Paper ID #10334Workshops on Fundamental Engineering Skills: A Graduate Student-LedTeaching InitiativeJustin M. Foley, Applied Physics Program, University of Michigan Justin is a doctoral candidate in the Applied Physics Program at the University of Michigan. His disser- tation research involves spectral manipulation, including broadband reflectance and narrowband filtering, using subwavelength dielectric gratings. He is currently the president of the student chapter of ASEE at the University of Michigan. In addition to his research and education interests, Justin holds a position with the Office of Technology Transfer
article is scholarly and whether it follows citation or styleguidelines. Finally, students can use the criteria for validity as scholarly research and what waslearned in the discussions to write their critique reviews.Tips 1. Students need exposure to many good examples of the type of writing that they are expected to produce. They need to read and critically examine those examples, and have samples of the type of work available to them to review in courses. 2. Feedback to students should emphasize what is done right as well as areas for improvement. Feedback should be given often. Try to guide the development of the writing by having the student address fundamental flaws in one draft, then mechanics in the next, then
how being a writer is. (Focus group) Yeah, this class, this mentorship program helped get this connection for me that'll be useful going forward. (Focus group)Second, the graduate students appreciated the disciplinary diversity of their peers as theyperceived it important for helping communicate to non-expert audiences: The fact that we're all from different areas kind of helped get us all on even footing, because we're all expert in our field, but then we all have to bring it back to the fundamentals and explain it in a difficult way when you're used to thinking in such a high level. So I think that helped us be more cohesive and caring about each other. (Focus group) I enjoyed the academic
Paper ID #33208Academic Writing at the Doctoral and Professional Level in Engineering:The Current State of the Field and Pathways ForwardMs. Kate Caroline Batson, University of Georgia KateBatsonis a PhD candidate within Language and Literacy Education at the University of Georgia. Her research is centered around writing practices at the doctoral and professional levels within engineering. Previously, she served as an instructor in the Intensive English Program (IEP) at The University of Missis- sippi, where she taught 18 different courses and served as the IEP Operations Coordinator. She was also the IEP in-house
Mapping, and Writing Goal Accountability. Rationale for and demonstration of eachof these techniques is offered in this paper as guidance to faculty who mentor their own students’development as disciplinary writers.IntroductionDisciplinary writing in the form of contributions to grant proposals, peer-reviewed journalpublications, and conference papers is a natural outcome of gradate engineering students’research activities and vital to the research productivity of these students’ faculty advisors.However, while students may possess content knowledge and technical expertise, many entergraduate programs with limited understanding of the disciplinary writing and publicationprocesses. Graduate students typically learn about these processes through
addition, during intense, annual multi-day retreatsat Cornell University (winter) and Norfolk State University (summer), trainees come together forfurther technical training, professional development, program self-reflection and redesign.Most of the education and training part of the program is delivered in four courses: (1) Technicaland Professional Writing (6 weeks); (2) Training in Independent Research (12 weeks); (3) BestPractices in Teaching and Learning (8 weeks); and (4) Ethics and Intellectual Property (4weeks). The sequence of short, focused modular courses provides a framework conducive to thecycle of (re-)design, enactment, and study of the proposed graduate training activities. It allowsfor students to learn and practice in the same
distance delivery at peer institutions isincluded to examine research and writing requirements common in CM programs with distancedelivery. Detail of corrective actions that have been implemented with limited effect areprovided. Finally, the program change for the most recent cohort of students enrolled in theprogram to a guided capstone academic writing activity under the direction of a single facultymember is described.IntroductionGraduate education in Construction Management (CM) has been slow to develop. In the yearssince the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) was organized in 1974 by theAmerican Institute of Constructors (AIC) and the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), ithas accredited undergraduate programs that
