programs in the design phase aswell as those currently being delivered.IntroductionDoctoral degrees lead the hierarchy of higher education qualifications, and within the ranks ofdoctoral education, the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) generally reigns supreme [1]. As a recent 1addition to the compendium of research doctoral disciplines, Engineering Education (Eng Ed)programs aim to prepare students to independently conduct rigorous research on engineeringcurriculum, pedagogy, assessment, and faculty development” among other relevant topics [2],[3], [4]. It is expected that based on their doctoral education and training, graduates will not onlyserve as researchers but will also perform leadership functions
. Copeland, R. Hopson, T. Simmons, and M. J. Leibowitz, “The role of professional identity in graduate school success for under‐represented minority students,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 70–75, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1002/bmb.20673.[4] A. Wierzbicka, “A case study of emotion in culture: German Angst,” 1999, pp. 123–167. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511521256.003.[5] E. H. Erikson, Identity, youth, and crisis, [1st ed.]. New York: New York : W. W. Norton, 1968. [Online]. Available: https://unlv-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/ovttgp/01UNLV_ALMA21171117 830004081[6] M. P. Orbe, “Theorizing multidimensional identity negotiation: Reflections on the lived experiences of first-generation college students,” New
-classenvironment itself provides this opportunity, but in online formats, the instructional designshould be pre-structured to make it happen. Community building can be added to the syllabus aspart of a learning assignment. For example, grouping students for topic search, sharing resources,or any other low-level activities can help build relationships. Forming small groups is always agood idea so that students have the opportunity to contribute equally.ConclusionThis exploratory study contributed to the field of STEM education and, specifically, tounderstanding how STEM graduate students learn in shared collaborative learning environments.The findings revealed that inquiry-based online courses with integration of applied research peerreview activities need
are designed to produce the next generation of experts in industry andacademia. In parallel to recent advances in science and engineering, convergence research — themerging of diverse knowledge — is being called upon to solve complex problems at theintersection of science and society. To align graduate STEM education with the need ofconvergent approaches, graduate students are expected develop skills in problem solving,collaboration, systems thinking, and communication. This article describes ConGrad, aconvergent graduate education framework that combines transdisciplinary methodologies,experiential learning, and learning by teaching, within the context of a project-based curriculum.Using the ConGrad framework, we propose a program in which
and curricula have been created to train a new generation of scientists to engage with complex issues. It seems critical that those most affected by interdisciplinary education—doctoral students—provide feedback about such innovations. Without understanding students’ experiences in interdisciplinary programs, faculty will not know whether they are “getting it right” for future generations of interdisciplinarians (p. 757). iven the persistent challenges of interdisciplinary graduate education, scholars haveGconsistently called for multifaceted, systemic change across the layered systems of academic institutional governance and the incentive structures both inside and
graduate education areto (1) break the traditional "one-size-fits-all" approach to graduate STEM education by creating andvalidating a PLM that is inclusive to all students and (2) propagate our engineering education researchinto practice by generating the knowledge to extend this innovation to other STEM graduate programs.The Personalized Learning Model (PLM)Seeded by a shared vision across SSOE and guided by experts in engineering education, we are piloting,measuring, refining, and institutionalizing the PLM for STEM Graduate Education (Figure 1). Recognizingthat a program with "pointwise" personalization (i.e., a single course or professional development focus)will have a modest impact, we propose a personalized learning model that permeates
develop a community withpeers in the same field.Two faculty members, who are active STEM education researchers, have instituted a newseminar series specifically for these students that is designed to realign the course withengineering education topics, continuously improve the Ph.D. curriculum, and assist students ontheir Ph.D. paths. The group of faculty and students began meeting every other week to discusstopics specifically related to STEM education and the needs of graduate school in lieu ofattending the general engineering seminars. This new seminar series covers multiple topicsapplicable to students in STEM education, including developing a plan of study, writing andpresenting a proposal for a dissertation, and on-campus graduate
GrantOpportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) established in 1995 [6], and Industry-University Cooperative Research Center (IUCRC) [7]. In spite of these programs running fordecades, the interaction between universities and companies was not progressing fast enough.Therefore, a few years ago NSF’s Directorates for Education and Human Resources; Engineering;and Computer and Information Science and Engineering introduced ‘Non-Academic ResearchInternships for Graduate Students (INTERN)’. Even the critics of Stokes’ model have recognizedthat ‘working with industry can provide tremendous benefits and generate many new questions offundamental importance’ [5].A key aspect that is absent in these various analyses of research has been the education
Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01854 Abstract Balance problems affect more than eight million adults, and the percentage of balance problems increases with age. Globally, the population is aging, making balance problems a relevant topic of investigation. Balance impairments are the primary cause of falls, which result in debilitating injuries, especially for the elderly population. There is a significant opportunity for students in engineering and other disciplines to explore and contribute to research and education in this area. In this work, a group of graduate students from
