. • 81% ranked the educational value of the assigned work as very good or excellent. • 74% said that they put more effort into the course relative to other courses. • 43% reported that they spent 17 hours or more per week on all activities related to the course. 62% reported 13 hours or more.Bibliography1. ABET, “Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs”, http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents- UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%2011-03-09.pdf , accessed 1/8/2010.2. Educational Benchmarking, Inc. http://www.webebi.com/, accessed 1/8/2010.3. M.A. Gennert & G. Tryggvason, “Robotics Engineering: A Discipline Whose Time Has Come”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, pp. 18-20, June 2009.4. M.A
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Program: http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010- 11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf 2. Koh, M.-S., Rodriguez-Marek, E., & Talarico, C. (2009). Development of Course-Assessment Metrics to Measure Program Outcomes Against ABET Criteria in a Digital Circuits Class. Proceedings of 2009 ASEE Conference, (p. 236). 3. Mason, G., & Dragovich, J. (2010). Program Assessmetn and Evaluation Using Student Grades Obtained on Outcome-Related Course Learning Objectives. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice , Submitted. 4. Das, N. (2008). Assessment and Evaluation of Engineering Technology Program
AC 2007-2365: ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING WITHIN A MULTIDISCIPLINARYPROGRAMRobert Grondin, Arizona State University Robert Grondin received the PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan in 1982. Since 1983 he has been a faculty member at Arizona State University. In 2004 he became a founding faculty member in the new Multi-disciplinary engineering program at the Polytechnic campus of Arizona State University in Mesa AZ.Darryl Morrell, Arizona State University Darryl Morrell received the PhD degree in Electrical Engineering from Brigham Young University in 1988. Since then he has been a faculty member at Arizona State University. In 2004 he became a founding faculty member in
track record of producingpapers about their departments along with curriculum and education-based information abouttheir programs1-3 while others have little or no widely available work about their program. Also,there are not any current overviews about all of these departments4. As many of the grandchallenges for engineering5 are highly related to optics and optical engineering, this critical bodyof knowledge will remain instrumental through the 21st century. Even the Popular Science6listing of the 100 innovations of 2010 includes many technologies made possible through optics.The only question remaining is how are people learning these critical technologies; in otherwords, what pedagogies are being used to train the innovators who will answer
Annual Conference Proceedings, June 15-19, 2019, Tampa, Floridasurvey respondents in the study indicated that they would not encourage their children to pursue amanufacturing career.Consequently, the problem is two-fold: First, the public perception, or misperception, regardingadvanced manufacturing impacts enrollment of students in manufacturing-related education programs.Second, traditional programs within educational institutions, for the most part, are not currentlyproducing graduates with core competencies sought by manufacturers, which include programming andhands-on operation of state-of-the-art manufacturing equipment, technology/computing, mathematicsand problem solving. For instance, many graduate engineers are not
2006-349: LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF U.S. NEWS RANKINGS OFENGINEERING PROGRAMS IN INSTITUTIONS WITHOUT DOCTORALPROGRAMS IN ENGINEERINGJames Farison, Baylor University Dr. Jim Farison is currently professor and chair of the ECE Department at Baylor University, and is also administratively responsible for Baylor's B.S. in Engineering program. He currently serves as chair of ASEE's Multidisciplinary Engineering Division, and is a member of the ASEE Accreditation Activities Committee. He received his B.S.E.E. from the University of Toledo and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University, before returning to serve on the faculty at UT in the EE and then the Bioengineering departments, and including 10 years
reallocating faculty time, providing laboratory space, and a small amount ofoperating funds. The program is lead by the department heads from Computer Science, Electricaland Computer Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering as well as other faculty members fromthese departments. The courses are being designed and taught by an interdepartmental facultyteam from all three departments and we are currently searching for a faculty member explicitlyidentified as holding a joint appointment.In addition to resources committed by the Institute, we have sought and received external supportfor two related activities. One is a small pilot grant to work with FIRST to strengthen socialnetworking among teams in the competition. This is particularly important for
