Paper ID #39152A Comparison Study of Engineering Standards Taught in MechanicalEngineering Programs in Two CountriesMr. Talha Bin Asad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University I was born and raised in Mandi Bahauddin, a small city whose claim to fame is that it is where Alexander The Great famously fought his last major campaign against Raja Porus. In 2015, I completed my BS in Mechatronics Engineering from the University of Engineering and Tech- nology, Pakistan, where I worked on designing the electrical and mechanical components of a wireless surveillance robot. My team and I developed and prototyped a
that relate to real-world situations in the discipline – improve learning outcomesand skill transfer in technical communications courses [6, 25]. Industry-aligned capstone designprojects are often cited as examples of authentic, situated technical communication [6]. Althoughthis is true, capstone design is one of the last courses in the undergraduate program, which leaveslittle room for growth and refinement prior to graduation. There is clearly a need to embedindustry-aligned, situated communications experiences earlier in the program of study.In this paper, we build on prior work in engineering education by introducing a within-discipline,large-enrollment GS technical communications course, called Technical Communications, forfirst-year
the standard for design instruction across the curriculum of the MEprogram at UVU.In the current program curriculum, there are 3 classes that are being used to evaluate design aspart of the ABET evaluation (ABET Student Outcome 2). These classes occur in the third andfourth years of the ME program. While these three courses offer the best opportunity to evaluatestudents’ performance related to ABET Outcome 2, it doesn’t allow the faculty to see howstudents’ understanding of the engineering design process improves and evolves over the courseof their studies. It is proposed to offer formal coverage of at least a portion of the standardengineering design process in courses occurring in each semester during the 2nd and 3rd year ofstudy. These
conclusions, and future work.Methods The goal of this work is to continue investigating the relationship between participationin the AIMS certificate programs and constructs of interest (ESE and EJ). A survey wasdistributed among students enrolled in 6 core AIMS courses over the past 2 years with recordedresponses from 38 graduate students and 98 undergraduate students. Students were askedquestions related to ESE [10] and EJ [7] based on the articles referenced. An example questionfor ESE was “I can do well in an engineering major during the current academic year” and for EJwas “I can determine when a calculation or estimation is good or precise enough”. The levels ofagreement for the questions were indicated by a Likert scale (Table 1
andlearning from the senses. In this work, a completely refurbished dynamic systems laboratorycourse is implemented into an undergraduate mechanical engineering program for the purpose ofproducing excellence in student learning and engagement. The new laboratory assignmentsinvolve physical experimentation, which is a modification to the previous course that includedonly simulation projects. Custom-made exercises include physical measurement and analysis ofsound pressure signals, and reverse engineering of products using the Raspberry Pi computeplatform. Coding of Raspberry Pi boards is accomplished using MATLAB Online and SimulinkOnline. Student engagement with both the new hardware-based course and previoussimulation-based course are assessed using
to integrate and track conscientious engineering aspects throughout the undergraduate educational experience across the college. His efforts include formally integrating sustainability design requirements into the mechanical engineering capstone projects, introducing non-profit partnerships related to designs for persons with disabilities, and founding the Social/Environmental Design Impact Award. He manages several outreach and diversity efforts including the large-scale Get Out And Learn (GOAL) engineering kit program that reaches thousands of local K-12 students.Dr. Natasha Andrade, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Natasha Andrade is a Senior Lecturer and the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Studies in
withopportunities to analyze trends with parametric variations as opposed to focusing on a singleanswer for one set of conditions. In addition, problems can also be scaffolded so that studentsreceive instantaneous feedback on intermediate stages of a complex problem. Furthermore, theauthors have often grappled with how to best grade programming-based assignments. MATLABGrader is an excellent platform that addresses these objectives and desires. This work is unique in that, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the use of MATLABgrader in mechanical engineering courses is not well-documented. There is more evidence of itsuse in the electrical/computer engineering discipline, but evidence of its use in mechanicalengineering is more limited. As a
Space Mechanisms: An undergraduate controls course for mechanical engineering studentsAbstractStudents in a traditional undergraduate mechanical engineering program typically take a controlscourse during their junior or senior year. Often, these courses are highly theoretical and may ormay not have a corresponding lab component. Students often struggle to connect thefundamentals of feedback control systems with practical hardware and software implementation.To address this crucial learning gap and to foster more engaging learning experiences, a newtechnical elective was developed at the Milwaukee School of Engineering titled “Simulation andControl of Space Mechanisms.” The new course is a follow-on course to a
Paper ID #40204Board 136: Utilizing Active Learning to Replace Traditional Homework inUndergraduate Engineering MajorsDr. Zahra Pournorouz, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) ”Zahra Pournorouz received her Bachelor of Science degree in Aerospace Engineering from Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic) in Tehran in the Fall of 2014. After finishing her bache- lor’s studies, she got admitted directly to the Ph.D. program in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas at Arlington and graduated in August 2018. Her research interests mainly focus on oil-based nanofluids
Paper ID #42273Pilot Study: Incorporating the study of engineering history into engineeringcourses.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests include dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, artificial intelligent in
, prototyping, program development, crafting interactive curricula, and bringing ideas to fruition. With over 9 years of experience in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Anand possesses a solid background in Innovation and Entrepreneurship education, Additive Manufacturing, and Digital Fabrication technologies. He has taught lectures and workshops on advanced subjects to more than 1000 undergraduate engineering students and 150 graduate students, while advising on over 500 student and faculty research projects. His academic credentials include an M.B.A in Organizing Innovation and Product Management from Worcester Polytechnic Institute, M.S. in Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering from New York University and