University.Dr. Samhita Rhodes, Grand Valley State University Dr. Samhita Rhodes is Professor of Biomedical and Electrical Engineering, and the Graduate Program Director of the School of Engineering at Grand Valley State University. Dr. Rhodes’ expertise is in biomedical signal modeling and advanced image processing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Onboarding Engineering Graduate Students from Non- Engineering Undergraduate MajorsAbstractVarious government agencies forecast a shortage of engineers caused by a combination offactors including an increase in job opportunities, attrition in the STEM pipeline, and exits fromthe labor force for various reasons
Paper ID #37529Writing in discipline-appropriate ways: An approach to teachingmultilingual graduate students in mechanical engineeringMr. Xixin Qiu, Pennsylvania State University Xixin Qiu is a doctoral candidate in Applied Linguistics at The Pennsylvania State University. His re- search concerns the application of corpus-based linguistic analysis to engineering writing pedagogy. Cur- rently, he teaches both freshman and graduate-level academic writing to international students and serves on the Student Editorial Board of English For Specific Purposes. ©American Society for Engineering Education
PhD Candidate.Andrea D. Beattie Andrea D. Beattie is a graduate from Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts in Political Science in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Currently she serves as a Manager, Research and Innovation at SHPE. In this role, she assists the organization with research, program evaluation, and data analytics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38332Ashleigh Tierney Ashleigh currently serves as a Director of Research & Innovation at SHPE. In this role, she leads the Men
research opportunities andpublishing.This program can also be generalized to other historically unrepresented communities as well asother STEM degrees. This program is designed to identify additional areas where Hispanicstudents struggle when applying to graduate school. The goal is to use this information tocontinuously improve the current program; as well as, to support the development of newinterventions to fill any identified gaps.Future GRADS also provides the opportunity to educate both mentors and mentees, not only inthe topics pertaining the GSAP, but also in how to be good mentors for future generations, givingparticipants the opportunity to pay it forward once they are done with the process themselves.AcknowledgementsWe would like to
Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: What if they choose: Surfacing insights associated with a pedagogy for doctoral educationIntroductionIs it possible to create a doctoral learning experience that is grounded on participants readingwhat they choose? Why would this be of interest
of community and belonging in the field of engineering. Prof. Goodman has experience teaching 4th, 11th, and 12th grade science, and has worked for two science education nonprofits.Dr. Gail P. Baxter, Stevens Institute of Technology Gail P. Baxter is the Co-Director, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts and manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-bas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Three-Pronged Approach to Support Active Learning in the Graduate ClassroomAbstract:Many graduate courses are the ideal size for
we used the first and second strategies, we narrowed down the articles/papers by using a listof ideas and keywords we wanted to be present in their text. For example, we wanted thesearticles/papers to include concepts such as “mentor,” “graduate student,” “undergraduate,”“triad,” and others as seen in the following section, Selection.In the case of the first and second strategies, the topic of mentoring relationships in STEMdisciplines is a universal educational research topic that has publications in disciplines other thanEngineering describing the relationships seen in their laboratories, educational articles discussingthe educational outcomes of mentoring relationships, or even behavioral science fields discussingthe mentoring
Paper ID #43247Impacts of Near-Peer Mentoring Between Graduate Students and UndergraduateTransfer Students in Engineering and ComputingShannon Conner, Clemson UniversitySkylar Hubbarth, Clemson UniversityDr. D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson University Dr. Boyer is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering & Science Education in the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. His work focuses on how technology supports knowledge building and transfer in a range of learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Impacts of
University Dr. Janie McClurkin Moore is an Assistant Professor in the Biological and Agricultural Engineering De- partment at Texas A&M University in College Station. A native of Columbus, Ohio, she attended North Carolina A&T State University where she received a B.S. in Bio Environmental Engineering in 2006. She then began pursuing her graduate education at Purdue University in the Agricultural and Biological ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38356Engineering Department, completing her Ph.D. in 2015. Her primary research areas include 1) myco-toxin risk assessment and
Kennesaw State University (KSU). He earned both his Master in Architectural Engineering and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Napol ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Assessment of International Graduate Student Recruitment and Retention in Sample STEM ProgramInternational students play a significant role in education, culture, and economy for both the USand their native countries and are consistently positioned as a source of quality by bringingdiversity and a variety of worldviews into classrooms. This research aims to investigateenhancing international graduate student recruitment and enrollment processes by analyzing andunderstanding sample STEM
Paper ID #43481”How You Got Me Messed Up”: A Critical Analysis of Doctoral EngineeringEducation through the Lens of Black PhD CandidatesMrs. Crystal Alicia Nattoo, Stanford University Crystal Nattoo (she/her) is a first-generation college student from South Florida. She graduated with her bachelors from the University of Miami in 2019 as an Electrical Engineering (EE) major and Graphic Design minor. She then received her EE M.S. degree at Stanford University in 2021, and is currently continuing in the EE Ph.D program. Her current research focuses on the fabrication and characterization of flexible sensors and circuits using
