Paper ID #37711Preliminary Results from a Work in Progress Assessing StudentPerceptions of the Benefits of Continuing HyFlex Course Format Beyondthe COVID-19 PandemicDr. Nicole Becklinger, University of Southern Indiana ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Preliminary Results from a Work in Progress Assessing Student Perceptions of the Benefits of Continuing HyFlex Course Format Beyond the COVID-19 PandemicAbstractBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic required instructors to quickly alter course formats,with many adopting synchronous online, asynchronous online, or hybrid and HyFlex teachingmodels. As the pandemic abates, it
particular charactercount result in “discourse” with too little understanding or listening. Rather, ad hominem attacksand warring factions dominate[5] where diplomatic longform debate once reigned[6]. Ubiquitousadvertising has shaped a visual medium commonly applied to topics that inspire the mostextreme emotions with little concern for nuanced, propositional truth[7]. While intended tomaintain remote student engagement, COVID accelerated a transition in education to post-literate teaching methods built on passive video[8].The K-12 public education system has contributed to the cultural move away from the writtenword through a focus on specified learning outcomes rather than harder-to-assess, classically-liberal educational goals[9]. The modern
: Exploring Common Ground, M. T. Huber and S. P. Morrealle Eds. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2002, pp. 217-245.[7] M. Ko, J. F. Mirabelli, A. J. Barlow, K. Jensen, and K. J. Cross, "Faculty Motivations and Barriers for Engineering Education Research," presented at the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Meeting, July 26-29, 2021.[8] M. Borrego and R. Streveler, "Preparing engineering educators for engineering education research," in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds Eds. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[9] M. Borrego, R. Streveler, N. Chism, K. Smith, and R. Miller, "Developing an Engineering Education Research Community of Practice Through a
in real time.This paper provides the new STEM educator with relevant background about how undergraduatestudents approach source evaluation, both traditionally and today. This work summarizesexisting research to help new STEM educators understand and situate themselves among bestpractices in teaching source evaluation and information literacy to undergraduate students. Mostimportantly, it provides classroom-ready collaborative activities (some writing-based, alldiscussion-based) for a STEM educator to help students learn and implement source evaluationtechniques in a manner that is engaging and efficient.As students progress through the activities, they—and the new STEM educator—learn not onlyhow to recognize a credible source in general (e.g
and Collaboration in theKnowledge Economy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2(1).Ellis, G.W., Rudnitsky, A. & Moriarty, M. (2010). Theoretic stories: Creating deeper learning inintroductory engineering courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(5).Ellis, G.W., Rudnitsky, A., McGinnis-Cavanaugh, B., Huff, I., & Ellis, S.K. (2015). Designing aMultimedia Learning Environment that Engages Children Through Narrative. American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA.Goodman, I.F., Cunningham, C.M., Lachapelle, C., Thompson, M., Bittinger, K., Brennan, R.T.,& Delci, M. (2002). Final Report of the Women’s Experiences in College Engineering (WECE)Project, Cambridge: MA
]. Likewise, through the use of course modulescovering topics on self-directed learning [9]-[10]; problem-based curricula [11]-[12];engineering projects [13]; journaling [14]; and reflective writing [15], instructors have monitoredand assessed changes in students’ SDL skills. These approaches were described in studies suchas Fellows et al. [3] that entailed a range of classroom and project activities designed accordingto the Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Model [16]. During the activities, students’SDL ability was assessed in Four stages - Dependent (stage 1), Involved, Interested, and Self-Directed (stage 4). Ulseth [17] explored the experiences of students taught using Problem-BasedLearning (PBL) to gain in-depth understanding of the
attentive to looking forconceptual connections between notes. Once the notes have been connected to larger ideas, thenthe author can begin to write these ideas and share the insight.Personal knowledge management (PKM) may be the broadest term that has been used todescribe these processes, however, I only encountered the term last fall. Second brain seems tobe a more recent and popular synonym for PKM and is widely used by internet content creators.PKM goes beyond merely organizing research and literature to other aspects of larger projects.For example, some academics include information for courses and committee work in theirPKM.There are many models for PKM. Cheong and Tsui [3] reviewed several and proposed that aPKM system should have four
