Academies Press.16. G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, and K. Knutson. Learning Conversations in Museums. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 2002.17. G. Hein, Learning in the Museum. London, UK: Routledge, 1998.18. M. Callanan, C. Cervantes, and M. Loomis, “Informal Learning,” Interdisciplinary Reviews, vol. 2, issue 6, pp. 646-655, 2011.19. R. Semper, “science Museums as Environments for Learning,” Physics Today, vol. 43, pp. 50-56, 1990.20. C. A. Haden, E. A. Jant, P. C. Hoffman, M. Marcus, J. R. Geddes, and S. Gaskins, “Supporting Family Conversations and Children’sSTEM Learning,” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 333-344, 2014.21. J. A. Holmes, “Informal Learning: Student Achievement and Motivation in Science Through Museum-Based
Paper ID #42608Empowering Engineers: Enhancing Communication Skills through a TechnicalCommunication LabAmanda Dawn Hilliard, The Johns Hopkins University Amanda Hilliard received her MA in Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language and PhD in Applied Linguistics from the University of Birmingham in the UK. She has taught writing and communication courses abroad in South Korea, Vietnam, and Ecuador, and in the U.S. in Georgia, Texas, Arizona, and Maryland. She currently teaches in the Center for Leadership Education at the Johns Hopkins University.Ryan Hearty, The Johns Hopkins University Ryan Hearty teaches in the
committee. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Courses Designed to Support Students’ Professional Development and Progress through a Multi-Year Co-Curricular Program, the Grand Challenges Scholars ProgramAbstractThis paper describes three courses designed and implemented at Arizona State University (ASU)to support students’ progress and persistence through a multi-year co-curricular program, theGrand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP). The first course primarily focuses on theinterdisciplinary exploration of global challenges within four theme areas (Sustainability,Security, Health, Joy of Living) to help students identify which area to focus their GCSPexperiences on for
Paper ID #41079Innovative Mobility Program Series for Asian Students’ Equitable LearningOpportunities Through Interdisciplinary MethodologiesMr. Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Shibaura Institute of Technology Hiroyuki Ishizaki is a Visiting Professor at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), a leading Japanese engineering school. His research interests include multidisciplinary teaching and learning, cross-cultural competence, collaborative online international (COIL), technopreneurship, and project/problem-based learning methods. As a Director of the Malaysia Office, he has been expatriated in Malaysia since 2014 and leading the
weekly progress meetings. Project 2builds on Project 1, expanding to a three-factor, three-level experiment. It challenges students withadvanced analysis tools, promoting personal ownership and leadership in structured problem-solving. The methodology extends beyond the classroom, impacting students in diverse learningenvironments and enhancing knowledge beyond technical domains through ownership andpersonalization of problems. Student projects in the academic years 2022-2023 showcaseengagement, critical thinking, and tangible results that extend beyond the classroom, leading tothe engagement of 30% of class students in undergraduate research on their MEEN 404 topicsafter completion of the course work. Specific learning outcomes demonstrate how
., Dzombak, R., & Martin, S. (2018). Building 21st century skills through development engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34, 619-631. 9. Passino K. M. (2009). Educating the humanitarian engineer. Science and engineering ethics, 15(4), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9184-8 10. Baaoum, M. (2018). Humanizing Engineering Education: A Comprehensive Model for Fostering Humanitarian Engineering Education. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 2(1), 1-23. 11. U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023, March). Addressing Challenges of Forced Displacement through STEM Education: A Workshop. https://www.nationalacademies.org/event/03-09-2023
addresses the needs of the college, the students, local industry, and the local K-12system.Initial motivationBefore starting this engineering program, we worked to understand the local landscape to see ifthere was a need that could be filled. Carthage College is situated along a corridor betweenChicago and Milwaukee in which there is a strong manufacturing presence. In the next 10 years,the overall growth rate in engineering jobs for the state of Wisconsin is projected at 13%,outpacing the 6.7% growth overall in employment opportunities1. Through talks with the localindustry, we learned that there was difficulty recruiting trained engineers to the area. As many ofour students are from the area and want to stay in the area post-graduation, they