distribution, power economics, and public policy. Following thecore, students take more focused courses that go deeper into power and energy topics within theirspecific engineering discipline. For the graduate certificate, there is an Energy Experiencescourse where students make weekly visits to regional power and energy related sites. Students inthe program are also eligible for scholarships for a 4-week international renewable energyprogram offered in Pamplona, in the region of Navarre, Spain. Page 25.76.3 Figure 1. Education
2006-130: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT FOR AN INTERDISCIPLINARYMANUFACTURING ENGINEERING PROGRAMFrank Liou, University of Missouri-Rolla Dr. Frank Liou is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR). He currently serves as the Director of the Manufacturing Engineering Program at UMR. His teaching and research interests include CAD/CAM, nano-technology, rapid prototyping, and rapid manufacturing. He has published over 100 technical papers and has research grants and contracts over $7M. Page 11.384.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
areas, Health, Energy, Security, and Water. Thecollege R&D application and proposal must include information and details about the relevanceof the research project to one or more of the specified engineering themes.Research Course: As detailed in a separate contribution (ASEE paper submission entitled ENGR497: AnIntroduction to Research Methods Course), the distinctive education initiative has developed andintroduced a course on research methods. Students participating in the Armour R&D programwere encouraged to take this course as part of the program. The course introduces students toresearch methods and contemporary issues related to research in a university setting with a focuson applying engineering methods to the research
theseinstitutions was charged with developing innovative curricula in an effort to enhance theexperiences of students at the freshman and sophomore levels in an attempt to increase students’interest in the science and engineering fields and improve retention beyond the sophomore year.One of the most reported curricular changes involves the careful integration of several courseswithin the discipline and across several disciplines. This was prompted mainly by the belief thatstudents’ understanding of the subject matters and their interest in engineering are greatlyimproved once they realize why the courses are important and how they are related to each other.The Integrated Engineering program introduced at Southern Utah University is based upon adifferent
deliverables. The faculty advisor for the project is required to identify which Program Outcomes are being met by this project. The student, faculty member, and Engineering Fundamentals department chair all must approve this project before the student is allowed to begin their project work. 5. BSE Core competencies checks. The assessment of competencies in the Engineering Fundamentals Core courses is limited to the common Core courses that all BSE students take: ENG1101, ENG1102, ENG2120, ENG3200, EE3010, and MY2100. This assessment involves the use of exam questions to determine if course learning objectives are being met. In order to relate the assessment to Program Outcomes, each course’s learning
projectsand as a form of community and industry engagement. We expect to exhibit around 80 projectsthis year (some will come from class projects or traditional research projects not counted ascapstone projects). We also engage the sponsors by having them provide assessment of thestudent work and projects beyond the project that their company sponsored.Goals and Objectives of iProjects1. Increased engagement. The goal of engaging all CTI undergraduate students in authentic,practice and team-based projects or learning experiences is being accomplished. All CTI seniorsin engineering-related programs are involved in such projects, with additional involvement ofother students from non-engineering majors.2. Improve Student Learning Outcomes. We have
paper profiles innovations from ten VIP Programs that have breached silos to cultivatemeaningful partnerships between departments to meet the needs of faculty and students, workingtoward or having achieved institutionalization within their institutions.The VIP Model: A Brief BackgroundWhile the innovations set forth in this paper would be of use to any multidisciplinary program, itis useful to understand the VIP model [3]. The model was developed by Ed Coyle at PurdueUniversity. It grew out of the Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS) program, inwhich student teams addressed engineering-related problems in the community [4]. The teamswere vertically integrated, with students of various academic ranks (sophomore, junior, senior,etc
Paper ID #15420Toward Engineering-Oriented Health Informatics EducationDr. D. Cenk Erdil, Marist College Dr. Erdil is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Marist College. He has been designing and teaching general computer science courses for more than a decade. He has also contributed to the design and management of several computer science and engineering programs as a program coordinator. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, distributed resource scheduling, cloud computing for big data, public health informatics, and mHealth. Prior to joining Marist, he was an Associate Research Scientist at
