir communities [1]. With this, we
on average attending the sessions.Community BuildingThrough the blocked schedules, extra Friday classes, and SI sessions, students were encouragedto form social connections with each other and build study groups, fostering a sense ofcommunity within the SSP. In addition to the technical courses, students enrolled in a commonFirst-Year Experience (FYE) seminar course section. This FYE course was led by their ENGR120 instructor with occasional visits from their Math 240 instructor. This provided more casualcontact with their instructors and included icebreakers to increase the students' comfort levelswith them and each other early in the year.In the winter quarter, the faculty and staff associated with the grant introduced a weekly grouplunch
& Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. https://peer.asee.org/44154[3] Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in physiology education, 40(2), 147– 156. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00138.2015[4] Johri, A. (2023). International Handbook of Engineering Education Research (1st ed.). Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from https://www.perlego.com/book/4140786/international-handbook-of-engineering- education-research-pdf (Original work published 2023)[5] Cutri, R.; Gil, H. A. C. and Freitas, P. A. de M. "A curricularização da extensão e sua aplicação nas escolas de engenharia," in Proceedings of the
negative comments by sentimental analysis. The negative comments were thencategorized into major issues mentioned by the Lencioni Model [2]: lack of trust, fear of conflict,lack of commitment, avoidance of accountability; inattention to results. A detailed interventionguideline would also be provided in this study. A mixed-method analysis was used to evaluatethe impact of instructors’ interventions.IntroductionThere are three constructivist concepts as the foundation of the student-centered instructionmethod known as project-based learning (PBL) [3-6]: learners actively participate in the learningprocess, a specific context for learning, and the project objectives achieved via mutualinteractions as well as sharing of technical knowledge and
dropoutrates and improving student success.Keywords: AI, data mining, dropout, engineering, first-year students, higher educationIntroductionOver the years, many studies have been conducted to understand why students leave theirstudies in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplinesprematurely. Research has delved into sociocognitive factors that play a critical role in studentpersistence in university. For instance, sense of belonging [1, 2], self-efficacy [3, 4], identity[5, 6], and intrinsic motivation [7], which are vital to student persistence in university. Forinstance, Andrews et al. [8] researched how the incorporation of makerspaces impactsstudents' self-efficacy and sense of belonging concerning design, engineering