has focused on introducing new functionality and novel processing of glass, and making glass education available worldwide freely. For the last several years, he has been advocating for use-inspired research, and led the development of a new STEM doctoral workforce training model: Pasteur Partners PhD (P3) based on Industry-University partnerships. He is an author/editor of 12 patents, 10 books and over 400 research publications on glass science, technology and education.Volkmar Dierolf, Lehigh University Volkmar Dierolf is a Professor of Physics a Distinguished University Professor of Physics and Materials Science & Engineering at Lehigh University, where he has been a faculty member since 2000. He received
’ and women’s participation and persistence in STEM education from elementary school through doctoral training. In addition to her scholarly work, she is co-author of the undergraduate textbook, Psychology of Women and Gender: Half the Human Experience+ (Sage, 2022). She is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and is Associate Editor of the journal Stigma and Health.Dr. Joseph Roy, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Joseph Roy has over 15 years of data science and higher education expertise. He currently directs three national annual data collections at the ASEE of colleges of engineering and engineering technology that gather detailed enrollment, degrees awarded, research expenditures
Professor in the Materials Science and Engineering department at Iowa State University. He obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, working with Professor Steve Granick on Janus particles. AfteYiqi Liang, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Yiqi Liang is a PhD student in Higher Education in the School of Education at Iowa State University.Dong Chen, The University of Arizona ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Implementing Project Management Skills Training Through Thesis Research Within STEM Graduate EducationAnn M. Gansemer-Topf, Shan Jiang, Yiqi Liang, Dong Chen, Qing Li,Nigel Reuel, Gül E. Okudan Kremer Iowa State University
an ethnographic study of the interplay between ethics and imagination in engineering research. As an extension of this work, I am closely collaborating with engineers and other technologists on issues related to the future of work and technology. In addition, I am a co-PI on an NSF-funded graduate research training program on robots in the future workplace, and a co-PI on an NSF-funded research project on platform design for nonprofits. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 ConGrad: A Graduate Education Framework for Convergence Research and Experiential Learning Tess B. Meier, Ceren Yilmaz-Akkaya, Yunus Do˘gan TellielAbstractGraduate STEM programs
Paper ID #39627Human Balance Models for Engineering Education: An Innovative GraduateCo-Creation ProjectAlana Teresa Smith, University of Massachusetts Lowell Alana Smith is a first-year PhD student at the University of Massachusetts Lowell studying Mechanical Engineering and a research assistant in the BUilding REsilience through Knowledge (BUREK) Lab. Her research is focused on resilient systems in the renewable energy and agri-food sector. Using life cycle assessment, techno-economic analysis, and process modeling, Alana is working on finding environmen- tally, socially, and economically sustainable solutions to energy
addition to her scholarly work, she is co-author of the undergraduate textbook, Psychology of Women and Gender: Half the Human Experience+ (Sage, 2022). She is a Fellow of the American Psychological Association and is Associate Editor of the journal Stigma and Health.Dr. Joe Roy, American Society for Engineering Education Joseph Roy has over 15 years of data science and higher education expertise. He currently directs three national annual data collections at the ASEE of colleges of engineering and engineering technology that gather detailed enrollment, degrees awarded, research expenditures, faculty headcounts, faculty salary and retention data for the engineering community. He is PI of a NSF Advanced Technological
Director of Graduate Education in the School of Education . She teaches courses in program evaluation and assessment, student affairs and higher education.Prof. Shan Jiang, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Dr. Shan Jiang is currently an Associate Professor from the Materials Science and Engineering department at Iowa State University. Dr. Jiang earned his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. After graduation, he furthered his study at MIT as a postdoc. Following his academic training, Dr. Jiang then worked at the Dow Chemical Company Coating Materials as a research scientist. Drawing on his industrial background, Dr. Jiang initiated the Graduate for Advancing Professional Skills
