and Associate Director of Graduate Education in the Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at Harvard Medical School and as a Visiting Scholar- in-Residence at Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering. At Harvard Medical School, Dr. Venkatesh works with faculty on improving the first-year PhD courses in molecular biology and biochemistry, trains teaching assistants, expands programming to build community among graduate students, and researches the best ways to train and assess PhD students in skills such as experimental design and science com- munication. Her other work includes contributing to dance performances that raise awareness about the human impacts on marine life and designing and
Paper ID #9549Work-in-Progress: Undergraduate Teaching and Research Experiences inEngineering (Utree): An Engineering Student Organization with a Commu-nication FocusVictoria VadyakMr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (2nd edition) and the faculty advisor of Utree.Dr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion UniversityMs. Christine Haas, Christine Haas Consulting
dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy to engineering students. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, and engineering design.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette enay Purzer is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering
learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program at the University of Georgia.Dr. Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia Shari E. Miller is an Associate Professor and the Associate Dean of the School of Social Work at the Uni- versity of Georgia. Her research focuses broadly on social work education and the social work profession with specific areas ranging from educational innovation, thinking in and for social work, development of theory, inter- and trans-disciplinary and inter-professional education and practice, and
Paper ID #14423Implicit Bias? Disparity in Opportunities to Select Technical versus Non-Technical Courses in Undergraduate Engineering ProgramsDr. Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado - Boulder Marissa H. Forbes is a research associate at the University of Colorado Boulder and lead editor of the TeachEngineering digital library. She previously taught middle school science and engineering and wrote K-12 STEM curricula while an NSF GK-12 graduate engineering fellow at CU. With a master’s degree in civil engineering she went on to teach physics for the Denver School of Science and Technology, where she also created and
popularculture, can operate using stereotypes, distort the truth by sensationalizing the issues or serve apolitical agenda.Census of feature films and television series featuring engineers and their workSome preliminary work has already been conducted by the lead researcher and results have beensuccessfully integrated into teaching practice. It is suspected, however, that a pool of potentialcandidate films is much broader (in particular if foreign-made films are also considered) andshould be better explored. Consideration of foreign movies is important consideringglobalization issues. The initial sources of information will be some of the references alreadylisted in the proposal, Internet Movie Database (http://www.imdb.com) and other sources thatwill
Paper ID #9686Long-distance collaboration, international perspective, and social responsi-bility through a shared interdisciplinary engineering design courseDr. Jodi Prosise, St. Ambrose University Jodi Prosise is an assistant professor at St. Ambrose University in the Department of Engineering and Physical Science. She earned her PhD in Biomedical Engineering at University of Minnesota and her Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at Iowa State University. She teaches courses in both Industrial and Mechanical Engineering at SAU, focusing in Engineering Graphics, Manufacturing, the Engineering Sciences, and Design
Senior Design I (ECGR3253) Rubric Senior Design II (ECGR3254) Page 24.729.7Actual ImplementationAfter receiving IRB (Institutional Review Board for Research with Human Subjects) approvalfor the project, twenty students in the spring 2012 sophomore design class were selected withconsent (see consent form in Appendix I) as the project students. The remaining nineteenstudents served as the control group. A share-drive at N:\uncc.edu\usr8\SOTL_Project wasestablished on the Engineering computer network (known as Mosaic) for the project students’videotaped presentations, instructors’ reflective writing prompts
the university about bringing scholarly teaching and learning innovations into their classroom and assessing their impact. He has regularly published and presented work on a variety of topics including assessment instruments and methodologies, using technology in the classroom, faculty development in instructional design, teaching diversity, and peer coaching. Dr. Utschig completed his PhD in Nuclear Engineering at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.Mr. Anthony Joseph Bonifonte, Georgia Institute of Technology Anthony Joseph Bonifonte is currently in his 3rd year of Georgia Tech’s PhD program in Operations Research in the Industrial and Systems Engineering Department. He attended Oberlin College as an
. Lieberman, Queensborough Community College, CUNYProf. Tak Cheung, Queensborough Community College, CUNY Tak Cheung, Ph.D., professor of physics, teaches in CUNY Queensborough Community College. He also conducts research and mentors student research projects. Page 25.1267.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012Technological literacy in required science courses for non-STEM students in acommunity college with extension to junior high school environmentAbstractTechnological literacy is an important outcome for a non-STEM student taking a requiredscience course to function effectively in our