has been well-defined as comprising product engineering and engineering materials,process science, quality engineering and production systems engineering.1,2 Other engineeringdisciplines are defined in parallel fashion.Engineering research, which is central to graduate study, is characterized by both discovery andapplication -- by creation of something new. This often leads the research into paths somewhatafield from traditional sub-disciplinary topical definition. One of the challenges, thus, of thefaculty advisor is to balance attention to recognizable disciplinary fundamentals with the creativespirit of the graduate student researcher. Experience suggests that recognized accomplishment inthe core competencies of the engineering field are
senior member of IEEE and is a member of ASME, SIAM, ASEE and AGU. He is actively involved in CELT activities and regularly participates and presents at the Lilly Conference. He has been the recipient of several Faculty Learning Community awards. He is also very active in assessment activities and has presented more than a dozen papers at various Assessment Institutes. His posters in the areas of Bloom’s Taxonomy and Socratic Inquisition have received widespread acclaim from several scholars in the area of Cognitive Science and Educational Methodologies. He has received the Assessment of Critical Thinking Award twice and is currently working towards incorporating writing assessments that
AC 2011-355: IMPLEMENTING THE MASTERS FOR ENGINEERINGPROFESSIONALS DEGREE AT NJITStephen J. Tricamo, New Jersey Institute of Technology Page 22.825.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Implementing the Master’s for Engineering Professionals Degree at NJITAbstract This paper reports on a plan for implementing a Master’s for Engineering Professionals atNew Jersey Institute of Technology. The Master’s for Engineering Professionals is intended forthe early career development of engineers in industry. It teaches the skill sets and abilitiesrequired of these
AC 2010-201: STRENGTHENING THE U.S. ENGINEERING WORKFORCE FORINNOVATION: IMPLEMENTING THE POSTGRADUATE PROFESSIONALMASTER OF ENGINEERING CONCEPT AT NJITStephen Tricamo, New Jersey Institute of Technology Page 15.1107.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Strengthening the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Innovation: Implementing the Postgraduate Professional Master of Engineering Concept at NJITAbstract This is the fourth of four invited papers prepared specifically for the NationalCollaborative panel session concerning the advancement of postgraduate professionalengineering education relevant to
they finish at the end ofthe 3rd year, but the opportunity does exist. The new found independence from classes incombination with the daunting task of writing a dissertation often leaves the third yearstudents lost again. Students typically have a hard time defining the research in theirdissertation and getting started.The Third Year (and Beyond) StudentYou made is through two years, now is the tough part. By the third year you have shouldbe a fairly independent researcher. At this point you need to start working on yourdissertation. (Your own research problem and solution.) If your advisor is nice he/shewill help you get started by working with you to lay out your dissertation, but this is notalways the case. If your advisor doesn’t sit down
. It is common tosee collaboration among industries and universities on research areas. However, it is unusualto see academic programs developed in conjunction with the industries. The need forenhanced integration of basic fundamentals along with the application concepts, demanded byspecialized fields, can be accomplished by bringing together viewpoints from experiencedacademics and expert practitioners. Over the past few years, developments in highereducation have brought collaboration between the university and the private sector more andmore common. The industry approach to professional development is based on the needs ofacquiring, developing, and retaining a skilled and competent workforce. Universities, in turn,may benefit from the
the three groups, including elementsof competence, engineering fundamentals and application, environmental constraints, qualitycontrol, technical knowledge, and economic and political issues.11Less work has been done at the level of graduate education. There is general agreement about thelack of preparation for engineering careers in both industry and academia of Ph.D. students, as aresult of the high level of specificity and focus on research from most doctoral engineeringprograms.4,13 This misalignment can be avoided through faculty and university intervention inidentifying and developing the skills and knowledge that Ph.D. students need to have before theyleave their graduate studies: Many improvements have been suggested in literature to
process is also an engaging experience for the sponsor. The sponsor writes a‘Sponsorship Letter’ along with a commitment to give the required data to the student team in atimely manner. As noted earlier, the output of the capstone project has two clients [2], theacademia faculty who will evaluate the course output to meet the required universityrequirements and standards, and the industry project sponsor. Both the sponsor and the advisorstay on with the team till the project is completed.Capstone Project Proposal (Part A – SEM610A Project I)The main goal of this phase ‘Part A Project I’ is for the student team to develop and complete aproject proposal document with all the necessary key elements to go in to implementation in PartB Project II. The
