interdisciplinary research andeducation by creating institutions and hubs [7], [8]. These new initiatives have been supported bystudents, politicians and federal research granting agencies who want to see moreinterdisciplinary research, innovation, and educational programs across traditional disciplinarylines [9]. However, there is a wide spectrum regarding the level of success for theseinterdisciplinary initiatives. The goal of this study was to gain insight from experts who havebeen involved with the development, implementation, and operation of interdisciplinaryinitiatives. The focus was the examination of key factors for success and the development of amodel which can be used to improve the outcomes for existing initiatives and assist in theplanning
Paper ID #43560Work-in-Progress: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Initiatives and Assessmentsin a non-Ph.D. Granting School of Engineering and Applied Science Embeddedin a Multicultural RegionProf. Margaret A Hunter, Hofstra University Margaret Hunter,Ph.D., is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Engineering at Hofstra University in the Fred DeMatteir School of Engineering and Appplied Science. She has been teaching in the Civil Engineering program for 25 years. Her educational research focuses on broadening the participation in enigineering. This has included both formal and informal learning activites in pre
, higher education institutions (HEI)have started matching such industry needs. HEIs are initiating having students work acrossboundaries of sector, discipline, and identity. Students are being prepared for intersectoralcollaboration and multiple career pathways in a workforce that will change more rapidly incoming years. Students are enabled to join multidisciplinary teams with people who approachproblems with different methods and knowledge, and to solve problems in diverse groups interms of culture, race/ethnicity/nationality, gender or socioeconomic status.The International Research Experience for Students (IRES) program of NSF contributes todevelopment of a diverse, globally engaged higher education workforce with world-class skills.Within
interdisciplinary undergraduateresearch program. We interviewed 10 participants, evenly split by gender, of whom four have transitionedto the workforce and describe what they gained from the experience. The findings offer insights intostudent skill development and provide perspectives on the benefits of the experience from recent alumniwho have transitioned to the workforce after participating in the undergraduate research experience.Introduction The 2012 "Engage to Excel" report emphasized the significance of dedicated research projects inenhancing undergraduate STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education.Supporting this idea, initiatives aim to increase active learning while decreasing reliance on traditionallectures [1
Paper ID #41312Comparing Outcomes Between Two Engineering Majors in a DeterministicOperations Research CourseHsin-Li Chan, Penn State University Dr. Hsin-Li Chan is an Assistant Teaching Professor of Industrial Engineering at Penn State Behrend. She received the Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University and the M.S. in Applied Statistics from Syracuse University. Dr. Chan’s research interests include applied statistics, quality control in manufacturing process, and optimization.Dr. Yuan-Han Huang, Penn State University Dr. Yuan-Han Huang is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering and
students who havesuccessfully completed both seminar classes. The evaluation focuses on their confidence to guideand navigate research within the realm of engineering and computer science education, with aspecific emphasis on aspects such as idea generation, research implementation, and presentationof findings.2. BackgroundElevating the engagement of undergraduate students in research is becoming progressivelyessential. This is evident in initiatives such as the Research Experiences for Undergraduatesprogram funded by the NSF. At our R1 minority institution, it is both a mission and a priority tooffer such opportunities to our students. Investments in programs like the UndergraduateResearch Awards (URA) and Undergraduate Research and Creative Day
: The Effect of Summarizing a Research Article on Students’ Area of Robotics Interest1 BackgroundThe need for capable, ethical robotics engineers is growing with the industry valued at 32.32billion in 2021 with anticipated growth of 12.1% from 2022 to 2030 [1], and projected 17,900mechanical engineering job openings each year [2]. It is imperative that undergraduate andgraduate programs prepare engineers for industry positions in robotics, and that they includeand encourage diverse groups of students to enter the field.Additionally, diversity among engineers in general is limited, starting with bachelor’s andbeing further exacerbated when entering engineering professions. For example, 22% of engi-neering bachelor degrees in