Paper ID #18789Self Authorship and Reflective Practice in an Innovation MinorChris Gewirtz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests start with how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering, where American engineering assumptions tend to fall apart or reproduce injustice.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
Paper ID #16152”Give Me Every Idea You Have”: Building with Improvisation in Engineer-ing EducationDr. Stephanie Pulford, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) Dr. Stephanie Pulford is an instructional consultant and research scientist within University of Washing- ton’s Center for Engineering Teaching & Learning, where she has coordinated the Engineering Writing & Communication Development Program. Dr. Pulford’s professional background in engineering includes a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineer- ing as well as industry experience as
visiting scholar at the Air Force Research Laboratory and the Singapore University of Technology and Design, Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Science and the Science and Technology Policy Institute. As a professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Engineering Systems, Professor Hastings has taught courses and seminars in plasma physics, rocket propulsion, advanced space power and propulsion systems, aerospace policy, technology and policy, and space systems engineering. His teaching has ranged from freshman classes to doctoral seminars. His research has spanned five areas. He has worked in laser material interactions, fusion plasma physics, spacecraft plasma environment interactions, space
AC 2011-2091: EXPLODING PIPELINES: MYTHOLOGICAL METAPHORSSTRUCTURING DIVERSITY-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATIONRESEARCH AGENDASAlice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a Ph.D. minor in Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is Co-PI and Research Director of Purdue University’s ADVANCE program, and PI on the Assessing Sustainability Knowledge project. She runs the Research in Feminist
”pivot thinking,” the cognitive aptitudes and abilities that encourage innovation, and the tension between design engineering and business management cognitive styles. To encourage these thinking patterns in young engineers, Mark has developed a Scenario Based Learning curriculum that attempts to blend core engineering concepts with selected business ideas. Mark is also researches empathy and mindfulness and its impact on gender participation in engineering education. He is a Lecturer in the School of Engineering at Stanford University and teaches the course ME310x Product Management and ME305 Statistics for Design Researchers. Mark has extensive background in consumer products management, having managed more than 50
by the National Science Foundation (NSF) undergrant number 1256529. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References1. Merrifield, J. (n.d.; c. 1985). Putting Scientists in their Place: Participatory Research in Environmental and Occupational Health. New Market, TN: Highlander Research and Education Center.2. von Hippel, F. (1990). Citizen Scientist. New York: American Institute of Physics.3. Nieusma, D. (2004). Alternative Design Scholarship: Working Towards Appropriate Design. Design Issues, 20(3): 13-24.4. Lucena, J., & Downey, G. L. (1999, June), Engineering Cultures: Engineering Problem Solving
AC 2011-1233: FOSTERING INNOVATION THROUGH THE INTEGRA-TION OF ENGINEERING AND LIBERAL EDUCATIONCherrice Traver, Union College Cherrice Traver received her BS in Physics from the State University of New York at Albany in 1982 and her PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 1988. She has been a faculty member at Union College in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department since 1986, and has been the Dean of Engineering since 2005. Recently Dr. Traver has been involved in initiatives at the interface of engineering and the liberal arts. She has led two national symposia on Engineering and Liberal Education at Union College and she was General Chair for the 2008 Frontiers in Education
Paper ID #19630Teaching the Non-neutral Engineer: Pathways Toward Addressing the Vio-lence of Engineering in the ClassroomMichael Lachney, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Michael Lachney is a PhD candidate in Science and Technology Studies at the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. His research is at the intersection of STEM education and critical pedagogy. Michael’s work has appeared in Learning, Media and Technology, Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies, and the International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.Dr. David Adam Banks, University at Albany - SUNY David A. Banks is an interdisciplinary
with engineering.One of the most pervasive engagement strategies employed in K-12 engineering education is useof real-world, context-driven engineering design. This is especially true of the Engineering isElementary (EiE) curriculum for grades K-8. EiE’s mission statement is “fostering engineeringand technological literacy for ALL elementary school-aged children.”16 The EiE curriculum issponsored by the National Center for Technological Literacy and is hosted by the Museum ofScience, Boston. Through curriculum development, research, and teacher professionaldevelopment, EiE disseminates engineering design-based curriculum for life science, earth andspace science, and physical science. The science focus in EiE is consistent with
. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and
specific disciplinaryaudience. In this paper, we propose that explicit rhetorical genre instruction can bolster studentunderstanding of disciplinary reasoning patterns and assumptions of their specific sub-fields. Ourmodel’s attention to the specificity of different engineering discourses makes our methodapplicable in a wide range of engineering communication courses.II. Course Context and Theoretical FrameworkA. Engineering Communication Pedagogy“Preparation for Undergraduate Research” presents a weekly seminar on topics such as currentfaculty research, technical innovation in industry, entrepreneurship, and professionaldevelopment. Each semester, we communication instructors additionally teach students in aseries of three to four workshops in