members. To begin, weidentify the goals of the ASEE student chapter. Then, we assess the resources currently offeredby other campus entities that could overlap with ASEE student chapter activities. Finally, wedevelop strategic ASEE student chapter events and activities that further the goals of ASEE andthat provide value beyond what other campus organizations already provide.Identify ASEE Student Chapter GoalsThe first step in maximizing the effectiveness of an ASEE student chapter is to identify its goals.While the exact goals may vary between campuses, the fundamental goals of an ASEE studentchapter are to encourage engineering students to pursue academic careers, to increasepedagogical understanding (i.e., knowledge of how to teach), to
initiation, direction intensity andpersistence of efforts. Undergraduate engineering research has gained significant popularity in many engineeringschools in the past few years. Engineering research includes the aspect of pursuing a scientifictopic, a hypothesis or an idea in a systematic rigorous fashion. This requires critical thinking inorder to answer questions and to produce new and original knowledge. Another aspect ofresearch is describing the intellectual activity and communicating the new knowledge both orallyand in writing. This paper describes a research program that was conducted by fourteen undergraduatemechanical engineering students during the past three and a half years; and it also assesses themotivation of the students toward
dimension of required skills in addition to the soft, hard, andglobal competencies. This skill set, particularly applicable to nanotechnology, is calledTranslation. This is the ability to transform fundamental research into complete engineeringsystems. The vision for nanotechnology in 2020 is to achieve translation from the research labsto consumer use1. While the past decade focused on fundamental research and scientificdiscovery, the goal now is application-driven research leading to new technologies and Page 24.1281.4industries.We believe that promoting translation requires a combination of three competencies: (i) Theability to view and solve
, Theory, and Culture, with a focus on Writing Program Administration in STEM. As an IEEE Senior Member, she currently serves as secretary to the IEEE Professional Communication Society Board of Governors and as Campus Representative for the ASEE North Midwest Section. She is also an active member of the Consortium for Graduate Communication and the National Council of Teachers of English. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020PeerPresentationsasaStudent-centeredLearningApproachinaNanotechnologyClassAbstract:BackgroundActive learning techniques have proven effective at engaging students in course content andfostering deeper learning, as compared with traditional lecture techniques
Technology (CIT) at Purdue University. She has been with the University since 2007 and is responsible for teaching database fundamentals courses and introductory technology courses. Laux has 10 years of industrial experience in the information technology field, and her research area of interest includes technology readiness, the social impacts of technology, and increasing interest in the field of computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Evaluation of STEM Integration Effectiveness by Artifact AnalysisAbstractImproving the learning experience is the purpose of integrating curricula and providing studentswith explicit connections between disciplines. However, the mainstream
Live Platform. Note that, while the courses are taught to students at international loca-tions, there are no export control concerns since ITAR §120.10 exempts “information concerninggeneral scientific, mathematical, or engineering principles commonly taught in schools, colleges,and universities” from export control.3 Scalable Teaching and Learning EnvironmentThe Live Platform is the key innovation in the international degree program that we describe here.This section describes the various components and modes of interactions. The most importantaspect of all these variations is that the instruction is synchronous, i.e., live. As such, this programis fundamentally different from online programs, which use recorded instruction. In particular
. ENGR0011 has an extensive writing component that involves asemester long project that produces 4 written projects and a presentation at the end of thesemester. The presentation component is integrated into the Peer Mentor component ofENGR0081. Thus, this presentation fulfills the first step or introductory exposure of publicspeaking for every student. By having the student presentation in the small mentor section, lessthan 15 students, the student‘s first public speaking experience takes place in a very friendly andinformal setting. This addresses the anxiety issue stated above. In addition, by having fourindependent writing assignments throughout the semester, that each produce a milestoneproduction, we are also addressing item 2 above, by