leadership roles, related to the design and/or delivery of an US Eng Ed PhDprogram. Program selection was restricted to Engineering Education PhD degree programs in theUS and it excluded programs with any integration of other disciplines and focus areas in the titlee.g., Science Technology Engineering Mathematics Education PhD programs. The focus onleaders, such as program directors and/or coordinators, resonates with perspectives of doctoraleducation leadership that Prewitt espoused [10]. Prewitt argued that unlike pre-doctoralqualifications, the design and delivery of PhD programs is shaped by a broad spectrum ofinstitutional and national leaders who control entry into PhD programs, doctoral training,publication outlets, career development, and
themselves)[4], [15], [16], [17]. hese research gaps have highlighted the need for systems-oriented research. To that end, thisTstudy used Ecological Systems Theory (EST)[9], [18]to examine how dimensions of graduate education interact to influence interdisciplinary students’ development across high- to low-consensus backgrounds. This research focused on a qualitative and longitudinal case study of systems influences on interdisciplinary graduate students’ development within an interdisciplinary program focused on disaster resilience (referred to as the IDR program throughout). We used a secondary dataset of 62 annual semi-structured interviews with 26 interdisciplinary graduate students across 5 years. A key
science education nonprofits.Emily L. Atieh, Stevens Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Graduate student perceptions of community building as a precursor to active learningAbstract:Active learning is widely understood to improve student outcomes, yet many active learningimplementation efforts are focused only on undergraduate courses [1], [2], [3]. Factors that mayinhibit active learning implementation in graduate courses include the belief that “rigor” andlecturing should go hand-in-hand in higher level courses, or a lack of community building morecommonly seen in undergraduate programs. Here, we present an exploratory study that uses
Content Knowledge about how technology and the content are Knowledge (TCK) reciprocally related (e.g., knowing how subject matter can be changed by the application of technology). Technological Pedagogical Knowledge for good teaching with technology which requires Content Knowledge (TPCK) understanding how technologies can support teaching subject matter. The TPACK framework has been used throughout science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) fields to aid in professional development (PD) for teachers. Chai reviewedstudies that integrated STEM education and TPACK in teacher professional development [16
. Forthat reason, capstone projects are increasingly used as a result of both ABET (AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology) requirements and strong consensus among educators andindustry that students need hands-on practical design experiences. Capstone projects may be oneof the best ways to evaluate how well students have learned to apply technical competencies [8,9]. In fact, the ability to assimilate, assess, and apply knowledge while building deeper levels ofunderstanding demonstrates mastery [10, 11].Although literature about capstone use in engineering confirms its usefulness in the academythere is limited studies regarding graduate-level capstone use in engineering. Reviews of priorresearch revealed that there are studies on
Professional Development Course Series for all engineering graduate students. Assanah’s research focuses on synthesizing hydrogels to mimic the mechanical behavior of the brain matter and investigate the cellular response to injury. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Cultivating Scientific Communication Skills through Professional Development Course Series for the Graduate CurriculumBritney Russell, University of ConnecticutBritney Russell is a doctoral student in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Universityof Connecticut. She was a teaching assistant for the First Year Experience, ScientificCommunication, and Engineering Internships and Careers in Industry courses that
: Promoting a Research Mindset Among Faculty and Students,” Educ. Forum, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 444–456, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00131725.2016.1206159.[15] W. I. P. O. Staff, Global Innovation Index 2022, 15th Edition What is the future of innovation driven growth? Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2022.[16] D. Archibugi and A. Coco, “A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (ArCo),” World Dev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 629–654, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.008.[17] K. Sylwester, “R&D and economic growth,” Knowl. Technol. Policy, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 71– 84, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1007/BF02693991.[18] National Science Foundation and National Science Board, “2020