. Initiallythe teaching methods included lectures, discussions, videos, exams, and written projects(Loendorf6, 2004). Over time the teaching methods have been expanded to include recreatedartifacts (Loendorf & Geyer9, 2008), demonstrations (Loendorf & Geyer10, 2009), othercollections of technologies (Loendorf & Geyer11, 2010), and innovative visual content(Loendorf8, 2011).An additional teaching method was incorporated right from the very beginnings of the course butwas so tightly integrated into the course that it was almost overlooked. That method wasstorytelling. Stories with a historical perspective as well as personal experiences abouttechnology are intertwined throughout the entire course. These stories, in many ways, help thestudent
Paper ID #9303Effect of Student Model Presentations from a Speaking Contest on the Devel-opment of Engineering Students as SpeakersMs. Maryellen Meny OverbaughMr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (2nd ed.) and faculty advisor for Utree: Under- graduate teaching and research experiences in engineering.Ms. Christine Haas, Engineering Ambassadors Network
ABSTRACTThis paper describes the way innovation and entrepreneurship have been integrated intoan engineering curriculum through a year-long liberal arts seminar. This three-coursesequence has “The City” as its topical focus, and it incorporates principles ofentrepreneurship and innovation through course content specifically centered on theseconcepts through experiential learning in a service project, and through critical thinkingand rhetorical analysis of students’ own research strategies using the Burkean parlormodel of academic and professional conversation.In Fall Quarter, students read texts, view films, and study other cultural products relatedto the concept of “The City.” They examine how depictions of entrepreneurs andindustry illuminate our
Master of Public Health and Bachelor of Arts, major in Psychology, from the University of Virginia. She is beginning her professional career as an Associate Clinical Research Coordinator at the Mayo Clinic. Prior research experience has involved neurodegenerative disorders, pathogens, mental health outcomes and policies, and engineering ethics education.Araba Dennis, Purdue University Araba Dennis is a second-year PhD student studying race, culture, and institutional definitions of inclu- sion. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring values and norms of engineering through responsible innovation and
Jones.12. Hill, Catherine, Christianne Corbett, Andresse St. Rose. (2010). Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D.C.: AAUW.13. Bucciarelli, L. & Drew, D. (forthcoming). Liberal Studies in Engineering – A Design Plan. Engineering Studies.14. Clance, P.R. & Imes, C. (1978). The Impostor Syndrome in High-Achieving Women: Dynamics and Therapeutic Intervention. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, and Practices, 15(3): 241-247.15. Ong, M., 2005, Body Projects of Young Women of Color in Physics: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593-617.16. Barton, A. C., 1998, Feminist Science Education. New York: Teachers College Press.17. Riley, D
recipient of the ASEE Educational Research Methods Division’s ”Apprentice Faculty Award,” was selected as a 2010 Frontiers in Education ”New Faculty Fel- low,” and is currently a UGA ”Lilly Teaching Fellow.” His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and creativity into the environmental engineering program. In this context, he is involved in the development and implementation of the Synthesis and Design Studio series at UGA.Dr. Shari E. Miller, University of Georgia Shari Miller is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at the University of Georgia. She teaches in the undergraduate and graduate programs with an emphasis on theory, reflective practice, so- cial work and
and ex-engineering students. They are also interested in examining and critiquing the engineering and engineering education institution to determine how its current structure can serve to marginalize minority communities.Dr. Rod D. Roscoe, Arizona State University Rod Roscoe is an Associate Professor of human systems engineering in the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, and a Diane and Gary Tooker Professor of Effective Education in STEM. He is affiliate faculty of the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, and a member of the Institute for the Science of Teaching and Learning (ISTL) and the Center for Human, Artificial Intelligence, and Robot Teaming (CHART). His research investigates how
AC 2012-3009: USING STUDENT AMBASSADORS TO RELAY THEMESFROM CHANGING THE CONVERSATION IN ENGINEERING FIRST-YEAR SEMINARSDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current research interests include integrating creativity into the engineering curriculum, developing in- struments to measure the engineering professional skills, and using qualitative data to enhance response process
and drawbacks of STEAM as it is currentlyunderstood (i.e., inserting the arts into the STEM curriculum as a way to make students morecreative [2]. Another, “Turning STEM into STEAM,” discusses the role of images in scientificcommunication and argues that “teaching the foundational concepts of Art, with disciplinaryrigor and engineering context, would help improve critical and creative thinking, guide andencourage innovative engineering and visual art; fostering more effective direct and conceptualcommunication of scientific ideas and advancements” [3].The thesis of this paper is that an art museum and its collection can function as a central location,both physically and conceptually, for STEAM on a college campus. The paper’s authors