) educationprojects at Georgia Tech to produce a collective result that is greater than the sum of its parts.The grant also promotes collaboration within Georgia Tech and with nearby institutions in orderto give graduate students the skills and experience they need to successfully transition to afaculty member position. There is both a formal structured certificate program and less structured a la carteoptions. There are two tiers of the certificate program. The first tier includes a graduate levelcourse on the fundamentals of teaching and learning and a teaching practicum whereby graduatestudents work with a mentor and take on some of the duties of teaching a course, such aspreparing and delivering several lectures, helping write assignments and
simulations, structural health monitoring, and damage prognosis, 3) jointLANL/UCSD research projects, and 4) industry short courses.The Los Alamos Dynamics Summer SchoolThe LADSS is a very selective 9-week summer school in which top upper-level US-citizenundergraduate students (mean GPA > 3.8/4.0) from universities around the nation participate insummer school activities and work in teams of three with a LANL mentor on research projectsrelated to the EI’s technology focus2. The summer school activities include four basic elements: Page 12.1422.4lectures on fundamental engineering topics; a distinguished lecturer series on “cutting edgeresearch”; a
program,supervising undergraduate students for senior projects, and mentoring junior graduate studentsfor research projects. Based on the contract in Figure 2, activities are determined individuallywith the assigned teaching mentor. Each student must complete a minimum of 10 hours ofmentored activities. A broad range of teaching opportunities is provided, and the mentoredinternship may be completed over one or several quarters, depending on the researchcommitments of the individual student.20-EECE-954. Advanced Teaching Techniques, offered in the Spring Quarter, emphasizesadvanced pedagogical techniques including Bloom’s taxonomy, concept maps, project and teammanagement for developing leadership skills, teaching evaluations, proposal writing
Paper ID #19042Energy Science and Engineering Graduate Education at Tokyo TechProf. Jeffrey Scott Cross, Tokyo Institute of Technology Jeffrey S. Cross received a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Iowa State University in 1992. He has worked in Japan at Fujitsu Lab Ltd., National Institute for Inorganics Materials, and at Tokyo Tech for over 20 years and is fluent in Japanese. Jeffrey is Prof. in the School of Environment and Society, Dept. of Transdisciplinarity Science and Engineering and graduate coordinate for the Energy Science and Engineering Major. He teaches online courses on academic writing and on education
engineers5.Some identity researchers theorize that identity construction is a manifestation of a “narrative ofself,” which is a fluid and malleable vision of one’s own personhood6. Winberg 7 discusses thepractices involved in changing identities as “ventriloquation” (citing Bakhtin8) as studentslearning within a community of practice embody different narratives. Dannels9 suggests that forengineers, identity development occurs “through experiencing disciplinary genres, engaging indisciplinary research, and interpreting disciplinary texts” (p. 7) citing scientific writing andspeaking as tied to engineering identity. In fact, the production of engineering rhetoric isimportant in knowledge construction, socialization, and negotiation of disciplinary
and development occurs, throughshared interactions and experiences with other graduate students as well as faculty advisors7.Characterizing the structure, or in some cases the absence of structure, in the research grouplearning environment is key to better understanding how we train engineering graduate students.Research-focused graduate programs (thesis master’s and PhD) are meant to transform studentsinto independent researchers with critical and analytical thinking skills who can set goals,collaborate with others and communicate their ideas orally and in writing. Students’ experiencesin these research groups, both positive and negative, influence the extent to which they learnthese skills, as well as their satisfaction and intention to
during the first semester in which theyare appointed. The TA certification workshop is based on research and best practices ineducation – it takes a hands-on and interactive approach in covering the following topics:understanding undergraduate students and the culture of higher education in the United States,principles of student success, fundamentals of pedagogy, student learning styles, questioningstrategies to increase student engagement, and managing the practical aspects of a TA position,such as working with faculty, grading, office hours, and resolving student issues. TAs are eitherobserved during their classroom/laboratory session or are required to participate in a teachingpracticum session, where they are evaluated by their peers. These
Paper ID #34351Education and Evaluation for the NRT: Accounting for NumerousRequirements, Multiple Disciplines, and Small CohortsDr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and a Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is responsible for the launch and development of the university’s multidisciplinary undergraduate entrepreneurship program, which involves 2000 students from all majors per year. She