levels over the past two decades. [1,9] AlthoughSTEM education research has flourished, there has yet to be equal activity in the propagation of theseinnovations, as the National Research Council (NRC) highlighted. [10] The NRC called for the propagationof engineering education research into practice, including adopting evidence-based practices. Further, theneed for more successful propagation has also been highlighted by an ASEE report [11] that included anappeal to funding agencies to use resources to propagate better efforts that have proven successful.Although educational innovations have been produced over the past few decades, Rogers highlights aneed for knowledge of how to implement the innovation correctly and a lack of underlying
in spacesof higher education. In this work, we will use autoethnographic narratives to investigate common barriers faced byBlack students entering engineering graduate education and present recommendations on strate-gies for making academia more inclusive to Black PhD students specifically. The issues will beillustrated chronologically and narratively from the lived experiences of the authors in order toallow the reader to understand the consequences of these issues. There will be a discussion ofthe experience starting from the social implications of being easily identified as different in one’scohort, continuing with the experience of being pressured to solve a university’s JEDI issues, andending with the tension of working in the
Paper ID #38277Assessment and Support of Advisor-Student Mentoring for GraduateEngineering Students at a Land-Grant InstitutionRachel Elisabeth Gehr, Purdue University Rachel is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue Uni- versity. She has earned a BS in Civil Engineering from LeTourneau University and MS in Environmental Engineering from Purdue. Rachel’s current research focuses on fair assessments and evaluation in engi- neering, but she also has experience in photochemistry, water quality, PFAS remediation, and disinfection. In her free time, Rachel enjoys kayaking, hiking
, particularly for international students. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency by interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group. He served as the ASEE Purdue Student Chapter President from 2022-2023, the Program Chair of ASEE Student Division, and Purdue ENE Graduate Committee Junior Chair.Dr. Moses Olayemi, University of Oklahoma Moses Olayemi is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Pathways at the
ofengineering PhD students, and what type of training mode is suitable for differentengineering PhD students?3. Research design3.1 Research tools and variable settingsTo gain a comprehensive understanding of the current training experience of Chinesedoctoral students, the China Doctoral Education Research Center launched by PekingUniversity, commissioned by the Ministry of Education's Department of DegreeAdministration and Graduate Education, has been conducting the NationalPostgraduate Training Quality Feedback Survey Project since 2016. This nationalsurvey focuses on recent doctoral graduates. The team developed the NationalDoctoral Graduates Survey Questionnaire as a survey tool, drawing from existingsurvey questionnaires. The questionnaire uses a
actua- tion into heterogeneous systems; manufacturing technology and processes. He has delivered >£55M of research from public and industry funding that has included research in cyber-physical simulation, design tools, pervasive sensing and intelligence, and informatics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Why a PhD? An exercise with LEGO® Using novel communication tools to express multi-level complex messagesAbstractSTEM doctoral students are typically regarded as strong model builders but weak reflectivecommunicators. Expressing one’s motivations to undertake a PhD degree requires theelaboration of a multi-level complex message
Paper ID #41241Preferences of Returners and Direct Pathway Students for Online vs. In-PersonMaster’s ProgramDr. Elizabeth Gross, Sam Houston State University Elizabeth A. Gross MLIS, PhD is currently associate professor of Library Science and Technology at Sam Houston State University and engineering education researcher. Her doctoral degree is in learning design and technology from Wayne State University in Detroit, MI. Other interests include AI in education and information literacy.Dr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University
Intermountain Engineering Technology and Computing (IETC), Orem, UT, USA, September 2020.19. Y.-C. Liu, “A programming course including C# and MATLAB for mechanical engineering students”, ASEE Computers in Education Journal, 2(3), 2011, 106-112.20. Y.-C. Liu, “Implementation of MATLAB/Simulink into a vibration and control course for mechanical engineering students”, ASEE SE Annual Conference, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, March 8-10, 2020.21. Y.-C. Liu, “Renovation of a mechanical engineering senior design class to an industry-tied and team-oriented course”, European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 2017, 800-811.22. Y.-C. Liu and Y.-Q. Dou, “Design of an industry-tied and team-oriented course for mechanical engineering