students often struggle with mechanical engineering concepts due to a lack of prior knowledge31 and a poor foundation in mathematics and physics [2].32 Project-based learning, problem-based learning [3], inquiry-based learning [4], and experiential33 learning [5] are among the pedagogical methods used in engineering education that emphasize34 active learning, student-centered approaches, and engagement with real-world problems. One35 pedagogical approach that relates directly to the current study is the use of peer teaching. Peer36 teaching involves students teaching and learning from each other in a structured and37 collaborative manner. This approach has been shown to have several benefits, including
perceived barriers to adoption.IntroductionEngineering programs are designed to prepare students with the knowledge and skills needed tobecome successful engineers. There are inherent differences between the academic andworkplace contexts that are widely discussed in literature [1], [2], [3]. The application of contentin the academic context is quite different from the real world. Academic problems tend to have aclear, step-by-step solution that often leads to a single answer. Conversely, engineering problemstend to be ill-structured and ambiguous without a single clear answer [4]. Some of the reasonsfor these differences relate to the scaffolding required to introduce students to concepts and toassist with the evaluation of learning outcomes. This
importance on critical global issues related to energy security and climatechange [1]. This renewable energy sector growth should drive engineering education institutions todevise transformative pedagogical techniques to fill the gap in sync with the sustainable industry.Such programs must lay the groundwork for students to become familiar with various greentechnologies, associated ecological impacts, and fundamental engineering concepts andformulation approaches. However, the mechanisms of how students are informed aboutenvironmental challenges during their undergraduate studies in engineering and the link betweenstudents' environmental awareness and motivation to join sustainable industries upon graduationare not well-known. Intuitively, the
Paper ID #43071Sustainability-focused Digital Case Studies: Enhancing Engineering EducationDeepika Ganesh, University of Michigan Deepika is a second year Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, School for the Environment and Sustainability. She specializes in Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and is curious about informal education spaces, especially outdoor and digital spaces, and their role in contextual learning environments. Her most recent projects include program evaluation for the Next-Gen Scholars program aimed at first generation and underrepresented masters students in her department, and studying
implemented and evaluated in several different contexts.Examples include using specifications grading in two math courses [13], in an organic chemistrylaboratory course [14], in a chemistry writing course [15], in laboratory courses with over 1,000students [16], and in a biology course [17]. A study involving the integration of a standards-basedgrading system in five science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) courses foundthat standards-based grading improved students’ self-efficacy and was perceived as valuable bythe students [18].In engineering, there are examples of using both standards-based grading and specificationsgrading. They are closely related with a focus on students demonstrating mastery of standards orcriteria based on
confident in their technical analytical skills. They have highconfidence level (over 60% of students) in their abilities related to curiosity and creating value forrelevant EML outcomes. The results show that engineering students can perform certain tasksneeded for an open-ended video project using an entrepreneurial mindset while they continue tohave the room to build on their skills to communicate in a digital environment effectively.1. Introduction1.1 Problem IdentificationProfessionals from the engineering industry have called for the need to increase entrepreneurial-minded learning (EML) skills for engineering students since they see a lack of skills and ability tosolve critical problems (social or cultural problems with responses rather than
involved in programs 31.4 33.0 37.5 39.4 37.8 40.5 45.9 49.2 to clean up the environment Working to correct social 44.9 NA NA NA 63.5 NA NA NA inequalitiesNA = not asked on the survey in that yearWithin engineering, there is evidence that females are particularly interested in sustainabilitytopics. Klotz et al. [18] found that female engineering students were significantly more interestedthan male engineering students in work in their careers related to disease, poverty anddistribution of resources, and opportunities for women and minorities; female engineeringstudents had lower interests in energy. Verdin et al. [19] found that community college
given administration, influences all engineering sectors 7 Engineering in Public Policy with emphasis on how the military industrial complex invariably relates to job prospects post-graduation. Covering the establishment of engineering programs at the History of Engineering at university, the ways they have (or have not) changed over 8 [name of university] the years, and how engineering at the university has served the wider public in recent years. Discussing one of the unique
before making a physical model of it using 3Dprinting. Overall, I was able to learn how to use CAD programs to influence and test my design,along with prototyping techniques (like 3D printing) that allowed me to test my conceptual designin the real-world environment. “The authors can relate this case study to multiple ABET Student Outcomes [14] as listed below: (1) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics - Students involved in a study like this need to know laws of mechanics as they try to reverse engineer and rebuild a robot that is mechanically programmed. (6) an ability to develop and conduct appropriate
several helpful resources. For example, there areresources available that describe suggested curriculum changes that focus on specific fields andmajors (e.g. [3]) quarters vs semesters [4], [5]. However, the aim of this paper is to broadlyfocus on the process used and how that process can be best utilized to maintain a focus onstudent learning and maintain the strengths of a given program. We present our experience ofmaking the transition from quarters to semesters in a mechanical engineering program.However, we hope to provide information that would be beneficial to not just mechanicalengineering programs, but any discipline making major curriculum changes or creating a newcurriculum.ing a new curriculum. Our goals for the new curriculum
’ technical approach to designproblems and what the participants perceive their own design abilities to be.BACKGROUND Research has shown that while freshmen and seniors in engineering programs understandboth engineering knowledge and engineering as a profession, they struggle to understand howthe two are connected [7]. Part of that disconnect is due to the lecture methodology implementedin engineering education, also commonly known as “chalk talk.” Research has shown that thistraditional lecture style of teaching is not as effective as student-centric learning, however it isstill widely implemented [8]. Lecture based teaching has been considered the norm in STEM education, while liberalarts adopted the student-centric approach much
journals. Dr. Niksiar is teaching graduate andundergraduate courses in the area of thermal and fluid Sciences, aerodynamics, materials, design,measurements and numerical methods.Blakeley OdomBlakeley Odom is a bachelor’s student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The Citadelwith an expected graduation date of May 2024. He is also part of The Citadel Master ofMechanical Engineering Program with an expected graduation date in 2025.