[? ]. Guided useby instructors will allow for the exploration of GenAI tools in a moderated and safe manner, verysimilar to the process many go through when obtaining professional licensure in engineering oreven the much more ubiquitous process of obtaining a driver’s license. There is inherent powerwith the usage of GenAI to produce change just as there is inherent danger of allowing a teenagerto barrel at 70 miles per hour and beyond down the highway, but with proper coaching andinstruction with these tools they can be made a part of our everyday lives and enrich our livedexperiences tremendously. It is the duty of instructors to ensure students understand the powerthey have access to, and explain what downfalls and limitations exist while taking
prestigious journals and presentations at conferences. Dr. AbdelGawad’s interests are centered around materials and manufacturing, with a strong focus on corrosion of advanced materials, and the study of statics and mechanics. With an extensive teaching background, she has developed a keen interest in advancing innovation in engineering education. At present, she actively explores various methods to enhance student engagement and optimize their learning experiences through curriculum and course design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring Artificial Intelligence Tools for Materials Science in Engineering: A Work in Progress in Undergraduate Classroom
Engineering in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in areas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incorporating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Impact of Satellite campuses on undergraduate student experience in comparison
systems, ii) formulation andimplementation of advanced model-based robot control algorithms using classical and modern controltheory, and iii) programming and performance evaluation of robotic systems on physics engine robotsimulators. Course evaluations and student surveys demonstrate that the proposed project-basedassignments successfully bridge the gap between theory and practice, and facilitate learning ofcontrol theory concepts and state-of-the-art robotics techniques through a hands-on approach.1 IntroductionControl theory is a key foundation in the fields of robotics and engineering and is an essentialsubject in both undergraduate and postgraduate engineering curricula. It provides a mathematicalframework for analyzing and designing
the quality of educational assessments, particularlythose that match the expectations set by performance-based assessments [13]. Linnet and hiscolleagues advocate for a broader set of criteria in evaluating new educational assessmentmethods beyond traditional factors like efficiency and reliability. Emphasizing the importance ofa more expansive view of validity, Linn suggests comprehensively assessing alternative methodslike performance-based measures. Linn highlights the need to move beyond the sole emphasis onefficiency, reliability, and comparability, arguing the evolving nature of educational assessments.This shift in perspective calls for carefully examining assessment criteria that can effectivelycapture the diverse skills and
of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Dr. Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lauren Singelmann is an Assistant Professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato with the Iron Range Engineering program. She has a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education through North Dakota State University. Her research interests include learning analytics and alternative assessment.Mr. Rob Sleezer, Virginia Tech Rob Sleezer earned his
study was to introduce a group of diverse students (ChemicalEngineering, Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Generals Engineering students) toproblem-solving (PS) and foster entrepreneurial mindsets (EMs) through a 4-week project. This4-week project was to design a snowmaking system for a local ski resort. Our hypothesis was thatusing a real-world project can promote students’ curiosity in problem-solving, help students makeconnections between the knowledge they learned in classroom and the problem, and encouragestudents to apply this knowledge to create values for our communities, which are the 3Cs of EMs.To test this hypothesis, we organized a field trip and used teaching techniques such as Jigsaw inaddition to traditional lecturing
Paper ID #39121A Self-Study of the IRE 5-Point Grading Scale for Promoting Growth Mind-setDr. Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato Lauren Singelmann is an Assistant Professor at Minnesota State University, Mankato with the Iron Range Engineering program. She has a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering and STEM Education through North Dakota State University. Her research interests include learning analytics and alternative assessment.Dr. Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato Dr. Yuezhou Wang is an associate professor in both Iron Range Engineering and Twin Cities Engineering programs
problems to students using real-world experiences in an immersive learning environment, the challenge was three-fold:identifying a problem domain, locating a real challenge that include stakeholders that could beconsulted to inform the design process, and develop an experiential learning experience thatengages students with the problem beyond the classroom. The organizers found an opportunity inurban challenges that are multi-faceted in nature, involving stakeholders who run the city, andcan be addressed meaningfully through a sustainability lens to create a comprehensive solutionand recommendation. The organizers leveraged the support and expertise of the Douglas WrightEngineer-in-Residence (EIR) at the University of Waterloo, which is a role