Paper ID #38901Student-led program to improve equity in Ph.D. oral qualifying examsMeredith Leigh Hooper, California Institute of Technology This author was an equal first author contributor to this work. Meredith Hooper is an Aeronautics PhD student studying under Professor Mory Gharib in the Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology (GALCIT). Meredith is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, leader within the GALCIT Graduate Student Council, and Co-Director of the Caltech Project for Effective Teaching (CPET). Her PhD research uses a combination of machine learning and
(3), 285–301. Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (2000). Mentoring minority students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 441–476. Campbell, Toni A., and David E. Campbell. "Faculty/student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention." Research in higher education 38 (1997): 727-742. Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Chen, X., & Weko, T. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009-161
of Transportation, US Department of Transportation (via the Mineta National Transit Research Consortium and the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center), Federal Highway Administration, National Cooperative Highway Research Program and National Science Foundation. Dr. Gayah currently serves as an editorial advisory board member of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, an editorial board editor of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, an associate editor for the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (an international peer-reviewed journal), a handling editor for the Transportation Research Record and is a member of the Transportation Research Board’s Committee on
, she works as a Doctoral Researcher and Adjunct Professor at Louisiana Tech University’s DECODED Lab, focusing on VR flight simulation programs. She has also worked as Executive Director leading public relations and scientific research for the SGWCD for fifteen years. Lindsay holds a Master of Science in Engineering and Technology Management, a Master of Business Administration, and a Bachelor of Science in Agricultural Business. In addition, she holds black and green belt six-sigma certifications.Dr. Kelly B. Crittenden, Louisiana Tech University Dr Kelly Crittenden is a member of Louisiana Tech University’s Integrated STEM Education Center (ISERC), and is the Harrelson Family Professor of engineering. He is also the
taken in thisstudy was influenced by the first-hand knowledge and experience of the first author. The secondand third authors are both researching professors at R1 universities whose backgrounds are incomputer science and chemical engineering along with engineering education and industrialexperience. All authors are pragmatists when it comes to engineering education research and standin agreement with the importance of an integrated engineering skillset and a holistic understandingof the usefulness and applicability of the research findings related to workforce developmentprograms for engineering graduate students. All authors discussed the findings to ensureaccountability and minimize bias in the systematic literature reviews
of community and belonging in the field of engineering. Prof. Goodman has experience teaching 4th, 11th, and 12th grade science, and has worked for two science education nonprofits.Dr. Gail P. Baxter, Stevens Institute of Technology Gail P. Baxter is the Co-Director, Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education (CIESE) at Stevens Institute of Technology. Baxter leads CIESE research and evaluation efforts and manages a program to support faculty adoption of evidence-bas ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Three-Pronged Approach to Support Active Learning in the Graduate ClassroomAbstract:Many graduate courses are the ideal size for
of Environmental Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville (TAMUK). He is the graduate coordinator of the doctoral program in environmental engineering. He has served as the Director of the Center for Research Excellence in Science and Technology – Research on Environmental Sustainability in Semi-Arid Coastal Areas, Interim Executive Director of the Eagle Ford Shale Center for Research, Education and Outreach, and program coordinator of several TAMUK’s education programs including the NSF-Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Talent Expansion Program, and the EPA-Multidisciplinary Approach to Educate and Train Undergraduate Students in Air Pollution Issues of the U.S.-Mexico Border Region. Currently
provide a roadmap for advisors and institutions alike, thereby enhancinginclusivity, fostering innovation, and enriching the educational landscape in graduate STEMprograms.Researcher Perspectives/PositionalityOur work's direction and purpose are heavily influenced by the personal stories of the authorswith ADHD and/or dyslexia, alongside our collective work with neurodiverse students inneurodiversity-focused engineering and STEM education projects. Our own experiences have ledus to adopt an approach that celebrates and affirms neurodiversity by using supportive languagewhen recruiting participants and during our study interactions. We believe our shared journeyhas created a welcoming space for neurodiverse graduate students to share their