Unleashed program [3]. In Fall, 2017, these faculty membersintroduced entrepreneurial mindset through collaborative, active pedagogies in several coursesand workshops from sophomore to senior levels. This paper relates their experiences, studentfeedback, and planned next steps. The paper also includes discussion of the preliminary resultsfrom this collaborative effort by faculty to infuse entrepreneurial mindset simultaneously into theengineering curriculum.Purpose of researchThe purpose of this paper is to relate the experiences of faculty and students in the Iron RangeEngineering (IRE) Program in implementing Entrepreneurial Minded Learning (EML) moduleswith undergraduate student engineers through active learning activities simultaneously
Paper ID #23331Nanotechnology Fellows Program: Integrating Interdisciplinary Education,Professional Development, and OutreachProf. Saniya LeBlanc, George Washington University Dr. Saniya LeBlanc obtained a PhD in mechanical engineering with a minor in materials science at Stan- ford University. She earned her BS from Georgia Institute of Technology and a Master’s of Philosophy in Engineering from Cambridge University as a Churchill Scholar. With a strong commitment to educa- tional equity, she served in Teach For America as a high school math and physics teacher in Washington, D.C., and she was co-founder of the
MEP scholar program. These activitieshave helped to build up and strengthen close connections between scholars and faculty. Theconnections have translated into an improved retention rate and enhancing recruitment of newstudents to STEM programs.KeywordsCo-curricular, Extra-curricular, Undergraduate research, NSF S-STEM MEP. 1. Introduction We are a small predominantly undergraduate institution (PUI) and liberal arts (LIA) privateuniversity. We received this NSF award in July 2014. The award has three goals:1. Improve the enrollment of students in engineering-related degrees;2. Improve enrollment of underrepresented groups in engineering-related disciplines;3. Improve retention through graduation or transfer to an affiliated institution
Paper ID #22319Social Network Analysis: Peer Support and Peer Management in Multidisci-plinary, Vertically Integrated TeamsJ. Sonnenberg-Klein, Georgia Institute of Technology Assistant Director, Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program, Georgia Institute of Technology; Doc- toral student in Education at Georgia State University, with a concentration in Research, Measurement and Statistics; Master of Education in Education Organization and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Bachelor of Science in Engineering Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.Dr. Randal T. Abler, Georgia Institute
the typicalABET-identified professional competencies is recorded in Johnson and Ulseth [8].Multi-disciplinary learning is emphasized, including a broad base of engineering “corecompetencies” including entrepreneurship. Project teams of 3 - 5 learners are vertically integratedfrom Junior 1 through Senior 2, as well as disciplinary integration; electrical engineering focusedstudents are on the same project team as mechanical focused learners.The program is ABET accredited and has added student outcomes related to people and projectmanagement, entrepreneurship, and inclusivity in addition to the traditional ABET studentoutcomes. The program includes a broad breadth of student experience, including co-opexperiences and Study Abroad. Learning is
interviews and conductspurposeful conversations with the research subjects directly or indirectly to better describeand explain things, events, phenomena, people, and to better understand the researchquestions [22]. Centering on the theme of "New Engineering Construction Path Recognitionand University Path Selection," the research has designed related interview questions.Example questions are: "What are the characteristics and advantages of your new school/professional/projectnew engineering construction?" "What kind of path or path combination does your school/professional/project take toimplement new engineering construction?" "Why is this path used, and what are the characteristics and effects of the path?" "What difficulties and
partnership and its internationalizedsystem give the JI good opportunities to offer creative degree programs. The dual-bachelor’sdegree (DD) program allows JI students to pursue two undergraduate degrees in two different butclosely related engineering or science disciplines at the JI and UM within just 4 years of time.The global degree pathways (GDP) program creates pathways for the JI students to have anintegrated BS/MS study experience whereby they are able to earn a Bachelor’s degree from theJI and a Master’s degree in engineering or non-engineering disciplines from a global partneruniversity.Dual-Bachelor’s Degree (DD) ProgramThis program is designed to allow a student entering the JI’s undergraduate program to earn aBachelor of Science degree
