of Personality/Behavior/Motivation Assessment in the Design of a Good Group Project Team o Teaching in Large Classes: Ensuring Student Success and Engagement o What Makes a Good Assessment? o Collaborative learning in the Classroom o Technology in the Classroom: What works and what does not o How and where to Incorporate Active Learning into Courses o Learner-Centered Teaching o Grades and Learning: Expectations, Assessments, and Accountability o Developing Cross-Disciplinary Learning Experiences for Students o Incorporating and Teaching Global Perspectives o Promoting Learning through WritingInnovation and Creativity o Teaching Innovation in Design Courses o Benefits of/Best Practices in Integrating Innovation
to others). In contrast, successfulchange efforts incorporate significant contextual information (e.g., acquired through curiosityand connections) and a careful assessment of needs and possible directions (e.g., creating the val-uable change for that situation). Further, the connection of change agents and their skills andneeds to the entrepreneurship literature is more readily apparent if one considers academic inno-vations as start-up operations. Many of the same skills needed to support start-up activities in thebusiness world are those needed for change agents in academia – for example, advocacy for aproject, creating a network, developing vision, and passion [9, 10]. Although this business-ori-ented language may be unfamiliar, there are
students registeredacross the three campuses. Classes were held in distance learning classrooms at each school.Course broadcasting and web-archiving facilities were enabled through resources provided byPitt’s Bioengineering Department. The course met once a week for three hours. NCAT, whoseengineering graduate students did not have any prior biology knowledge, were providedadditional biology orientation by organizing a weekly recitation session staffed by qualifiedgraduate students recruited from NCAT’s Department of Biology. This course was led by one of this paper’s authors (Roy), a professor in thebioengineering department at Pitt with an established track record of research in this field. It alsohad technical input from another author
Woodcock, University of Michigan Cassandra (Cassie) Woodcock is a PhD Candidate at the University of Michigan. She is pursuing a PhD in Biomedical Engineering (BME) with an Emphasis in Engineering Education. Her research interests involve experiential engineering out-of-class experiences and the professional, personal, and academic outcomes of students engaged in these experiences. She is also involved in student outcomes research in the BME Department and with the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education Office, College of Engineering at Michigan. Cassie received a B.A. in Engineering Sciences at Wartburg College (Waverly, IA) and a M.S. in BME from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor).Dr. Aileen Huang-Saad
related material such as class notes, grades, homework, tests, etc. usingMEEG 2303: Introduction to Materials as a learning vehicle. Common pedagogical techniquesincluded communication and presentation skills, body language and tonal variation forengagement, preparation of information rich slides and explanation which helped the graduatestudent and postdoc provide a spherical learning experience for students. In this pilot program,the mentees learnt five key aspects of modern teaching: (1) dedication and empathy towardsstudents, (2) engaging and exciting the students in the class for the subject matter and self-motivated learning after-class, (3) giving and receiving constructive feedback, (4) learning howto learn and teach, and (5) connecting
Ph.D in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She
from classes and work, so they could 100% be in and take partin all activities.Recommendations for future workIdeathon Challenge participants had an opportunity to learn about Design Thinkingfrom worldwide experts, gain unique professional experience in research analysis,create innovative original business solutions (that should be of great interest toindustry and academia), and pitch them to a professional judging panel. They had achance to put their academic knowledge and creative thinking to the test to solve real-world problems of the post-covid world. Moreover, it was a great chance to meet withstudents and experts from other countries and expand the network. • Being the organizers, we came up with the key characteristics identified for
the most time towards this one particular class during that semester, but also got the most out of it. My research, programming, and presentation skills were sharpened like never before, and I learned to appreciate the value of resourcefulness, initiative, and constructive feedback.”Almost another forty percent of the comments (n = 18) related to the inclusion of “the realworld” into the course, whether through connections between content and real world challengesor interactions with clients on projects. Silvia traveled to India, for example, as part of herHumanitarian and Social Entrepreneurship course. “We had to create everything from zero in atrue startup environment. It was incredibly frustrating but taught me a lot
education faculty, leaders and facilitators of professional development opportunities, and peer mentors who help practitioners improve teaching and learning [9].Again, it is possible for a single individual to hold one, two, or all three of these roles.Often, a single individual holds one or multiple roles in the Engineering Education disciplinewhile holding one or multiple roles in an additional discipline. A frequent example of thisintersection of disciplines is the faculty member who is teaching classes in one discipline, suchas civil engineering, who is also using the knowledge base and outputs of researchers in theengineering education discipline. As shown in Figure 2, this individual is simultaneously‘wearing’ the trainer hat
expectations, enthusiastically sharing their research with theirstudents, incorporating their field of research in their classes, and delivering lectures at a pacethat would give students the time and space to ask questions and engage in discussions.Additional areas of importance included limiting course preparation time after the first offeringto less than 1.5 hours of preparation, allowing for more time to spend on writing, research,networking with other faculty members an average of 2-4 hours per week, developingconnections that helped them with both academic instruction and field research, and easing theirintegration into the academic community4. The new faculty orientation workshop was generated by a collaborative effort of