Raise Your Hand. The program brought together severalundergraduate capstone design teams, multiple sub-teams connected through a VerticallyIntegrated Projects (VIP) team, undergraduate researchers, extracurricular high school students,and a graduate student. The contribution of this work is the description of the evolving projectmanagements strategies that project leaders used to organize program efforts and integrate thestudent work for a successful deployment of the exhibit in Fall 2022.In this paper, we discuss the project context, team composition, learning outcomes, projectstages, and key techniques that coordinated and structured the project. The project contextdescribes the design vision for the Raise Your Hand exhibit, which was
learning by the students as they quickly realize that the instructor is uninterested intheir class. The learning from a program point of view is to ensure that the prospectiveinstructor(s) are qualified – they know the topic – and are enthusiastic about teaching thecourse(s) to these very enthusiastic first-year students and that the program administratorsfollow-up to ensure that these come through with the students. This is certainly important for allcourses, but it is especially important for first-year courses as we help the students learn theirmajor of choice and transition from high school to college. It is just as important to recruit, notassign, instructors in colleges and universities as it is to recruit, not assign, people on teams
Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on investigating evidence-based teaching and learning approaches and the impact of learning technologies in STEM K-12 classrooms.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC), Dr. Alemdar made significant contributions to the fields of STEM education. Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher professional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar currently serves as PI and co-PI for
redefined failure as anopportunity to learn and built their resilience to challenge and risk.The field of engineering education is moving beyond teaching specific content, to thinking abouthow to holistically develop engineers who are resilient, and who can work through failure, tackleill-structured problems, and address real-world challenges [1]-[4]. In solving these real-worldproblems, solutions are rarely straightforward nor adequately achieved through a singular firstattempt [5], [6]. Thus, the ability to iterate through failure is a critical element of both learningand engineering design.How students think about and persist through failure is influenced by their understanding of therole of iteration in both engineering design and their own
the activity helped them think abouthuman-centered design issues beyond the course. This indicates that the activity could contributeto forming habitual behavior. Moreover, the instructor analyzed students’ artifacts to assessEntrepreneurial Mindset Outcomes (EMO) including curiosity, connection, and creating value.The results indicated that the students’ artifacts presented the EMO items (average percentage ofobserved occurrence): value creation (58%), connection (45%), and curiosity (42%). This paperwill share the motivation and rationale behind creating and proposing such a habitual activity todevelop a user-centered mindset in students through Entrepreneurially Minded Learning (EML).The paper also provides the activity instruction
, prepare them to drive innovation in the industry.In the development of a Mechatronics, Robotics, and Control (MRC) Lab, it’s essential toconsider the key stakeholders and their drivers. These stakeholders, including students, edu-cators, and industry partners, have varying needs such as practical skills, teaching resources,and skilled graduates. Stakeholders also control resources like funding, curricula, and demand,making their involvement from the beginning of the lab development critical for the lab’s suc-cess. Their backing also ensures the lab’s long-term sustainability through ongoing funding,curriculum integration, and student engagement. Furthermore, stakeholder input maintains thelab’s relevance, especially in a rapidly evolving field
qualitative analysis ofstudents' responses to open survey questions following their first semester.b. ISOS Program InterventionsThe first cohort of students participated in two significant activities: the Summer Camp and theCreating a Sustainable World course.Summer Camp: The ISOS summer camp, held from July 10 to 14, 2023, offered participantsdiverse activities and discussions covering various sustainability topics. Through talks,demonstrations, games, and site visits, participants gained insights into the multifaceted nature ofsustainability, extending beyond environmental concerns to encompass societal, economic, andtechnological dimensions. Talks introduced different sustainability topics and showcaseduniversity sustainability initiatives
