Paper ID #43538A New Personalized Learning Approach Towards Graduate STEM Education:A Pilot in Chemical EngineeringDr. April A. Dukes, University of Pittsburgh Dr. April Dukes is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL at the University of Pittsburgh. April’s research and teaching efforts engage graduate students, postdocs, and faculty to inform and support systemic change toward excellence and inclusivity in higher education.Ms. Valerie E. Kerr, University of Pittsburgh Valerie E. Kerr serves as the Graduate
, internship or co-op experiences and managing research programs. She earned her PhD in Chemistry from Penn State, conducted postdoctoral research at Wake Forest’s School of Medicine. She received her B.S. in Chemistry from the University of Buffalo. Since coming back to Penn State in 2014, she has directed the Chemistry Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) programs and worked on numerous student success programs at the undergrad and graduate level. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Graduate Research Experience and Transitioning to Grad School (GREaT GradS): A New Approach to Graduate-School Onboarding for Marginalized GroupsAbstract:After
Ph.D. research at Texas A&M University, Dr. RDr. Mesbah Uddin, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Mesbah Uddin is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte’s Williams States Lee College of Engineering. He is currently leading Charlotte’s new multidisciplinary public-private research partnership initiative, Digital Design and Opti- mization (DDO), which is intended to strengthen Charlotte’s connections to North Carolina defense and security-related companies interested in multidisciplinary advanced manufacturing, engineering design and optimization, computer science and cybersecurity, and manufacturing innovation. He is currently
Intelli- gence (AI), computational neuroscience, and AI for arts. She has published over sixty peer-reviewed publications, including two books on real-time three-dimensional graphics and one book chapter on Big Data computing with a new computational brain model. Dr. Liao earned her M.S. & Ph.D. degrees in Computer Science from Purdue University & George Washington University, respectively.Dr. Ioulia Rytikova, George Mason University Ioulia Rytikova is a Professor and an Associate Chair for Graduate Studies in the Department of Informa- tion Sciences and Technology at George Mason University. She received a B.S./M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Automated Control Systems Engineering and Information Processing. Her
Paper ID #41103Understanding Ecosystems of Interdisciplinary Graduate Education throughan Ecological Systems ApproachMargaret Webb, Virginia Tech Margaret (Maggie) Webb is a master’s and Ph.D. student in sustainable land development (civil engineering) and engineering education, respectively, at Virginia Tech. She graduated with her mechanical engineering degree from Rice University and worked for ExxonMobil as a subsea engineer and as a high school STEM teacher in a Houston charter school before starting grad school. Her research interests include interdisciplinary higher education, focusing on organizational systems
Paper ID #41713Cultivating Scientific Communication Skills through Professional DevelopmentCourse Series for the Graduate CurriculumBritney Russell, University of ConnecticutAntigoni Konstantinou, University of ConnecticutAyah Abdallah, University of ConnecticutDr. Fayekah Assanah, University of Connecticut Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, 260 Glenbrook Road, Unit 3247, Storrs, CT 06269-3247. Dr. Fayekah Assanah is an Assistant Professor in Residence in the Biomedical Engineering Department. She leads multiple initiatives in the university’s undergraduate and graduate curriculum and directs the
Paper ID #42829Development of a Climate Survey for Engineering Doctoral Students from anIntersectional Approach: First-Round Validity EvidenceDr. So Yoon Yoon, University of Cincinnati Dr. So Yoon Yoon is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and Computing Education in the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati, OH, USA. Dr. Yoon received her Ph.D. in Gifted Education, and an M.S.Ed. in Research Methods and Measurement with a specialization in Educational Psychology, both from Purdue University, IN, USA. She also holds an M.S. in Astronomy and Astrophysics and a B.S
to engineering andconstruction education. The goals of this study are to (1) investigate Construction Managementand Civil Engineering bachelor’s programs to identify the accessibility to forensic engineeringcourses; (2) identify essential forensic engineering skills that students lack; and (3) investigatestudents’ interest to work in the forensic engineering field. This study will benefit educationalinstitutions by helping them recognize the need for forensic engineering education as well asstudents who will gather new skills which will help them become more successful in theirprofessional careers.MethodologyThis research adopted an exploratory approach to: (1) investigate accessibility to forensicengineering-based courses in the
face-to-face class and permanentlyimplemented into ME curriculum as a core graduate course taught during regular semesters.Students from any engineering or science department who need to predict microstructureevolutions or understand process-structure-property relationships of materials will benefit fromthis class. The present course development approach can also be adjusted for the development ofother online numerical modeling and analysis courses.References1. L.-Q. Chen, “Phase-field models for microstructure evolution”, Annual Review of Materials Research, 32(1), 2002, 113-140.2. L. Chen, C.O. Yenusah, Y.-Z. Ji, Y.-C. Liu, T.W. Stone, M.F. Horstemeyer, and L.-Q. Chen, “Three-dimensional phase-field simulation of γ” precipitation
learning andresearch. This can involve seeking out opportunities for independent study and project work, workingcollaboratively with peers and mentors, and taking advantage of professional development workshopsand training programs.Similarly, in upcoming years, the engineering workforce will require particular skill sets that involvethe combination of discipline-specific knowledge and technology to address complex problems with theinvolvement of diverse field experts. Thus, co-creation is being proposed as an alternative learning andteaching method. This refers to the joint and collaborative effort between educators and students to de-sign and implement curriculum components, pedagogical approaches, and other educational initiatives.This approach
prepared to conduct effectiveeducational research on engineering curriculum, pedagogy, assessment, and faculty developmentamong other topics. With the recency of these programs, there is significant opportunity to learnmore about what constitutes quality within this educational context. In this work-in-progresspaper, authors explore conceptions of engineering education PhD program quality as understoodfrom the lived experiences of the program directors who facilitate their delivery. Research intothe quality of doctoral-level programs is at an all-time high due to increased attention by nationalagencies, disciplinary bodies, and higher education stakeholders. These calls result from severalfactors but are most amplified by the inextricable link
. Benson, A. Hunt, D. Riley, and G. Ryan, “What does hidden curriculum in engineering look like and how can it be explored?,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. 5. A. Darwin and E. Palmer, “Mentoring circles in higher education,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 2009. 6. C. M. Millett and M. T. Nettles, “Expanding and cultivating the Hispanic stem doctoral workforce,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 258–287, 2006.