mechanical engineering courses offered better learning outcomescompared to traditional and online course delivery [2].A research study by Duan and Bassett shared experiences and lessons learned during theexploration of hybridization between classroom and online teaching in mechanical engineering,suggesting that this blended approach effectively combines the advantages and avoidsdisadvantages of both modalities. The current assessment indicates it provides a promisingalternative for teaching undergraduate courses. [3] Alkhatib explored an interactive learningapproach for engineering education, implemented through a flipped classroom model within ablended learning framework. This approach shifts traditional lectures to an online, self-pacedformat
best practices in writing scholarly work will be presented that canbe used to avoid improper and inappropriate use of materials. The checklist will ensure properprocedure is followed. In a collaborative paper or proposal, all authors will review and followthese guidelines. The appropriateness of the use of one's previous work and the limitations willalso be discussed.Introduction:Scholarly works generally pertain to formal research created by experts within a particular field,intended for an audience of fellow scholars, and often involve a systematic approach toinvestigation and formal presentation through avenues such as academic journals, conferences,and books. It is a critical aspect of academic life. It's a challenge for graduate students
through the primary learning management system (LMS).[13]There has been a shift in our perception regarding attendance and student performance in thispost-pandemic era. Traditionally, attendance was seen as crucial, with studies showing itspositive correlation with academic performance [14-16]. However, some research suggests thatmandatory attendance may only sometimes benefit students. Studies on medical students foundno correlation between academic performance [17] and the number of hours spent studying,challenging the notion of compulsory attendance[18]. Moreover, mandatory attendance has beenassociated with various benefits, including fostering social connections, facilitatingcommunication, promoting interaction with instructors, and
literature review will serve as the basis fordeveloping strategies to ensure that students are able to thrive in a learning environment wherethe focus is on learning, going beyond numeric or similar representations of academicperformance.To answer the questions posed above, we conducted a scoping review of literature on students’perceptions of grades. We used a broad search parameter that may yield literature from both K-12 and higher education spaces to establish the general conversation on grades from students’perspectives. We followed Arksey & O’Malley’s (2005) five-stage framework for conductingscoping literature reviews as a methodology to identify possibly relevant articles and filterthrough which answer our research question to include in
curricula donot often specifically target these skills (Pinelli et al., 1996). While several studies have beendedicated to understanding how technical written communication skills of engineering studentsmay be improved, especially through lab reports (Hilgers et al., 1999; Goldsmith et al., 2019;Goldsmith, 2018; Wallwey et al., 2021), a cursory review of the available literature reveals alimited number of studies that focus on alternatives to lab reports and their effectiveness. Theobjectives of this article are to provide a brief survey of these studies, and to serve as a quickreference for those lab instructors who wish to diversify the form of lab assignments in theircourses. Alternatives to lab reports discussed in this article are poster and
on the right track but makes major errors. Meeting Standards - has correct process and correct answers. B 3 May have minor mistakes. Exceeding Standards - must go above and beyond meeting A 4 standards or is perfectWhile the instructor liked the idea of grading on standards and has kept it as part of thegrade, it was difficult to compute the grade, especially the final grade, solely onstandards. For starters, the standard grades should be averaged rather than expressed as apercentage or as a percentage of a total. Canvas will only calculate the percentage of atotal and not average assignment grades in a rubric. This method of
potential of GTAs as higher education practitioners is often hindered by a lack of teaching opportunities beyond grading, demonstration, and supervision. Training and support systems for their preparation are also limited [4]. GTAs are expected to perform various pedagogical practices, including lab instruction, lab demonstrations, and grading student work while often experiencing minimal opportunities to fully comprehend the implications and rationale of best practices behind these activities. When opportunities for learning to teach do exist, they often fail to address the specific needs of different disciplines, despite the clear necessity for discipline-specific preparation [5]. Effective educators must possess not only subject matter knowledge