these boundaries, as the projects are multidisciplinary by nature(Figure 1).The VIP Program at Georgia Tech began in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, but it hasexpanded significantly. Teams are now led and co-led by faculty and research staff from five of the sixcolleges on campus, as well as the Georgia Tech Research Institute and other campus units (Figure 2).One third of teams are co-led by instructors from different campus units.An analysis of university exit surveys showed higher scores and meaningful effect sizes for VIPparticipants in ability to work in multidisciplinary teams, ability to work with individuals from diversebackgrounds, and understanding of technologies related to student’s field [6]. Subsequent social
2018. Another potential target for “NEETizing” is the new civil engineering withcomputer science degree program that is being developed for launch in Fall 2019 or later. “NEETizing”in a simplistic sense is designing and creating a project-centric program that offers projects across thetwo or more departments that are offering joint degree programs. Implementing these “NEETized”threads could help inform the design of computing-related academic programs that may be offered withor by the recently announced MIT Stephen A. Schwarzman College of Computing.4.3 Building communityDeveloping NEET as a community will be a key focus. NEET conducted a survey11 early in 2019 ofNEET juniors and sophomores to understand what they mean by community and what
Paper ID #14932Impact of Class Size on Student Success in a Multidisciplinary Honors Pro-gramMrs. Kylie Goodell King, University of Maryland, College Park Kylie King is Program Director of the Quality Enhancement Systems and Teams (QUEST) Honors Pro- gram. She has worked with the program since 2010 and currently teaches courses on defining and complet- ing innovation and consulting projects. She is also involved in QUEST’s learning outcomes assessment process. Kylie has a B.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from North Carolina State University and a M.S. in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from the
Paper ID #15132Supporting Student Attainment and Management of Competencies in a Trans-disciplinary Degree ProgramProf. Amy S. Van Epps, Purdue University, West Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective meth- ods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Prof. Van Epps has a BA in engineering science from
further criterion-related validation to better understand the predictive ability ofthese measures to important learning, performance, and program outcomes. Page 22.241.4Best PracticesThe four university partners in this NSF CCLI Phase 2 project share key characteristics: all haveundergraduate engineering programs with multidisciplinary teams, all support 25-40 teams persemester, all have learning activities related to teams and include teamwork as part of theirlearning objectives for their design experiences. Each program, however, also has distinctfeatures, as described below.Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS), a program in
4-year engineering curriculum for this mechatronics engineering program is shown in Figure1. The first year is common to all engineering areas of interest.8 The first mechatronics electivethat a student must take is Digital Logic. Students must take this during the second semester oftheir sophomore year is in order to stay on track in the 4-year plan of study, due to thesequencing of prerequisites for the mechatronics related courses, shown in Figure 2. Thecommittee recommended eight courses (listed in bold font in Figure 1) that already exist forstudents who specialize in electrical or mechanical engineering. A new course explicitly inmechatronics engineering will be handled as a separate section of ENGR 471 – EngineeringDesign &
student programs. He has published and presented widely in areas of surface science, electronic materials and processes, project management, and industry/university relations. He holds 4 patents and has received awards for excellence in technical innovation (IBM), technical authorship (IBM), teaching (University of Colorado), and scholarship (National Science Foundation).Shekar Viswanathan, National University Dr. Viswanathan is a Professor and Chair of the Department of Applied Engineering and Lead Faculty for Engineering Management and Homeland Security and Safety Engineering. He is the Lead for six full time and fifty two adjunct faculty members. His department offers three
.1,5The program goals and detailsThe main goal for proposing the minor in engineering studies is to provide a technologicaleducation to non-engineering students with various backgrounds. The minor is not anengineering degree. This is not a minor in engineering but a minor in engineering studies. Thestudent will not be trained as an engineer (and cannot compete for engineering jobs) but willhave a good understanding of what engineering, engineering design process, technology, andtechnology-related concepts are. This program is trying to build basic literacy in the field, andthe first goal is to provide a perspective for appreciating engineering and technological issues.We are a school of science and technology as well as a land-grant university