personal connections they may notshare with a more senior mentor. Near-peer mentors are often perceived as more in tune with thestruggles of their mentees [1] and more approachable than an individual who identifies as an“expert” scientist [2]. Examples of near-peer mentoring relationships in academia include anupper-level student and a first-year student, an undergraduate student and a graduate student, or agraduate student and a new faculty member. Near-peer mentoring can positively affect both the mentor and the mentee. Studentmentees have stated that they feel more comfortable asking a near-peer mentor for academic helpthan they do a professor [3] and believe access to near-peer mentors promotes success in theircoursework [4]. Students
in academic research, includingprogrammatic assessment and curriculum design. However, recent literature suggests thatacademics are observers of user experience, but not necessarily practitioners. In other words,academics study user experience, but they do not actively practice user experience as a processfor developing new frameworks, such as program design, curriculum, and technologies [16],[17]. Typically, programmatic decisions are made within academic committees composed offaculty with expertise in the subject matter; students—the actual users engaged with theprogram—are not included. Rarely do teachers, program directors, and other administratorsengage students as other than functional by-products of curricula. Rather, in typical
Paper ID #38901and inclusion of identities, histories, experiences and perspectives historically underrepresented in STEMfields.As an equity-minded strategist, Yazmin is passionate about developing evidence-based programming thatdelivers authentic and sustainable change. Her approach focuses on coalition-building and mentorship.Trained as a mixed methods researcher, she holds a M.A. and B.A. in Latin American Studies from UCLA. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student-led Program to Improve Equity in PhD Oral Qualifying ExamsAbstractIn this paper, we present a student-developed and led program implemented in our graduatedepartment to help students begin
instruction that is systematic throughoutthe span of an engineering student’s Ph.D. studies shows promise in terms of the perceived value andtherefore is utilized by students. Such gradual skill building fits into a rigorous doctoral program andmeets the stated preferences and needs of students. Next steps include more systematic analysis ofbenefits to students in terms of improving their communications. Outcome-based data to supplementsurveys of student views would support further development of a programmatic approach. Collectingdata that indicates value and improvement potential would have clear value in framing engineeringgraduate communication supports and would facilitate program design.References[1] Steve Simpson, “New Frontiers in Graduate
Paper ID #38844Work in Progress: Student Learning Experiences in the Research Lab:Qualitative Analysis of Two Types of Leadership-Mentorship StyleDr. Magdalena G. Grohman, University of North Texas Magdalena Grohman, Ph.D. is Clinical Associate Professor in Design at New College, University of North Texas at Frisco. Her research, publications, and educational interests focus on design, creative thinking and creative problem solving, pedagogy of creativity, and engineering ethics education. Dr. Grohman has significant experience in mixed methods and in studies employing cognitive ethnography as main methodology. She was Co
Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, K-12 outreach, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, service learning, and curriculum innovation for introductory computing courses.Prof. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, engineering education, engineering leadership, and
educating and developing engineers, teachers (future faculty), and the community at all levels (k12, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate and internationally). A few of these key areas include engineering identity and mindsets, global competencies, failure culture, first year experiences in engineering, capstone design thinking, integrating service and authentic learning into the engineering classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using traditional and non-traditional manufacturing. She seeks to identify best practices and develop assessments methods that assist in optimizing computing and engineering learning. Dr. Gurganus was one the inaugural award winners of the Diane M. Lee
meet increased professionalresponsibilities. Specifically, these include increased technical, policy and regulatory skills;expanded professional skills; the ability to identify opportunities for improvement; and theability to work effectively in a globally connected and interdisciplinary work environment. Toaddress the increasing demand for engineering professionals to have advanced education, PennState University developed a new Master of Engineering degree to prepare STEM professionalswho are versed in policy and law systems and the way emerging technologies interact with andenter these systems. The Master of Engineering degree in engineering, law, and policy (MELP)will enhance the key attributes of an engineer: solidly grounded, technically
Paper ID #37003Redesigning US STEM Doctoral Education to Create a National WorkforceofTechnical LeadersProf. Himanshu Jain, Lehigh University Himanshu Jain is the T.L. Diamond Distinguished Chair Professor of Engineering and Applied Science, and the Director of Institute for Functional Materials and Devices at Lehigh University. He helped estab- lish and served as the director of NSF’s International Materials Institute for New Functionality in Glass, which pioneered globalization of glass research and education, and led to multiple international glass research centers in different countries. Over the past three decades he