used bystudents. It is important for faculty to have a firm understanding of how AI tools are being usedby students to write reports. Faculty perspectives differ on how AI assistance can benefitengineering students while avoiding academic dishonesty issues. Faculty will need tocommunicate the permissible and prohibited usage of AI tools in future assignments.IntroductionChatGPT, introduced in the fall of 2022, has swiftly emerged as a prominent ArtificialIntelligence (AI) chatbot, finding widespread use, including in higher education [1], [2].Engineering educators have taken notice and discussed how it is impacting a freshmanengineering course [3] and throughout engineering programs [4]. Within a few months of therelease of ChatGPT, it was
Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of industries from the petroleum and natural gas industry to brewing and newspaper industries. Dr. Ayala has provided service to professional organizations such as ASME. Since 2008 he has been a member of the Committee of Spanish Translation of ASME Codes and the ASME Subcommittee on Piping and Pipelines in Spanish. Under both memberships, the following Codes have been translated: ASME B31.3, ASME
previously taught concepts. The coursesdiscussed are MSE and related courses that provide relevant curriculums and instructing methods. It isvital for engineering students to recognize the importance of MSE, and the roles materials play inengineering. MSE education, instruction, and relation to MSE and non-MSE courses are dependent onthe engineering program unison. Based on the analysis, it was concluded that the education andapplication of MSE courses are most effective when key MSE concepts, principles, and knowledgethreads are continuously introduced, reviewed, and reintroduced for students in all levels of courses.For better outcomes, it is recommended that MSE instructors highlight materials’ importance throughapplication and explain MSE’s
industry is a key concern inengineering education.Compounding this preparedness problem is the COVID-19 pandemic, which prompted rapidchanges to the higher education system and caused significant disruptions to both teaching andlearning. During this period, most institutions shifted to emergency remote learning whichaffected both how academics taught and how students learned. Studies have shown that this shiftto online instruction disrupted in-person laboratory courses, causing engineering students to loseopportunities for hands-on learning [10]. Moreover, some instructors were faced with a need toremove content from their courses in order to adjust to lost instruction time [10]. These COVID-related challenges lead us to believe that the pandemic
Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high-performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala held a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente where he taught and developed courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Hydraulic Machinery, as well as different Laboratory courses. Additionally, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have given him an important perspective and exposure to the industry. He has been directly involved in at least 20 different engineering projects related to a wide range of
points of viewC. Professional Identity and EthicsProgram Goal: The successful student will be able to understand the profession in relation toself and society and be able to operate professionally, ethically, and with societal awareness andintegrity.To meet this program goal, the successful student will be able to: 1. Fully describe the discipline of engineering and the sub-discipline of mechanical engineering. a. Initiate a clear career path utilizing discipline 2. Discern the ethical considerations and implications of engineering decisions, in the context of their environment, profession, and society at large. a. Consider multiple viewpoints b. Engage in meaningful debate with others about difficult
engineering field, such as cyber-enabledsystems, autonomous systems, mechatronics, robotics, and related advanced manufacturingtechniques for their fabrication and interfacing with support systems. Most leading engineeringprograms understandably focus on the development of strong technical skills (e.g., CarnegieMellon’s focus on the four core areas of perception, cognition, action, and math). Even cutting-edge programs with a specific emphasis on interdisciplinarity (e.g., Oregon State’s CollaborativeRobotics and Intelligent Systems Institute) do not provide training in disciplines outside of theprimary areas of engineering, mathematics, and computer science.Thus, we designed the NRT-LEAD program (NextGen Robotics Training – Leadership