interdisciplinary nature ofVIP programs introduces an additional layer of complexity, as students and instructors fromdiverse backgrounds bring varying methods and priorities to their collaborative work. Navigatingthese challenges requires a nuanced understanding of how to bridge the gap between thequantitative expectations of students and the qualitative demands of PBA. This work-in-progresspaper aims to explain the steps of developing this research that explores students’ perceptions ofPBA to effectively implement it within the undergraduate and interdisciplinary contexts of VIPprogramsIDPro Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) initiatives serve as a platform enabling students toengage in extended projects spanning multiple semesters. This
include interdisciplinary higher education, focusing on organizational systems theory and facilitating interdisciplinary graduate programs; the identity development and experiences of interdisciplinary engineering graduate students and faculty; and the decision-making processes and factors impacting implementation of interdisciplinary graduate education initiatives. She works as a graduate research assistant for the Virginia Tech Disaster Resilience and Risk Management interdisciplinary graduate program, as well as for the VT Center for Refugee, Migrant, and Displacement Studies.Xiaoqi Feng, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Xiaoqi Feng is a Doctoral Researcher at Aalto University. Her research area includes
her research focuses on inclusion in STEM education, communication in STEM education, user-centered design and user experience (UX), and the assessment of educational materials.Dr. Robert Weissbach, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Robert Weissbach is currently chair of the department of engineering technology at IUPUI. From 1998 - 2016 he was with Penn State Behrend as a faculty member in Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology. His research interests are in renewable energ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Work in Progress: Engaging STEM Studentsin Revising Technical Writing Assignments Abstract —The continued struggle to improve undergraduate student
was‘experimenting and testing’, This result is not surprising, as UROP tends to focus in large part onlab-based research work. 12The participants appear to be deriving benefits from NEET that are comparable to the 53-year,long-established and highly successful experiential learning program at MIT, i.e., UROP. Thisshould be taken only as an initial indication which requires further data collection and study.Other experiential learning programs were mentioned by very few participants, and so were notincluded in this summary.4.1.3. Unique contribution of programAs further indication of the unique contribution of NEET to students’ career readiness, nine ofthe 16 participants responded with 4 or 5 to the item “My
teams, which consist of people fromdifferent backgrounds and who have experience with different research methodologies. Table 1below lays out typical roles on a multi-disciplinary science team engaged in talent managementresearch. Role Primary Task Example of Key Contributions Program Manager Employee Listening Idea initiation (e.g., Analyze Instruments employee sentiment to propose a (e.g., surveys and focus program to improve an outcome.) groups) Data Scientist Modeling, Analysis, Idea Validation (e.g., Explore Predictions
IDProprojects to provide relevant knowledge foundations. At the same time, we recognized thepotential need to develop new courses customized around particular project activities oroutcomes. We decided to initially integrate IDPro with the existing [redacted for review]Undergraduate Research and Interdisciplinary Capstone course based on their project-basedlearning models. Regarding assessment, we promote performance-based evaluation to assesslearning outcomes. Ongoing refinement of the curriculum design will occur as the programevolves. Program features include: 1. Flexibility in credit. We needed to be flexible to allow students to take the course foras many credits as their schedules allowed. Students might have limited time, and opt for
department includes nine full-timeemployees working to develop strategies, exhibits, programs, and other educational experiencesfor the museum guests to enjoy and learn about nature and science. The public engagementdepartment is responsible for the educational programs offered by the museum, includingsummer camps, school tours, community outreach visits, and other initiatives. They also developeducational content within the museum. In this study, we shared the snake jaw robot with thepublic engagement team at the museum so they could use it in various educational programs.In the summer of 2023, the research team met with the public engagement team at the museum tointroduce them to the snake jaw robot. This meeting lasted 2 hours and functioned as a