-engineering-programs-2022-2023/ (accessed Feb. 11, 2023).[4] L. D. McDowell, “The roles of motivation and metacognition in producing self- regulated learners of college physical science: a review of empirical studies,” Int. J. of Science Educ., vol. 41, no. 17, pp. 2524–2541, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1689584.[5] C. Jannette, “Lifelong learning in the 21st century and beyond,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 613-622, 2009, doi: 10.1148/rg.292085179.[6] K. Colthorpe, J. Ogiji, L. Ainscough, K. Zimbardi, and S. Anderson, “Effect of metacognitive prompts on undergraduate pharmacy students’ self-regulated learning behavior,” American J. of Pharmaceutical Educ., vol. 83, no. 4, 2019, doi: 10.5688
they shared with the other students. The premise of the seminar was to engage studentsin design metacognition, specifically, thinking about design processes with the goal ofdeveloping their “ideal” design process (or signature) by the end of the seminar. The idea of anideal design signature was scaffolded with a new lens to interpret design each week. Thisincluded the first three weeks on how to capture and represent design processes (1. What countsas design?, 2. Qualitative coding, 3. How to capture design); weeks four through eight ondifferent lenses for “seeing” design (4. How to visually represent design, 5. Design awarenessquestions and metacognition, 6. Many models of design processes, 7. Design expertise research,8. Other design
decades, microplastics in marine and freshwater ecosystems havebeen extensively studied due to their bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms, eitherdirectly [4] or via trophic transfer [5], acting as pollutant carriers [6-9] like heavymetals and hydrocarbons [10], the toxicity of plastic additives [11] and potentialexposure to humans via the food chain [12]. Through our experiments, we identified that stormwater runoff, especiallyfrom urban areas, acts as a vector to transport land-based microplastics toreceiving waters, and their composition varied with different land uses [13].Green infrastructures are being installed in urban areas as part of stormwatermanagement. Upon investigation, we identified that microplastics areaccumulated in rain
researchers have long been siloed into their own areas of research expertise, such thatcollaborations often occur with researchers in the same or adjacent fields. Yet, the challengesfacing the world require solutions that do not exist within one disciplinary silo and requirecreative solutions that reach across the boundaries of science, technology, engineering, arts, andmathematics (STEAM) disciplines. One way creativity is sparked is through interdisciplinarycollaborations. When conflicting perspectives on a given topic are presented, people seek toovercome these conflicts and through this process, creative solutions can emerge. However,interdisciplinary collaborations are often complicated due to differences regarding disciplinarylanguages, lack of
SuccessBuilding a successful research team often involves skills and activities not directly related toacademic achievement. It is important to build a supportive lab culture, one that fosterscollaboration rather than competition. It is good for students to feel invested in each other’swork. Celebrating important events can help, like birthdays, paper acceptances, and the passingof milestone exams. Even lab cleanup or hosting events together (e.g., visiting dignitaries orfuture students) can help build a sense of camaraderie.Some activities beyond academic ones are related to personal growth of the mentors, i.e., how domentors find mentors for themselves. Others are related to student (and faculty) well-being:work-life balance, team building, celebrating
contextualized findings in the2019 ASEE ERC Start-up Survey [10] which included responses from 42 to 49 seniorengineering faculty. There was an implicit understanding or a “feeling” that the start-up wouldbe recouped via future research funding [1], [8], [10]. The National Science FoundationIUSE/PFE program has described professional formation as “the formal and informal processesand value systems through which an individual becomes an engineer [11]. This made thearticulation, negotiation and acceptance of a start-up package potentially one of the earliestfaculty professional formation skills accomplished within an engineer’s professional role inacademia beyond signing their employment contract. In many ways, it may be the first way thatearly career
Monday. The lab experiment related to the material and homeworkstarts on the Monday following the due date and continues through that week. All lecture notes,homework, projects, and labs are posted prior to the start of class in multiple formats. Thetextbook is presented online in the TopHat engagement tool and includes videos, sampleproblems, and example data to provide multiple routes to learning the material. This course doesnot have exams as the grades are determined by the homework, in-class work, lab reports, and aterm project done with their lab group.In Fall 2020, in response to the pandemic, the course was taught in a hybrid mode whichcontinued through Spring 2021. During that time the university launched a campaign to raiseawareness
feel that I have learned more efficiently (in the sense that I used less time) when I learn through problem-solving in class. Figure 10. Student Perception of Mastering in Fall 2019 Would you be willing to pay for Mastering, if a future course were offered with a complete integration with Mastering? 0% 29% 71% Yes, it's worth it. I'd love to, but I doubt that I can afford it. No, it's not worth it