, the participants found value in the seminar, and their feedback reinforces the importanceof providing comprehensive training and fostering a supportive community in the academic jobpreparation process. Future data analysis of the responses to the open-ended survey questionswill be helpful to supplement these findings.Lastly, student comments to the Spring 2022 semester (when offered as a 1-credit course)suggested that students were generally positive and that the course filled a critical need in theirgraduate education. Examples include: • “This course was on an important topic which was absent during the previous years. The professor's knowledge, patience, and willingness to answer our questions and concerns were so helpful
their learning journey,highlighting achievements, areas of improvement, and lessons learned. This reflective processfosters metacognitive awareness, enabling students to understand their strengths and weaknessesbetter to gauge their growth [21]. This feedback, in turn, helps to improve the courses for thefuture. This ensures we stay responsive to our students' changing educational, career-orientedgoals. Combining experiential learning assessments and student reflection promotes a dynamicand student-centered learning approach to achieve professional development. The coursestructure is presented in Figure 2 and the topics covered in these courses are discussed further inthe sections below.Figure 2. The general workflow and course structure that
science education nonprofits.Emily L. Atieh, Stevens Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Graduate student perceptions of community building as a precursor to active learningAbstract:Active learning is widely understood to improve student outcomes, yet many active learningimplementation efforts are focused only on undergraduate courses [1], [2], [3]. Factors that mayinhibit active learning implementation in graduate courses include the belief that “rigor” andlecturing should go hand-in-hand in higher level courses, or a lack of community building morecommonly seen in undergraduate programs. Here, we present an exploratory study that uses
Paper ID #43552Harnessing the Strengths of Neurodiverse Students in Graduate STEM Fields:The Central Role of Advisor-Advisee CommunicationMs. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Connie Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and Innovations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) ”Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity
studentsopportunity to solve real-world engineering problems [2]. Learners demonstrate the ability toplan, select, and locate information; engage in critical analysis; apply multilayered decisionmaking; and generate new meaning [3]. Mosher found that the purpose of capstone programs isto give students the opportunity to apply technical tools, techniques and knowledge learned inthe classroom to an open-ended, realistic, and creative problem-solving experience [4, 5, 6, 7]. Inaddition to the value of the application of engineering concepts, these educational experiencesare lauded as excellent preparation and are strongly encouraged by industry [2]. Ha contends thata capstone project can be an extremely useful application in high demand in the real world
implementation details for this intervention.2.1 Learning to Read Academic PapersIn terms of how to read scientific papers, there is a small set of research papers related to the topicbroadly in the domain of graduate education, reading groups, literature searches, and focus paperson how to teach this skill. Reading comprehension is a broad topic in K-12 education andhigher-education research but is beyond the scope of this work. As for information on how to readscientific papers, there are some online articles such as “How to (seriously) read a scientificpaper” (Accessed January 10th, 2024 - http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/03/how-seriously-read-scientific-paper).From a graduate engineering education perspective, Jenkins et al. [17] in their
Paper ID #37478Facilitating Engineering Faculty Success: Faculty Development ofGraduate Mentoring PracticesHimani Sharma, Arizona State UniversityMiss Amanda Marie Singer, The Ohio State University Amanda Singer is a second-year Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She graduated in 2021 from Michigan Tech with a Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Environmental Engineering. Her current research interests include engineering identity formation, community college engineering education, and mixed methods research.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles
NSF Research Traineeship (NRT) program at Kansas State University is dedicated toenhancing graduate STEM education through a comprehensive traineeship model that integratesan applied curriculum, interdisciplinary research, professional skills development, andmentoring. The NRT at our university has prepared graduate students in STEM, both master’sand doctoral students, to solve the grand challenges in the Food, Energy, and Water (FEW)nexus in rural communities by investigating engineering and socioeconomic innovations toconserve water, create renewable energy, and help rural communities thrive. Since 2018, theNRT at our university has trained 40 diverse, culturally competent STEM leaders to dointerdisciplinary work, and understand their
initiallyguided principally by the top-down approach that aims to initiate changes in the engineeringgraduate education systems, students’ perspectives were actively sought by engaging doctoralstudents from the department in a focus group. Broadly similar interview questions, designed tobetter focus on our research questions and adapted to fit the target group, were asked of doctoralstudents, as presented in Table 3TABLE 2 Mapping overarching research questions: faculty and administrator focus groupTargeted QuestionsRQ1: Current General Advising Support Structures and Expectations 1. Please outline the strategies or initiatives your department employs to foster effective graduate student advising. Specifically, how does your department ensure
Department of Education, the Accelerate to Industry (A2i) program, the North CarolinaAlliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate sponsored by the NSF, and other activitiesand workshops offered by the Graduate College. The HBGI program hosts an annual symposiumcovering topics specifically related to Ph.D. students in engineering and the sciences. The A2iprogram hosts a series of workshops promoting "Job Search Strategies" throughout the academicyear and "Industry Immersion Week," involving several days of direct student interaction withour corporate sponsors. At the end of the week, the Graduate College hosts a mini career expofor graduate students only. Each spring the Graduate College sponsors a symposium titled"Preparing Future Faculty