, art and humanities, and raised interest among the worldwide press, including the Wall Street Journal and the BBC.Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan Hiroyuki Ishizaki is a Visiting Professor at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), a leading Japanese en- gineering school. His research interests include multidisciplinary teaching and learning, cross-cultural competence, collaborative online international (COIL), technopreneurship, and project/problem-based learning methods. As a Director of the Malaysia Office, he has been expatriated in Malaysia since 2014 and leading the internationalization of SIT and its partner universities throughout the Southeast Asian region. Under his initiatives
out of their prosthetic limb and aremore likely to use a prosthetic that is visually appealing. Two features of the prosthetic design aremyoelectric technology to detect muscle contractions and 3D printing technology in theconstruction of the hand. Each academic year, a new student team spends two semesters focusedon improving the prosthetic hand design from the previous year’s team. The student team wassmall consisting of no more than five students from the Mechanical Engineering, ElectricalEngineering, and Computer Engineering majors.This paper will detail the evolution of the interdisciplinary project from its first group of studentswho focused their efforts on researching and developing an initial prototype, due to workingremotely because
achieved satisfactory results is crucial for encouraging futureengagement. This research investigates the learning outcomes of these unique programs throughthe following research questions (RQs):RQ1: What were the initial objectives of participants who chose to attend this program and travelto Indonesia, often at their own expense? What motivators would encourage future participantsto join international mobility programs?RQ2: What are participants’ learning outcomes related to WA11 GAPs?RQ3: Which program content and/or conditions were influential to participants’ learningoutcomes?5. Program Structure1) Hosting Institutions and Participant Home UniversitiesVAx was initiated by the six core members of the ATU-Net Mobility SIG. Consequently
mindsets and iteration guided data collection,analysis, and initial interpretation towards the development of three preliminary themes: 1) howstudents redefined failure as an opportunity to learn, and 2) how students reframe difficult tasksas challenging rather than risky, and 3) how the ability to iterate supported student agency. Inaddition, in these interviews, we explored how these preliminary themes related to the supportiveprogrammatic features that define this experimental program, and specifically, hands on, problembased learning and mastery assessment. Our discussion concludes with initial reflections on howexploratory findings in this pilot study can inform future programmatic decisions and directionsfor the larger research
, USA, where he is the recipient of the Pratt Fellowship. He collaborated as an adjunct lecturer in the Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Escuela Su- perior Polit´ecnica del Litoral, Guayaquil, Ecuador, with previous positions as an analyst and consultant for telecommunications service providers. He holds certifications in fieldbus networks, wireless network administration, and ISO 9001 certified auditing. His research interests include engineering science ed- ucation, technology management, and wireless network systems. Memberships include ASEE, IAENG, IEEE TEMS, and IEEE EdSoc.Dr. Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech Jennifer Case is Head and Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia
Paper ID #43968Leading College Engineering Competition Teams as an Informal LearningExperience ItselfDr. Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Micah Lande, PhD is an Assistant Professor and E.R. Stensaas Chair for Engineering Education in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. Dr. Lande directs the Holistic Engineering Lab & Observatory. He teaches human-centered engineering design, design thinking, and design innovation courses. Dr. Lande researches how technical and non-technical people learn and apply design thinking and making processes to their
where he worked on modeling the transient dynamic attributes of Kinetic Energy munitions during initial launch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer working for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air and ground. His team
EducationArtificial Intelligence Education is an interdisciplinary research field, and existing researchcan be roughly divided into two categories. One stream is AI in Education (AIEd), whichfocuses on the application of AI in the education contexts [9-10]. For example, utilizing AI topromote personalized learning [11]. Another stream is AI for Education, which aim tocultivate AI talents to meet the needs of technological progress and industrial development.In terms of research heat, studies focused on AI in Education noticeably outnumber those inAI for Education. However, in policy initiatives, the emphasis on AI for Education holds anoverwhelming position, with global policymakers increasingly emphasizing the cultivation ofAI talents through education [2