students'motivation to learn and enhances their collaboration skills [19] Additional research found thatundergraduate research opportunities strengthen students' communication, investigation, anddocumentation abilities [20]. Beyond skill development, undergraduate research also makes students morecompetitive applicants for graduate programs and jobs after graduation [21]. Our interdisciplinary VIPcourse allowed students to gain a wide range of skills through team-based research projects. In terms ofteamwork, students improved their teamwork dynamics and ability to collaborate effectively. They alsobuilt technical skills including engineering and technological competencies such as software proficiency,research methods, and understanding the IRB review process
health and wellness for Purdue IE Graduate Student Organization.Mr. Siqing Wei, Purdue University, West Lafayette Siqing Wei received B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering and Ph.D. in the Engineering Education program at Purdue University. His research interests span on three major research topics, which are teamwork, cultural diversity, and international and Asian (American) student experiences. As a research assistant, he investigates how the cultural diversity of team members impacts team dynamics and outcomes, particularly for international and Asian students. He aims to help students improve intercultural competency and teamwork competency through interventions, counseling, pedagogy, and tool selection to
‘threads’: Autonomous Machines, Climate &Sustainability Systems, Digital Cities, and Living Machines. Each thread equips students withthe ability to develop, operate, design, and test novel technologies and/or conduct novel scientificresearch through cross-departmental teamwork and hands-on projects, leveraging cutting-edgemethodologies and tools.Distinct from experiential learning programs at MIT, NEET is characterized by its multi-yearduration and interdisciplinary nature, facilitating collaboration on progressively complexprojects. These attributes enable students to acquire specialized proficiencies aligned with theirchosen NEET thread. Participation in NEET is voluntary and does not confer a degree orconstitute a major or minor at MIT
never had a list of principles to reference when creating a design.I can now use this list to create just designs in my life.” – A.P.“The real lesson of the exercise though is just how big of an impact design can have on people andhow long that the impact can be felt even generations later. On top of that, through this assignmentI was also able to learn about both the history of I-375 and Black Bottom, which despite drivingthrough a couple times, was a subject I knew nothing about. I had no idea Black Bottom existeduntil now, or how its history was as rich as the soil it was named after. In engineering there’s a lotof talk about how we need to “think about the user” but this exercise opened my eyes that we reallyneed to think beyond that. We
collaboratively, develop problem-solvingskills in high-pressure situations, and cultivate a diverse skill set essential for future engineers.Supporting these teams are governing bodies that provide a framework for teams such as MiniBaja SAE, Formula SAE, and Supermileage, among others, to thrive. With a large membershipbase, these teams offer invaluable experiences beyond traditional classroom learning, enrichingmembers' educational journeys with practical, hands-on experiences. The role of these governingbodies is crucial, as they promote and sustain these teams, ensuring their success both incompetition and in fostering the development of well-rounded engineers.This research paper aims to explore the dynamics of leadership and governance
, research, industry, and entrepreneurial endeavors intheir second and third years. Existing vertically integrated projects, such as the EngineeringProjects in Community Service (EPICS) program, were influential in our program design as wesought to broaden the scope beyond just community service projects. In building IDPro, werecognized that existing efforts like [redacted for review], which already engages students inPBL, could be integrated into this programmatic structure to provide a continuous,interdisciplinary experience throughout the undergraduate years. These programs served a subset of students, and their structures were limited in scale andaccessibility. The [redacted for review] program is managed by a single faculty member who
contributions and being acknowledged on a broader scale within and beyond theiracademic communities.Identity (Re)-construction and Shifts in MindsetBoth sites’ students discussed the processes of identity reconstruction and shifts in their mindsetspursuing interdisciplinary work and research. Particularly, they emphasized how their personaland professional identities have evolved and re-shaped through exposure to other fields. Studentshave shared how they have adopted a new lens, mindset, or set of values. For example, at theU.S. site, Emily explained: [Interdisciplinary education] involves [a shift of] mindset to listen to other disciplines’ research. it’s not important about the level of understanding... but it is more to work with other