scientific fields, how metaphors help scientists process abstract information,or how metaphors can translate scientific research for the public. Moreover, this studyemphasizes the need for writing and communication classes that target multiple audiences as anintegral part of any graduate-level engineering curriculum.1. Introduction In the groundbreaking 1980 book Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff and Johnson explain that ratherthan simply serving as a poetic device, metaphor structures “how we perceive, how we think, andwhat we do” every day [1, p. 4]. In the decades since their book was first published, cognitivelinguists have researched how we express conceptual metaphors linguistically [2]-[5], proposeddifferent mechanisms for how we mentally process
, faculty headcounts, faculty salary and retention data for the engineering community. He is PI of a NSF Advanced Technological Education funded grant to build a national data collection for engineering-oriented technician degree and certificate programs at 2-year institutions. Prior to joining the ASEE, he was the senior researcher at the American Association of University Professor and directed their national Faculty Salary Survey. He also developed a technical curriculum to train analysts for a national survey of languages in Ecuador while he was at the University of Illinois as a linguistic data analytics manager and member of their graduate faculty. He has a B.S. in Computer Science & Mathematics, a M.S. in
University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.Dr. Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell Dr. Yanfen Li is an Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. She received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2018. Dr. Li has extensive experience in engineering education focusing on recruitment and retention of underrepresented and under resourced students and engineering pedagogy. Her work spans the areas of curriculum instruction and design, program design and evaluation, and the first-year college experience.Shanna Rose Thompson, University of Massachusetts LowellNicole Danielle Jackson
support for establishing collaborative efforts, underscores the necessity for a multi-faceted doctoral training approach to support doctoral students more effectively.We believe that the insights reported here will help in designing support systems that willempower faculty to contribute to the training of doctoral workforce for the benefit of society atlarge. It will also inform curriculum development and help prepare students better for a widerrange of career paths.1. IntroductionPhD training holds a crucial role in higher education within STEM disciplines, traditionallyfocusing on enhancing doctoral students' academic skills, including in-depth research on ascientific question or engineering problem, communication of newly generated knowledge
broader context of higher education commercialization. Tas(2013), [7] emphasizes equal treatment and integration of international and domestic students inacademic and non-academic aspects, recommending the full incorporation of the InternationalStudent Office in all campus activities and the development of comprehensive orientationprograms by the ISO and Campus Life to foster diversity and enhance retention [7].Adapting to new academic environments, which requires negotiating multiple teaching methods,curriculum systems, and classroom dynamics, is one of the most difficult hurdles newinternational students face. Language obstacles, particularly in English proficiency, have beenshown in the literature to have a major impact on academic success and
in order to assess and organize an overall approach to Smart Manufacturing training" [17]• Knowledge transfer on cybersecurity threats o "Overall, the paper and the proposed curriculum hold the promise of contributing to the ongoing effort to bridge the knowledge/skill gap by educating the future engineering and security workforce on protecting the ICS and CI from cybersecurity threats and attacks" [23]• Project management o "A key feature to the Artemis ground operations at KSC is the deployment of Artemis and the Exploration Ground Systems (EGS) teams working together to ensure that assembly and integration handoffs are well defined and coordinated. This
research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimization.Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University Dr. Malini Natarajarathinam is a Professor in the Industrial Distribution (ID) program in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution (ETID) in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in purchasing, distribution logistics, strategic relationships, distribution customer experience, etc. She has been involved in numerous research and consulting engagements in inventory management, supplier relationships, and improving profitability at
promising findings of this research and the encouraging feedback of the student community motivated him to pursue this line of research in his NSF CAREER award in 2017. Since then, he has built a coalition within the university to expand this work through multiple NSF-funded research grants including IUSE/PFE: RED titled ”Innovation Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation”. Because of the importance of neurodiversity at all levels of education, he expanded his work to graduate STEM education through an NSF IGE grant. In addition, he recently received his Mid-CAREER award through which, in a radically novel approach, he will take on ambitious, transdisciplinary research integrating
develop a community withpeers in the same field.Two faculty members, who are active STEM education researchers, have instituted a newseminar series specifically for these students that is designed to realign the course withengineering education topics, continuously improve the Ph.D. curriculum, and assist students ontheir Ph.D. paths. The group of faculty and students began meeting every other week to discusstopics specifically related to STEM education and the needs of graduate school in lieu ofattending the general engineering seminars. This new seminar series covers multiple topicsapplicable to students in STEM education, including developing a plan of study, writing andpresenting a proposal for a dissertation, and on-campus graduate