experience indrone technology. Consequently, this project has evolved into something significantly greaterthan I had initially envisioned. While the outcomes of the record-breaking attempts remainuncertain, I am confident in the student's potential for success, or at the very least, to approachthe existing records closely. This endeavor has enriched my own research as well as theinstitution's contributions to the field of drone technology.ConclusionIn closing, this paper has chronicled a pedagogically driven, student-led endeavor to elevate theflight endurance of multi-rotor aircraft, aimed at surpassing the existing world record forautonomous flight duration in this category. While the project's objective is centered ontechnical innovation, the
classes had to consent to participate in the survey and collection of thein-class assignment. Student participation in the survey was not incentivized, leading to arelatively small sample size. Survey data was examined by the research group once the fall 2023semester concluded and grades were posted.We used quantitative and qualitative analysis to examine the survey responses. Since this is apilot study, we will refine the survey questions based on this initial data and recruit additionalparticipants in 2024.ResultsThere were a total of 48 participants in this pilot study. A majority of the participants were first-year students (n=17 , 30%) while the next closest were juniors (n=15, 25% ). The majority of theparticipants were male (n=41, 75%) and
Scholar, in the task engineer and/or earning an engaging in activities to engineering degree become a Grand Challenges Scholar (i.e. competency related activities)Based on observations made during the initial review of the data, the researchers defined fouradditional codes related to Connections: Connections to People (general), Connections toStudents, Connections to Faculty, and Connections to Activities. Two researchers thenindependently coded the data
jobs/ internships/ research positions, internal advocates and referralsCourse OfferingsThis course was offered multiple times. In Winter 2022 and Winter 2023, we offered the coursewith cross-listed course codes ASCI 10/ENGR 35 to a wide range of students across SCU’s threemain undergraduate schools, the College of Arts and Sciences, School of Engineering, andSchool of Business. In addition, we have offered an ‘engineering-only’ version of this coursetargeted specifically for our engineering undergraduate students, both in Fall 2022 and Fall 2023,with course code ENGR 35. This was offered through our General Engineering department, andthe format and content is largely the same, including students from multiple majors
, Tampa, Florida. https://doi.org/10.18260/1- 2--32485[17] Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., & Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 8-13.[18] McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.[19] Lambert, M. (2019). Grounded theory. In Practical Research Methods in Education (pp. 132- 141). Routledge.[20] Medina, L. A., González, J., López, C., & Rodríguez, I. (2016). “IDDEAS Real Time PC: An Industrial Engineering Outreach Initiative.” In Proceedings of the Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference, Anaheim
their visits.The continuing research will be based on two hypotheses: 1. The use of this robotic arm inseveral engineering and robotics courses will make the student learning experience moreinteresting and relevant. 2. The use of this robotics arm in recruitment activities will increase thelikelihood of prospective students choosing Biola University and also improve current studentinvolvement. We will use anonymous surveys and course evaluations to evaluate theeffectiveness of the course integration, and will collect feedback from the incoming freshmenclass to assess the impact of the robotic arm in recruitment.The full implementation of the proposed initiatives will take place in the new several years. Wehope to report our progress to the
College of Education.Justina Jackson, Georgia Institute of Technology Justina Jackson (PhD) is a Research Scientist at Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). As part of the Research and Evaluation Team at CEISMC, she is involved in the study of STEM/STEAM programs and initiatives in K-12 and university settings. She earned her Ph.D. in Educational Policy with a Certificate in Qualitative Research and Certificate in Excellence in College Teaching from Georgia State University.Jasmine Choi, Georgia Institute of Technology Jasmine Choi is a Research Scientist II at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and
research (PAR) is a research framework that prioritizes the experiences andconcerns of the people directly impacted by the project and involves them in identifying andimplementing constructive changes. To initiate this process, we designed and conducted twofocus groups that were facilitated by a member of the research team. All eight participantsattended the first focus group, and seven participants attended the second focus group. Thegraphic in Figure 9 highlights the first stage of PAR that was implemented in this research. PARis typically iterative in addressing the issues that participants identify and the action items thatthey may take on to address these issues, which are then further evaluated to determine ifimprovements are in place